← Back to Rankings

JNJJohnson & Johnson

Fundamentals Score: 54.3/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Healthcare

Description

Johnson & Johnson is a holding company, which engages in the research, development, manufacture, and sale of products in the healthcare field. It operates through the Innovative Medicine and MedTech segments.

Score Breakdown

Growth
50.7/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
50.8/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
74.3/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago

P/E (TTM)
32.2
Yield
1.93%
RSI (14)
65.3
vs SMA20
+4.10%
vs SMA50
+6.61%
vs SMA200
+18.26%
Analyst Target
$283
+1.5%
18 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$261
-6.4%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, J&J trades at $265.77, about 3.9% below its 52-week high of $276.47, after a Q2 beat and raised FY2026 guidance. RSI at 53.4 and price above its 20-, 50-, and 200-day averages describe an intact uptrend, though the stock is not cheap at ~23x forward earnings.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

The market is constructive after Q2 2026 sales grew 6.6% to $25.31B, adjusted EPS beat at $2.90, and management lifted FY2026 operational sales growth to 6.5%-7.1% and adjusted EPS to roughly $11.50. Defensive rotation, the 64th consecutive dividend increase, and a Buy-rated analyst consensus add to the positive tone, although the ~$280-282 price target leaves only mid-single-digit upside from current levels.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has inflected upward over the last three years: quarterly sales went from ~$21.35B in late 2023 to $23.74B in Q2 2025 and $25.31B in Q2 2026, with YoY growth of 9.9% in Q1 2026 and 6.6% in Q2 2026. Clean operating margins have stayed in the high-20s percentage range, but GAAP net income is noisy because of one-time items—Q1 2025 EPS of $4.54 included a large tax-related benefit, while late-2024 quarters carried charges—so adjusted EPS and cash flow are more reliable for the trend. TTM free cash flow through Q2 2026 is roughly $18.7B, up about 14% YoY, but quarterly FCF is lumpy ($1.47B in Q1 2026, $3.39B in Q2 2026).

Valuation Assessment

On trailing GAAP multiples, JNJ looks expensive: P/E is 30.7x versus the 20.4x five-year average, and P/S is 6.54x versus 5.08x. But trailing GAAP EPS is depressed by charges, so the more useful metric is ~22.9x next-fiscal-year adjusted EPS of $11.585—roughly one turn above the five-year average P/E. That is a fair-to-slightly-rich price for a defensive compounder with mid-single-digit-plus growth; the negative PEG is not meaningful here because of one-off GAAP distortions.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

The market is paying ~23x forward earnings, meaning the stock already reflects the re-acceleration story: Tremfya up 71%, Darzalex above $4B per quarter, and guidance raised for 2026. To justify further upside, JNJ must prove Stelara's 56% biosimilar-driven revenue decline can continue to be offset and deliver a credible longer-term growth plan at the December 8, 2026 business review. If growth disappoints, multiple compression back toward 20-21x forward earnings would put fair value around $235-245; if execution beats, the bias is toward the ~$280 consensus.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI-14 is 53.4, which is neutral—neither overbought nor oversold. Price is +0.85% above the 20-day, +3.23% above the 50-day, and +13.8% above the 200-day, so the primary trend is up, but the stock is extended versus its 200-day and pulled back ~1.6% on the day after approaching $276. For an individual investor, this suggests holding rather than chasing; a pullback toward the 50-day, roughly $257, would be a more attractive entry.

Macro Factors
  • Large-cap healthcare is receiving defensive rotation as technology-sector volatility and macro uncertainty push capital toward low-beta (0.23) cash-flow compounders.
  • Interest-rate expectations influence the multiple; JNJ is effectively a bond-proxy/Dividend King, so lower rates support the stock while higher rates pressure it.
  • Drug-pricing regulation, IRA negotiation, and tariff costs (roughly $500M headwind) create a manageable but real pricing and margin overhang.
  • Biosimilar competition, highlighted by Stelara down 56%, is a patent-cliff dynamic forcing pharma to depend on new launches and pipeline strength.
  • Talc litigation remains an episodic headline overhang, but so far it has not disrupted operations or damaged the balance sheet.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings in mid-October: key test of whether Tremfya, Darzalex, and MedTech can keep offsetting Stelara erosion.
  • Enterprise Business Review on December 8, 2026: expected to outline a path toward double-digit revenue growth into the end of the decade.
  • Pipeline and portfolio execution: China approval of an oral psoriasis therapy, robotic surgery and cardiovascular expansion, and tuck-in M&A such as Expanding Innovations.
  • Potential further guidance raise if Innovative Medicine momentum continues through the second half of 2026.
Key Risks
  • Stelara biosimilar erosion is severe at -56% YoY and could accelerate faster than new products can fill the gap.
  • Valuation is rich relative to its own history, and consensus upside is limited; a growth miss could trigger multiple compression.
  • Talc litigation, drug-pricing pressure, tariffs, and regulatory actions are recurring overhangs.
  • MedTech growth is tepid at 3.6% operational, leaving the growth burden largely on Innovative Medicine.
Investment Thesis

JNJ is a high-quality defensive compounder with an improving product cycle, a fortress balance sheet, and a 64-year dividend growth streak, but at ~23x forward earnings the valuation already reflects those positives. It is a reasonable stock to own and collect the dividend for the long term, not an obvious bargain at this price; meaningful upside depends on execution and the December strategic update rather than multiple expansion.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Calculated by applying a 22.5x forward P/E multiple to FY2026 consensus adjusted EPS of $11.585. That multiple is a modest premium to the 20.4x five-year average, justified by ~7% EPS growth, strong margins, and defensive cash flows, but capped by Stelara erosion, modest MedTech growth, and litigation/tariff overhangs—yielding a fair value of $260.66, slightly below the current price of $265.77.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: High

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The deterministic score's 'Fair Fundamentals' verdict is in the right neighborhood, but I would nudge it upward—into the mid-60s/Good tier—because the formula is backward-looking and the trailing GAAP figures mix one-time charges and tax benefits that obscure the underlying earnings power. Revenue is reaccelerating, adjusted-EPS guidance was raised to ~$11.50, TTM free cash flow is up year over year, and the pipeline/momentum is genuinely better than a 54.3 score implies. I would not push it much higher than that because the Stelara cliff, tepid MedTech growth, litigation, and rich valuation keep it from being a Strong score.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.