#256S&P 500 rank

MAS — Masco Corporation

2-yr score: 50.5/100 (Middle 40%)Basic Materials6d
$74.56−0.13%
Description

Masco Corporation is a prominent global manufacturer and distributor of home improvement and building products, serving markets across North America, Europe, and other international regions. The company operates through two main segments.

Score breakdownLatest quarter61.5 · Good
Growth
47.6
Quality / Profitability
89.6
Financial health
90.4
Ratio screener
52.2
Track record: 2-yr avg 50.5 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 51.5 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 28, 2026 (in 6 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
17.1
Yield
1.73%
RSI (14)
67.2
vs SMA20
+6.65%
vs SMA50
+5.33%
vs SMA200
+5.70%
Analyst target
$78
+5.2%
5 analysts
AI theoretical price
$76
+1.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Masco trades at $68.55 (market cap ~$13.5B) — 15.8x TTM EPS of $4.45 and roughly 15.1x the $4.53 next-FY consensus EPS — sitting in the lower third of its $58.16–$83.64 52-week range after a -5.75% week and -8.2% month.

AI sentimentBearish

The tape, not the analyst community, is setting the tone as of 2026-09-13: MAS sits 5.05% below its 20-day SMA, 8.82% below its 50-day and 1.80% below its 200-day, with RSI(14) at 37.07 and one-week/one-month returns of -5.75%/-8.2%. The Q2 2026 report (July 29) missed revenue ($1.99B vs ~$2.08B consensus) and the $1.64 EPS beat vs $1.32 was driven largely by one-time IEEPA tariff refunds, so the market is discounting the quality of the beat even as management raised FY26 guidance to $4.40–$4.60. Wells Fargo cut its target to $82 from $87, DA Davidson initiated Neutral at $80 citing limited upside, and Zacks trimmed Q3 2026 EPS to $0.99 — a constructive-but-cautious analyst stance (20 Buy / 16 Hold / 2 Sell, $82.40 consensus target) that price action has overridden for now.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is flat-to-slightly-declining, not accelerating: YoY changes of -1.9% (Q2'25), -6.5% (Q1'25), -3.3% (Q3'25), -1.9% (Q4'25), +6.5% (Q1'26) and -2.9% (Q2'26), with quarterly revenue oscillating in a narrow $1.79B–$2.09B band since late 2023. Margins are stable, not inflecting: TTM operating margin was 17.7% at 2026-06-30 vs 17.6% a year earlier, but the quarterly path is noisy — Q2'26 operating margin spiked to 23.6% (gross margin 43.6% vs 37.7% in Q2'25) on the tariff refund, while Q4'25/Q1'26 dipped to 14.4%/16.5%. EPS is the cleanest growth line ($1.60 diluted in Q2'26 vs $1.28 a year ago, +25%), but a meaningful slice of that is the refund and the rest is a shrinking share count (~199M diluted vs ~211M a year earlier). Verdict: a mature, structurally flat top line with mid-single-digit EPS growth engineered through cost control and buybacks — stable rather than inflecting, and the latest quarter is a one-off-boosted blip, not the start of a new growth trend.

Valuation assessment

Fair-to-modestly-cheap as of 2026-09-13. At $68.55 the stock is 15.8x TTM EPS ($4.45) and ~15.1x the $4.53 next-FY consensus, versus a 5-year average P/E of 21.6x — a ~27% discount — with a 1.09 PEG and 11.1x EV/EBITDA. The discount is real but partly optical: strip roughly $0.35/share of one-time tariff refund from FY26 guidance and clean EPS is nearer $4.15, putting the stock at ~16.5x clean earnings rather than 15x. On sales it is not cheap at all — P/S of 1.77 vs a 5-year average of 1.80 — which tells you the 'cheap vs. its own history' signal comes from margin expansion and buyback-driven EPS, not an underperforming revenue line. Against a justified 17x on ~$4.45 of normalized forward EPS, fair value lands in the mid-$70s, modestly above the current quote.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying ~16.5x clean forward earnings for a business with zero revenue growth — i.e., it is pricing a housing-turnover recovery it cannot yet see, but only mildly. Do not extrapolate Q2 2026's $1.60 diluted EPS: Q3 2026 consensus has already reset to $0.99, and the raised $4.40–$4.60 FY guide leans on an $85–95M refund that does not repeat. If pro-remodel demand holds and buybacks keep retiring ~4–5% of the share count annually, EPS can grind toward ~$4.50 clean in 2027 and the multiple can re-rate to 17–18x — the ~$76–82 zone. If gross margin reverts from Q2's 43.6% to the ~36–38% underlying trend without a volume recovery, the 'cheap' 15x becomes a fair 16–17x on lower numbers and the stock stays range-bound in the $60s.

Technical picture

Weak, but not yet washed out. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 37.07 — soft but above the ~30 oversold line — with the shares 5.05% under the 20-day SMA, 8.82% under the 50-day and 1.80% under the 200-day, i.e. a short-term downtrend inside a longer-term range. Returns of -5.75% (1wk), -8.2% (1mo) and -7.44% (3mo) have killed momentum, though the 6-month return is still +11.38%. Entry implication: high-30s RSI with price near the bottom of the $58.16–$83.64 range favors starting to scale in, not backing up the truck — there is no reversal confirmation until the stock reclaims its 50-day, and a decisive break below the low-to-mid $60s would signal the market is pricing something worse than a flat housing cycle.

Macro factors
  • Elevated mortgage rates and the lock-in effect are suppressing existing-home sales, housing turnover and the discretionary DIY big-ticket spending that historically accompanies a move.
  • Offsetting that, aging North American housing stock and a strong home-equity base keep non-discretionary repair, maintenance and professional remodel activity flowing — a demand floor for Delta/Hansgrohe and Behr.
  • Tariff and commodity dynamics are the swing factor: mid-single-digit commodity inflation plus shifting trade policy, where the IEEPA refunds produced a one-time $85–95M net FY26 benefit that will not recur and could reverse.
  • The Fed's easing path into 2027 is the single biggest cyclical lever — any meaningful drop in mortgage rates would unlock deferred remodel demand and re-rate the whole building-products group.
  • Consumer discretionary pressure and mass-market retail sell-through (heavy big-box channel concentration) mean Masco has limited pricing power if volumes stay soft.
  • Sector rotation: a 1.29 beta, low-growth housing-exposed name tends to lag in risk-on, rate-cut-driven rotations until the earnings inflection is visible.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings, expected around October 29, 2026 — the key test of whether pro-remodel demand offsets soft DIY and whether gross margin holds anywhere near Q2's 43.6% without the tariff refund.
  • Any acceleration in Fed rate cuts or a visible turn in existing-home sales, which would unlock deferred remodel spend and drive multiple re-rating.
  • Continued aggressive capital return — $454M returned in Q2 2026 (dividends plus buybacks) on top of a $300M accelerated share repurchase — supporting ~4–5% annual share-count reduction and a ~6–7% total shareholder yield.
  • Trade-policy or tariff rulings that either extend the refund/cost relief or reverse it, moving FY26–FY27 EPS by a few dollars-cents per share.
  • New CMO Brad Hiranaga's enterprise growth agenda (appointed late July 2026) and any portfolio/brand actions or bolt-on M&A.
  • Balance-sheet repair narrative: negative stockholders' equity (-$365M at 2026-06-30) versus a very comfortable 1.87 current ratio — either direction of travel will be scrutinized.
Key risks
  • A structural, not cyclical, DIY slowdown: revenue has been flat-to-down for six straight quarters ($1.79B–$2.09B range) and could stay there if mortgage lock-in persists into 2027.
  • Earnings quality — the Q2 2026 beat and the raised $4.40–$4.60 guide are anchored by a non-repeating $85–95M IEEPA tariff refund; clean EPS power is roughly $4.15, not $4.50.
  • Negative stockholders' equity (-$365M at 2026-06-30) combined with $3.245B of long-term debt leaves little book-value cushion; buyback-funded capital return becomes harder to sustain in a downturn.
  • Margin normalization risk: TTM operating margin (17.7%) and Q2's 23.6% print are the high-water mark; a return to the ~36–38% gross-margin trend without volume recovery compresses EPS and the multiple simultaneously.
  • Channel concentration in big-box home centers and continued commodity/tariff cost inflation that cannot be fully passed through at current demand levels.
Investment thesis

Masco is a genuinely high-return, cash-generative business — 26.2% ROIC, ~17.7% operating margin, a -9.35% accruals ratio (net income of ~$885M TTM running well behind ~$1.45B of trailing free cash flow), a 1.87 current ratio and only $3.245B of long-term debt — trading at ~15.1x forward earnings against a 21.6x five-year average, with a 1.7% dividend and roughly 5% annual share shrinkage. The catch is that growth is cyclical-weak, not absent: revenue has been flat for six quarters, and the latest EPS beat is partly a one-time tariff refund, so the near-term case rests on the housing cycle bottoming rather than on the company's own momentum. For a patient 12–24 month holder willing to scale in on weakness, the risk/reward at $68.55 is favorable; this is not a momentum trade, and I would not chase it above the mid-$70s.

AI theoretical price methodology

Method: warranted forward P/E on normalized EPS. Start from FY2026 guidance of $4.40–$4.60 (midpoint $4.50), strip the non-recurring ~$0.35/share IEEPA tariff-refund benefit to get ~$4.15 of clean 2026 EPS, then grow that ~8% into FY2027 (~4–5% from continued share-count reduction, ~3% from cost/mix) for ~$4.48 of normalized forward EPS; applying a 17x multiple — justified between the current 15.1x forward and the 21.6x five-year average, given 26.2% ROIC and 17.7% operating margins but flat revenue and housing cyclicality — yields $76. Cross-checks: 11.5x on ~$1.5B EV/EBITDA implies ~$71, and a normalized ~$1.0B FCF stream at a 7–7.5% yield implies $65–72, so $76 is the optimistic end of a $70–$76 fair-value band and reflects the buyback compounding plus a housing-cycle recovery that is not yet visible in the numbers.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 61.5/100 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair read, and its two halves disagree for reasons a fixed formula cannot resolve. Quality/profitability (89.6) and financial health (90.4) correctly capture a genuinely high-return business — 26.2% ROIC, 17.7% operating margin, a -9.35% accruals ratio (net income running behind cash flow), a 1.87 current ratio and modest leverage. The 47.6 growth score is simultaneously too harsh and too generous: the -1.9% to -3.3% YoY revenue prints are cyclical (housing turnover at a trough, with pro repair/remodel as a floor) rather than share loss, but the Q2 2026 beat and the raised $4.40–$4.60 guidance are flattered by a one-time $85–95M IEEPA tariff refund, so trailing EPS — and therefore the 15.8x P/E 'cheap vs. history' signal — overstates true earnings power by roughly $0.35/share. Netting those two effects, I would nudge the score up to the mid-to-high 60s, still firmly 'Good Fundamentals,' which is inside the ~10-point band that keeps this at Agree. Note also that the formula's own notes list is non-empty (negative equity of -$365M, P/B and debt-to-equity excluded), so the underlying input set has real limitations — one reason confidence in the read is capped.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.