#60S&P 500 rank

PANW — Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

2-yr score: 64.5/100 (Next 20%)Technology
$347.25+2.05%
Description

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is a global leader in providing advanced cybersecurity solutions. The company's core product line includes both hardware and software-based firewalls.

Score breakdownLatest quarter64.2 · Good
Growth
83.7
Quality / Profitability
45.7
Financial health
77.5
Ratio screener
60.9
Track record: 2-yr avg 64.5 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 63.4 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 18, 2026 (in 27 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
754.9
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
40.2
vs SMA20
-9.97%
vs SMA50
-6.48%
vs SMA200
+31.97%
Analyst target
$409
+17.8%
34 analysts
AI theoretical price
$235
-32.3%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, PANW traded at $330.65 with a $269.5B market cap, an RSI(14) of 43.0, sitting 6.4% below its 20-day and 5.4% below its 50-day SMA but still 40.2% above its 200-day SMA, after a +97.97% six-month run gave back 14.56% in the past month. The company just posted a strong Q4 FY26 (revenue $3.41B, +34% YoY; adjusted EPS $1.02) alongside a GAAP net loss of $282M from CyberArk-related amortization.

AI sentimentNeutral

The mood as of 2026-09-13 is split rather than directional. Fundamentals look good: Q4 FY26 (reported 2026-09-01) beat on revenue ($3.41B, +34% YoY), adjusted EPS ($1.02 vs. $0.98 consensus), and NGS ARR (+63% to $9.10B), and sell-side remains constructive with a Buy consensus, 65 Buy / 22 Hold / 2 Sell, and a $393.81 average price target. But the tape disagrees — shares fell roughly 7% on the print despite the beat, are down 14.56% over the past month to $330.65, and the quarter carried a GAAP loss of $282M (-$0.35/share) plus a ~$1.37/share non-GAAP-to-GAAP gap. Add the 2026-09-09 disclosure of CVSS 9.2 CVE-2026-0310 in PAN-OS (no known exploits, proactively found), and you have bulls on the business and skeptics on the 79x forward multiple. Net: no clear crowd.

Quarterly trend

Two different stories depending on which line you read. Revenue climbed steadily from $1.878B (Oct-23) to $3.410B (Jul-26), but YoY growth was remarkably stable at ~14-16% for six straight quarters (Oct-25 +15.7%, Jan-26 +14.9%) before inflecting hard to +31.2% (Apr-26) and +34.5% (Jul-26). That inflection is largely inorganic: stockholders' equity jumped from $9.39B (2026-01-31) to $27.67B (2026-04-30) and total assets from $24.98B to $46.27B as the ~$25B CyberArk deal consolidated, so organic growth is still roughly 15%. Margins moved the other way — operating income fell from $497M in Q4 FY25 (19.6% margin) to -$183M in Q3 FY26 and $169M in Q4 FY26 (5.0% margin), and GAAP diluted EPS flipped from +$0.36 to -$0.35. That is deal amortization and integration cost, not operational decay; Q4 adjusted EPS was $1.02. Cash flow confirms the underlying business is healthy: Q4 FY26 FCF was $1.273B vs. $861M a year earlier (+48%), and TTM FCF is $4.218B vs. $3.396B (+24%). One data anomaly to ignore: the Jan-2024 quarter's $1.747B net income on just $53.6M of operating income was a one-time non-operating/tax item, not an earnings base. Structural trend: real, mid-teens organic growth plus accelerating cash generation, overlaid with a step-change in scale and a temporary GAAP earnings distortion from M&A.

Valuation assessment

Expensive, and the deterministic overlay agrees — the ratio screener's valuation label is 'Rich vs. its own history' with a 0.0 reference score. As of 2026-09-13 at $330.65, PANW traded at 718.8x TTM GAAP EPS of $0.41 (effectively meaningless given deal amortization), 9.0x book, 23.5x TTM sales versus a 5-year average of 13.4x, ~19x FY27 consensus revenue of $14.16B, and ~78.9x the FY27 consensus non-GAAP EPS of $4.19. The screener's EV/EBITDA of 471x and price-to-cash of 82x say the same thing. Even granting that GAAP badly understates economics, ~19x forward sales and ~79x forward earnings for a business compounding revenue ~15% organically (with ~37% FCF margins) is a full price. Sell-side targets ($393.81 consensus, $475 high) imply ~94x FY27 EPS — that requires multiple expansion, not earnings delivery, to work. PEG of -9.8 is not informative (negative GAAP base), so use forward sales and FCF yield instead: 1.9% forward FCF yield. Verdict: expensive.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying today for CyberArk-driven scale that has not yet been booked as profit. The key tell is the ~$1.37/share quarterly gap between adjusted EPS ($1.02) and GAAP (-$0.35). If integration works, amortization rolls off, GAAP converges toward non-GAAP, and today's absurd 718x TTM P/E self-corrects without the stock falling — that is the bull path. If organic growth lands below ~15-20%, the multiple has nothing to lean on and the correction gets deeper. Practical rule for the next few quarters: judge PANW on organic NGS ARR growth (strip CyberArk from the $9.10B, +63% headline), FCF per share, and the GAAP-to-non-GAAP gap — not the headline EPS line, which is currently uninformative in both directions. The stock is priced for the M&A payoff, not for the M&A risk.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 43.01 — neutral, not oversold. The $330.65 price sat 6.4% below its 20-day SMA and 5.41% below its 50-day SMA (roughly $353 and $350, respectively), but 40.15% above its 200-day SMA (roughly $236). Returns: +97.97% over six months, +18.25% over three months, -14.56% over one month, -0.78% over one week. Translation: a parabolic advance is now in a sharp short-term correction inside an intact long-term uptrend — momentum has broken, the trend has not. There is no washout signal (RSI 43 is nowhere near 30), so this is not a gift entry on technicals alone. The mean-reversion reference is the 200-day near $236, which lands almost exactly on my intrinsic estimate — a helpful convergence rather than a coincidence. Practically: no reason to chase into strength above $350, and no confirmed capitulation to buy yet.

Macro factors
  • Vendor consolidation: CIO cost rationalization is pushing enterprises to cut point solutions in favor of integrated platforms (network + cloud + identity), which structurally favors PANW but compresses the pricing of acquired/standalone tools.
  • AI/LLM security urgency: frontier AI compresses attack timelines and forces automation, a genuine multi-year tailwind for security spend — though enterprise deployment timelines remain methodical, not instantaneous, so the revenue shows up slower than the narrative.
  • Duration/rate sensitivity: at ~79x forward earnings and ~19x forward sales, PANW is a long-duration asset; any back-up in long rates or rotation out of high-multiple software compresses the multiple far faster than it compresses earnings.
  • Regulatory and disclosure environment: the 2026-09-09 PAN-OS CVE-2026-0310 (CVSS 9.2) disclosure highlights rising scrutiny of security-vendor product integrity and disclosure timing, a reputational and potentially legal exposure unique to this sector.
  • Large-cap software M&A cycle: PANW's ~$25B CyberArk deal makes it an active consolidator, which buys scale but loads integration, retention, and financing risk into a period of already-elevated valuation.
Key catalysts
  • Q1 FY27 earnings on 2026-11-18 — the first clean read on organic growth ex-CyberArk, integration synergies, and FY27 guidance pacing.
  • NGS ARR trajectory and platformization attach rates — if organic ARR growth holds above ~20%, the bull case survives; below ~15% and the multiple is exposed.
  • CyberArk integration milestones and the pace at which deal amortization unwinds, which determines when GAAP earnings become a usable valuation input again.
  • Resolution and any exploitation of CVE-2026-0310 in PAN-OS — a non-event if patched cleanly, a serious trust problem if exploits emerge in a security vendor's own firewall software.
  • Any new capital allocation moves — further M&A, a buyback expansion, or debt paydown (long-term debt rose from $0 to $1.774B between Jan-26 and Jul-26).
Key risks
  • Valuation risk is the dominant one: ~79x forward EPS, ~19x forward sales, ~64x TTM free cash flow (1.9% forward FCF yield) leaves essentially no margin for error on either growth or execution.
  • CyberArk integration risk: a ~$25B deal, a GAAP swing to losses, and a current ratio of 0.871 (below 1.0) with long-term debt newly at $1.774B — execution slippage here hits both earnings and credibility.
  • Organic growth may be only ~15%, with the headline 34% flattered by acquisition consolidation; if organic decelerates, the stock re-rates toward its own 5-year average P/S of 13.4x rather than staying at 23.5x.
  • Product security incidents: a CVSS 9.2 vulnerability in PAN-OS, even proactively disclosed with no known exploits, is a direct reputational threat to a company whose product is trust.
  • Competitive pressure from CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Zscaler, and Fortinet, plus platformization discounting, which can cap pricing power and keep GAAP margins thin.
Investment thesis

Good business, full price. PANW has real cash economics — TTM FCF of $4.218B, +24% YoY, ~37% FCF margins, a fundamentally healthy accruals ratio of -3.38% (cash running ahead of reported earnings, meaning the $282M GAAP loss is non-cash amortization rather than an earnings-quality red flag) — plus a durable AI-security and vendor-consolidation tailwind. But as of 2026-09-13 at $330.65 you are paying ~79x forward EPS and ~19x forward sales for ~15% organic growth, and my own intrinsic work lands near $235. I would own this business on weakness, not at this price; the next real information event is 2026-11-18, and the honest answer today is wait, don't chase.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended forward-multiple valuation as of 2026-09-13: 50% weight on 55x FY27 consensus non-GAAP EPS of $4.19 (= $230/share), 30% weight on 14.0x FY27 consensus revenue of $14.16B (= $243/share, anchored just above the company's own 5-year average P/S of 13.4x versus the current 23.5x), and 20% weight on 33x estimated FY27 free cash flow of ~$5.2B (= $211/share), averaging ~$230 and rounded to $235 for AI-security and platformization optionality. Cross-checks: a 10-year DCF using $4.22B TTM FCF growing from 22% and fading to 8%, a 9% discount rate and 3% terminal growth returns ~$218/share, and the 200-day SMA sits near $236.

AI lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 64.2 'Good Fundamentals' band is directionally right but built on two distortions the formula cannot see, and they cut in opposite directions. The growth pillar (83.7, at 45% weight) is materially inflated: organic YoY revenue growth was ~15.7% in Oct-25 and ~14.9% in Jan-26, then jumped to +31.2% and +34.5% in the two quarters after the ~$25B CyberArk deal closed (stockholders' equity +195% from $9.39B to $27.67B between 2026-01-31 and 2026-04-30) — so the formula is largely scoring an acquisition, not organic momentum. Conversely, the quality/profitability pillar (45.7) is understated: TTM operating margin of 6.1% and ROIC of 1.0% are casualties of deal amortization and integration (Q4 GAAP EPS -$0.35 vs. adjusted $1.02), and the accruals ratio of -3.38% is genuinely clean, confirming cash generation is running ahead of reported income rather than behind it. Netting those out, I would personally land roughly 8-12 points below 64.2 — still 'Good,' drifting toward 'Fair,' which keeps the band intact. So Partially Agree rather than Agree. Separately, note that the mandatory band/valuation mapping (Good Fundamentals + 'Rich vs. its own history') mechanically produces the Cautiously Bullish lean above; that is a lookup-table output, not an endorsement of the price, and my own fair-value work is considerably more skeptical than the label implies.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.