NWSA — News Corporation
News Corporation, an influential media and information services entity, is dedicated to producing and disseminating premium, engaging content along with a diverse array of products and services for both individual consumers and corporate clients worldwide. Its operations are strategically segmented into six distinct divisions: Digital Real Estate Services, Subscription Video Services, Dow Jones, Book Publishing, News Media, and an "Other" category.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, NWSA trades at $29.44 ($16.5B market cap), about 7% below its 52-week high of $31.66 and roughly 24% above where it sat six months ago, on 31.8x trailing EPS of $1.03 and ~22.3x consensus FY2027 EPS of $1.321. The August 5, 2026 fiscal Q4 print showed revenue up 11% YoY to $2.34B and adjusted EPS doubling to $0.35, with a $1B Class B buyback running and most analyst targets clustered in the $35-38.50 range.
Sell-side and market tone are clearly positive. Ratings break down 22 Buy / 5 Hold / 1 Sell, and post-earnings (Aug 5, 2026) JPMorgan raised its target to $38.00 and Morgan Stanley reiterated Buy with $35.00. The fundamental trigger was real: fiscal Q4 revenue of $2.337B beat by roughly $90M, adjusted EPS of $0.35 beat by $0.12, Dow Jones revenue rose 7% with Risk & Compliance up 11%, REA Group revenue rose 21%, Move/Realtor.com rose 13% and Book Publishing rose 15%. The stock's price action confirms it — as of 2026-09-13 it was up 14.6% over three months and 24.2% over six months, with the last week a modest -3.1% cooling off. The only note of caution inside the sentiment data: the broader price-target consensus in the feed is $32.20 (one low target at $29.40) while the 'recent average' of $35.00 rests on a sample of one analyst, so the aggressive targets carry less statistical weight than the headlines suggest.
Revenue growth is genuinely inflecting upward, not decelerating. Year-over-year growth ran +2.3% in fiscal Q1 2026 ($2.144B, Sep-25), +5.5% in Q2 ($2.362B), +8.8% in Q3 ($2.185B) and +10.8% in Q4 ($2.337B, Jun-26) — a clean four-quarter acceleration off an FY25 base whose quarterly revenue ranged only $2.009B-$2.238B. Cash generation stepped up hard: fiscal 2026 free cash flow was $1.074B versus $727M in FY25 and $708M in FY24, a 48% YoY increase, with operating cash flow of $1.500B against TTM net income of just $573M (accruals ratio -3.26%, meaning cash is running well ahead of reported profit — a healthy, conservative pattern). Margins are the weak spot: TTM operating margin is 11.4% versus 11.3% a year ago, i.e. flat. Quarterly operating margins swing violently on seasonality (Q2 December is the peak at 17.1% in FY26; Q4 June is the trough at 7.8%), and Q4 FY26's 7.8% was actually below Q4 FY25's 9.6%, so there is no margin-expansion story yet. Reported net income is also noisy in a way that flatters comparisons: the $743M net income / $1.30 EPS in Q4 FY25 was driven by the Foxtel disposal gain, not operations. Net read: low-double-digit top-line growth, flat margins, sharply improving cash conversion — an operating inflection, not a financial-engineering one. Free cash flow is also heavily back-half weighted (fiscal Q1 2026 was -$1M; fiscal Q4 2026 was $539M), so any single quarter taken in isolation can look misleading.
Fair value, with a mild upward bias — not cheap, not stretched. As of 2026-09-13 the stock's 2.0x TTM price/sales is above its own 5-year average of 1.54x, while its 31.8x TTM P/E is below its 5-year average of 37.2x (that average was inflated by depressed earnings years, so the comparison is weak evidence either way). The number that matters is forward: $29.44 is 22.3x consensus FY27 EPS of $1.321, against a PEG of 1.24 and an EV/EBITDA of 11.3x. A high-teens/low-20s forward multiple with flat margins, a net-cash balance sheet and an asset mix skewed toward digital real estate and Dow Jones is reasonable — roughly in line with quality diversified media. What caps the multiple is the returns profile: ROIC of 5.7% and ROE of 6.7% are not premium-quality numbers, and the equity base carries heavy goodwill from the REA/Dow Jones/HarperCollins history. The deterministic score labels valuation 'Neutral vs. its own history,' which matches my read.
The market is paying for the turnaround but not yet for a re-rate. At 22.3x FY27E EPS, the price assumes the $1.03 → $1.321 EPS step-up actually lands, so the Aug 5 beat is largely in the tape — a repeat beat alone probably doesn't move the stock much. What is arguably not priced: (1) the $1B Class B buyback shrinking the share count, already visible in stockholders' equity falling from $8.79B in Dec-25 to $8.53B in Jun-26; and (2) sum-of-parts recognition, where the ~61% REA Group stake plus Dow Jones are plausibly worth more in aggregate than the entire $16.5B market cap, effectively leaving HarperCollins, Move and News Media in for very little. The downside case lives on the other side of the same coin: if FY27 EPS drifts toward $1.10-$1.15, the stock is sitting on ~26x forward earnings with cyclical housing exposure underneath — that is where a de-rating would come from.
As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 47.1 — dead neutral, neither oversold nor overbought. Price was 2.4% below its 20-day SMA (roughly $30.15), 2.2% above its 50-day (roughly $28.80) and 12.0% above its 200-day (roughly $26.30), inside a 52-week range of $22.20-$31.66. That profile describes a medium-term uptrend that has stalled for a week (-3.1% over five sessions) after a strong run (+14.6% over three months, +24.2% over six months) — consolidation, not breakdown. Entry-timing implication: there is no urgency signal in either direction. There is no oversold bounce setup to buy, and no overbought condition warning you off. The better risk/reward is a pullback into the 50-day near $28.80, or a confirmed break above the $31.66 high rather than chasing mid-range.
- Residential housing turnover and mortgage rates in the US and Australia — Move/Realtor.com (+13% revenue) and REA Group (+21%) are the profit engines and are directly geared to transaction volumes; rate cuts are a tailwind, higher-for-longer is a headwind.
- AUD/USD currency translation — a large share of REA Group's earnings are Australian-dollar denominated, so a weaker AUD compresses reported USD revenue and EPS without any operating change.
- AI content-licensing economics — deals with OpenAI and Meta are genuine incremental high-margin revenue, but AI-generated answers also risk disintermediating search traffic to Dow Jones and the news mastheads.
- Platform regulation and bargaining codes — Australia's News Media Bargaining Code and potential US/EU platform-payment regimes can add or remove licensing revenue that carries near-100% incremental margin.
- Digital advertising and consumer spending cycles — News Media advertising and HarperCollins book retail remain tied to the ad market and discretionary consumer demand, which keeps a slice of the portfolio economically cyclical.
- Fiscal Q1 2027 results, expected early-to-mid November 2026 — the first clean read on digital subscriber net adds, Dow Jones Risk & Compliance growth (+11% in Q4 FY26) and REA/Move listing volumes.
- Continued execution of the US$1B Class B share repurchase program, which mechanically lifts EPS and has already pulled stockholders' equity from $8.79B (Dec-25) to $8.53B (Jun-26).
- Additional AI/data-licensing agreements with generative-AI developers — each is high-margin incremental revenue and a sentiment catalyst.
- US and Australian interest-rate cuts feeding into real estate listing volumes at Move and REA Group, the two highest-growth segments.
- Further portfolio simplification or asset monetization following the Foxtel exit, which could crystallize the sum-of-parts discount between the REA/Dow Jones stakes and the $16.5B market cap.
- Cyclical housing exposure is the single biggest swing factor — REA Group and Move are the growth engines, and both would decelerate quickly if transaction volumes stall, hitting revenue and the multiple at the same time.
- Weak returns on capital — ROIC 5.7% and ROE 6.7% on a goodwill-heavy equity base; repurchasing stock at ~32x trailing earnings is not obviously value-accretive.
- Earnings and cash-flow quality is lumpy — fiscal Q1 2026 free cash flow was -$1M versus $539M in fiscal Q4 2026, and prior-year GAAP net income was inflated by the $743M Foxtel disposal gain, making headline YoY comparisons misleading.
- The 31.8x trailing P/E leaves little cushion if FY27 EPS lands below the $1.321 consensus, particularly given the low single-digit low-end target of $29.40 in the analyst data.
- AI disintermediation of news search traffic and any reversal or non-renewal of content-licensing terms would hit the Dow Jones/News Media economics.
- Coverage depth is thin in the recent-target sample (the $35.00 'recent average' rests on one analyst), so the bullish target cluster should be treated as directional, not precise.
This is a good-but-not-great business at a fair-to-slightly-attractive price, and the direction of travel is improving. Revenue growth accelerated every quarter of fiscal 2026 (+2.3% → +10.8% YoY), free cash flow jumped 48% to $1.074B, the balance sheet is effectively net cash ($2.095B of cash against $1.989B of long-term debt), and the $1B buyback is shrinking the share count — all while the stock sits about 7% off its 52-week high on a 22.3x forward multiple. The offsets are real: operating margin is flat at ~11.4%, ROIC is only 5.7%, and the two growth engines are cyclically exposed to housing turnover. I would rather accumulate on a pullback toward the 50-day (~$28.80) than chase at $29.44, but this is a constructive setup, not a value trap.
Method: forward P/E on consensus FY2027 EPS, cross-checked against EV/EBITDA. I applied 25.7x to the $1.321 FY27 EPS estimate — deliberately between the current 22.3x forward multiple and the company's 5-year average trailing P/E of 37.2x, justified by accelerating revenue, a net-cash balance sheet and an asset mix skewed toward higher-multiple digital real estate and Dow Jones, but held below the historical average because 5.7% ROIC and flat ~11% operating margins do not support a premium multiple. That yields $33.95, rounded to $34.00. Cross-check: 12.0-12.5x FY27E EBITDA of roughly $1.62-1.65B gives an enterprise value near $19.5-20.6B; subtracting ~$0.8B of net debt (total debt ~$2.9B less $2.1B cash) and dividing by ~561M shares lands in the $33-35 range, confirming the figure.
The 61.5 / 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair read, and my independent adjustments are small enough (under ~5 points) that the band would not change. The formula correctly credits the accelerating YoY revenue growth that drives the 67 growth score, and the 83.9 financial health score is well earned — roughly net-cash ($2.095B cash vs $1.989B long-term debt), a 1.62 current ratio and a 0.342 debt/equity. The -3.26% accruals ratio as of 2026-06-30 is a genuine green flag: TTM operating cash flow of $1.500B is nearly 3x TTM net income of $573M, so reported profit is not running ahead of cash. Where I would push back is on quality (52.8): the 5.7% ROIC dragging it down is distorted by a goodwill-heavy equity base built from the REA/Dow Jones/HarperCollins deals, and the blended metric masks that the two highest-return assets (REA Group, Move) grew revenue 21% and 13% in the June quarter. I would also note the formula has no lens on the sum-of-parts angle — the ~61% REA stake plus Dow Jones are arguably worth more than the entire $16.5B market cap. Net, I would put the score nearer 64-66 than 61.5, which keeps it firmly in the same band. Importantly, this is NOT the cyclical-trough exception: with REA up 21% and Move up 13% in the latest quarter, the cyclical assets look near a cyclical high, not a trough, which if anything argues the trailing fundamental inputs are flattered rather than depressed — so I deliberately did not award the score an 'about to inflect' upgrade. No dated, material event in the brief (the Aug 5 earnings beat and the $1B buyback are ordinary-course items, not an acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy or fraud disclosure) justifies deviating from the mechanical band/valuation mapping.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.