#380S&P 500 rank

NTRS — Northern Trust Corporation

Q3 Beat, But Next-Year EPS Still Shrinks

Northern Trust beat Q3 2026 estimates on fee growth; next-FY EPS is expected to decline, leaving shares fairly valued.

2-yr score: 43.8/100 (Lower 20%)Financial Services
$166.91+0.89%
Description

Northern Trust Corporation, a financial holding company established in 1889 and based in Chicago, Illinois, offers a comprehensive suite of wealth management, asset servicing, asset management, and banking solutions worldwide. Its diverse client base includes corporations, institutions, families, and individual investors.

Score breakdownLatest quarter38.5 · Weak
Growth
0.0
Quality / Profitability
38.6
Financial health
29.2
Ratio screener
57.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 43.8 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 44.1 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Jan 28, 2027 (in 98 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
12.9
Yield
1.76%
RSI (14)
40.1
vs SMA20
-1.23%
vs SMA50
-6.35%
vs SMA200
+1.41%
Analyst target
$185
+10.5%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$173
+3.6%
as of 2026-10-21

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-10-21 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-10-21, Northern Trust trades at $167.09, or 12.9x TTM EPS and about 14.5x next-FY consensus EPS, after a Q3 2026 adjusted EPS beat and a dividend raise. The stock sits just below its 20-day average, 5.3% below its 50-day, and 2.6% above its 200-day as of that date.

AI sentimentNeutral

The market read is a cautious Hold: the 2026-10-21 Q3 print showed adjusted EPS of $3.40 versus ~$2.87 consensus, revenue up ~13% YoY, 8% trust/investment fee growth, and +600 bps operating leverage, but forward consensus EPS of $11.53 is below TTM EPS of $13.33 and analysts worry about sequential moderation and a mixed Q4 outlook. As of 2026-10-21, the stock was 5.6% lower over the prior month and 5.5% lower over three months, with the consensus rating Hold and a $184.71 average price target.

Quarterly trend

Underlying operating momentum is stable-to-improving, but the raw FMP quarterly series is noisy. Q3 2026 revenue was $2.294B versus $4.212B in Q2 2026, and the deterministic score itself flags a -46% sequential revenue move that looks like a presentation/divestiture distortion rather than organic collapse; the live brief says Q3 revenue actually rose ~13% YoY. Cleaner data: adjusted EPS of $3.40 beat consensus, trust/investment servicing fees rose 8% YoY to $1.37B, and operating leverage was positive by more than 600 bps. The multi-quarter EPS path from Q4 2023 ($0.52) through Q4 2025 ($2.42) to Q3 2026 ($3.51 GAAP, $3.40 adjusted) shows recovery from a weak 2023-24 base, but Q2 2026 ($4.23) looks inflated by one-offs and forward EPS is still expected to fall to $11.53 next FY. Net: not a structural acceleration; a quality franchise with noisy reported results and normalizing earnings.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-10-21, the stock at $167.09 trades at 12.9x TTM EPS, below its 5-year average P/E of 14.73x, but that TTM figure includes elevated/one-off earnings. On next-FY consensus EPS of $11.531, the forward P/E is ~14.5x, only slightly below the 5-year average, while P/S is 2.20x versus a 2.15x 5-year average—so valuation is fair to modestly cheap, not deeply discounted. The 0.258 PEG looks optically cheap but is not reliable here because next-FY EPS is expected to decline; P/B is 2.44x and the dividend yield is 1.76% on the stated payout (the newly raised $0.88 quarterly dividend would be roughly 2.1% at $167.09).

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $167.09 as of 2026-10-21, the stock is trading at ~14.5x next-FY EPS of $11.53, so it is not pricing in a collapse but also not offering a big cushion. The Q3 beat is real, but because next-FY EPS is below TTM EPS, the market is already looking past one-off gains and demanding evidence that fee growth and buybacks can offset NII normalization. If consensus EPS stabilizes or moves up after Q3, a 15-15.5x multiple supports the high-$170s; if rate cuts pressure NII and estimates drift toward $11 or below, 13-14x implies roughly $143-$154. The key tell is post-Q3 EPS revision direction, not the headline beat.

Technical picture

As of 2026-10-21, RSI(14) was 45.0—neutral, neither oversold nor overbought. The price at $167.09 was 0.13% below its 20-day SMA, 5.28% below its 50-day SMA, and 2.59% above its 200-day SMA; the one-week return was +3.83%, but the one-month and three-month returns were -5.64% and -5.48%. That is a short-term bounce inside a medium-term pullback, still range-bound: not an oversold entry signal, and a reclaim of the 50-day would improve the setup while a break below the 200-day would weaken it.

Macro factors
  • Interest-rate path and NII sensitivity: rate cuts and deposit betas affect cash-sweep yields and net interest income; Northern Trust has managed funding costs but remains exposed.
  • Capital-market levels: fee revenue is tied to AUC/A and AUM, so equity and fixed-income valuations directly influence trust, investment, and servicing fees.
  • Regulatory capital requirements: Basel-endgame iterations and compliance costs can constrain capital-return flexibility, though current capital generation is strong.
  • Wealth and asset-servicing consolidation: the UBS/former Credit Suisse fund administration transfer is both a growth opportunity and an integration/execution risk.
  • Global market/currency backdrop: a meaningful share of assets and clients are outside the U.S., so dollar moves and non-U.S. market performance can affect reported results.
Key catalysts
  • Integration and client onboarding from the UBS/former Credit Suisse fund administration businesses in Switzerland and Luxembourg.
  • Execution of the newly authorized share repurchase program and the recently raised $0.88 quarterly dividend.
  • Q4 2026 earnings on 2027-01-21 and any post-Q3 consensus EPS revisions.
  • Rate-cut trajectory and its effect on NII, deposit betas, and cash-sweep revenue.
  • Continued net client inflows and market-level gains supporting AUC/A and AUM.
Key risks
  • Forward EPS of $11.53 is below TTM EPS of $13.33; worse-than-expected earnings normalization would undercut the valuation case.
  • Rate cuts could compress NII and cash-sweep yields more than expected.
  • A market downturn would reduce AUC/A and AUM, pressuring fee revenue and operating leverage.
  • Regulatory capital changes or compliance costs could limit buybacks/dividends.
  • Integration risk and competition in wealth/asset servicing could slow the expected growth from recent mandates.
Investment thesis

Northern Trust is a high-quality custody and wealth franchise with strong Q3 2026 fee momentum, positive operating leverage, and a respectable 13.4% ROE, but at $167.09 as of 2026-10-21 it trades near its own forward-earnings average rather than at a clear discount. The deterministic score is too harsh because it penalizes bank-like cash-flow volatility and distorted reported revenue, yet the forward EPS decline and Hold consensus keep the risk/reward from being compelling. I would call it fairly valued with limited margin of safety, not a fresh buy.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 15.0x P/E to next-FY consensus EPS of $11.531, giving $172.97 (rounded to $173.00). The multiple is a modest premium to the 5-year average P/E of 14.73x to reflect Q3 2026 fee growth and +600 bps operating leverage, but it is held below the analyst target because forward EPS is expected to decline from TTM and rate-cut/NII risk remains.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 38.5 'Weak Fundamentals' score is directionally too harsh for a 13.4%-ROE custody bank with 18% operating margin and a Q3 2026 adjusted EPS beat. Two formula blind spots explain the gap: growth is scored at zero partly because the FMP revenue series shows a -46% Q2-to-Q3 move that the note itself flags as likely divestiture/presentation distortion, and financial health is 100% FCF-based for a bank whose operating cash flow swings with balance-sheet flows. My independent read would put the business closer to Fair Fundamentals (~50-55), one tier higher. I stop short of Disagree because next-FY EPS of $11.53 is below TTM, analyst consensus is Hold, and P/S is slightly above its 5-year average, so the weak-score band is not wholly wrong—just overstated.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.