#184S&P 500 rank

NWSA — News Corporation

2-yr score: 54.1/100 (Middle 40%)Communication Services14d
$30.43−0.72%
Description

News Corporation, an influential media and information services entity, is dedicated to producing and disseminating premium, engaging content along with a diverse array of products and services for both individual consumers and corporate clients worldwide. Its operations are strategically segmented into six distinct divisions: Digital Real Estate Services, Subscription Video Services, Dow Jones, Book Publishing, News Media, and an "Other" category.

Score breakdownLatest quarter61.5 · Good
Growth
67.0
Quality / Profitability
52.8
Financial health
83.9
Ratio screener
59.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 54.1 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 52.8 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 5, 2026 (in 14 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
32.3
Yield
0.68%
RSI (14)
61.7
vs SMA20
+4.09%
vs SMA50
+2.55%
vs SMA200
+13.64%
Analyst target
$35
+15.0%
2 analysts
AI theoretical price
$34
+11.7%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, NWSA trades at $29.44 ($16.5B market cap), about 7% below its 52-week high of $31.66 and roughly 24% above where it sat six months ago, on 31.8x trailing EPS of $1.03 and ~22.3x consensus FY2027 EPS of $1.321. The August 5, 2026 fiscal Q4 print showed revenue up 11% YoY to $2.34B and adjusted EPS doubling to $0.35, with a $1B Class B buyback running and most analyst targets clustered in the $35-38.50 range.

AI sentimentBullish

Sell-side and market tone are clearly positive. Ratings break down 22 Buy / 5 Hold / 1 Sell, and post-earnings (Aug 5, 2026) JPMorgan raised its target to $38.00 and Morgan Stanley reiterated Buy with $35.00. The fundamental trigger was real: fiscal Q4 revenue of $2.337B beat by roughly $90M, adjusted EPS of $0.35 beat by $0.12, Dow Jones revenue rose 7% with Risk & Compliance up 11%, REA Group revenue rose 21%, Move/Realtor.com rose 13% and Book Publishing rose 15%. The stock's price action confirms it — as of 2026-09-13 it was up 14.6% over three months and 24.2% over six months, with the last week a modest -3.1% cooling off. The only note of caution inside the sentiment data: the broader price-target consensus in the feed is $32.20 (one low target at $29.40) while the 'recent average' of $35.00 rests on a sample of one analyst, so the aggressive targets carry less statistical weight than the headlines suggest.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth is genuinely inflecting upward, not decelerating. Year-over-year growth ran +2.3% in fiscal Q1 2026 ($2.144B, Sep-25), +5.5% in Q2 ($2.362B), +8.8% in Q3 ($2.185B) and +10.8% in Q4 ($2.337B, Jun-26) — a clean four-quarter acceleration off an FY25 base whose quarterly revenue ranged only $2.009B-$2.238B. Cash generation stepped up hard: fiscal 2026 free cash flow was $1.074B versus $727M in FY25 and $708M in FY24, a 48% YoY increase, with operating cash flow of $1.500B against TTM net income of just $573M (accruals ratio -3.26%, meaning cash is running well ahead of reported profit — a healthy, conservative pattern). Margins are the weak spot: TTM operating margin is 11.4% versus 11.3% a year ago, i.e. flat. Quarterly operating margins swing violently on seasonality (Q2 December is the peak at 17.1% in FY26; Q4 June is the trough at 7.8%), and Q4 FY26's 7.8% was actually below Q4 FY25's 9.6%, so there is no margin-expansion story yet. Reported net income is also noisy in a way that flatters comparisons: the $743M net income / $1.30 EPS in Q4 FY25 was driven by the Foxtel disposal gain, not operations. Net read: low-double-digit top-line growth, flat margins, sharply improving cash conversion — an operating inflection, not a financial-engineering one. Free cash flow is also heavily back-half weighted (fiscal Q1 2026 was -$1M; fiscal Q4 2026 was $539M), so any single quarter taken in isolation can look misleading.

Valuation assessment

Fair value, with a mild upward bias — not cheap, not stretched. As of 2026-09-13 the stock's 2.0x TTM price/sales is above its own 5-year average of 1.54x, while its 31.8x TTM P/E is below its 5-year average of 37.2x (that average was inflated by depressed earnings years, so the comparison is weak evidence either way). The number that matters is forward: $29.44 is 22.3x consensus FY27 EPS of $1.321, against a PEG of 1.24 and an EV/EBITDA of 11.3x. A high-teens/low-20s forward multiple with flat margins, a net-cash balance sheet and an asset mix skewed toward digital real estate and Dow Jones is reasonable — roughly in line with quality diversified media. What caps the multiple is the returns profile: ROIC of 5.7% and ROE of 6.7% are not premium-quality numbers, and the equity base carries heavy goodwill from the REA/Dow Jones/HarperCollins history. The deterministic score labels valuation 'Neutral vs. its own history,' which matches my read.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying for the turnaround but not yet for a re-rate. At 22.3x FY27E EPS, the price assumes the $1.03 → $1.321 EPS step-up actually lands, so the Aug 5 beat is largely in the tape — a repeat beat alone probably doesn't move the stock much. What is arguably not priced: (1) the $1B Class B buyback shrinking the share count, already visible in stockholders' equity falling from $8.79B in Dec-25 to $8.53B in Jun-26; and (2) sum-of-parts recognition, where the ~61% REA Group stake plus Dow Jones are plausibly worth more in aggregate than the entire $16.5B market cap, effectively leaving HarperCollins, Move and News Media in for very little. The downside case lives on the other side of the same coin: if FY27 EPS drifts toward $1.10-$1.15, the stock is sitting on ~26x forward earnings with cyclical housing exposure underneath — that is where a de-rating would come from.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 47.1 — dead neutral, neither oversold nor overbought. Price was 2.4% below its 20-day SMA (roughly $30.15), 2.2% above its 50-day (roughly $28.80) and 12.0% above its 200-day (roughly $26.30), inside a 52-week range of $22.20-$31.66. That profile describes a medium-term uptrend that has stalled for a week (-3.1% over five sessions) after a strong run (+14.6% over three months, +24.2% over six months) — consolidation, not breakdown. Entry-timing implication: there is no urgency signal in either direction. There is no oversold bounce setup to buy, and no overbought condition warning you off. The better risk/reward is a pullback into the 50-day near $28.80, or a confirmed break above the $31.66 high rather than chasing mid-range.

Macro factors
  • Residential housing turnover and mortgage rates in the US and Australia — Move/Realtor.com (+13% revenue) and REA Group (+21%) are the profit engines and are directly geared to transaction volumes; rate cuts are a tailwind, higher-for-longer is a headwind.
  • AUD/USD currency translation — a large share of REA Group's earnings are Australian-dollar denominated, so a weaker AUD compresses reported USD revenue and EPS without any operating change.
  • AI content-licensing economics — deals with OpenAI and Meta are genuine incremental high-margin revenue, but AI-generated answers also risk disintermediating search traffic to Dow Jones and the news mastheads.
  • Platform regulation and bargaining codes — Australia's News Media Bargaining Code and potential US/EU platform-payment regimes can add or remove licensing revenue that carries near-100% incremental margin.
  • Digital advertising and consumer spending cycles — News Media advertising and HarperCollins book retail remain tied to the ad market and discretionary consumer demand, which keeps a slice of the portfolio economically cyclical.
Key catalysts
  • Fiscal Q1 2027 results, expected early-to-mid November 2026 — the first clean read on digital subscriber net adds, Dow Jones Risk & Compliance growth (+11% in Q4 FY26) and REA/Move listing volumes.
  • Continued execution of the US$1B Class B share repurchase program, which mechanically lifts EPS and has already pulled stockholders' equity from $8.79B (Dec-25) to $8.53B (Jun-26).
  • Additional AI/data-licensing agreements with generative-AI developers — each is high-margin incremental revenue and a sentiment catalyst.
  • US and Australian interest-rate cuts feeding into real estate listing volumes at Move and REA Group, the two highest-growth segments.
  • Further portfolio simplification or asset monetization following the Foxtel exit, which could crystallize the sum-of-parts discount between the REA/Dow Jones stakes and the $16.5B market cap.
Key risks
  • Cyclical housing exposure is the single biggest swing factor — REA Group and Move are the growth engines, and both would decelerate quickly if transaction volumes stall, hitting revenue and the multiple at the same time.
  • Weak returns on capital — ROIC 5.7% and ROE 6.7% on a goodwill-heavy equity base; repurchasing stock at ~32x trailing earnings is not obviously value-accretive.
  • Earnings and cash-flow quality is lumpy — fiscal Q1 2026 free cash flow was -$1M versus $539M in fiscal Q4 2026, and prior-year GAAP net income was inflated by the $743M Foxtel disposal gain, making headline YoY comparisons misleading.
  • The 31.8x trailing P/E leaves little cushion if FY27 EPS lands below the $1.321 consensus, particularly given the low single-digit low-end target of $29.40 in the analyst data.
  • AI disintermediation of news search traffic and any reversal or non-renewal of content-licensing terms would hit the Dow Jones/News Media economics.
  • Coverage depth is thin in the recent-target sample (the $35.00 'recent average' rests on one analyst), so the bullish target cluster should be treated as directional, not precise.
Investment thesis

This is a good-but-not-great business at a fair-to-slightly-attractive price, and the direction of travel is improving. Revenue growth accelerated every quarter of fiscal 2026 (+2.3% → +10.8% YoY), free cash flow jumped 48% to $1.074B, the balance sheet is effectively net cash ($2.095B of cash against $1.989B of long-term debt), and the $1B buyback is shrinking the share count — all while the stock sits about 7% off its 52-week high on a 22.3x forward multiple. The offsets are real: operating margin is flat at ~11.4%, ROIC is only 5.7%, and the two growth engines are cyclically exposed to housing turnover. I would rather accumulate on a pullback toward the 50-day (~$28.80) than chase at $29.44, but this is a constructive setup, not a value trap.

AI theoretical price methodology

Method: forward P/E on consensus FY2027 EPS, cross-checked against EV/EBITDA. I applied 25.7x to the $1.321 FY27 EPS estimate — deliberately between the current 22.3x forward multiple and the company's 5-year average trailing P/E of 37.2x, justified by accelerating revenue, a net-cash balance sheet and an asset mix skewed toward higher-multiple digital real estate and Dow Jones, but held below the historical average because 5.7% ROIC and flat ~11% operating margins do not support a premium multiple. That yields $33.95, rounded to $34.00. Cross-check: 12.0-12.5x FY27E EBITDA of roughly $1.62-1.65B gives an enterprise value near $19.5-20.6B; subtracting ~$0.8B of net debt (total debt ~$2.9B less $2.1B cash) and dividing by ~561M shares lands in the $33-35 range, confirming the figure.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: High
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 61.5 / 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair read, and my independent adjustments are small enough (under ~5 points) that the band would not change. The formula correctly credits the accelerating YoY revenue growth that drives the 67 growth score, and the 83.9 financial health score is well earned — roughly net-cash ($2.095B cash vs $1.989B long-term debt), a 1.62 current ratio and a 0.342 debt/equity. The -3.26% accruals ratio as of 2026-06-30 is a genuine green flag: TTM operating cash flow of $1.500B is nearly 3x TTM net income of $573M, so reported profit is not running ahead of cash. Where I would push back is on quality (52.8): the 5.7% ROIC dragging it down is distorted by a goodwill-heavy equity base built from the REA/Dow Jones/HarperCollins deals, and the blended metric masks that the two highest-return assets (REA Group, Move) grew revenue 21% and 13% in the June quarter. I would also note the formula has no lens on the sum-of-parts angle — the ~61% REA stake plus Dow Jones are arguably worth more than the entire $16.5B market cap. Net, I would put the score nearer 64-66 than 61.5, which keeps it firmly in the same band. Importantly, this is NOT the cyclical-trough exception: with REA up 21% and Move up 13% in the latest quarter, the cyclical assets look near a cyclical high, not a trough, which if anything argues the trailing fundamental inputs are flattered rather than depressed — so I deliberately did not award the score an 'about to inflect' upgrade. No dated, material event in the brief (the Aug 5 earnings beat and the $1B buyback are ordinary-course items, not an acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy or fraud disclosure) justifies deviating from the mechanical band/valuation mapping.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.