#176S&P 500 rank

NDSN — Nordson Corporation

2-yr score: 54.4/100 (Middle 40%)Industrials
$331.54+1.39%
Description

Nordson Corporation engineers, manufactures, and markets products and systems to dispense, apply, and control adhesives, coatings, polymers, sealants, biomaterials, medical components, and other fluids. The Industrial Precision Solutions segment provides dispensing, coating, and laminating systems for adhesives, lotions, liquids, and fibers to disposable products and roll goods; automated adhesive dispensing systems; components and systems for thermoplastic and biopolymer melt stream; fluid components, such as nozzles, pumps, and filters; smart components that measure and control the flow, quantity and location of dispensed fluid; control systems; and product assembly solutions.

Score breakdownLatest quarter56.7 · Fair
Growth
48.8
Quality / Profitability
58.7
Financial health
78.0
Ratio screener
56.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 54.4 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 55.1 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 9, 2026 (in 48 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
33.4
Yield
1.11%
RSI (14)
58.9
vs SMA20
+0.85%
vs SMA50
+2.96%
vs SMA200
+13.22%
Analyst target
$364
+9.8%
4 analysts
AI theoretical price
$321
-3.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Nordson trades at $314.47 with a ~$17.5B market cap, roughly 7% below its 52-week high of $339.12, after reporting a record fiscal Q3 2026 (revenue $817.7M, +10% YoY; GAAP diluted EPS $2.73, adjusted $3.25) and raising full-year guidance on 2026-08-19. The stock commands 31.7x trailing earnings versus a 5-year average of 28.1x, so the operating story is strong while the multiple is full.

AI sentimentBullish

Sentiment is genuinely constructive, not just polite: the 2026-08-19 Q3 print was a record quarter with revenue +10% YoY (~12% organic) and adjusted EPS of $3.25 versus ~$3.09 consensus, management raised FY26 guidance to $3.035-3.075B of sales and $11.80-12.00 of adjusted EPS, and total backlog is up 35% YoY with book-to-bill around 1.14x. Sell-side followed: DA Davidson went $345 to $375, Oppenheimer $335 to $370, KeyBanc $335 to $360, with only Baird staying Neutral at $351 (consensus target $360.20). The 2026-08-27 announcement of a 15% dividend hike to $0.94/quarter - the 63rd consecutive annual increase - reinforced the quality narrative. Price action confirms it: as of 2026-09-13 the stock is +9.11% over three months and +17.53% over six, though it has gone quiet near-term (-1.22% over one week, +1.03% over one month) and RSI at 49.64 shows the enthusiasm has cooled rather than broken.

Quarterly trend

This is an up-cycle inflection, not a fading story, and the sequence is clear. Revenue by quarter has gone $669.5M (Jan-2026) to $740.8M (Apr-2026) to $817.7M (Jul-2026) - a record - with YoY growth accelerating from +1.0% in the Oct-2025 quarter ($751.8M vs $744.5M) to +8.8% (Jan-2026), +8.5% (Apr-2026) and +10.3% (Jul-2026). Operating margin has expanded roughly 200bp YoY in each of the last three quarters: 24.9% vs 22.9% (Jan-2026), 26.6% vs 24.7% (Apr-2026), 27.3% vs 25.3% (Jul-2026), with TTM operating margin now 26.9% and gross margin 55.3%; the brief pegs EBITDA margins near a record ~32%. GAAP diluted EPS went $2.21 (Jul-2025) to $2.69 (Oct-2025) to $2.38 (Jan-2026) to $2.09 (Apr-2026) to $2.73 (Jul-2026). Two caveats worth flagging: the Jan-2026 quarter looks tax-flattered (net income $133.4M on $669.5M revenue, a 19.9% net margin, versus $117.3M on $740.8M revenue in Apr-2026, a 15.8% margin despite $30.8M more operating income), and the Apr-2026 GAAP dip to $2.09 is mostly amortization/timing rather than demand, since operating income still rose YoY. Cash is clean: TTM free cash flow is $728.5M and the accruals ratio of -1.62% as of 2026-07-31 means cash is running ahead of reported earnings, not behind.

Valuation assessment

Full-to-slightly-rich versus its own history, but not bubble territory. As of 2026-09-13, the $314.47 price is 31.7x trailing GAAP EPS of $9.965 versus a 5-year average P/E of 28.14x (a ~13% premium), and 5.88x sales versus a 5-year average P/S of 5.20x (also ~13% rich). Price/book is 5.36x, EV/EBITDA 20.4x, PEG 1.31, and the TTM FCF yield is roughly 4.2% ($728.5M FCF against $17.5B market cap). On forward numbers the picture improves materially: using the $11.893 next-FY consensus EPS (which matches company FY26 guidance of $11.80-12.00) the forward P/E is 26.4x, and on my ~$13.00 FY27 estimate it is 24.2x. So the honest read is that the market has already paid for the recovery - the question is whether 10% organic growth and record margins extend into FY27, not whether the stock is cheap.

Price vs. earnings playbook

This is not a case of the price discounting growth that hasn't shown up - the growth has already shown up (record Q3, +35% backlog, a raised guide), and the stock has been re-rated accordingly from a 52-week low of $220.47 to a high of $339.12. The risk therefore sits in the multiple, not the earnings. If FY27 guidance lands at or above the ~$13.00 adjusted EPS my model implies, the current price only carries ~24x forward and there is room toward the $345-375 analyst targets. If instead FY27 guidance comes in at only +5-8% - plausible if the electronics/advanced-packaging order wave normalizes - a de-rating to 22-24x forward puts the stock in the $285-310 zone on perfectly respectable absolute results. Practically: buy the earnings news, but don't buy the multiple expansion twice.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 49.64 - dead neutral, neither overbought nor oversold - with the price 1.7% below its 20-day SMA but 2.8% above the 50-day and 11.97% above the 200-day, which is a textbook consolidation inside an intact intermediate-term uptrend. The 52-week range is $220.47-$339.12, so the stock is about 7% off its high, and trailing returns are -1.22% (1 week), +1.03% (1 month), +9.11% (3 months) and +17.53% (6 months). There is no technical urgency here: the chart is neither an oversold entry nor an overbought chase. A pullback toward the 50-day SMA (roughly $306) or the $290-300 shelf would be a materially better risk/reward entry than $314, and a decisive break above $339 on strong volume would confirm the next leg.

Macro factors
  • Electronics/AI capital-spending supercycle: advanced semiconductor packaging, panel-level packaging and AI infrastructure hardware are driving Nordson's Advanced Technology Solutions segment, which is why the ASYMTEK Vantage XL launch at SEMICON Taiwan (2026-09-05) matters more than a typical product refresh.
  • Industrial capital-spending cycle: traditional Industrial Precision Solutions end markets remain mixed with a slow cyclical recovery, while Medical and Fluid Solutions compounds steadily - so roughly two-thirds of the portfolio is stable and one-third is carrying the growth story.
  • Rates and cost of capital: moderating inflation and easing debt costs help a levered acquirer (debt/equity 0.555, long-term debt $1.529B), and the new commercial paper program added during the quarter gives cheap, flexible funding for M&A.
  • Tariffs and trade friction: Nordson sells into a diverse global manufacturing base with significant non-US revenue, so tariffs affect both equipment demand from customers and input costs, and FX translation cuts both ways on reported results.
  • Serial-acquirer M&A environment: with net debt/EBITDA around 1.5x and strong free cash flow, Nordson has real capacity to buy growth - which is a tailwind if multiples paid are disciplined and a risk if they are not.
Key catalysts
  • Q4/FY2026 earnings and initial FY2027 guidance, expected late November or early December 2026 - the single biggest re-rating event, since it will show whether the +35% backlog converts and what growth management will underwrite for FY27.
  • Backlog conversion and order-entry trends: book-to-bill near 1.14x needs to hold; a slip toward or below 1.0x would be the first hard signal that the advanced-packaging/electronics demand wave is normalizing.
  • Ramp of the ASYMTEK Vantage XL and other ATS products into AI hardware and automotive electrification applications, which is the highest-incremental-margin growth vector in the portfolio.
  • Continued 15%-style dividend increases and possible buyback acceleration, funded by ~$728M of TTM free cash flow and a newly established commercial paper program.
  • Any announced acquisition - the balance sheet supports one, and deal multiples versus Nordson's own 5.36x P/B will be the tell on capital-allocation discipline.
Key risks
  • Multiple compression: at 31.7x trailing GAAP earnings versus a 28.1x 5-year average, a return to the historical multiple alone implies roughly $280 per share even if earnings hit plan - the valuation is the dominant risk, not the business.
  • Cyclicality in semiconductor/electronics capital spending: ATS is both the growth engine and the most cyclical segment, and the company is currently posting record revenue with record ~32% EBITDA margins - i.e., the trailing numbers being scored are peak-ish, not trough.
  • GAAP versus adjusted divergence: roughly $2.00 per year of acquisition-amortization separates adjusted EPS ($3.25 in Q3 FY26) from GAAP EPS ($2.73), so headline beats can mask a lower-quality reported number.
  • Industrial Precision Solutions softness and tariff/trade friction: a slow general-manufacturing recovery and any escalation in trade barriers would hit the largest, least-cyclically-favored part of the portfolio.
  • Order lumpiness and customer concentration in semiconductor and medical OEM channels, where a handful of large orders can swing a quarter in either direction.
  • Capital allocation: ROIC of 10.7% is structurally held down by a goodwill-heavy, serial-acquirer balance sheet, so the return on the next deal matters more than the last one.
Investment thesis

Nordson is a genuinely high-quality, cash-generative industrial machinery franchise in the middle of a real up-cycle: record Q3 FY26 revenue of $817.7M (+10.3% YoY), roughly 200bp of YoY operating-margin expansion for three consecutive quarters, 55.3% gross margins, $728M of TTM free cash flow at a ~4.2% yield, a 63-year dividend-increase streak, and net debt/EBITDA around 1.5x. The problem is not the company, it is the price: at $314.47 as of 2026-09-13 the stock trades at 31.7x trailing and ~26x forward earnings, above its own 5-year averages, and the trailing results it is being valued on are record-margin, cycle-peak numbers. I would want either a pullback to the high-$280s/low-$300s or a credible FY27 guide showing that the +35% backlog converts into sustained double-digit growth before committing new money at these levels.

AI theoretical price methodology

I used a forward P/E approach on adjusted earnings: blending FY26 consensus adjusted EPS of $11.893 (which matches company guidance of $11.80-12.00, with Q4 FY26 implied at ~$3.18 after $8.72 of adjusted EPS in the first three quarters) with my ~$13.00 FY27 estimate implied by roughly 9% growth off the +35% backlog and 1.14x book-to-bill, gives a next-twelve-month adjusted EPS of about $12.55. I applied a 25.5x multiple - a premium to ITW/Graco-type industrial peers at ~22-24x for Nordson's 55.3% gross margin, 26.9% operating margin, negative accruals and 63-year dividend record, but a discount to the 31.7x trailing GAAP multiple it commands today - yielding about $321. Cross-checks corroborate: that price is a 4.1% free-cash-flow yield on $728M of TTM FCF and roughly 20x EV/EBITDA on ~$930M of TTM EBITDA, both consistent with a fairly-valued quality industrial, and both below the $360.20 sell-side consensus target, which implies a richer ~28x on FY27 earnings than I am willing to underwrite at this point in the cycle.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read largely confirms the 56.7 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band, though for different reasons than the formula used. The growth leg (48.8) understates the business - revenue growth accelerated from +1.0% (Oct-2025 quarter) to +10.3% (Jul-2026) with ~200bp of YoY operating-margin expansion each of the last three quarters and a +35% backlog - while the quality leg (58.7) is dragged by ROIC of 10.7%, a figure structurally depressed by a goodwill-heavy serial-acquirer balance sheet that ignores the excellent -1.62% accruals ratio and 100%+ free-cash-flow conversion. Offsetting that, the score is being computed on record revenue and record ~32% EBITDA margins, i.e. cycle-peak earnings, and the ratio screener (56.3) is legitimately held back by a 5.39x P/B and 20.4x EV/EBITDA. Netting those out, my adjustment is modest - I would put the score in the high-50s to low-60s, same band - so I agree with the number and band. Note this is the mirror image of the trough-cyclical blind spot in the methodology: Nordson is not a depressed cyclical scoring badly before a recovery, it is a peak-margin cyclical scoring adequately, which means the backward-looking formula is more likely to be flattering than harsh here. The 'Rich vs. its own history' overlay is the more decision-relevant signal than the 56.7 itself.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.