#266S&P 500 rank

NTAP — NetApp, Inc.

2-yr score: 50.1/100 (Middle 40%)Technology
$217.21+3.45%
Description

NetApp, Inc. is a technology company focused on providing cloud-centric and data-driven services that enable businesses worldwide to efficiently manage and share their information across on-premises infrastructure, private cloud setups, and public cloud platforms. The company's operations are divided into two key segments: Hybrid Cloud and Public Cloud.

Score breakdownLatest quarter56.2 · Fair
Growth
60.9
Quality / Profitability
64.5
Financial health
42.4
Ratio screener
52.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 50.1 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 51.2 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 1, 2026 (in 40 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
30.3
Yield
1.23%
RSI (14)
53.3
vs SMA20
-0.66%
vs SMA50
+7.00%
vs SMA200
+48.58%
Analyst target
$218
+0.2%
14 analysts
AI theoretical price
$195
-10.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, NTAP trades at $199.28 (market cap ~$39.1B), having gapped ~8.5% higher on blowout Q1 FY27 results (revenue $2.025B, +30% YoY; non-GAAP EPS $2.58 vs. ~$2.12 consensus) and a sharply raised FY27 guide. The stock is up 101.99% over six months and sits 50.6% above its 200-day SMA, while the deterministic value score rates fundamentals merely 'Fair' (56.2) and valuation 'Rich vs. its own history' (27.8x TTM P/E vs. a 16.3x 5-year average).

AI sentimentBullish

The tape is unambiguously bullish as of 2026-09-13: the Sept 2, 2026 Q1 FY27 print delivered record revenue of $2.025B (+30% YoY) with all-flash arrays +47% and public cloud +28%, and management raised FY27 revenue guidance to $7.975-8.225B and EPS to $9.73-10.03 - a company that grew revenue ~5.4% in FY26 now guiding mid-teens. That triggered an 8.54% single-day move and a wave of target hikes (Argus to $225 from $200). What keeps it from being a clean consensus story: the sell-side rating profile is still 'Hold'-heavy (0 strong buy / 26 buy / 37 hold / 8 sell) with a $197 consensus target below the current $199.28 price, so the marketplace is more enthusiastic than the analysts covering it.

Quarterly trend

The last three years split cleanly into a dead-flat base and a sharp inflection. From Oct-2023 through Jul-2025, eight consecutive quarters printed revenue between $1.541B and $1.732B - no growth trend at all. Then: $1.705B (Oct-25), $1.713B (Jan-26), $1.948B (Apr-26), $2.025B (Jul-26), with YoY revenue growth running +1.2% (Jul-25) → +2.8% → +4.4% → +12.5% → +29.9% (Jul-26). The company's own FY27 guide of $7.975-8.225B implies ~15-19% growth for the year versus ~5.4% in FY26. Margins confirm it is real: operating margin went 19.8% (Jul-25) → 23.4% → 25.2% → 27.3% → 26.7% (Jul-26), a ~690bp YoY improvement, with gross margin at 70.1% in the latest quarter and R&D up to $274M. Two caveats keep this from being a clean 'accelerating' label: (1) free cash flow is NOT participating - $1.65B TTM (401+900+271+78) versus $1.66B in the prior TTM, despite ~30% revenue growth, because capex jumped to $102M in the Jul-26 quarter from $53M a year earlier and working capital is absorbing the upside; (2) GAAP diluted EPS fell sequentially in Jul-26 to $1.88 from $2.03 in Apr-26 even as revenue hit a record, and the GAAP-to-non-GAAP gap is wide ($1.88 GAAP vs. $2.58 non-GAAP, largely SBC and amortization). Bottom line: a genuine inflection, but with three quarters of evidence, not three years - and the cash flow has yet to confirm it.

Valuation assessment

Rich, though not absurd. As of 2026-09-13, NTAP trades at 27.8x TTM EPS of $7.24 and 5.29x TTM sales, versus 5-year own-history averages of 16.3x and 2.79x - roughly a 70% P/E premium and a 90% P/S premium. On the FY27 guidance midpoint of $9.88, forward P/E is ~20.2x; on the analyst next-FY average of $9.95 it is 20.0x; TTM PEG is 1.14. EV/EBITDA sits at 19.0x and TTM FCF of ~$1.65B yields 4.2% against the $39.1B market cap. The re-rating is defensible if mid-teens growth and 26%+ operating margins persist - this is quantitatively a different business from the flat-revenue FY23-FY25 hardware story that earned 16x - but at 20x forward with flat free cash flow and a 1.23% dividend yield, there is no valuation cushion and the 5-year anchor says buyers are paying up front for growth with only three quarters of proof.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $199.28, NTAP trades above the $197 consensus target and the $194.60 recent average target, which is the tell: the sell-side's own models say the good news is already in the price. The market is discounting roughly $10 of FY27 EPS at ~20x plus another year of double-digit growth into FY28. That is a 'show me' setup - the +47% all-flash and +28% public-cloud growth from the July quarter must repeat in the December print for the multiple to hold. The asymmetry is two-sided but not symmetric: if FY27 lands at the high end ($10.03) and FY28 grows 12%+, a 22-23x multiple on ~$11 supports ~$240; if all-flash growth decelerates toward single digits and the multiple mean-reverts toward the 16-17x historical anchor on ~$10, you get $160-170. The stock is priced for the first outcome; the second is the risk you are currently paid nothing to take.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 61.6 - bullish momentum without being technically overbought. Price was 4.38% above the 20-day SMA (~$190.9 implied), 9.82% above the 50-day (~$181.5), and 50.64% above the 200-day (~$132.3). That is a powerful, established uptrend, but distance from the 200-day of this magnitude after a +101.99% six-month return means you are buying after the move, not before it. Note that the one-month return was actually -1.37% going into the print - the stock had been consolidating, and the ~8.5% earnings gap re-launched it. Entry-timing implication: chasing at $199.28 is poor risk/reward; a pullback into the $181-191 zone (50-day/20-day as of 2026-09-13) would be a materially better entry, and a decisive break below the 50-day would signal the earnings gap is failing.

Macro factors
  • Enterprise AI infrastructure buildout: demand for clean, scalable data pipelines feeding AI models is the direct driver behind +47% all-flash array and +28% public-cloud revenue growth in the July 2026 quarter.
  • Hybrid/multi-cloud architecture shift: NTAP is a native first-party storage service inside AWS (FSx for ONTAP), Azure, and Google Cloud, which lets it capture multi-cloud workloads without hardware lock-in - a structural, but also competition-attracting, position.
  • Component supply tightness and NAND/DRAM cost inflation, explicitly flagged by management - this is the main threat to gross margins that are currently holding near 70.6%.
  • Interest-rate stability re-engaging enterprise IT budgets, but with disciplined ROI scrutiny that favors vendors who can prove immediate efficiency savings - a fit for Keystone storage-as-a-service, less so for large upfront capex purchases.
  • Competitive pricing pressure in enterprise storage from Dell, Pure Storage, and HPE, plus the long-run threat of hyperscalers' own native storage services displacing third-party ONTAP deployments.
Key catalysts
  • Q2 FY27 earnings, tentatively scheduled for December 1, 2026 - the first real test of whether the raised FY27 guide ($7.975-8.225B revenue, $9.73-10.03 EPS) holds and whether all-flash growth stays in the 40%+ range.
  • Adoption metrics for the AWS Transform AI migration service integration with FSx for NetApp ONTAP - a direct read on whether the cloud business can sustain ~28% growth.
  • Enterprise traction from ONTAP capabilities validated for VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1, which supports on-premises/hybrid-cloud stickiness against Dell and Pure.
  • Further post-print analyst target revisions (Argus already moved to $225 from $200) and any upgrades that narrow the gap between the current 'Hold' consensus rating and the bullish price action.
  • Potential multiple re-rating if the market begins valuing NTAP as a hybrid cloud/software business rather than computer hardware - the single largest swing factor in the valuation.
Key risks
  • Valuation risk is the dominant one: 27.8x TTM P/E versus a 16.3x 5-year average and 5.29x sales versus a 2.79x average leaves zero cushion if growth decelerates, and the $197 consensus target already sits below the current $199.28 price.
  • The inflection is only three quarters old - the prior eight quarters were flat between $1.541B and $1.732B in revenue. Two strong quarters of AI-driven storage refresh demand is not yet a proven multi-year trend, and product refresh cycles in storage can reverse quickly.
  • Free cash flow is flat despite the revenue surge: $1.65B TTM versus $1.66B a year earlier, with capex tripling to $102M in the July 2026 quarter. Earnings are growing faster than cash, which is exactly what the deterministic score's accruals check is designed to catch (here it reads a healthy -1.17%, but the FCF trend is the thing to watch).
  • Balance sheet is thin: stockholders' equity of just $1.495B against $9.46B of total liabilities (D/E 1.695, LT debt $1.938B vs. $1.573B cash), a current ratio of 1.242 and quick ratio of 1.16 - largely a byproduct of aggressive buybacks rather than distress, but it removes flexibility if demand rolls over.
  • Wide GAAP-to-non-GAAP gap and a sequential EPS decline ($2.03 in Apr-26 to $1.88 in Jul-26) on record revenue - a reminder that headline beats are being measured on adjusted numbers, not reported ones.
  • Component supply tightness and NAND/DRAM pricing pressure that management has explicitly flagged, threatening the 70%+ gross margin that underpins the whole thesis.
Investment thesis

NetApp is a genuinely better business today than it was 18 months ago - revenue growth inflected from ~1% to ~30%, operating margin expanded ~690bp YoY, and AI-driven all-flash and public-cloud demand is real. But the stock has already been paid for that transformation: NTAP is up 102% in six months, trades at 20x forward earnings versus a 16.3x five-year average, sits above the consensus target, and free cash flow has not grown at all. I would not be a seller into strength given the momentum, but I would not be a buyer at $199.28 either - the risk/reward now depends on the December quarter repeating the July quarter, and the entry price is 50% above the 200-day moving average. Fairly valued with real upside optionality, and real downside if the AI storage cycle cools.

AI theoretical price methodology

I valued NTAP at 19x blended next-twelve-month EPS of ~$10.20 - built from the company's own FY27 guidance midpoint of $9.88 (75% weight) and an estimated FY28 of ~$11.00 assuming ~10-11% EPS growth (25% weight) - yielding ~$194; the 19x multiple sits above the 16.3x five-year average because revenue growth has inflected to mid-teens with 26.7% operating margins, but below the 27.8x TTM multiple because that growth has only three quarters of evidence. A cross-check DCF on TTM free cash flow of $1.65B growing 10% annually for five years with a 3.5% terminal rate and a 9.0% WACC brackets $186-207 per share (assuming ~196M shares and ~$0.4B net debt), so my single-point estimate is $195.00, roughly 2% below the 2026-09-13 price of $199.28 and consistent with a fairly-valued stock rather than a bargain.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lands within a few points of the given 56.2 (Fair Fundamentals). The score slightly understates the business: revenue growth inflected to +29.9% YoY with operating margin up ~690bp to 26.7%, ROIC is 19.4%, gross margin is 70.6%, and the accruals ratio of -1.17% confirms cash earnings are running ahead of reported net income, which is the healthy pattern. Two mechanical drags look overstated to me: financial health (42.4) is penalized by D/E of 1.695 that is an artifact of buybacks shrinking equity to $1.495B while net debt is only ~$0.4B (LT debt $1.938B vs. $1.573B cash), and the growth leg is dragged by a 25% YoY decline in operating cash flow ($673M to $503M) that reflects working-capital and capex timing ($102M capex in the July quarter versus $53M) during a 30% revenue surge, not deteriorating economics. Normalizing those two puts my fair score around 62-65 - the top of the Fair band, roughly +6 to +9 points, which confirms rather than overturns the given band. The counterweight that keeps me from pushing further is that the ratio screener - half the blend - is largely penalizing valuation (P/B 26.66, EV/EBITDA 19.0, P/C 11.1), and on that front I fully agree with the 'Rich vs. its own history' label: 27.8x TTM and 5.29x sales against 16.3x and 2.79x five-year averages is a real premium, and the 'Fair Fundamentals' band is a fair summary of a company with excellent momentum sitting on a stretched balance sheet and flat free cash flow.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.