#70S&P 500 rank

MRNA — Moderna, Inc.

2-yr score: 62.5/100 (Next 20%)Healthcare
$245.81+1.54%
Description

Moderna, Inc., a biotechnology firm, is dedicated to the discovery, development, and commercialization of messenger RNA (mRNA) based therapies and preventive medicines. Its extensive research and development efforts target a broad spectrum of medical needs, including infectious diseases, cancer immunology, rare conditions, cardiovascular ailments, and autoimmune disorders, with operations spanning the United States, Europe, and other global markets.

Score breakdownLatest quarter68.0 · Good
Growth
48.4
Quality / Profitability
51.8
Financial health
84.0
Ratio screener
80.9
Track record: 2-yr avg 62.5 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 62.1 (Good, 39 quarters ≈ 9.8 yrs) · next earnings Nov 6, 2026 (in 15 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
-30.8
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
69.1
vs SMA20
+17.03%
vs SMA50
+48.40%
vs SMA200
+205.32%
Analyst target
$145
-41.1%
9 analysts
AI theoretical price
$129
-47.5%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, MRNA trades at $143.97 ($57.1B market cap), RSI 61.25, still +126.1% over the past month and +152.0% above its 200-day SMA after the Aug 19, 2026 Phase 3 intismeran melanoma win drove a ~177% one-day surge. The financials are still deeply unprofitable: Q2 2026 revenue of $145M, diluted EPS of -$1.96, and TTM free cash flow of roughly -$1.2B.

AI sentimentBullish

This is a catalyst-driven tape, not a fundamentals tape. The Aug 19, 2026 INTerpath-001 topline made intismeran autogene (with Merck) the first personalized mRNA cancer therapy to hit Phase 3 endpoints, triggering roughly a 177% one-day move; as of 2026-09-13 the stock was still +126.1% in one month and +188.5% in three months. Sell-side reactions were mixed-to-slow: Argus upgraded to Buy with an $180 target, Rothschild lifted its sell target to $81 from $40, and the published consensus remains Hold (0 strong buy / 8 buy / 16 hold / 5 sell) with an average target of $115.70 and a recent average of $109.15 — both below the $136.62 close on 2026-09-12. In other words, the market is outrunning the models, the classic signature of an option-value re-rating rather than an estimate-driven one.

Quarterly trend

The three-year pattern is a structural pandemic unwind, with an early but unproven attempt at a new revenue base. Revenue collapsed from $2.81B in Q4 2023 and $1.86B in Q3 2024 to a seasonal respiratory shape — $107-389M in the off-quarters with a $0.7-1.9B Q3/Q4 booster spike. FY2024 totaled ~$3.20B, FY2025 ~$1.94B (-39% YoY), and H1 2026 came in at $534M versus $249M in H1 2025 (+114%), though Q2 2026 alone was only $145M (+2% YoY) and management guides full-year 2026 to 'up to 10%' growth. Losses have not yet inflected: H1 2026 net loss was $2.13B versus $1.80B in H1 2025. TTM gross margin is -12.6% and operating margin -149%, the classic fixed-cost under-absorption problem of a shrunken vaccine franchise; R&D has been cut to ~$650M/quarter from $1.1-1.2B through 2024, and 2026 opex guidance was trimmed by ~$0.2B to $4.7B. Free cash flow burn is improving in steps (-$4.06B in 2024, -$2.05B in 2025, -$1.26B in H1 2026) but stockholders' equity has fallen from $13.85B (Dec 2023) to $6.76B (Jun 2026). Read plainly: the respiratory business is shrinking and seasonally lumpy; the oncology inflection is real news but has zero revenue in the numbers yet.

Valuation assessment

Expensive on everything currently measurable. At the 2026-09-13 price of $143.97, price-to-sales TTM is 25.6x versus a 5-year average of 5.19x (a comparison distorted by pandemic-era revenue, but the direction is unambiguous), price-to-book is 8.4x, P/E TTM is -18.0x on -$7.96 EPS, and next-FY consensus of -$8.31 EPS on $2.10B revenue implies roughly 27x forward sales. Enterprise value of roughly $51B (after ~$5-6B of net cash post-settlement and post-convert) is about 24x 2027E revenue for a company with no positive EBITDA. There is no earnings or cash-flow anchor here — the entire valuation rests on option value in the oncology pipeline, which is legitimate but entirely unbooked.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is pricing revenue the models do not contain yet. Consensus next-FY revenue is $2.10B with EPS of -$8.31 — essentially flat versus 2026E — so the +188% three-month move is multiple and optionality expansion, not estimate revision. Three practical tells: (1) if 2027-2029 revenue estimates start moving up on intismeran filing/approval and label expansion, the multiple has something to stand on; (2) if estimates stay flat while the price grinds higher, you are long sentiment and the downside is violent; (3) the real fundamental turn shows up as a positive full-year gross margin (currently -12.6% TTM) and cash burn below ~$1B/yr, at which point the market can value earnings rather than hope. Do not use trailing P/E or P/S to time entries in this name; watch the estimate tape and the burn.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI was 61.25 — elevated, not overbought — with price +7.92% above the 20-day, +58.14% above the 50-day and +152.0% above the 200-day SMA. The 52-week range is $22.28-$176.66: the stock printed a post-catalyst high at $176.66 and has eased to $143.97, down 1.09% on the week. This is a post-gap consolidation inside a violently extended uptrend — trend intact, but mean-reversion risk is extreme and the unfilled late-August gap leaves a thick air pocket underneath. Chasing here is momentum trading; a pullback into the $110-125 area (where sell-side targets cluster) offers a materially better risk/reward, and a break below ~$100 would suggest the gap is failing.

Macro factors
  • Post-pandemic respiratory normalization: COVID-19 booster volumes keep shrinking versus pandemic highs, so Moderna is leaning on geographic expansion (recent EU procurement contracts, Brazilian supply partnerships), the mRESVIA RSV launch and potential combo vaccines to hold baseline revenue.
  • Rate and risk-appetite regime for pre-profit biotech: high discount rates compress long-dated pipeline NPV, and Moderna's upsized $2.6B convertible senior notes issuance (late August 2026) both demonstrates capital access and signals that future dilution/refinancing is part of the plan.
  • Regulatory and vaccine-policy risk: FDA/ACIP recommendation dynamics and government purchasing decisions directly drive annual booster revenue, while scrutiny of accelerated oncology approvals determines how fast intismeran can be monetized.
  • Individualized-therapy manufacturing and reimbursement economics: bespoke neoantigen therapy requires per-patient manufacturing, release testing and timely delivery — a largely unproven industrial and payer-coding framework that could cap real-world penetration regardless of trial data.
  • Sector rotation: biotech flows remain selective, favoring large-cap pharma and obesity/GLP-1 assets; single-readout repricings of this size are unusual and often accompanied by elevated volatility and index/flow-driven overshoots.
Key catalysts
  • Detailed intismeran subgroup data and the next INTerpath readouts (NSCLC, renal, bladder) at medical and investor conferences starting September 2026 — each new positive tumor type expands the addressable market.
  • Regulatory path for intismeran autogene in adjuvant melanoma: filing/submission, acceptance and eventual FDA/EMA decision (likely 2027-2028), plus clarity on whether RFS/DMFS endpoints support full or accelerated approval.
  • Q3 2026 earnings (late October/November 2026): first read on 2026-2027 seasonal respiratory uptake, updated cash burn, and confirmation of the trimmed $4.7B opex and $4.7-5.2B year-end cash guidance after the $950M litigation payout and the $2.6B convert.
  • Commercial rollout of the FDA-approved 2026-2027 COVID formulation and any RSV/combination-vaccine approvals or new national procurement contracts.
  • Sell-side estimate revisions: upward movement in 2027-2029 revenue/EPS lines would be the cleanest confirmation that the oncology asset is being capitalized, and could pull consensus targets toward the current price.
  • Norovirus (mRNA-1403) re-enrollment outcome and readouts from CMV, EBV and rare-disease programs — a mixed bag that is currently a modest swing factor against the oncology story.
Key risks
  • Cash burn and dilution: TTM free cash flow of about -$1.2B, H1 2026 burn of -$1.26B, equity down from $13.85B (Dec 2023) to $6.76B (Jun 2026), and a $2.6B convertible issue that converts into dilution if the stock stays high — continued capital raises look likely before the oncology ramp.
  • The entire post-August rally rests on one asset: if intismeran commercializes slowly (manufacturing at scale, time-to-treatment, payer access) or the FDA is strict on the package, a large part of the re-rating reverses.
  • Respiratory franchise erosion: FY2025 revenue of $1.94B was down 39% from FY2024, Q4 2025 was down 29% YoY, and gross margin TTM of -12.6% shows the cost base is still sized for a much bigger business.
  • Pipeline execution risk beyond oncology: the norovirus Phase 3 interim miss requiring an extra enrollment cohort is a reminder that this pipeline has repeatedly slipped, and competitors (Pfizer/BioNTech combos, large-cap oncology) are well funded.
  • Valuation and positioning risk: ~25-27x sales, +188% in three months, +152% above the 200-day SMA, and a consensus target ($115.70) below the market price means any sentiment shift has a long way to fall.
  • Regulatory/political risk on both sides of the house — vaccine recommendation policy affecting the commercial base, and accelerated-approval scrutiny affecting the oncology upside case.
Investment thesis

The Aug 19, 2026 Phase 3 intismeran win is genuinely transformative to the story: Moderna is no longer just a shrinking COVID franchise, it now owns a first-in-class personalized mRNA oncology asset partnered with Merck. But at $143.97 you are paying roughly 25-27x sales and ~24x 2027E revenue for a company with a -$8.31 forward EPS and >$1B of annual cash burn, while published consensus targets sit at $115.70. My own probability-weighted fair value is about $129, so the risk/reward at this exact price is roughly balanced with fat tails in both directions — the framework lean is constructive, but this is a hold-what-you-own / buy-on-pullback setup rather than a chase after a 177% one-day move.

AI theoretical price methodology

Probability-weighted scenario value, since there is no earnings or cash-flow base to discount: 35% bear case at $45 (intismeran commercializes slowly or filing slips, respiratory erodes below $2B, another dilutive raise), 45% base case at $130 (adjuvant-melanoma approval around 2028 with Moderna-attributable peak sales of ~$2.5-3B by the early 2030s on top of a stable ~$2B respiratory base and continued opex discipline), and 20% bull case at $275 (the platform validates across NSCLC/renal/bladder with >$7B Moderna-attributable peak sales and a durable high-margin oncology franchise) — 0.35(45) + 0.45(130) + 0.20(275) = $129.25, rounded to $129. Cross-checked against ~$5B of net cash post-settlement/post-convert and the stock's ~26x 2027E sales at the 2026-09-13 price of $143.97.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

I'd take the 68.0 / 'Good Fundamentals' band down roughly one tier, to Fair, for about a 10-15 point reduction — hence Partially Agree rather than Agree. The score's own internals show the problem: growth 48.4 and quality/profitability 51.8 are mediocre, and the 68.0 total is lifted by financial health (84.0) and the ratio screener (80.9, which is literally 50% of the overall number and rewards a low-debt, cash-rich balance sheet). That balance sheet is real, but it is also a rear-view read: op margin -149%, ROIC -29.7%, gross margin -12.6% TTM, and $7.1B of equity burned in ten quarters. Two further caveats the formula cannot see. First, the balance-sheet inputs are dated 2026-06-30, before the $950M July litigation payout and the $2.6B August convertible issuance, so the 'cash-rich' signal is stale. Second — and this cuts the other way — the score is entirely backward-looking and cannot see the Aug 19, 2026 INTerpath-001 Phase 3 success, which genuinely improves the forward opportunity set even though it has produced no revenue yet. I am not deviating from the mandated lean: Good Fundamentals + Neutral-vs-own-history maps to Bullish, and I am applying that table exactly; my qualification is that the band label flatters a business whose trailing profitability is deeply negative and whose strength is concentrated in the balance sheet and in a not-yet-monetized oncology option.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.