MGM — MGM Resorts International
MGM Resorts International, through its various divisions, manages and possesses casino, lodging, and entertainment complexes across the United States and Macau. The company's operations are segmented into three main areas: Las Vegas Strip Resorts, Regional Operations, and MGM China.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, MGM trades at $39.89 (market cap ~$10.0B), roughly 17% below a live $48.30/share unsolicited buyout bid and 18.5% below where it traded three months earlier, with RSI(14) at 25.8 and the price just 0.3% above its 200-day SMA. Q2 2026 revenue of $4.45B grew only ~1% year-over-year, but TTM free cash flow of $1.67B is worth about a 16.6% yield on the market cap.
The tape as of 2026-09-13 is unambiguously negative: MGM was down 18.5% over three months, 9.3% over one month and 3.2% over the prior week, with RSI at 25.8 and price 5.6% below its 20-day SMA and 10.0% below its 50-day SMA. The drivers are soft Las Vegas Strip demand visibility, revenue growth that has slowed to about +1% YoY (Q2 2026: $4,450.9M vs $4,404.9M), a GAAP net margin of only 2.4%, and UBS cutting its target to $46 while staying Neutral. The one large offset is the unsolicited $48.30/share Barry Diller-backed buyout bid under board review, which puts a visible upside reference above the quote (~17% above) but also comes with shareholder-rights litigation and an unresolved board process, so the market is clearly not treating it as a done deal.
Revenue has ground higher but is decelerating: $3.96B in Q3 2023 to $4.45B in Q2 2026, yet YoY growth has fallen from +6.0% in Q4 2025 and +4.2% in Q1 2026 to just +1.0% in Q2 2026. Gross margin is strikingly stable at 43-46% in every one of the last 12 quarters, so the entire swing factor is operating expense: operating margin ranged from 10.5% (Q1 2024) to -2.7% in Q3 2025 (a -$112.9M operating loss and -$1.05 EPS quarter that looks charge-dominated) and back to 11.3% in Q2 2026 ($503.6M), the best of the 12 quarters - though Q2 2026 GAAP EPS of $1.11 sat well above the $0.59 adjusted figure cited in the brief, meaning the underlying quarter was less spectacular than GAAP implies. Read straight: stable-margin, low-growth cyclical in a soft patch, not a structural collapse. Cash generation is the strongest line - TTM FCF of $1.67B is up ~29% versus the prior TTM's ~$1.30B, and the -0.67% accruals ratio says reported earnings are not running ahead of cash. The offset: book equity has been consumed from $3.97B (Q3 2023) to $2.51B (Q2 2026) by buybacks and losses, leaving a very thin cushion under $36.5B of liabilities.
Cheap on cash, expensive on earnings. As of 2026-09-13, MGM traded at 23.9x TTM EPS of $1.678, 4.03x book and 0.565x sales, versus its own 5-year averages of 31.9x P/E and 1.09x P/S - which is why the deterministic model flags it 'Cheap vs. its own history' (score 90.8). Forward P/E is ~21.7x on the $1.841 next-FY consensus EPS, and PEG is negative (-2.73) because trailing earnings are distorted by the Q3 2025 loss, so PEG carries no information here. The screener's EV/EBITDA of 18.9x looks expensive, but that EV is carrying a large debt/lease-like liability balance ($29.8B of debt against $2.5B of equity in the screener's own arithmetic); on the equity alone MGM trades at roughly 3.8x TTM operating cash flow and a ~16.6% TTM free cash flow yield. Net read: inexpensive relative to its own history and genuinely cash-generative, but not a statistical bargain on reported earnings power.
The market is doing two jobs at once. The $39.89 quote sits ~17% below both the $48.30 bid and the $48.03 consensus target, which implies only a partial probability of a deal plus a stand-alone value in the low-to-mid $30s - a ~$33 break-price and a ~50-60% deal probability reproduces today's price almost exactly. On earnings, the $1.678 TTM EPS is depressed by the Q3 2025 charge; a normalized run-rate of ~$2.10 (Q2 2026 adjusted $0.59, Q1 2026 $0.48, plus normalized Q3/Q4 2025) supports only $31-33 at 15x. So a deal break likely resets the stock toward the low $30s, while continued margin expansion plus a normal fall sports-betting season could lift the stand-alone case toward the high $30s. Earnings are not what is holding this stock up - the bid is.
Oversold inside a downtrend. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 25.84, price sat 5.59% below the 20-day SMA and 9.97% below the 50-day SMA but only 0.3% above the 200-day SMA, with 1-week/1-month/3-month returns of -3.2%/-9.3%/-18.5%. Momentum is bearish with no reversal signal yet; the 200-day line near $39.8 and the 52-week low of $29.19 are the levels that matter. Reclaiming the 50-day SMA would be the first real evidence of a turn, while a decisive loss of the 200-day opens the low $30s. Oversold creates bounce risk for shorts, but 'oversold' is not a thesis - scale in, don't chase.
- Elevated Treasury yields raise the discount rate on a long-duration, lease-heavy cash flow stream and keep pressure on consumer-discretionary multiples.
- Soft and uneven Las Vegas Strip demand visibility, with room-supply additions and convention-calendar variability compressing the highest-margin revenue line.
- Oil price spikes tied to Middle East tensions raising travel and airfare costs, which disproportionately hits discretionary leisure trips.
- Macau/China macro and regulatory backdrop for MGM China (majority-owned but with significant minority leakage) - visa policy, junket rules and Chinese consumer confidence.
- Multi-year international capital commitments (MGM Osaka in Japan, Dubai) that consume free cash flow before they generate any.
- Board response to the unsolicited $48.30/share buyout proposal, any sweetened bid, and the related shareholder-rights investigations - the single largest swing factor for the stock.
- Q3 2026 earnings (late October / early November 2026), which will show whether the Q2 2026 11.3% operating margin holds and whether Las Vegas volumes stabilize.
- Fall NFL and college football betting volume at BetMGM - handle, hold percentage and customer-acquisition economics.
- Continued buybacks and any improvement in MGM China or digital segment margins, which would lift normalized EPS toward the ~$2.10 run-rate.
- MGM Osaka (Japan) and Dubai development milestones, the structural bull case for diversifying away from Las Vegas.
- Las Vegas Strip demand deterioration - weak visibility plus elevated rates and fuel costs hitting the highest-margin segment.
- Leverage including lease obligations: $36.5B of total liabilities against $2.51B of book equity (D/E 11.9), with equity down ~37% from $3.97B in Q3 2023 - little cushion if EBITDA rolls over.
- Repeat one-off charges: Q3 2025 delivered a -$285.3M net loss and -$1.05 EPS on a -$112.9M operating loss, and impairment-driven quarters have recurred.
- Deal risk is two-sided: if the $48.30 bid is rejected or collapses, the stock plausibly re-rates toward stand-alone value in the low-to-mid $30s; M&A litigation adds noise either way.
- Macau/China regulatory or macro shock, and competitive promotional intensity at BetMGM against DraftKings and FanDuel.
- Thin profitability leaves no margin for error: 2.4% net margin and 2.6% ROIC mean any cost or rent-escalation surprise flows straight to the bottom line.
Not a clean buy. MGM is a real cash machine - $1.67B of TTM free cash flow against a $10.0B market cap - wrapped around thin reported earnings (2.4% net margin, 2.6% ROIC), ~1% revenue growth, an equity base that has shrunk nearly 40% in three years, and $36.5B of liabilities. The $48.30 buyout bid is the most important fact about the stock today and it cuts both ways: it gives a defined upside reference well above the $39.89 quote, but if the board rejects it or the deal breaks, the stand-alone fundamentals support something closer to the low $30s. Lean cautious - own it small, if at all, and size for the deal-break outcome rather than the deal.
A weighted blend of three legs: (1) 45% weight - normalized FCF of ~$1.45B (TTM $1.67B haircut for rising maintenance/growth capex including Osaka) capitalized at a 12% required equity yield given the leverage and lease encumbrance, implying ~$48/share; (2) 30% weight - a 15x multiple on ~$2.10 of normalized EPS (last four quarters' adjusted run-rate, above the $1.841 consensus), implying ~$31.50; (3) 25% weight - the live $48.30 buyout bid net of a ~20% control premium, implying ~$40.25 stand-alone. Blended result: ~$41.00, i.e. roughly fair value with modest cash-flow-supported upside and the deal as the real optionality.
The 40.9 / 'Weak Fundamentals' band is directionally fair but too harsh on the earnings line, and I would move it roughly 10-12 points higher, into the mid-50s ('Fair'). Two things the fixed formula cannot see: (1) Q3 2025 was a charge-dominated quarter (-$112.9M operating income, -$1.05 EPS, -$285.3M net income) that drags trailing EPS to $1.678 and makes both the 23.9x P/E and the 28.8 growth score look worse than the ~$2.10 normalized run-rate implies, while the -0.67% accruals ratio and $1.67B TTM FCF (+29% YoY) show cash conversion is actually healthy; (2) the ~1% revenue growth is a cyclical Las Vegas soft patch, not structural decline - gross margin has held at 43-46% for twelve straight quarters. I would not go above 'Fair', though: the balance sheet really is encumbered (D/E 11.9, equity down to $2.51B, and the dataset shows long-term debt jumping to $31.2B in the 2025-12-31 column versus ~$6.1-6.4B in every other quarter, which looks like a lease/debt reclassification rather than a clean figure). The specific, dated event the score structurally cannot price is the pending unsolicited $48.30/share buyout proposal under board review - that binary overlay, not a general sentiment shift, is why I read 'Weak fundamentals + Cheap vs. its own history' as Cautiously Bearish rather than outright Bearish.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.