#347S&P 500 rank

MTD — Mettler-Toledo International Inc.

2-yr score: 45.6/100 (Middle 40%)Healthcare14d
$1,677.94+2.69%
Description

Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD) is a global enterprise dedicated to the production and provision of precision instruments and related services. The company's operations are strategically organized across five geographical divisions: its domestic U.S. market, Swiss operations, Western European activities, Chinese operations, and an 'Other' segment covering remaining territories.

Score breakdownLatest quarter48.0 · Fair
Growth
54.2
Quality / Profitability
68.5
Financial health
50.1
Ratio screener
36.7
Track record: 2-yr avg 45.6 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 47.3 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 5, 2026 (in 14 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
37.7
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
77.0
vs SMA20
+7.39%
vs SMA50
+15.20%
vs SMA200
+26.13%
Analyst target
$1571
-6.4%
7 analysts
AI theoretical price
$1400
-16.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, MTD trades at $1,293.52, down ~10% over the prior month after peaking near $1,445 post-Q2 2026 earnings, with RSI-14 at 31.9 (near oversold) and price below its 20-, 50-, and 200-day SMAs. It is a high-quality precision-instrument compounder in the middle of an earnings inflection but priced at a full ~28x forward P/E.

AI sentimentNeutral

The tape is genuinely two-sided as of 2026-09-13. Fundamentals are improving: Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $11.46 beat consensus (~$10.80), revenue of $1.03B matched, local-currency growth of 6% marked a rebound, and management delivered a second consecutive 2026 guidance raise. Yet the stock sold off roughly 8-9% from its August high, and sell-side actions turned mixed: UBS downgraded to Neutral on 2026-09-09 (target cut to $1,460), RBC and Rothschild Redburn initiated at Sector Perform ($1,515) and Sell ($1,200) respectively, while Stifel stayed Buy at $1,600. Consensus sits at Hold with a ~$1,450-1,469 average target. The market likes the business but is not willing to pay more for it at ~29x trailing earnings while rates stay elevated.

Quarterly trend

This is a real inflection off a trough, not a one-quarter blip. Revenue YoY went from -4.6% in Q1 2025 to +3.9% (Q2'25), +7.9% (Q3'25), +8.1% (Q4'25), +7.2% (Q1'26), then moderated to +4.5% in Q2 2026 (reported; ~6% local currency). Margins are expanding: operating margin moved from 24.8% in Q1 2025 to 29.9% in Q2 2026, and Q2 2026 gross margin jumped to 63.3% versus a stable ~57-58% range across 2024-2025 — a ~610bp spike that is the least durable-looking element in the data and should not be fully extrapolated. Diluted EPS swung from -5.8% YoY in Q2 2025 to +18.2% in Q2 2026 ($11.55 vs $9.77). TTM free cash flow is ~$864M, and the accruals ratio of -2.11% confirms reported profit is running behind, not ahead of, cash generation — healthy earnings quality.

Valuation assessment

Fair, leaning full on an absolute basis and cheap only relative to its own history. As of 2026-09-13, the TTM P/E is 29.06x (EPS $45.01), forward P/E is ~27.8x on the ~$46.55 consensus 2026 EPS, and PEG is 2.36 — expensive relative to a ~6-10% growth rate. P/S of 6.32x sits below the 5-year average of 7.94x and the 29x P/E is well below the 5-year average of 37.0x, which is why the deterministic model tags it 'Cheap vs. its own history.' But that average was inflated by the 2021-2022 premium-multiple era; given structurally slower organic growth, the current multiple is closer to fair than to bargain. The negative book equity makes P/B (2,034x) and ROE (-36.8%) meaningless here — use ROIC (~35.5%) instead.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The key tell as of 2026-09-13 is that the stock fell ~10% in a month despite an earnings beat and a guidance raise — the market is de-rating the multiple on rate sensitivity and growth-durability concerns, not marking down earnings. Price now embeds ~27.8x 2026E EPS, so for the stock to work from here, H2 2026 must deliver the implied ~$26.6 in EPS (vs ~$19.9 in H1). If the Q3 report confirms the trend, multiple compression looks overdone; if Q2's gross-margin spike fades or biotech/pharma budgets tighten, the multiple has room to fall further toward the low-$1,200s.

Technical picture

Weak but not washed out as of 2026-09-13. RSI-14 at 31.9 is near oversold without being an extreme washout, and the stock is below all three key moving averages: -5.91% vs the 20-day (~$1,374), -5.05% vs the 50-day (~$1,362), and -1.79% vs the 200-day (~$1,317). Returns of -3.85% (1wk) and -10.08% (1mo) contrast with +14.32% (3mo) and +10.2% (6mo) — a sharp pullback within a still-positive medium-term trend. The 200-day near $1,317 is the immediate level to watch; losing it decisively tilts the setup defensive. A near-term bounce is plausible, but momentum favors patience over chasing.

Macro factors
  • Interest rates: MTD is a premium-multiple compounder (beta 1.22), so a higher-for-longer rate backdrop mechanically compresses its P/E even with stable earnings.
  • Pharma/biotech R&D funding: labs remain cost-conscious and constrained, capping the pace of instrument replacement and new-capex cycles.
  • China and emerging-market demand: currently a tailwind offsetting European industrial weakness — a reversal would remove a key support for the recovery narrative.
  • Regulatory/quality-assurance mandates: heightened scrutiny in pharma, food, and diagnostics is a structural, multi-year demand driver for audit-proof precision instruments.
  • Currency: significant international revenue means a strong dollar drags reported growth and margins, while a weaker dollar provides an unreported tailwind.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (typically late Oct/early Nov 2026): the market will test whether the Q2 rebound sustains and whether a third consecutive guidance raise is possible.
  • Continued recovery in China/emerging-market demand and any thaw in pharma/biotech capex budgets, which would support multiple re-rating.
  • Post-autumn-conference analyst re-evaluations: a shift in the Hold consensus toward Buy would likely pull the stock back toward the $1,450+ target cluster.
Key risks
  • Valuation and rate sensitivity: ~28x forward and ~29x trailing P/E leave little cushion; a multiple de-rating, not a downgrade in earnings, is the fastest path to further downside.
  • Demand durability: European industrial weakness and constrained biotech/pharma spending could stall the recovery, and Q2 2026's 63.3% gross margin may not repeat.
  • Balance-sheet optics: negative shareholders' equity and ~$2.04B long-term debt (D/E 164.7%, current ratio 1.12, quick ratio 0.78) limit flexibility despite strong cash flow; the deterministic model flags equity-swing distortions in the trend data.
  • Insider selling of $6M+ over the trailing three months — not fatal, but it undercuts the idea that management sees the shares as undervalued.
Investment thesis

MTD is a genuinely high-quality franchise — ~29% operating margins, ~35.5% ROIC, pricing power, and ~$864M TTM free cash flow — now two quarters into a real earnings inflection after a 2024/early-2025 trough. The problem is price: at ~$1,293 it trades at ~27.8x forward earnings, which is fair-to-full for ~6-10% growth, and the tape is weak (below all key SMAs, RSI 31.9). This is a reasonable hold with roughly 8% upside to my ~$1,400 fair value, but not a compelling new-money buy — the risk/reward improves meaningfully on a pullback toward the low-$1,200s. Not personalized advice.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 30x forward P/E to a blended FY2026/FY2027 EPS of ~$46.9 (2026 consensus ~$46.55; next-FY estimate $47.33), yielding ~$1,407 and rounded to $1,400. The 30x multiple sits between the current ~27.8x forward and the 5-year average 37x, and reflects MTD's ~29% operating margins, ~35.5% ROIC and pricing power offset by structurally slower (~6%) organic growth — a fair-value estimate that is my own, not a restatement of the ~$1,466 consensus target or the deterministic score.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 48/Fair Fundamentals score is a defensible read, and my independent view lands close to it — I'd nudge it up only a few points to ~54, still 'Fair,' hence Agree. My main pushback is that the ratio screener (36.7) unfairly penalizes MTD's negative shareholders' equity: a P/B of 2,034x and D/E of 164.7% are artifacts of years of aggressive buybacks, not distress, since operating income of ~$307M/quarter covers interest many times over and TTM FCF is ~$864M. The quality/profitability leg (68.5, with a healthy -2.11% accruals ratio) and the 'Cheap vs. its own history' valuation context (76.2) better capture the real story. The one genuine caveat is that this deterministic score is entirely backward-looking; MTD looks like a cyclical business past its 2024-early-2025 demand trough, so a purely trailing score may understate the forward setup — worth noting, but not enough to move a band. No single dated, score-invisible event (no acquisition, bankruptcy, or restatement) justifies deviating from the Fair-band mapping.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.