← Back to Rankings

KVUEKenvue Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 48.8/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Consumer Defensive

Description

Kenvue Inc. functions as a global leader in the consumer health sector. The company structures its operations across three primary divisions: Self Care, Skin Health and Beauty, and Essential Health.

Score Breakdown

Growth
43.6/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
50.5/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
59.8/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 4h ago

P/E (TTM)
21.5
Yield
4.39%
RSI (14)
43.6
vs SMA20
-1.62%
vs SMA50
-2.29%
vs SMA200
+4.38%
Analyst Target
$20
+4.1%
2 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$20
+6.7%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, KVUE trades at $19.20 with a 4.39% dividend yield, near the top of its $14.02-$20.82 52-week range. The stock is range-bound ahead of the pending Kimberly-Clark combination, with Q2 2026 adjusted EPS missing consensus by $0.01.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

The tape is balanced: Q2 2026 revenue grew 3.0% but organic growth was only 1.6%, adjusted gross margin fell 70bps, and adjusted EPS of $0.31 missed by a penny. The bigger driver is the KMB merger—approved by shareholders in January 2026 and targeted to close in Q4 2026—which gives the stock a floor but also caps upside until terms close. Analyst ratings are mostly Hold with a $19.50 average target.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has been a steady low-single-digit grower: $3.66B in Dec-2023, $3.90B in Mar-2026, and $3.96B in Jun-2026, with YoY growth recovering from -3.5% in Q3-2025 to +4.5% in Q1-2026 and +3.0% in Q2-2026. Operating margins were noisy in 2024 (Q2-2024 operating income was only $154M on one-offs), but recent quarters are healthier—TTM operating margin is 19.5% and TTM net margin is 10.8%. GAAP EPS in the last two reported quarters was $0.25 and $0.24, roughly in line with year-ago levels. This is not a growth story; it's a stable cash-generative staples franchise with occasional margin volatility.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the TTM P/E of 22.1x is flattered by one-off charges; on next-FY consensus EPS of $1.176, the forward P/E is about 16.3x. Price/sales of 2.39x is below the 5-year average of 2.84x, and the 4.39% dividend yield is supportive. On a forward basis the stock is fair to modestly cheap for a defensive staple, not a deep value.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $19.20 the market is paying ~16x forward earnings for a company with 1.6% organic growth and 4.4% dividend yield. That is not pricing in a growth turnaround; it's pricing in stability plus deal completion. If the KMB deal closes at the expected terms, upside is likely capped near the deal value; if it breaks, the dividend and reasonable forward multiple provide a cushion but the stock could trade down toward the lower end of its range.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI-14 is 51.49—neutral, not overbought or oversold. Price sits just 0.2% above the 20-day SMA, 0.5% above the 50-day SMA, and 7.4% above the 200-day SMA. The stock is technically range-bound near the upper end of its 52-week range; there's no strong momentum signal in either direction, and a pullback toward the $18 area would be a more attractive entry.

Macro Factors
  • Tariffs and raw-material inflation are pressuring gross margin; adjusted gross margin fell 70bps in Q2 2026.
  • High interest rates make the 4.39% dividend yield competitive versus cash, supporting the stock.
  • Defensive-sector rotation favors consumer staples in a late-cycle, low-growth macro environment.
  • Foreign exchange volatility is an ongoing headwind for a global consumer-health portfolio.
  • International antitrust reviews (e.g., Australia) remain a final procedural hurdle for the KMB merger.
Key Catalysts
  • Q4 2026 closing of the Kimberly-Clark combination and up to $2.1B of targeted annual cost synergies.
  • Final international regulatory approvals for the KMB deal.
  • Commercial ramp of newly approved Tylenol with Naproxen (3-year exclusivity) and Zyrtec Allergen Shield.
  • Portfolio simplification—e.g., $284M sale of Brazil feminine care business to Essity—could unlock value.
Key Risks
  • The KMB merger could be delayed, blocked, or closed on less-favorable terms, leaving KVUE in limbo.
  • Persistent tariff, freight, or FX cost inflation could keep compressing margins and offset volume growth.
  • Stagnant organic growth and private-label competition in OTC/self-care could make the high payout ratio unsustainable.
  • The dividend payout is high (~88% of free cash flow), limiting financial flexibility while the deal is pending.
Investment Thesis

KVUE is a hold, not a compelling buy, at $19.20. The portfolio of trusted brands, 4.4% yield, and ~16x forward earnings make it a reasonable income vehicle, but the pending KMB transaction muddies the standalone story and top-line growth is weak. Wait for deal clarity or a lower entry price.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applying a justified 17x forward P/E to next-FY consensus EPS of $1.176 gives $20.00; the multiple is modestly below the average staples multiple due to ~3% revenue growth and tariff/margin pressure, but supported by a 4.4% dividend yield, 19.5% operating margin, and low beta.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The 48.8 'Fair Fundamentals' score is a fair read. The formula correctly penalizes the sluggish top line and moderate ROIC, while the negative accruals ratio confirms cash flow is backing reported earnings. I would nudge the score slightly higher—low 50s rather than 48.8—because TTM GAAP EPS of $0.864 includes one-off noise and forward consensus EPS of $1.176 points to stronger normalized earnings power. That is less than a 10-point adjustment and doesn't change the Fair band. The real caveat the formula cannot see is the pending KMB acquisition, which makes backward-looking scoring less predictive than usual.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.