JCI — Johnson Controls International plc
Johnson Controls International plc, together with its subsidiaries, engages in engineering, manufacturing, commissioning, and retrofitting building products and systems in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific. The company designs, manufactures, sells, installs, and services heating, ventilating, air conditioning, controls, building management, refrigeration, integrated electronic security, integrated fire detection and suppression systems, and digital solutions.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, JCI traded at $146.01 (market cap ~$88.4B) inside a 52-week range of $104.49–$157.06, having just posted a fiscal Q3 2026 beat (adjusted EPS $1.42 vs. $1.30 consensus; revenue $6.61B, +9.3% YoY). The operating business is accelerating with expanding margins, but the shares sit at ~28.8x next-FY consensus EPS of $5.07 and had slipped 4.44% over the prior month.
Sell-side tone is firmly positive: 28 Buy vs. 17 Hold and zero Sell ratings, with Morgan Stanley and Bernstein lifting targets to $180–190 after the Q3 FY26 beat, and the FMP consensus target at $170.57 (range $144–$190; recent-3 average $181.67). Institutional ownership holds near 90%. Price action broadly confirms it — as of 2026-09-13 the stock was up 12.18% over six months and 0.74% over the past week — but the -4.44% one-month return shows profit-taking near the $157.06 52-week high, and early-August insider sales (~$3.6M at a weighted average $153.07, well below the last close) are a mild caution flag rather than a thesis-breaker.
Revenue growth is clearly ACCELERATING, not merely stable. YoY growth by fiscal quarter: Q1 FY25 +4.2%, Q2 FY25 +1.4%, Q3 FY25 +2.6%, Q4 FY25 +3.1%, then Q1 FY26 +6.8%, Q2 FY26 +8.2%, Q3 FY26 +9.3% ($6,614M vs. $6,052M). That is a genuine inflection off a soft FY25 base and matches the commercial-HVAC / data-center cooling demand described in the research brief. Margins tell the same story: operating margin went 9.7% (Q1 FY25) → 14.7% (Q1 FY26); 11.3% → 13.1% (Q2); 13.7% → 14.9% (Q3, $987M on $6,614M). TTM gross margin is 36.7% and net margin 14.3%. Diluted EPS rose $0.63 → $0.85 (Q1), $0.72 → $1.00 (Q2), $1.07 → $1.22 (Q3), with company-reported adjusted EPS of $1.42 in Q3 FY26. Two caveats on the GAAP slope: Q4 FY25 net income of $1,693M was roughly double operating income of $830M on a ~$860M non-operating (divestiture) gain, and Q2 FY24 printed a -$277M net loss on a -$142M operating loss from charges — so the TTM GAAP EPS of $5.897 is flattered by a one-off and the multi-year GAAP line is choppier than the underlying business. Free cash flow confirms the improvement: Q3 FY26 FCF was $1,501M (on $1,596M OCF) versus $901M a year earlier; TTM FCF through 2026-06-30 is $1,997M, held down by a -$572M FY25 Q4 that reflected divestiture/restructuring cash costs, not operational weakness. Conclusion: structural improvement, not a one-quarter blip.
Fair-to-expensive as of 2026-09-13. The trailing P/E of 25.3x on TTM EPS of $5.897 is misleading because that TTM includes the ~$860M Q4 FY25 divestiture gain — the honest number is the forward multiple: $146.01 ÷ $5.072 next-FY consensus EPS = 28.8x, ABOVE the trailing P/E and roughly in line with (slightly above) the 5-year average trailing P/E of 28.73x. P/S of 3.54x is a ~69% premium to the 5-year average of 2.10x. The PEG of 0.358 looks cheap but is an artifact — the trailing growth denominator is inflated by the FY24 Q2 loss, so ignore it. P/B of 6.57x against an ROIC of only 8.7% is the weakest link: JCI earns little more than its cost of capital on invested capital, despite a headline ROE of 25.5% that is flattered by leverage. The screener's EV/EBITDA of 27.3x equates to roughly 22x on a normalized ~$4.2B EBITDA. Data caveat: the vendor classifies JCI as 'Basic Materials / Construction Materials,' which is wrong — it is an Industrials/building-technologies company — though the ratio screen benchmarks against the full S&P 500, so the distortion is limited. Net: a full-to-premium multiple that only holds if the beats keep coming.
The market is already paying for the good news. At $146.01 on 2026-09-13, an investor is paying 28.8x FY27 consensus EPS of $5.072 — or roughly 30–32x FY26 adjusted EPS (~$4.60–4.85) — versus 5- and 6-month price gains of just 0.72% and 12.18%. To justify $146 at a more normalized 25x, you'd need about $5.84 of EPS, roughly 15% above the current FY27 consensus, meaning either estimates must keep climbing or the premium multiple must persist. What's embedded: the ~$1B CDU pipeline converting, sustained operating-margin expansion, and continued high-single-digit organic growth. What's NOT embedded: a backlog-conversion slowdown, a softer hyperscaler capex cadence, or a conservative FY27 guide at the fiscal Q4 print. The asymmetry into that print is unfavourable — a beat that merely confirms the trend probably holds the multiple, while a guidance shortfall compresses it quickly from a full starting point. Practical read: trim into strength toward $155–160; the risk/reward improves in the $140–145 zone where the 20-/50-day averages sat.
Range-bound-to-uptrending as of 2026-09-13. RSI(14) stood at 53.04 — dead neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The $146.01 price sat above all three key averages: +1.28% vs. the SMA20 (≈$144.16), +0.85% vs. the SMA50 (≈$144.78), and +7.88% vs. the SMA200 (≈$135.35). The wide spread to the 200-day confirms a primary uptrend, while the tight 20/50-day cluster at roughly $144–145 shows consolidation. Return profile: +0.74% 1-week, -4.44% 1-month, +0.72% 3-month, +12.18% 6-month — a one-month pullback inside a rising six-month trend, not a breakdown. Entry implication: with RSI at 53 there is no momentum edge to buy or sell; the $144–145 cluster is the line to watch — a decisive close below it with RSI under ~45 would signal a medium-term trend break toward the 200-day, while a reclaim of $157 re-opens the highs.
- AI / data-center cooling supercycle: hyperscale spend on liquid cooling and coolant distribution units (CDUs) is the single biggest structural tailwind — JCI's ~$1B CDU pipeline and multi-year data-center agreements are the core of the growth story and the reason the multiple is where it is.
- Interest rates and non-residential construction financing: high rates still pressure traditional commercial real-estate capex, partially offset by mission-critical and energy-transition spending; rate cuts would be a direct tailwind to the order book and to the traditional commercial HVAC cycle.
- Energy-efficiency and decarbonization mandates (refrigerant transitions, building-performance rules, electrification) structurally pull forward HVAC/controls replacement demand independent of the new-build cycle.
- Supply-chain and electrical-grid component lags of 3–4 months — management frames these as timing bottlenecks rather than lost demand, but they can shift revenue between quarters and complicate the Q4 print.
- Theme correlation risk: JCI is now partly valued as an AI-infrastructure name, so a de-rating of AI-adjacent industrials or sector rotation away from them hits the multiple regardless of JCI's own execution. Tariffs and FX add noise given the international revenue base.
- Fiscal Q4 2026 results and initial FY27 guidance — backlog conversion rate and order velocity are the numbers that matter; this is the next hard catalyst and lands against a full multiple.
- Conversion of the ~$1B CDU pipeline and multi-year data-center agreements into recognized revenue, which would validate the premium multiple.
- Continued operating-margin expansion and further portfolio simplification post the Residential & Light Commercial HVAC divestiture to Bosch (potential bolt-ons or accelerated buybacks).
- Further sell-side estimate and target revisions — Morgan Stanley and Bernstein are already at $180–190; upward estimate revisions would help hold the ~29x forward multiple.
- Fed rate cuts easing non-residential construction financing costs, which would revive the more cyclical traditional commercial HVAC and controls demand.
- Valuation risk is the biggest one: 28.8x next-FY EPS and 3.54x sales vs. a 2.10x five-year average P/S means multiple compression alone can produce a large drawdown without the business actually breaking.
- Weak returns on capital — ROIC of 8.7% (ROE of 25.5% is leverage-flattered) means JCI earns little above its cost of capital, which structurally caps how much multiple the equity deserves and undermines the quality case.
- Data-center capex cyclicality and competition: if hyperscaler spending decelerates, or Vertiv/Trane/Schneider take share of liquid-cooling and CDU projects, the growth narrative and the premium multiple deflate together.
- Earnings-quality noise cuts both ways — Q4 FY25 net income was double operating income on a one-off divestiture gain, and Q4 FY25 FCF was -$572M from restructuring/divestiture cash costs, so headline GAAP figures can mislead in either direction.
- Balance-sheet liquidity: current ratio of 0.97 is below 1.0 with $8.3B of long-term debt, and cash flow is strong but lumpy across quarters.
- Insider selling in early August 2026 (~$3.6M at a weighted average $153.07) plus any sustained weakness in non-residential construction or a delay in the 3–4 month component backlog.
JCI is a genuinely improving business trading at a full price — so own it on weakness, don't chase it here. The operating story is real: revenue growth accelerated to +9.3% YoY in Q3 FY26, operating margin expanded to 14.9% from 13.7% a year earlier, quarterly FCF hit $1,501M, and the data-center cooling pipeline gives multi-year visibility well beyond the trailing numbers. The problem is what you pay for it: 28.8x next-FY consensus EPS and 3.54x sales against a 2.10x five-year average P/S, with an ROIC of only 8.7% to justify the premium. That combination makes $146 a poor entry point with the fiscal Q4 print and FY27 guide immediately ahead, and the $140–145 moving-average cluster a materially better one. Not a broken thesis — a fair-to-full valuation with unfavourable near-term asymmetry.
Two blended methods as of 2026-09-13. (1) 29x forward P/E — a modest premium to JCI's own 5-year average trailing multiple of 28.7x, justified by accelerating revenue (+9.3% YoY in Q3 FY26) and 120–500bps of YoY operating-margin expansion — applied to the $5.072 next-FY consensus EPS gives $147. (2) A 3.75% target normalized free-cash-flow yield on ~$3.5B of run-rate FCF (the nine-month FY26 figure of $2.57B annualized, excluding the restructuring-distorted -$572M FY25 Q4) across ~610M shares = $5.74/share ÷ 0.0375 = $153. Averaging the two gives ~$150, which I nudge to $152 to reflect the multi-year data-center CDU pipeline that neither method explicitly captures — roughly 4% above the $146.01 price and well below the $170+ sell-side consensus, which embeds a more optimistic FY27 EPS path.
The deterministic 55.7 'Fair Fundamentals' score is a defensible read and my independent work lands close to it. The formula gets the shape right: a mid-60s growth score (65.1), mid-60s financial health (66.5), a mediocre 55.0 quality/profitability score correctly penalized by an ROIC of just 8.7% (the accrual check is healthy at -2.19%, i.e. cash flow exceeds reported net income), and a 50.1 ratio-screener leg that properly flags P/B of 6.6x, price/cash of 140x and EV/EBITDA of 27.3x. If I re-scored it myself I'd add roughly 3–5 points (to ~58–60), not 10+, because the trailing growth input understates the current inflection: revenue growth ran from +1.4% YoY in Q2 FY25 to +9.3% in Q3 FY26, operating margin expanded 120–500bps YoY across the last four quarters, and the ~$1B CDU pipeline is not yet in the trailing numbers. That adjustment sits well inside the ±10-point 'Agree' band, and the excluded valuation overlay ('Rich vs. its own history,' 32.5) is a fair warning rather than a misread — I would also discount, not reward, the trailing GAAP figures since Q4 FY25 net income was inflated by a ~$860M divestiture gain. No single dated, material event in the live brief (no announced acquisition, restatement, or fraud) justifies deviating from the mapping, so the Fair Fundamentals band and the Neutral lean it produces are the correct read.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.