LVS — Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Fundamentals Score: 48.4/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Consumer Cyclical
Las Vegas Sands Corporation, in conjunction with its various subsidiaries, specializes in the development, ownership, and ongoing management of comprehensive integrated resort properties across both Asian and United States markets. The company maintains a significant portfolio of establishments in Macao, People's Republic of China, including The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel, the Londoner Macao, The Parisian Macao, The Plaza Macao (which encompasses the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai Strip), and the Sands Macao.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 3h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, LVS sits at $44.24, down 4.3% on the day and barely above the 52-week low of $43.92, after a Q2 2026 earnings miss driven by weak Macao hold. The stock trades about 19% below its 200-day moving average, and the market is pricing in continued China/Asian gaming macro pressure.
The immediate tape is bearish: Q2 2026 revenue of $3.154B and EPS of $0.53 badly missed consensus, several banks cut price targets, Argus downgraded to Hold, and the stock has fallen more than 30% year-to-date to a new 52-week low. Heavy insider selling over the past year adds a yellow flag, though sell-side consensus still implies meaningful upside from this depressed level.
The 3-year trend is best described as stabilizing with one volatile quarter, not a structural collapse. Quarterly revenue climbed from roughly $2.7-3.0B through 2024 to $3.3-3.65B through 2025 and Q1 2026, with operating margins mostly in the 19-26% range. Q2 2026 was the clear exception: revenue fell to $3.154B and operating margin compressed to ~19.6%, but that was primarily a low Macao rolling-play hold quarter. Cash generation remains solid — TTM operating cash flow is ~$3.74B and TTM free cash flow is ~$2.79B — so the underlying demand trend looks better than the single-quarter reported EPS suggests.
Cheap versus its own history. As of 2026-08-27, trailing P/E is 17.1x and forward P/E on next-FY consensus EPS of $3.11 is roughly 14.2x, versus a reported 5-year average P/E of 26.1x. Price/sales is 2.09x versus a 5-year average of 5.23x, and PEG is 0.57. The discount is partly justified by $13.7B of long-term debt and China macro risk, but the market is already discounting a meaningful amount of bad news.
At $44.24, the market is pricing in continued weakness, not recovery. Analysts expect next-FY EPS of $3.11, which puts the stock at only ~14x forward earnings; if Macao hold normalizes and Chinese consumer spending stabilizes, the market could get both an EPS beat and a multiple re-rating. But if Q3 GGR and hold disappoint again, the stock can easily undercut the $43.92 low. The playbook is to wait for hold normalization / volume confirmation rather than assuming the cheap multiple alone is the edge.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) was 37.7, approaching but not yet oversold. Price was 4.2% below the 20-day SMA, 4.9% below the 50-day SMA, and 19.4% below the 200-day SMA, which is a clear downtrend rather than a range. The 52-week low at $43.92 is the key near-term support; a sustained close back above the 20-day would be the first sign of stabilization, but there is no confirmed bottom signal yet.
- China macroeconomic fragility and outbound capital-control concerns directly pressure Macao high-end rolling play and hold normalization.
- Macao GGR, visitation, and MICE/convention recovery are the dominant demand swing factors; LVS has no US gaming operations to offset weakness.
- Marina Bay Sands in Singapore provides geographic diversification but is still sensitive to Asian travel demand and potential regional competition.
- Elevated leverage: $13.7B long-term debt against only $0.58B of equity makes the company sensitive to interest rates and any sustained cash-flow shock; Moody's stable outlook is a modest backstop.
- Gaming regulatory/licensing dynamics in Macao and any changes to capital/dividend/remittance rules can affect shareholder returns.
- Q3 2026 earnings in late October: the first concrete test of whether Macao hold normalizes and volume growth translates into EPS; consensus is around $0.76.
- Continued execution of the expanded $6.0B share-repurchase program — $787M was already bought back in Q2 — plus the ~2.5% dividend yield provide a valuation floor.
- Monthly Macao GGR data and Chinese visitor/MICE trends, especially around Golden Week and the convention season.
- Any China stimulus, rate cuts, or easing of high-end liquidity constraints would likely trigger a sharp re-rating of the stock.
- Persistence of weak Macao hold or a deeper decline in high-end rolling play; Q2 2026 showed how much quarterly results swing on luck.
- High leverage and thin equity: long-term debt of $13.7B versus stockholders' equity of just $0.58B, and current ratio below 1.0, leaves little room for a sustained cash-flow shock.
- China macro/geopolitical risk: weaker property markets, tighter capital controls, or renewed regulatory scrutiny could pressure both Macao earnings and sentiment.
- Heavy insider selling totaling $338M over the past 12 months creates a mixed signal even with the company's own aggressive buybacks.
- Concentration risk: the entire business is Macao/Singapore, so there is no US or other regional earnings cushion.
LVS is a high-quality Asian gaming cash generator with a temporarily hold-depressed quarter, not a broken franchise: TTM OCF is ~$3.7B, TTM FCF is ~$2.8B, and forward P/E is ~14x. But the balance sheet is heavily levered and the market is still cautious on China, so the risk/reward is balanced. If Q3 confirms hold normalization and China stabilization, this is likely too cheap; if those don't come, the stock can keep making new lows. I view it as a fair-but-cyclically-depressed holding with a positive skew rather than a screaming buy or a short.
Calculated by applying a 19.0x forward P/E to next-FY consensus EPS of $3.11, a meaningful discount to LVS's own 5-year average P/E of ~26x to reflect elevated leverage and China macro risk. This is consistent with a normalized-recovery scenario and roughly in line with the post-cut analyst target range, while still being an independent multiple-based estimate rather than a copy of the consensus target.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The 48.4 "Fair Fundamentals" score is broadly right. The backward-looking formula is being dragged down by the weak Q2 2026 revenue/EPS comparison and a scary-looking debt-to-equity ratio, but the hold-driven blip is not a demand collapse: TTM operating cash flow of ~$3.7B is well above TTM net income of ~$1.75B, and the negative accruals ratio of -1.6% points to good earnings quality. Debt-to-equity of ~26x is distorted by share buybacks shrinking equity to $0.58B, though absolute debt is real and worth respecting. I would nudge the score slightly higher on the cash-flow strength, but not enough to change the band — Fair stays fair.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.