JNJ — Johnson & Johnson
Fundamentals Score: 54.3/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Healthcare
Johnson & Johnson is a holding company, which engages in the research, development, manufacture, and sale of products in the healthcare field. It operates through the Innovative Medicine and MedTech segments.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, J&J trades at $265.77, about 3.9% below its 52-week high of $276.47, after a Q2 beat and raised FY2026 guidance. RSI at 53.4 and price above its 20-, 50-, and 200-day averages describe an intact uptrend, though the stock is not cheap at ~23x forward earnings.
The market is constructive after Q2 2026 sales grew 6.6% to $25.31B, adjusted EPS beat at $2.90, and management lifted FY2026 operational sales growth to 6.5%-7.1% and adjusted EPS to roughly $11.50. Defensive rotation, the 64th consecutive dividend increase, and a Buy-rated analyst consensus add to the positive tone, although the ~$280-282 price target leaves only mid-single-digit upside from current levels.
Revenue has inflected upward over the last three years: quarterly sales went from ~$21.35B in late 2023 to $23.74B in Q2 2025 and $25.31B in Q2 2026, with YoY growth of 9.9% in Q1 2026 and 6.6% in Q2 2026. Clean operating margins have stayed in the high-20s percentage range, but GAAP net income is noisy because of one-time items—Q1 2025 EPS of $4.54 included a large tax-related benefit, while late-2024 quarters carried charges—so adjusted EPS and cash flow are more reliable for the trend. TTM free cash flow through Q2 2026 is roughly $18.7B, up about 14% YoY, but quarterly FCF is lumpy ($1.47B in Q1 2026, $3.39B in Q2 2026).
On trailing GAAP multiples, JNJ looks expensive: P/E is 30.7x versus the 20.4x five-year average, and P/S is 6.54x versus 5.08x. But trailing GAAP EPS is depressed by charges, so the more useful metric is ~22.9x next-fiscal-year adjusted EPS of $11.585—roughly one turn above the five-year average P/E. That is a fair-to-slightly-rich price for a defensive compounder with mid-single-digit-plus growth; the negative PEG is not meaningful here because of one-off GAAP distortions.
The market is paying ~23x forward earnings, meaning the stock already reflects the re-acceleration story: Tremfya up 71%, Darzalex above $4B per quarter, and guidance raised for 2026. To justify further upside, JNJ must prove Stelara's 56% biosimilar-driven revenue decline can continue to be offset and deliver a credible longer-term growth plan at the December 8, 2026 business review. If growth disappoints, multiple compression back toward 20-21x forward earnings would put fair value around $235-245; if execution beats, the bias is toward the ~$280 consensus.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI-14 is 53.4, which is neutral—neither overbought nor oversold. Price is +0.85% above the 20-day, +3.23% above the 50-day, and +13.8% above the 200-day, so the primary trend is up, but the stock is extended versus its 200-day and pulled back ~1.6% on the day after approaching $276. For an individual investor, this suggests holding rather than chasing; a pullback toward the 50-day, roughly $257, would be a more attractive entry.
- Large-cap healthcare is receiving defensive rotation as technology-sector volatility and macro uncertainty push capital toward low-beta (0.23) cash-flow compounders.
- Interest-rate expectations influence the multiple; JNJ is effectively a bond-proxy/Dividend King, so lower rates support the stock while higher rates pressure it.
- Drug-pricing regulation, IRA negotiation, and tariff costs (roughly $500M headwind) create a manageable but real pricing and margin overhang.
- Biosimilar competition, highlighted by Stelara down 56%, is a patent-cliff dynamic forcing pharma to depend on new launches and pipeline strength.
- Talc litigation remains an episodic headline overhang, but so far it has not disrupted operations or damaged the balance sheet.
- Q3 2026 earnings in mid-October: key test of whether Tremfya, Darzalex, and MedTech can keep offsetting Stelara erosion.
- Enterprise Business Review on December 8, 2026: expected to outline a path toward double-digit revenue growth into the end of the decade.
- Pipeline and portfolio execution: China approval of an oral psoriasis therapy, robotic surgery and cardiovascular expansion, and tuck-in M&A such as Expanding Innovations.
- Potential further guidance raise if Innovative Medicine momentum continues through the second half of 2026.
- Stelara biosimilar erosion is severe at -56% YoY and could accelerate faster than new products can fill the gap.
- Valuation is rich relative to its own history, and consensus upside is limited; a growth miss could trigger multiple compression.
- Talc litigation, drug-pricing pressure, tariffs, and regulatory actions are recurring overhangs.
- MedTech growth is tepid at 3.6% operational, leaving the growth burden largely on Innovative Medicine.
JNJ is a high-quality defensive compounder with an improving product cycle, a fortress balance sheet, and a 64-year dividend growth streak, but at ~23x forward earnings the valuation already reflects those positives. It is a reasonable stock to own and collect the dividend for the long term, not an obvious bargain at this price; meaningful upside depends on execution and the December strategic update rather than multiple expansion.
Calculated by applying a 22.5x forward P/E multiple to FY2026 consensus adjusted EPS of $11.585. That multiple is a modest premium to the 20.4x five-year average, justified by ~7% EPS growth, strong margins, and defensive cash flows, but capped by Stelara erosion, modest MedTech growth, and litigation/tariff overhangs—yielding a fair value of $260.66, slightly below the current price of $265.77.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The deterministic score's 'Fair Fundamentals' verdict is in the right neighborhood, but I would nudge it upward—into the mid-60s/Good tier—because the formula is backward-looking and the trailing GAAP figures mix one-time charges and tax benefits that obscure the underlying earnings power. Revenue is reaccelerating, adjusted-EPS guidance was raised to ~$11.50, TTM free cash flow is up year over year, and the pipeline/momentum is genuinely better than a 54.3 score implies. I would not push it much higher than that because the Stelara cliff, tepid MedTech growth, litigation, and rich valuation keep it from being a Strong score.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.