#143S&P 500 rank

LULU — Lululemon Athletica Inc.

2-yr score: 56.6/100 (Next 20%)Consumer Cyclical
$96.53−3.41%
Description

Lululemon Athletica Inc., alongside its subsidiaries, specializes in the design, global distribution, and retail of athletic apparel and accessories for both women and men. Its business operations are structured into two main divisions: company-owned retail establishments and direct-to-consumer sales.

Score breakdownLatest quarter54.2 · Fair
Growth
34.2
Quality / Profitability
53.6
Financial health
89.8
Ratio screener
58.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 56.6 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 66.9 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 10, 2026 (in 49 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
7.9
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
45.4
vs SMA20
+0.23%
vs SMA50
-8.05%
vs SMA200
-29.78%
Analyst target
$100
+3.1%
10 analysts
AI theoretical price
$121
+25.3%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, LULU trades at $98.97 (market cap ~$11.2B), near an eight-year low and roughly 56% below its 52-week high of $225.98, after a second consecutive full-year guidance cut on 2026-09-03. The stock sits 34.65% below its 200-day SMA with RSI(14) at 33.94 and a 6-month return of -37.27%.

AI sentimentBearish

Q2 FY2026 (reported 2026-09-03) missed badly: revenue fell ~4% YoY to $2.42B, global comparable sales dropped 9%, and Americas comps plunged 12%. Management cut FY2026 guidance for the second straight quarter (revenue $10.35-10.50B, -5% to -7%; EPS $9.48-9.73) and guided Q3 revenue down 10-11%. Shares fell ~17-18% to the ~$98-101 area, an eight-year low. The FMP analyst panel (12 firms) shows a 'Hold' consensus with a $97.67 mean target (high $115, low $70), and JPMorgan cut its target toward $95. New CEO Heidi O'Neill (ex-Nike) took over 2026-09-08 into a depleted executive bench, and Levi & Korsinsky opened a securities investigation. Sentiment is defensively bearish, with a minority 'fat pitch' contrarian camp (e.g. Michael Burry) citing the debt-free balance sheet.

Quarterly trend

A clear, multi-quarter deceleration and margin compression - not a blip. Revenue growth went from ~20%+ in 2023 to +7.1% YoY in Q3 FY2025 (rev $2.566B vs $2.397B), ~flat (+0.8%) in Q4 FY2025 (rev $3.641B vs $3.612B), and negative (-4.3%) in Q2 FY2026 (rev $2.416B vs $2.525B). Operating margins have compressed in step: Q4 op income fell from $1.042B (28.9% margin) to $803.5M (22.1%); Q2 op income fell from $523.8M (20.7%) to $453.7M (18.8%). Q1 FY2026 was the worst - revenue rose 4.3% ($2.472B vs $2.371B) but operating income fell 36.9% ($276.9M vs $438.6M, an 11.2% margin, likely hit by charges/tariff effects), and diluted EPS fell to $1.69 from $2.60. Diluted EPS: Q2 $2.92 (from $3.10), Q1 $1.69 (from $2.60), Q4 $4.97 (from $6.14), Q3 $2.59 (from $2.87). TTM EPS is $12.56 and consensus FY2026E EPS is $9.70 - the company is guiding its own earnings down ~20%+ this year. This is structural deceleration in the Americas masked by international growth that is now also slowing.

Valuation assessment

Cheap vs. its own history - but not obviously cheap vs. its deteriorating fundamentals. As of 2026-09-13 the stock trades at 8.13x TTM EPS ($12.56), ~10.2x the $9.70 consensus FY2026 EPS, 1.01x sales, ~4.7x EV/EBITDA, 2.33x book and a ~12% TTM FCF yield, versus a 5-year average P/E of 34.08 and P/S of 4.95 - a historic de-rating. But PEG is -0.468 precisely because earnings are shrinking, so the low absolute multiple is partly rational, not purely a mispricing. The deterministic model's "Cheap vs. its own history" label is accurate on its own terms; the question is whether a structural decliner deserves even 10x forward earnings.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market has stopped paying for growth: at ~10x forward EPS and a ~12% FCF yield, the price already embeds a lasting mid-single-digit revenue decline. Two readings. (1) If FY2026's $9.48-9.73 is the trough and Americas comps stabilize in FY2027, the stock is underpricing a recovery, and even a modest re-rate to 13-14x would be worth 25%+ from $98.97. (2) If the -9% global comps keep deteriorating and FY2027 EPS is revised toward $8, today's 'cheap' 10x is really 12x with more downside. The discriminator is the Q3 FY2026 print (~Dec 2026): does the -10% to -11% guide prove to be the bottom, or a waypoint? Until then, the estimate itself is the risk, not the multiple.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) is 33.94 - weak, but not yet classic oversold (<30). Price is 13.31% below the 20-day SMA, 15.5% below the 50-day and 34.65% below the 200-day, all steadily trending down with no flattening. Returns: -1.63% (1wk), -18.12% (1mo), -16.67% (3mo), -37.27% (6mo). At $98.97 against a 52-week range of $95.67-$225.98, this is a falling knife, not a base. Entry-timing implication: wait for a reclaim of the 20-day SMA or a positive RSI divergence before treating the oversold reading as actionable; buying purely on the P/E is how value traps are entered.

Macro factors
  • Consumer discretionary pressure on middle- and high-income households compressing discretionary apparel spend.
  • Athleisure market saturation in North America, with domestic share loss to Alo Yoga, Vuori and Fabletics.
  • China deceleration - soft store traffic, negative online commentary and shifting consumer sentiment in what had been a key growth market.
  • Tariffs and input costs pressuring gross margin; Q2 gross margin was helped by a discrete $134.5M tariff refund, so baseline profitability faces promotional-discounting risk.
  • Sector rotation and rate sentiment weighing on premium-multiple consumer names, amplifying the de-rating of a high-growth-to-low-growth transition story.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 FY2026 earnings (~Dec 2026) - first concrete test of the -10% to -11% revenue guide and whether Americas comps bottom.
  • New CEO Heidi O'Neill's initial strategy, restructuring and capital-allocation plan.
  • Possible buyback/dividend action given the debt-free balance sheet ($1.39B cash, zero long-term debt) and depressed valuation.
  • International/China trajectory and any stabilization in North American store traffic.
  • Developments in the Levi & Korsinsky securities investigation announced post-guidance-cut.
Key risks
  • Structural, not cyclical, market-share loss - if Alo/Vuori/Fabletics keep taking share, both the growth input and the multiple have further to fall.
  • Continued guidance cuts and FY2027 EPS downgrades that make today's ~10x forward multiple not actually cheap.
  • Margin compression from deeper promotions to clear inventory, compounded by tariff cost and the loss of the one-off $134.5M tariff refund.
  • Executive turnover and execution risk under a brand-new CEO inheriting a depleted bench.
  • Persistent negative momentum - the stock is down over 50% YTD and 34.65% below its 200-day; value traps can stay cheap for years.
Investment thesis

Genuine quality (22.7% ROIC, 56% gross margin, zero long-term debt, ~12% TTM FCF yield, 89.8 financial-health score) meets a genuine growth wall: revenue down 4% YoY, global comps down 9%, Americas comps down 12%, and a second guidance cut. At ~10x forward EPS, much of the bad news is likely priced in, and the debt-free balance sheet gives management real optionality. But the evidence points more to structural competitive share loss than a cyclical trough about to turn, and there is zero technical evidence of a base. Not a buy at $98.97 - the honest position is to wait for a comps bottom (Q3 print) or a technical base before committing capital.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied a forward P/E of ~12.5x to consensus FY2026E EPS of $9.70 (the midpoint of management's $9.48-9.73 guidance), giving ~$121. The multiple is far below the 5-year average P/E of 34.08 (a hyper-growth multiple no longer warranted) but above a generic no-growth retailer's, justified by the debt-free balance sheet, 22.7% ROIC, 56% gross margin and ~12% TTM FCF yield, and capped by negative comps and competitive share loss. Cross-check: ~$1.35B TTM free cash flow against an ~$9.85B EV implies ~7.3x EV/FCF, consistent with a low-to-mid-teens earnings multiple rather than a distressed one.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 54.2 ('Fair Fundamentals') reads about right. The formula correctly credits real quality - 22.7% ROIC, 56% gross margin, an 89.8 financial-health score (zero long-term debt, 2.19 current ratio) and a negative accruals ratio of -0.54% confirming earnings aren't outrunning cash - while docking growth (34.2) for the revenue and margin deceleration. I'd land within ~5 points of 54.2, so the band holds. Two things the formula can't see are worth flagging but don't change the band: (1) Q3 guided revenue down 10-11% means the forward growth picture is worse than the trailing growth score implies; and (2) the loss of US share to Alo/Vuori looks structural/competitive rather than cyclical, so I would explicitly NOT apply the 'temporarily depressed cyclical trough' upgrade here. Offsetting this, the ratio screener (58.1) and 'cheap vs. its own history' valuation context correctly capture that the stock is already priced for a lot of bad news. Net, no material adjustment.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.