← Back to Rankings

JJacobs Solutions Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 69.8/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Industrials

Description

Jacobs Solutions Inc. engages in the infrastructure and advanced facilities, and consulting businesses in the United States, Europe, Canada, India, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, the Middle East, and Africa. The company provides consulting, planning, architecture, design, engineering, and infrastructure delivery services including project, program, and construction management and long-term operation of facilities.

Score Breakdown

Growth
89.6/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
49.9/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
63.3/100
weight: 15%
* Revenue moved +353% between 2024-09-27 and 2024-12-27 (vs. -34% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 2m ago

P/E (TTM)
50.9
Yield
0.93%
RSI (14)
53.6
vs SMA20
-0.87%
vs SMA50
+5.74%
vs SMA200
+10.31%
Analyst Target
$162
+11.1%
7 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$163
+11.6%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, J trades at $150.62, up about 13% above its 200-day moving average after a Q3 FY2026 beat and raised guidance. The company has record backlog and strong AI-infrastructure tailwinds, but the stock is no longer cheap.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

Market sentiment is positive after Q3 FY2026 adjusted EPS grew ~14% YoY to $1.84, management raised FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance to $7.20-$7.30, backlog hit a record $29B (up 27% YoY), and management said it was aggressively buying back stock. Several analysts raised price targets, with the consensus target at $162.57 and a high of $174.

Quarterly Trend

Gross revenue is inflecting upward: sequential quarterly revenue went from $3.29B (Dec-25) to $3.69B (Mar-26) to $4.08B (Jun-26), with YoY growth accelerating from roughly 12% to 35%. The Sep-2024 negative revenue figure is a divestiture/reporting artifact, not an operating collapse. Reported operating results are noisy — Mar-26 showed an operating loss of $81M and net loss of $45.9M, likely from one-off charges — but surrounding quarters are solid and adjusted EPS plus guidance indicate the underlying trend is improvement, not deterioration. Still, reported GAAP margins are thin for a pass-through-heavy E&C business.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the trailing P/E of 52.5x is not economically meaningful because TTM EPS of $2.82 is depressed by divestiture and one-off items. On forward earnings, J is fairly valued but not cheap: $150.62 divided by the $7.25 FY2026 guidance midpoint is roughly 20.8x. That is well below its own 5-year average P/E of 31.3x, but that average predates the current business mix. Price-to-sales of 1.25x is in line with the 5-year average of 1.28x. The stock is priced for continued execution on its record backlog rather than for GAAP profitability alone.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $150.62, the stock is discounting not just FY2026 guidance of $7.20-$7.30 but continued double-digit growth into FY2027. If J delivers the ~19% EPS growth it guided to, the forward P/E settles into the low 20s and the price is reasonable. If backlog conversion slows or AI/data-center capex pauses, the valuation cushion is thin — under a 20x multiple, fair value would be closer to $145. Watch whether record backlog translates into operating margin expansion; so far the acceleration is mostly top-line.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, the 14-day RSI was 67.22 — strong momentum but not yet overbought. Price was +3.32% above the 20-day SMA, +11.34% above the 50-day SMA, and +13.35% above the 200-day SMA, so the trend is clearly upward. For entry timing, chasing at $150.62 after a 13% run above the 200-day carries short-term mean-reversion risk; a pullback toward the 50-day SMA (roughly $135) would offer a better risk/reward. Momentum can continue while RSI stays below 70, but this is not a low-risk entry point.

Macro Factors
  • AI and data-center infrastructure build-out is the dominant tailwind; direct AI-related work now represents 11% of adjusted net revenue and is still expanding.
  • Federal and state infrastructure spending on water, transit, and clean energy provides multi-year backlog visibility.
  • Nuclear energy expansion, including the UK nuclear planning mandate, adds a long-duration growth leg.
  • Interest rates and government capex cycles affect project funding and the multiple investors will pay for an E&C name.
  • Engineering labor supply and construction input costs remain swing factors for margin execution on fixed-price work.
Key Catalysts
  • Q4 FY2026 earnings and initial FY2027 guidance, typically late November/early December 2026, is the next major catalyst.
  • Capital allocation updates: continued aggressive buybacks, potential portfolio optimization, or margin-target announcements.
  • Further high-value data-center, water, and nuclear contract wins; backlog conversion at a 1.4x trailing book-to-bill already supports growth.
Key Risks
  • Margin pressure or cost overruns on large E&C projects could compress operating margins, which are already modest at 4.6% TTM.
  • AI-infrastructure demand is cyclical; a pause in speculative data-center projects would hurt both revenue and sentiment.
  • Leverage has risen materially — long-term debt was $3.58B at Jun-2026 versus $1.35B at Sep-2024 — and D/E is 1.24.
  • Management transition and the President's open-market sale of $2.48M in August 2026 add minor governance noise.
  • Divestiture-related financial discontinuities make reported comparability less reliable than the underlying adjusted metrics.
Investment Thesis

Jacobs is a well-run engineering and consulting business with record backlog, raised guidance, and durable exposure to AI power and infrastructure spending. At ~21x forward earnings and ~19% expected EPS growth, the stock is reasonably but not cheaply priced. This is a good business at a fair price — worth owning for multi-year backlog conversion, but not a bargain; the Cautiously Bullish lean reflects the rich-vs-history valuation overlay. This is analysis, not personalized financial advice.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applied a justified forward P/E of 22.5x to the FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance midpoint of $7.25. The 22.5x multiple is roughly 1.2x expected EPS growth and a modest premium to the current ~20.8x forward P/E, reflecting record backlog and raised guidance while staying disciplined given thin margins and elevated leverage.

AI Lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The 69.8 'Good Fundamentals' score is a fair read. Growth is genuinely strong — backlog is up 27% to $29B, FY2026 guidance was raised, and free cash flow conversion is healthy with a negative accruals ratio of -2.72%. Quality is held back by thin operating margins and 6.5% ROIC, and financial health is mediocre given D/E of 1.24. I would not move the score materially; the deterministic note about the 2024 revenue discontinuity is a data-quality caveat, not a reason to change the band. The Cautiously Bullish lean comes from the rich valuation overlay, not from disagreement with the score.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.