← Back to Rankings

LNTAlliant Energy Corporation

Fundamentals Score: 28.9/100 (Poor Fundamentals) · Utilities

Description

Alliant Energy Corporation functions as a utility holding company, specializing in the provision of regulated electricity and natural gas services. Its operational structure is divided into three principal segments: Utility Electric Operations, Utility Gas Operations, and Utility Other.

Score Breakdown

Growth
25.4/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
41.1/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
6.5/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago

P/E (TTM)
21.5
Yield
2.98%
RSI (14)
37.0
vs SMA20
-1.35%
vs SMA50
-5.91%
vs SMA200
-3.46%
Analyst Target
$79
+16.7%
3 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$73
+7.6%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, LNT trades at $68.21, down 1.03% on the day and below its 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages after pulling back from a $78.81 high. Q2 2026 EPS of $0.65 edged by consensus, revenue missed at $971M, and management reaffirmed 2026 EPS guidance of $3.36-$3.46 toward the upper half.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

The tape is cautious: the stock is near the lower end of its 52-week range, RSI is 36.69, and every major moving average is overhead. Fundamental sentiment is more balanced—Q2 EPS beat by a small amount, revenue missed, guidance was affirmed, and analyst targets average about $77 (12 Buy/11 Hold per FMP), but recent target trims from Jefferies, BMO, and Mizuho show valuation caution rather than fresh enthusiasm.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue has grown at a mid-single-digit clip on a YoY basis, but the trend is decelerating: Q3 2025 grew 11.9% YoY, Q4 2025 grew 9.0%, Q1 2026 grew 5.0%, and Q2 2026 grew only 1.0%. Trailing 12-month EPS is roughly $3.16 versus about $3.24 a year earlier—a slight decline, not growth—and Q2 2026 operating margin compressed to 19.0% from 23.2% in Q2 2025. Much of this is seasonal/cost timing in a regulated utility, but it is not an accelerating earnings trend on the trailing numbers. The stated H2 2026 path would require meaningful acceleration (~$1.84-$1.94 of H2 EPS versus $1.64 in H2 2025), so the next two quarters are the inflection test.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, LNT is fairly valued, not cheap. Trailing P/E is 21.5x versus a 5-year average of 20.9x; forward P/E on the 2026 consensus EPS of $3.42 is about 19.9x. P/S is 3.98x versus a 5-year average of 3.67x, and the dividend yield is 2.99%. The multiple is a modest premium to history on trailing metrics and roughly in line on forward earnings—it no longer embeds the data-center growth premium, but it also offers no valuation cushion if H2 disappoints.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

Price has fallen from the $78.81 high to $68.21 while 2026 EPS estimates have been nudged up to $3.42-3.43. That means the market is paying about 20x forward earnings for a utility with contracted 3 GW of data-center load and a projected ~50% peak-load increase by 2030. If that growth shows up in H2 2026 and the fall 2027 outlook is as strong as expected, the stock is repricing toward the $75-78 analyst target range; if H2 EPS comes in below the $1.84-$1.94 needed to hit guidance, the current multiple has room to de-rate toward the low-$60s.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 36.69, approaching oversold but not yet at the extreme reading that usually marks a clean bottom. Price was 1.95% below the 20-day, 6.38% below the 50-day, and 3.15% below the 200-day. The trend is down/range-bound, not basing; the stock needs to reclaim the 50-day or show an RSI turn before it is a technical entry candidate.

Macro Factors
  • Interest rates: low-beta utility with 1.61 debt/equity; falling rates would boost relative yield appeal while higher-for-longer rates pressure the multiple and financing costs.
  • Data center/AI load growth: 3+ GW of contracted demand is the main forward growth engine, but it depends on timely construction and state regulatory support.
  • Regulatory/political environment: Wisconsin primary outcomes avoided worst-case rate-freeze candidates; Iowa's gubernatorial race and rate-case decisions are key swing factors.
  • Capex and balance sheet: negative free cash flow and recurrent debt issuance make capital-market access and credit ratings important to the thesis.
  • Sector rotation: utilities are defensive beneficiaries in risk-off markets, but lag in a strong risk-on tape.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (late Oct/early Nov 2026): data-center construction milestones and evidence that H2 EPS can hit the upper half of guidance.
  • Fall 2027 outlook rollout: analysts expect management to frame a 6-8%+ long-term EPS growth path; a strong message could re-rate the stock.
  • Iowa gubernatorial election/regulatory outcomes: data-center-friendly policy would support load and rate-base growth.
  • Federal Reserve rate cuts: lower rates would improve utility valuations and reduce refinancing pressure on the $10.6B long-term debt stack.
Key Risks
  • High leverage and thin liquidity: debt/equity of 1.61 and current ratio of 0.47 leave little balance-sheet buffer; free cash flow has been negative in every reported quarter in the data.
  • Regulatory lag/rate shock: political pressure to hold rates down could delay recovery of the large capex program and compress ROIC (currently ~4.1%).
  • Rate/inflation risk: a persistently high rate environment raises interest expense and lowers the relative attractiveness of the 2.99% dividend yield.
  • Execution risk on data center capacity: if contracted load is delayed or renewables/capex come in over budget, the earnings-growth story underwhelms.
  • Trailing momentum is weak: TTM EPS and operating margins have slipped; a guidance miss would remove the valuation support.
Investment Thesis

LNT is a legitimate regulated-Iowa/Wisconsin utility with a real data-center growth narrative, and at $68.21 it is not a broken business. But the quantitative picture is weak—negative FCF, high leverage, flat TTM EPS, and a downtrend—so I would not rush to buy before the H2 inflection is confirmed. The mapped overall lean is Bearish because the weak fundamentals are not offset by a valuation discount; this is a wait-and-see setup, not a clear accumulation point.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

I used a justified forward P/E approach: 2026 consensus EPS of $3.422 times 21.4x, a modest premium to the 5-year average P/E of 20.9x reflecting contracted data-center load growth and low beta, but tempered by high leverage and negative free cash flow. That yields $73.20, between the current $68.21 price and the $77 consensus target.

AI Lean: BearishConfidence: Medium

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The 28.9 'Poor Fundamentals' score is a bit too harsh in my independent read. The formula's financial-health leg (6.5) heavily penalizes 1.61 debt/equity, a 0.47 current ratio, and negative free cash flow—but those are structural features of a capex-heavy regulated utility with stable cash flow and capital-market access, not signs of imminent distress. The growth score (25.4) is fair given flat TTM EPS and weak Q2 OCF, and the quality score (41.1) is reasonable. I would nudge the overall score into the mid-40s, which would put it closer to 'Weak/Fair' than 'Poor,' so I partially agree rather than rubber-stamping the exact number. No single dated event in the brief justifies overriding the fixed overall-lean mapping.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.