#92S&P 500 rank

NVR — NVR, Inc.

2-yr score: 60.2/100 (Next 20%)Consumer CyclicalToday
$5,900.00−1.30%
Description

NVR, Inc. functions as a prominent home construction company within the United States, organized into two primary divisions: homebuilding and mortgage banking. Within its homebuilding segment, the company develops and sells various residential units, including detached houses, townhouses, and condominium complexes, marketed under the brand names Ryan Homes, NVHomes, and Heartland Homes.

Score breakdownLatest quarter50.1 · Fair
Growth
26.4
Quality / Profitability
27.6
Financial health
76.8
Ratio screener
65.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 60.2 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 62.9 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 22, 2026 (today)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:26 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
14.5
Yield
18.24%
RSI (14)
44.5
vs SMA20
-1.67%
vs SMA50
-4.41%
vs SMA200
-10.52%
Analyst target
$6757
+14.5%
4 analysts
AI theoretical price
$6355
+7.7%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, NVR trades at $6,160.76 (market cap ~$16.6B, ~2.70M shares) after four straight quarters of YoY revenue declines and roughly 570bp of operating-margin compression from 2024 levels. Trailing P/E is ~15.2x on the data provider's TTM EPS of $416.69, but ~17.1x on the next-FY consensus EPS of $361.10 — the forward multiple is higher than the trailing one, meaning the market is already paying for a recovery that has not yet appeared in reported results.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is soft but not capitulatory. The Q2 2026 print (released 2026-07-23) showed revenue of $2.33B, down ~10.5% YoY, net income of $236.5M (down ~29%), and homebuilding gross margin of 19.2% versus 21.5% a year earlier, plus $21.7M of contract land deposit impairments — a clear miss on the revenue line. Price action confirms the malaise: as of 2026-09-13 the stock sits 2.24% below its 20-day SMA, 3.22% below its 50-day, and 9.23% below its 200-day, with returns of -2.19% (1wk), -2.12% (1mo), -3.36% (3mo) and -4.73% (6mo). RSI(14) at 43.45 is neutral-to-weak rather than oversold. The 25-analyst rating distribution is genuinely mixed (11 buy, 10 hold, 4 sell), and the consensus price targets (~$7,149 consensus, ~$7,423 recent average, only 2 contributing analysts) look stale relative to the falling EPS estimates. The offset keeping sentiment from turning outright bearish: new orders rose 9% YoY to 5,885 units, backlog rose 9% to 10,998 units ($4.99B), and the cancellation rate held stable at 15%.

Quarterly trend

This is deceleration and margin compression, not a one-quarter blip. Revenue peaked at $2,851M in Q4 2024 and has since gone $2,505M (Q3'25), $2,713M (Q4'25), $1,881M (Q1'26, -20.0% YoY) and $2,326M (Q2'26, -10.6% YoY). Operating margin has stepped down in three distinct phases: ~18.9-19.7% through 2023 and 2024 (Q4'23 18.91%, Q1'24 19.18%, Q2'24 18.92%), ~16.0-16.9% through 2025 (Q1'25 16.02%, Q2'25 16.43%, Q3'25 16.88%, Q4'25 16.49%), then 12.04% in Q1 2026 and 13.25% in Q2 2026. Consolidated gross margin fell from 25.58% in Q2 2024 to 20.85% in Q2 2026 — roughly 470bp. EPS tells the same story: quarterly peak of $139.93 (Q4 2024) has fallen to $108.37 (Q2'25), $112.13 (Q3'25), $121.54 (Q4'25), $67.76 (Q1'26) and $83.62 (Q2'26). Against that, the leading indicators are stabilizating rather than deteriorating: new orders +9% YoY, backlog +9% to 10,998 units worth $4.99B, cancellations flat at 15%. Cash generation is lumpy and seasonal — TTM operating cash flow of ~$1,067M (Q3'25 $438.7M, Q4'25 $439.7M, Q1'26 $339.7M, Q2'26 -$151.5M) versus TTM net income of ~$1,141M. The honest read: a cyclical-volume and margin trough with early demand-side stabilization, but no evidence yet of a margin inflection.

Valuation assessment

Fair-to-slightly-expensive on trough earnings, cheap only if you underwrite the recovery. As of 2026-09-13, the stock trades at 15.16x the data provider's TTM EPS of $416.69 (summing the four most recently reported quarters gives $385.05, i.e. ~16.0x), versus a 5-year average P/E of 14.21x — so it is roughly 7% above its own trailing-average earnings multiple while earnings are actively falling. The more telling number: on the next-FY consensus EPS of $361.10, the forward P/E is ~17.1x, higher than trailing, because estimates assume the trough deepens further. PEG (-0.78) is meaningless here since growth is negative. P/S of 1.76x sits below the 5-year average of 2.13x, and EV/EBITDA of ~11.6x (my calc: EV ~$16.3B on ~$1.4-1.5B TTM EBITDA) is a modest premium to typical homebuilder range. P/B of 4.98x looks extreme but is an artifact of buybacks shrinking equity to $3.39B while ROIC stays at 25.8% — book value is not the right lens for this name. Verdict: you are not being paid a valuation cushion for the uncertainty; you are paying a full multiple on depressed and still-declining earnings.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock at ~17x forward is pricing the trough as temporary, not pricing a recession. That is the crux: if Q2 2026's 19.2% homebuilding gross margin marks the bottom and the +9% order growth / +9% backlog converts into 2027 revenue at recovered margins, today's multiple looks entirely reasonable and normalized EPS of $400+ supports a mid-$6,000s price. If instead the margin compression is structural — lot cost inflation from third-party developers plus permanent affordability-driven incentives — then 17x on a $361 EPS stream that is still sliding is too rich, and a de-rating to 15x on that estimate implies ~$5,400 (close to the 52-week low of $5,501.01). The four sell ratings against eleven buys among 25 analysts capture exactly this binary. Practical read: the market is neither underpricing a turnaround nor fully pricing in a prolonged downturn — it is waiting for the Q3 2026 print (est. late October 2026) to show whether Q2 gross margin was the floor. Until that confirmation, the stock is a 'show me' story with roughly symmetric skew.

Technical picture

Bearish-to-neutral trend, no timing edge either way. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 43.45 — neither oversold nor overbought, so no mean-reversion signal. Price was below all three key moving averages: -2.24% vs the 20-day SMA, -3.22% vs the 50-day, and -9.23% vs the 200-day — a persistent downtrend, with the wide 200-day gap indicating months of distribution rather than a recent pullback. Returns of -2.19% (1wk), -2.12% (1mo), -3.36% (3mo) and -4.73% (6mo) describe a slow grind lower, not a crash. The stock sits ~12% above its 52-week low of $5,501.01 and ~27% below its 52-week high of $8,489.85 — mid-range in a downtrend, which is the worst place to add: no capitulation discount and no momentum. Best entry setups would be either a retest of the 52-week low (where the dividend-adjusted value case strengthens) or a reclaim of the 50-day SMA on a margin-stabilization earnings print.

Macro factors
  • Mortgage-rate path and Fed policy: persistently elevated rates are the single biggest swing factor for both buyer traffic and the incentive/price-concession burden; NVR's Q2 2026 gross margin compression is largely a rate-affordability symptom.
  • Housing affordability and pricing concessions: builders are funding rate buydowns and price cuts to move inventory, which is exactly what pushed NVR's homebuilding gross margin to 19.2% in Q2 2026 from 21.5% a year prior.
  • Land and developed-lot cost inflation: NVR's asset-light model buys finished lots from third-party developers, so rising lot costs feed straight into cost of sales with no raw-land hedge.
  • Normalizing resale/existing-home supply: as the mortgage 'lock-in effect' fades and resale inventory returns, builders lose scarcity pricing power — a structural headwind to both volume mix and margin.
  • Sector positioning: homebuilders trade as a leveraged rate/sentiment beta, so multiple expansion or contraction can dominate a single quarter's fundamental result.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings release, estimated late October 2026 (Oct 27-28) — the key question is whether homebuilding gross margin bottoms near Q2's 19.2%, plus cancellation trends heading into the winter season and backlog conversion pace.
  • Mortgage-rate trajectory — a sustained move lower would improve affordability and reduce the incentive spend currently compressing margins; a move higher would delay any earnings trough.
  • Continued share repurchases — with only ~2.70M shares outstanding, buybacks at $6,161 mechanically raise EPS per share and are a genuine per-share compounding engine (~4-5% share count reduction per year historically).
  • Conversion of the +9% order growth and $4.99B backlog into revenue and margin — this is the evidence the market needs that Q2 2026 was the trough.
  • Further land deposit impairments — Q2 2026 already carried $21.7M; a larger number would signal stress in the third-party developer lot market NVR depends on.
Key risks
  • Margin compression proving structural rather than cyclical: operating margin has fallen from 18.92% (Q2 2024) to 13.25% (Q2 2026), and lot costs plus affordability incentives do not resolve quickly.
  • Earnings still falling — four consecutive quarters of YoY declines, and the next-FY consensus EPS of $361.10 sits below TTM EPS, meaning the trough may not yet be in.
  • Balance-sheet cushion is thinning: cash fell from $2.61B (12/31/24) to $1.20B (6/30/26) and stockholders' equity from $4.21B to $3.39B, largely through buybacks that exceeded earnings — less dry powder if the downturn extends.
  • Earnings-quality watch: Q2 2026 showed $236.5M net income against -$151.5M operating cash flow, an accruals ratio of 7.09%, and it has worsened each year (Q2 2024: 2.63% → Q2 2025: 5.03% → Q2 2026: 7.09%). Mostly seasonal, but worth monitoring.
  • Valuation risk: ~17x forward earnings for a declining EPS stream offers no cushion if the 2027 recovery does not materialize; a de-rating to 15x on $361 EPS implies roughly $5,400.
  • Affordability shock: another leg up in mortgage rates would hit volumes and price simultaneously, and NVR's pre-sold model protects against spec inventory but not against demand disappearance.
Investment thesis

NVR is a genuinely high-quality business — 25.8% ROIC, 34.7% ROE, $1.2B of cash against $908M of long-term debt, an asset-light lot-option model that avoids raw-land risk, and an aggressive buyback shrinking a ~2.70M share count ~4-5% a year. But as of 2026-09-13 you are paying ~17x forward earnings for a company whose EPS is still falling, with the market already having priced in the recovery. The demand-side inflection is real (orders +9%, backlog +9% to $4.99B, cancellations stable at 15%) and is the reason not to be bearish, but it has not touched the income statement yet — operating margin went from 18.92% in Q2 2024 to 13.25% in Q2 2026 with no turn visible. This is a wait-for-confirmation name, not a buy at $6,161 mid-downtrend: own it on a margin-stabilization print or a pullback toward the $5,501 52-week low, where normalized earnings power of $400+ per share starts to look genuinely cheap. Not a sell, not a buy — a fair-priced quality cyclical in a trough.

AI theoretical price methodology

Normalized mid-cycle EPS of ~$410 — set between FY2025 actual EPS of $436.87 and the next-FY consensus of $361.10, reflecting a trough where orders and backlog are up 9% but margins have not recovered — multiplied by 15.5x P/E, a modest premium to NVR's own 5-year average of 14.21x justified by 25.8% ROIC, the asset-light lot-option model, and roughly 4-5% annual share-count reduction, but below peak-cycle multiples given residential-construction cyclicality. Cross-checks bracket the result: 10.5x EV/EBITDA on normalized EBITDA of ~$1.5B implies roughly $5,950/share and 15x on $410 implies ~$6,150, so $6,355 sits at the upper end of a $5,950-$6,400 range — consistent with a stock that is roughly fairly valued with a slight edge, well below the stale sell-side consensus of ~$7,149.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 50.1 'Fair Fundamentals' landing spot is defensible, but I'd nudge the composite modestly higher — into the high-50s, top of the Fair band — for two reasons the deterministic formula structurally cannot see. First, the quality/profitability pillar (27.6) is 65% weighted to a single-quarter accruals ratio of 7.09% as of 2026-06-30, a seasonally distorted figure for a builder that always drains cash in Q2 (Q2 2025: 5.03%, Q2 2024: 2.63%); on a trailing-four-quarter basis, net income of ~$1,141M versus operating cash flow of ~$1,067M implies an accruals ratio of roughly 1.4%, which alone would lift the quality leg by ~20+ points and the composite by ~4-5 points. Second, the score is entirely backward-looking, and NVR is a cyclical sitting at or near an earnings trough with leading indicators already improving — Q2 2026 new orders +9% YoY to 5,885 units, backlog +9% to 10,998 units worth $4.99B, cancellations stable at 15%. I would not push it to 'Good' or 'Strong': the margin damage is multi-quarter and real (op margin 18.92% → 13.25%), the next-FY EPS estimate of $361.10 is below TTM EPS, and ~17x forward is no valuation cushion. There is no single dated material event (acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy) in the brief that would justify deviating from the mandated band mapping, so the Neutral lean stands exactly as the table dictates.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.