#6S&P 500 rank

ISRG — Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Robotic Surgery Leader at a Rare Discount

Q3 2026 revenue rose 22% with no debt, but a $450M settlement and 3-5% pricing headwind cloud 2027.

2-yr score: 76.1/100 (Top 10%)Healthcare
$428.12−2.26%
Description

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. is a leading medical technology firm dedicated to advancing patient care by developing, producing, and commercializing sophisticated tools. These innovations empower medical professionals to deliver superior, accessible, and less-invasive treatment options to patients both within the United States and across international markets.

Score breakdownLatest quarter77.4 · Strong
Growth
76.6
Quality / Profitability
51.0
Financial health
98.6
Ratio screener
85.2
Track record: 2-yr avg 76.1 (Strong, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 73.1 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Jan 28, 2027 (in 98 days)(estimated)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:25 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
51.1
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
61.2
vs SMA20
+2.91%
vs SMA50
+8.61%
vs SMA200
-2.18%
Analyst target
$472
+10.3%
12 analysts
AI theoretical price
$475
+11.0%
as of 2026-10-21

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-10-21 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-10-21, ISRG traded at $414.93 after a 5.3% post-earnings drop; Q3 2026 revenue rose 22% to $3.05B, but GAAP EPS was $1.49 due to a $450M antitrust settlement.

AI sentimentNeutral

As of 2026-10-21, sentiment is neutral-to-cautious: shares fell 5.27% to $414.93 despite Q3 2026 revenue growth of 22% and non-GAAP EPS of $3.00 versus $2.65 consensus, because GAAP EPS was hit by a $450M antitrust settlement, procedure guidance was narrowed, and management flagged a 3-5% instruments revenue-per-procedure headwind from extended-use and China pricing. Analysts remain constructive—consensus Buy with a $485.50 target—but the stock sits 7.95% below its 200-day SMA and is down 16.72% over six months.

Quarterly trend

The 3-year trend is strong and stable-to-accelerating, not deteriorating. Revenue rose from $1.93B in Q4 2023 to $3.05B in Q3 2026, with latest-quarter growth of 21.7% YoY, following 18.5% in Q2 2026 and 23.0% in Q1 2026. Gross margin improved to 68.4% in Q3 2026 from 66.3% a year earlier, and the reported operating margin collapse to 19.4% is entirely due to the $450M litigation charge; excluding it, operating margin was roughly 34.2%, up from 30.3% in Q3 2025. GAAP EPS of $1.49 is a one-off distortion—non-GAAP EPS was $3.00—and free cash flow remains robust at $948M in Q2 2026, $809M in Q1 2026, and $730M in Q4 2025.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-10-21, shares at $414.93 trade at 49.6x TTM EPS, 38.4x next-FY EPS of $10.805, 12.7x sales, and 5.6x TTM PEG; those are high absolute multiples, but below the 5-year average P/E of 72.6x and P/S of 19.3x. For a debt-free 20%+ revenue grower with 67% gross margin and 34%-ish ex-charge operating margin, valuation is fair-to-cheap versus its own history—not cheap on an absolute basis.

Price vs. earnings playbook

As of 2026-10-21, the $414.93 price is about 38x next-FY EPS, so the market is pricing high-teens/20% growth but not the 50-70x multiples of the zero-rate era. Q3 2026 beat on revenue and non-GAAP EPS, yet the stock fell 5.27% because GAAP EPS absorbed a $450M settlement and 2027 pricing/extended-use headwinds could reduce instruments revenue per procedure by 3-5%. The one-off charge should be ignored; the pricing headwind is real and may cap the multiple until 2027 guidance clarifies procedure growth and revenue per procedure.

Technical picture

As of 2026-10-21, RSI was 46.55—neutral, not oversold—with the price 2.9% below its 20-day SMA, 2.3% above its 50-day SMA, and 7.95% below its 200-day SMA. The 6-month return was -16.72% versus +18.21% over three months, so the medium-term trend is repairing but not confirmed. Entry-timing implication: the post-earnings drop offers a better entry than the pre-print level, but there is no technical urgency until the stock stabilizes or reclaims the 200-day SMA.

Macro factors
  • Hospital capital spending remains pressured by higher-for-longer rates and budget scrutiny, making leasing flexibility and installation timing important for system placements.
  • China’s operating environment is explicitly challenging, and targeted pricing actions there are a direct headwind to international revenue per procedure.
  • Reimbursement and regulatory scrutiny across medtech can affect procedure adoption, system approvals, and hospital purchasing behavior.
  • Competitive surgical robotics entrants, including Medtronic Hugo and J&J Ottava, could pressure pricing over time even if ISRG remains the clear leader.
  • Procedure growth is bifurcated: U.S. growth has moderated to roughly 10%, while international markets are growing around 20%, making geographic mix and FX relevant.
Key catalysts
  • Q4 2026 earnings on 2027-01-28 (estimated) and initial 2027 guidance, especially procedure growth, margin trajectory, and pricing impact.
  • da Vinci 5 rollout velocity: 315 placements in Q3 2026 out of 546 total da Vinci systems, with a growing installed base of 12,094 systems.
  • Ion endoluminal system scaling, with Q3 2026 procedures up 31% year-over-year.
  • Clarity on the extended-use instrument program and China pricing actions, plus removal of the antitrust litigation overhang after the $450M settlement.
Key risks
  • Extended-use instruments and China pricing actions are expected to reduce instruments and accessories revenue per procedure by 3-5%, pressuring 2027 estimates.
  • U.S. procedure growth has moderated to roughly 10%, and full-year 2026 da Vinci procedure growth guidance was narrowed to 14-15%.
  • Hospital capital constraints and leasing/placement timing could slow system revenue and installed-base expansion.
  • Competition in robotic surgery and reimbursement/regulatory changes could limit pricing power or adoption.
  • At 38x forward EPS, the valuation leaves little room for execution misses or a slower procedure-growth trajectory.
Investment thesis

ISRG remains a high-quality, debt-free robotic-surgery franchise with reaccelerating 22% revenue growth, 68% gross margin, and a recurring instrument/service flywheel; the ugly Q3 2026 GAAP print was a $450M litigation charge, not operating deterioration. At 38x forward EPS—below its 5-year average—the stock offers positive long-term risk/reward, but the 3-5% pricing headwind for 2027 and weak technicals argue for patience rather than chasing.

AI theoretical price methodology

As of 2026-10-21, I applied a 44x forward P/E—justified by 20%+ revenue growth, 67% gross margin, roughly 34% ex-charge operating margin, and zero net debt—to next-FY consensus EPS of $10.805: 44 × 10.805 = $475.42. This is a growth-adjusted discount to ISRG’s 72.6x five-year average P/E and sits below the $485.50 analyst consensus target.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 77.4/Strong Fundamentals score is a fair read. It correctly captures high growth (76.6), pristine financial health (98.6), and a debt-free balance sheet, but the quality/profitability score of 51.0 is depressed by the $450M Q3 2026 antitrust settlement—a one-off that hit GAAP operating margin and EPS. Adding back the charge would lift my score by only a handful of points, not enough to change the Strong band, so I agree with the formula. The 'Cheap vs. its own history' label is also supported by 49.6x TTM P/E versus a 72.6x five-year average.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.