ILMN — Illumina, Inc.
Illumina, Inc. specializes in delivering advanced genetic and genomic analysis tools, primarily through sequencing and array technologies. The company's offerings empower clients across various sectors to integrate genomic insights into both research and clinical environments, with applications spanning critical fields like life sciences, cancer diagnostics, reproductive health, agriculture, and innovative new domains.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-10-04, Illumina trades at $273.04 ($41.3B market cap), up 114% over six months and 28% in the past month, having been added to the S&P 500 on 2026-09-21. Q2 2026 revenue rose 9.6% YoY to $1.159B with a 21.1% operating margin, but TTM free cash flow of $939M equates to only a ~2.3% FCF yield against a 50.5x trailing P/E.
Sentiment flipped decisively bullish on a stack of catalysts: S&P 500 inclusion effective 2026-09-21 drove passive/index buying and took the stock to $271-$274; Piper Sandler raised its target from $225 to $305 on 2026-09-28, Guggenheim went to $305, and UBS upgraded to Buy in September. Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-30) beat with revenue +9.4% YoY and management raised full-year guidance to above 5% organic growth and $5.30-$5.40 EPS, with NovaSeq X now ~78% of clinical sequencing volume. The tell that sentiment has outrun fundamentals: the 12-analyst consensus target of $237 now sits roughly 13% BELOW the spot price as of 2026-10-04.
This is a genuine multi-quarter inflection, not a one-quarter blip. Revenue was shrinking 5.0% YoY in Q2 2025 ($1,057M vs $1,112M) and has climbed through Q3 2025 (+0.3%), Q4 2025 (+5.1%), Q1 2026 (+4.8%) to +9.6% YoY in Q2 2026 ($1,159M). Gross margin is stable in the ~66-68% band. Operating margin recovered from -10.3% in Q1 2024 to 17.7% (Q1 2025), 19.2% (Q1 2026) and 21.1% (Q2 2026) — the June 2024 GRAIL spin-off removed the enormous impairments that produced Q2 2024's -$1,637M operating loss and -$12.50 GAAP EPS. The blemish: operating cash flow FELL YoY in Q2 2026 ($201M vs $234M) despite 9.6% revenue growth, and TTM FCF of $939M is flat versus FY2025's $939M (though well above FY2024's $709M). The income statement is healing faster than the cash flow statement.
Expensive. As of 2026-10-04: P/E TTM 50.47x, forward P/E roughly 51x on the next-FY EPS estimate of $5.353 — which is flat-to-down versus TTM EPS of $5.464, hence a negative PEG of -1.59. P/S is 9.20x against a 5-year average of 6.68x, P/B is 14.5x, and EV/EBITDA is 31.7x. The deterministic model's valuation overlay labels this 'Rich vs. its own history' (score 24.2). The 5-year average P/E of 48.7x looks benign, but it rests on only 2 years of data polluted by GRAIL write-offs and dislocations, so it is not a clean anchor. Most telling: the consensus price target ($237) implies roughly 13% downside from the current price.
The price is a re-rating, not an earnings-driven move. The +114% six-month gain came from GRAIL-overhang removal, index inclusion and multiple expansion, while forward EPS ($5.353) is flat versus TTM ($5.464) — a 51x forward multiple on zero near-term EPS growth bakes in re-acceleration that sell-side models do not yet show. Consensus forward revenue of $4.624B is only about +6.5% over FY2025's $4,341M. The 2026-10-29 Q3 print is the test: sustained >5% organic growth plus continued margin expansion supports the multiple; growth stalling or another YoY operating-cash-flow decline compresses it. Because the consensus target already sits 13% below the spot price, the burden of proof sits squarely on upward estimate revisions.
As of 2026-10-04, RSI-14 stood at 70.42 — right at the overbought line — with the price 13.1% above its 20-day SMA (~$241), 24.74% above the 50-day (~$219) and 67.81% above the 200-day (~$163). The 1-month return of +28.04% and 6-month return of +114.35% confirm this is a momentum leader, and the stock is at the top of its 52-week range ($88-$280.17). Entry-timing implication: this is a chase zone, not an accumulation zone — the more sensible approach is to wait for a mean-reversion pullback toward the 20-day or 50-day average rather than pay 68% above the 200-day.
- Easing interest-rate pressure is supportive of long-duration, high-multiple life-science tools valuations; ILMN's beta of 1.467 means it amplifies both directions of that trade.
- China trade restrictions and localization pressure remain a persistent headwind to cross-border instrument placements, partially offset by strong U.S. and European clinical demand.
- Resilient clinical sequencing demand — oncology treatment profiling, MRD monitoring, reproductive health — is defying post-pandemic 'clinical cliff' fears and underpinning the consumables pull-through.
- Structural passive demand following S&P 500 inclusion on 2026-09-21 mechanically broadened the shareholder base and can be a source of ongoing index-fund flows.
- Sector rotation into quality medtech means part of ILMN's move is group beta rather than company-specific, which cuts both ways if the sector re-rates lower.
- Q3 2026 results due 2026-10-29 (estimated) — the first print as an S&P 500 constituent and the key test of the raised 'above 5%' organic growth guidance.
- Continued NovaSeq X installed-base expansion (already ~78% of clinical sequencing volume) and the attached recurring consumables pull-through.
- Commercial ramp of recent portfolio launches: StrataMap Spatial Solution, DRAGEN v4.5, and multiomics/proteomics partnerships.
- Further sell-side target revisions post-index inclusion — Piper Sandler and Guggenheim both sit at $305 versus the $237 consensus, so upward estimate revisions are the swing factor.
- Acceleration in MRD/oncology clinical sequencing adoption, which would supply the growth the current multiple already assumes.
- Valuation risk: ~51x forward P/E on flat near-term EPS, 9.20x sales versus a 6.68x five-year average, and a consensus price target ($237) below the spot price as of 2026-10-04.
- Cash-conversion slippage: Q2 2026 operating cash flow fell YoY ($201M vs $234M) and TTM FCF of $939M is flat versus FY2025 despite 9.6% revenue growth.
- Competitive pressure in sequencing — new entrants, pricing pressure, and China localization eroding the pricing power of what has historically been a near-monopoly.
- Insider selling: director-level disposals into the 52-week highs, which is seldom a reassuring signal about near-term fair value.
- Momentum reversal risk: RSI 70.4 and a price 67.8% above the 200-day SMA mean a de-rating on a disappointing Q3 print could be sharp.
Great franchise, stretched price. Illumina owns the sequencing standard, converts ~66% gross margin into a recurring consumables annuity, has the GRAIL overhang behind it, carries only ~$451M of net debt, and just posted its best YoY growth (+9.6%) of the past three years. But the market has already paid for that recovery and more: roughly 51x forward earnings on flat EPS, 9.2x sales versus a 6.68x five-year average, an RSI at 70.4, and even the 12-analyst consensus target sitting 13% below the price. I would not chase here — the honest posture is to wait for a pullback toward the 20-day/50-day averages (~$219-$241) or for the 2026-10-29 print to prove that high-single-digit growth and margin expansion are durable.
I blended three methods anchored to the FMP data: (1) a two-stage DCF on FCF of $939M with 9% growth for five years, 5% for years six-ten, 2.5% terminal and a 9% WACC, which lands near $140-165/share and reflects the stock's thin ~2.3% FCF yield; (2) a 38x justified forward P/E — a premium to medtech tools peers but below the 51x the market now pays — applied to the next-FY EPS estimate of $5.353, giving ~$203; and (3) a 7.3x forward P/S (a modest premium to the 6.68x five-year average) on forward revenue of $4.624B, giving ~$223. Weighting the multiple-based methods more heavily to credit the wide-moat sequencing franchise and recurring consumables mix, but not ignoring the much lower DCF output, yields about $205 — well below the $273.04 spot price and the $237 consensus target.
The 57.3 / 'Fair Fundamentals' read is directionally right, but I would nudge it roughly 10 points higher into the mid-60s. The formula's own notes flag that the June 2024 GRAIL spin-off distorts YoY comparisons, and it clearly does: the trailing window is polluted by Q2 2024's -$1,637M operating loss and Q3 2024's deconsolidation gain, which drag the growth and quality legs. On clean post-GRAIL numbers the business is re-accelerating (revenue from -5.0% YoY in Q2 2025 to +9.6% YoY in Q2 2026), operating margin has expanded from 17.7% to 21.1% over five quarters, and the balance sheet is solid (net debt ~$451M, current ratio 1.80, ROIC 12%). The counterweight that stops me from pushing further is cash flow: TTM FCF is flat at $939M, Q2 2026 operating cash flow declined YoY, and the accruals ratio of 0.09% is barely on the right side of neutral. Net: the band is correct, the number is modestly low — Partially Agree.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.