NEE — NextEra Energy, Inc.
NextEra Energy, Inc., operating through its diverse subsidiaries, is a prominent electric power provider in North America. The company's operations encompass the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electricity to both individual consumers and large-scale wholesale clients.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, NextEra Energy traded at $82.31 (lower third of its $69.37-$98.75 52-week range), with RSI at 36.45 and the shares sitting below their 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages (-1.9%, -4.46%, and -6.24% respectively). It carries a 18.4x TTM P/E against a 5-year average of 30.7x and a 2.98% dividend yield.
Sentiment is genuinely split. The sell-side is constructive - 24 Buy / 11 Hold / 1 Sell, consensus target $102.11, July 2026 Q2 adjusted EPS of $1.15 beating the $1.08-$1.09 consensus, 3.6 GW of new renewables/storage added to backlog, a $1.9B DOE loan for the Duane Arnold nuclear restart, and progress on the Dominion merger. The tape says the opposite: as of 2026-09-13, NEE was down 1.34% on the week, 4.05% on the month, 4.28% over three months and 11.28% over six months, with RSI at 36.45. Net-net, the market is discounting rate/financing risk on a huge capex program and dilution/execution risk on the pending merger while analysts underwrite the long-term EPS story.
Revenue is inflecting up, not decelerating: Q2 2026 revenue of $7.534B was +12.4% YoY (vs +10.4% in Q2 2025), Q1 2026 was +11.4% YoY, and Q4 2025 was +21.9% YoY - a clear step up from the flatter 2023-24 period. Gross margin expanded sharply (Q2 2026: 81.8% vs Q2 2025: 64.1%), but operating margin barely moved (29.7% vs 28.5%) because depreciation and opex from the rapidly growing asset base absorb the gains. GAAP diluted EPS is noisy ($0.40 in Q1 2025, $1.18 in Q3 2025, $0.73 in Q4 2025, $1.04 in Q1 2026, $1.51 in Q2 2026); TTM EPS is $4.451, and the cleaner adjusted Q2 2026 figure of $1.15 grew ~9.5% YoY. The structural change in the numbers is on the balance sheet and cash flow, not the income statement: long-term debt rose from $61.4B at 12/31/2023 to $98.8B at 6/30/2026, total assets from $171.7B to $232.8B, and Q2 2026 capex of $16.08B drove quarterly free cash flow to -$11.42B (H1 2026 FCF -$12.0B vs +$1.4B in H1 2025). This is a business trading near-term cash generation for regulated rate-base and contracted-asset growth.
Cheap versus its own history, expensive versus peers - both are true. As of 2026-09-13, the TTM P/E of 18.4x is roughly 40% below the 5-year average of 30.67x, P/S of 5.92x is below the 5-year average of 7.01x, and the PEG of 0.334 is low for an entity guiding to 8%+ adjusted EPS CAGR through 2032. The forward multiple (~19-20x on ~$4.25 of NTM EPS, consistent with the brief's 19.4x) is still a premium to the ~15x utility sector median, but a discount to where NEE has historically traded on adjusted earnings (~22-24x). P/B of 3.01 and EV/EBITDA of 15.8x are rich in absolute utility terms and are the main reason a mechanical screen flags the stock. My read: fairly valued to modestly cheap on forward earnings, not the bargain the 'cheap vs. own history' label implies, because the premium multiple NEE once earned was partly a function of a cheaper cost of capital than it now faces.
At $82.31 on 2026-09-13, the stock is pricing in a slowdown that the reported numbers don't show. Forward EPS is being capitalized at ~19-20x while guidance calls for 8%+ EPS growth through 2032, Q2 2026 adjusted EPS beat by ~6-7%, and backlog grew 3.6 GW in one quarter. The 11.28% six-month decline looks driven by what the market can't see clearly - the funding cost of a capex program that hit $16.1B in a single quarter, negative free cash flow, rising leverage, and merger dilution - rather than by earnings deterioration. Practically: if the October 27 Q3 print reaffirms guidance and shows backlog converting, the gap between the ~19-20x being paid and the ~24x NEE historically commanded is a re-rating opportunity. If instead capex guidance rises again without matching earnings visibility, the discount is justified and stays.
Weak, but not yet washed out. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 36.45 - soft momentum, above the <30 oversold threshold. Price was 1.9% below the 20-day, 4.46% below the 50-day and 6.24% below the 200-day SMA, a clean downtrend with no bullish crossover or base formation. With the 52-week range at $69.37-$98.75, $82.31 sits in the lower third but well off the low. Entry-timing implication: there is no technical urgency to buy here - a reclaim of the 50-day (roughly the mid-$80s) or an RSI washout below 30 would offer better risk/reward. For a long-term holder, staged accumulation into weakness is reasonable; chasing a bounce is not warranted by this chart.
- Interest rates and financing costs: with $98.8B of long-term debt at 6/30/2026 and a capital program running at $16.1B of capex in one quarter, the cost and availability of debt directly sets both EPS and the multiple; the ~$38.5B hedge book cushions near-term but not indefinitely.
- AI/data-center power demand: FPL has over 21 GW of enterprise large-load interest, the single biggest structural tailwind in the US utility space and the core of the bull case.
- Regulation: Florida remains a constructive, predictable rate-base jurisdiction, but the Dominion merger pulls NEE into multi-state review (Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina) plus FERC Section 203, with state attorneys general and Virginia's governor already intervening.
- Federal energy policy support: the up-to-$1.9B DOE loan for the Duane Arnold nuclear restart and commercial terms for up to 10 GW of gas generation funding with the US and Japanese governments are tailwinds, but politically contingent.
- Sector rotation and duration: utilities have been re-rated as defensive AI-power proxies; a rate spike or a rotation out of defensives would compress NEE's premium multiple regardless of operational execution.
- Q3 2026 earnings on October 27, 2026 - backlog conversion, capex trajectory, and reaffirmation of the 8%+ adjusted EPS CAGR target through 2032.
- Dominion Energy merger regulatory milestones - state proceedings in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina plus FERC Section 203; approval conditions or timeline changes move the stock materially.
- Duane Arnold nuclear restart execution under the up-to-$1.9B DOE loan, a tangible cash-generating asset add.
- Conversion of FPL's 21+ GW large-load pipeline into signed data-center contracts and associated rate-base growth.
- Financing execution for the 2026-27 capex program, including any equity issuance or asset-level capital recycling.
- Leverage and returns: $98.8B long-term debt, D/E of 1.93, current ratio of 0.53, and ROIC of 4.2% - if the cost of debt exceeds returns on new capital, growth destroys rather than creates value.
- Negative free cash flow: -$11.42B in Q2 2026 and roughly -$12.0B for H1 2026, requiring continuous external financing in whatever rate environment prevails.
- Dominion merger execution risk: multi-state and FERC approvals, political intervention, all-stock dilution, and a real chance of conditions or delay.
- Earnings quality: in Q2 2026, net income of $3.144B exceeded operating income of $2.238B, meaning non-operating items and tax credits are doing heavy lifting; the GAAP-to-adjusted gap is wide and recurring.
- Valuation risk versus peers: at ~19-20x forward versus a ~15x sector median, there is room to de-rate if growth is not delivered on schedule.
NextEra is a premium regulated utility plus the largest contracted renewables developer in North America, and as of 2026-09-13 it trades at $82.31 - about 21% below its 52-week high and well under its own 5-year average multiple - while still guiding to 8%+ EPS growth through 2032 and sitting on a data-center demand pipeline most utilities can only envy. The offset is real and should not be waved away: debt has grown to $98.8B, free cash flow was -$12.0B in H1 2026, ROIC of 4.2% is thin, and the pending Dominion merger adds genuine execution and dilution uncertainty. This is a reasonable accumulation candidate for a patient investor collecting a ~3% dividend, not a screaming bargain and not a broken business. Directional lean: Neutral, not bearish.
Applied a justified forward P/E of 22x - a premium to the ~15x utility sector median on the strength of 8%+ guided EPS CAGR and a discount to NEE's own ~22-24x adjusted-earnings history and inflated 30.7x 5-year average - to roughly $4.25 of forward-12-month adjusted EPS implied by the brief's ~19.4x forward multiple at $82-84, giving about $93.50, which equates to roughly a 10.5% expected total return from the ~3% dividend yield plus 8% EPS growth.
My independent read is that the 38.9 / 'Weak Fundamentals' score understates the business by roughly one tier. The drag comes almost entirely from the ratio screener (23.9) and financial health (16.2), which z-score NEE against the entire S&P 500 on quick ratio (0.44), current ratio (0.53), D/E (1.93), LT D/E (1.73) and EV/EBITDA (15.8) - all normal-to-typical for a regulated utility that funds rate base with debt, and none of them signs of distress. The fundamentals-only pillar is 53.9 (Fair), and the score is structurally blind to the forward drivers: 8%+ adjusted EPS CAGR guided through 2032, 3.6 GW of Q2 2026 renewables/storage backlog growth, 21+ GW of FPL large-load interest, and the announced all-stock Dominion Energy merger whose joint regulatory applications were filed in July 2026 and which drew a Virginia governor intervention in late August 2026 - a dated, material, announced acquisition the trailing score cannot see. That said, the formula is right on one thing I would not dismiss: leverage and cash flow really are stretched (LT debt $98.8B, Q2 2026 FCF -$11.4B, ROIC 4.2%), so I would move the band to Fair (~50-52), not higher. That one-tier adjustment is also why I land on Neutral rather than the table's mechanical Cautiously Bearish for a Weak-band name with a 'Cheap vs. its own history' valuation tag.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.