NUE — Nucor Corporation
Nucor Corporation is a prominent producer and distributor of steel and diverse steel-related products. Within its Steel Mills division, the company manufactures a comprehensive range of steel goods.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Nucor trades at $259.43 (market cap ~$59.1B), roughly 7% below its early-August 52-week high of $280.11 after a +58.7% six-month run. Q2 2026 (reported July 27, 2026) was a clean beat — $5.04 diluted EPS, record steel mill shipments, revenue up 23% YoY to $10.40B — and the next print lands October 26, 2026.
The Street is constructive: consensus rating is Buy (19 buy / 10 hold / 3 sell) and Q2 price targets were lifted across the board (Wells Fargo $297, BMO $295, Barclays $295), with the consensus target at $267.50 and the recent-average at $280.50. The Q2 2026 print — $5.04 diluted / $4.84 adjusted vs. ~$4.46–4.53 consensus — validated the cyclical recovery thesis, and the stock sits above all three major moving averages. Sentiment is not euphoric, however: as of 2026-09-13 NUE was down 4.55% over one month and 2.6% over three months, a cool-off from the six-month +58.69% melt-up, and Canada's September 8, 2026 retaliatory tariffs of up to 50% on U.S. steel and aluminum reintroduced trade-war noise.
Revenue troughed at $7.08B in Q4 2024 and has stair-stepped up since: $7.83B (Q1'25), $8.46B (Q2'25), $8.52B (Q3'25), $7.69B (Q4'25 — a seasonal dip), $9.50B (Q1'26), $10.40B (Q2'26). That latest quarter is the highest revenue in the 12-quarter dataset and up 22.9% year-over-year. Earnings show the same inflection far more sharply: diluted EPS bottomed at $0.67 in Q1 2025 and has run $2.60 → $2.63 → $1.64 → $3.23 → $5.04, making the most recent quarter roughly 7.5x the trough. Margins confirm it — operating margin expanded from 4.1% in Q1'25 to 15.7% in Q2'26, and net margin from 2.0% to 11.1%. This is a genuine cyclical inflecting upward, not a structural decline. The one caution is that Q4'25's $1.64 EPS shows the recovery is not a straight line, and TTM EPS of $12.64 still understates run-rate earnings power (next-FY consensus is $18.86).
As of 2026-09-13, at $259.43 Nucor trades at 20.67x TTM EPS of $12.64 — roughly double its 5-year average P/E of 10.91x — and 1.64x TTM sales versus a 5-year average P/S of 1.01. That is exactly why the deterministic score flags 'Rich vs. its own history,' and the flag is legitimate. The mitigating math: on the $18.863 next-FY consensus EPS, the forward P/E is about 13.8x, a much more defensible number for a low-cost EAF producer with a 2.51 current ratio and 0.32 debt/equity; on the ratio_data, EV/EBITDA is 11.34x, which is full for steel. The PEG of 0.164 is an artifact of explosive EPS growth off a depressed base and should not be taken at face value. Bottom line: expensive on trailing numbers and vs. its own history, roughly fair on forward earnings — not a value entry.
The market has already paid up for the recovery. NUE is up 58.69% over six months while the TTM earnings base was still catching up, so today's price bakes in the move from $12.64 TTM EPS toward the $18.86 next-FY estimate. That makes the stock asymmetrically exposed to estimate revisions: hold FY2027 EPS near $18.86 and a 13–14x multiple gets you roughly $245–255 (little upside), while a cut to ~$15 on softer nonresidential demand or tariff friction at 12x implies roughly $180–200 (real downside). The bull case now requires sustained record shipments and margin durability, not just a trough bounce — which is precisely why the October 26, 2026 Q3 call and its forward guidance matter more than the backward-looking Q2 beat.
As of 2026-09-13, NUE's RSI(14) stood at 53.61 — dead neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. Price was 1.64% above the 20-day SMA (~$255) and 3.38% above the 50-day (~$251), but 24.62% above the 200-day (~$208), so the medium-term trend is clearly up while the stock digests a large move. The return profile says the same thing: +58.69% over six months but -4.55% over one month and -2.6% over three. Read: post-rally consolidation, not a breakdown and not a chase setup. Practical implication — waiting for a pullback toward the 50-day (~$251) or a decisive break above the August high of $280.11 offers better risk/reward than buying the middle of a flat range.
- Trade policy: Section 232 steel tariffs support domestic pricing, but Canada's September 8, 2026 retaliatory tariffs of up to 50% on U.S. steel and aluminum raise cross-border cost and logistics friction after U.S.–Canada talks collapsed.
- Interest rates: firm Treasury yields and elevated financing costs are a headwind to nonresidential construction and heavy industrial project starts, partially offset by public infrastructure spending.
- Scrap and energy input costs: Nucor's electric-arc-furnace model is scrap- and power-intensive, so scrap price swings and electricity costs flow straight into margins — a benefit when scrap is cheap, a squeeze when it is not.
- Demand mix rotation: data-center, infrastructure and manufacturing-reshoring construction are offsetting weakness in traditional office/commercial nonresidential, which is the swing factor for mill shipments.
- High beta and sector rotation: beta of 1.881 means NUE trades as a macro risk proxy — it outperforms hard in risk-on cyclical rotations and underperforms just as hard when growth fear returns.
- Q3 2026 earnings on October 26, 2026 — guidance on margin durability, steel mills backlog velocity, and buyback/dividend execution is the single biggest near-term swing factor.
- Ramp of the West Virginia sheet mill and other large capex projects (plus the August 13, 2026 $59M Vulcraft Indiana expansion) adding volume and higher-value product mix.
- Any resolution or further escalation in U.S.–Canada trade talks and additional tariff/safeguard actions, which can move domestic steel pricing quickly in either direction.
- Continued capital return — a ~1.0% dividend yield with a long-standing annual increase streak, plus buybacks against a ~$59B market cap.
- Cyclical pricing: further hot-rolled/plate/bar price increases would pull FY2027 consensus EPS ($18.86) higher; rollovers or declines would push it the other way.
- Cyclical reversal: steel pricing is volatile, and Q4'25's $1.64 EPS versus Q2'26's $5.04 shows the recovery is not linear — a stall in shipments or pricing would hit the already-rich multiple hard.
- Trade-war escalation: Canada's September 8, 2026 retaliatory tariffs and the collapse of U.S.–Canada talks could spread, raising regional supply-chain costs and dampening cross-border demand.
- Valuation compression: 20.67x TTM P/E and 1.64x sales sit far above 5-year averages of 10.91x and 1.01x; the stock is priced for the recovery, so estimate cuts would be doubly painful.
- Demand risk in nonresidential construction from persistently high rates — a slowdown in data-center or infrastructure spending would undercut the record shipment run.
- Input-cost and macro volatility: scrap, energy and labor cost swings, plus beta of 1.881, which amplifies any broad-market drawdown.
Nucor is a high-quality cyclical in the early-to-middle innings of a real recovery — best-in-class EAF cost position, a fortress balance sheet (0.32 debt/equity, 2.51 current ratio, ~$3.9B net debt), two consecutive quarters of record steel mill shipments, and a $40B+ forward revenue base. The problem is price, not the business: at $259.43 the stock trades at 20.7x trailing earnings and 11.3x EV/EBITDA after a 58.7% six-month run, versus a 5-year average P/E of 10.9x. My blended fair value (~$243) sits modestly below today's quote, so this is an accumulate-on-weakness name rather than a fresh-money buy at the current level — analysis, not personalized advice.
A 50/50 blend of two forward methods as of 2026-09-13: (1) 13.5x FY2027E consensus EPS of $18.863 = $255 — a justified premium to the 10.91x 5-year average, which was set on supercycle-peak 2021–23 earnings, framing a mid-cycle multiple for a low-cost, low-leverage, diversified EAF producer; and (2) 8.5x FY2027E EBITDA of ~$6.7B (16.5% margin on $40.37B consensus revenue) = EV ~$56.6B, less ~$3.9B net debt, divided by ~228M shares = ~$232. The blend gives ~$243, about 6% below the $259.43 quote and below the $267.50 analyst consensus — consistent with a good business that is fully, arguably richly, priced.
The 64.3 'Good Fundamentals' score holds up on my independent read. Its weakest leg — quality/profitability at 52.6, dragged by a 6.7% trailing ROIC and 11.5% operating margin — is exactly the backward-looking bias the methodology warns about: those are mid-recovery numbers, not normalized ones, and Q2'26 alone ran a 15.7% operating margin with a healthy -0.66% accruals ratio (cash generation running ahead of reported income, which is the conservative pattern). On the other side, the formula excludes valuation entirely, and the 'Rich vs. its own history' overlay (20.7x P/E vs. 10.91x 5-year average; 1.64x sales vs. 1.01x) is a genuine offset the number doesn't price. Those two errors roughly cancel, so I'd land the score in the high-60s (~68) — the band and figure are fair as stated, and no specific dated event (the Canada tariffs are a policy trend, not an acquisition/restatement/fraud) justifies overriding the band/valuation-context mapping. Worth noting the classic cyclical trap cuts the other way here: this is not a formula punishing a name at the trough — Q1'25's $0.67 EPS was the trough and the market has already re-rated the stock +58.7% in six months — so there's no depressed-score entry opportunity to argue for.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.