#127S&P 500 rank

PAYX — Paychex, Inc.

2-yr score: 57.3/100 (Next 20%)Industrials
$112.50−0.11%
Description

Founded in 1971 and headquartered in Rochester, New York, Paychex, Inc. delivers comprehensive human capital management (HCM) solutions. The company primarily serves small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) across the United States, Europe, and India, addressing their needs in human resources, payroll administration, employee benefits, and insurance.

Score breakdownLatest quarter53.9 · Fair
Growth
27.3
Quality / Profitability
62.2
Financial health
71.0
Ratio screener
60.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 57.3 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 60.5 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Dec 18, 2026 (in 57 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
22.3
Yield
3.82%
RSI (14)
59.5
vs SMA20
+7.75%
vs SMA50
-1.32%
vs SMA200
+8.82%
Analyst target
$112
-0.3%
5 analysts
AI theoretical price
$122
+8.4%
as of 2026-09-23

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-23 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-23, PAYX closed at $114.53 (market cap ~$40.7B) after a 7.99% one-month pullback, leaving RSI(14) at 38.63, price 4.78% below its 20-day SMA and 3.68% below its 50-day but still 9.78% above its 200-day; the dividend yield stood at 3.82%. Same-day Q1 FY27 results showed revenue +5.9% YoY to $1.63B, operating margin of 38.0% (up from 35.2%) and adjusted EPS of ~$1.34 versus ~$1.32-1.33 consensus.

AI sentimentNeutral

The market's mood is best described as bored-to-cautious. As of 2026-09-23, PAYX had beaten on adjusted EPS and matched on revenue the same morning, yet the shares were still down 7.99% over the prior month and 3.19% over the prior week, with the 5-analyst sell-side consensus stuck at Hold (0 strong buy / 5 buy / 20 hold / 5 sell) and FMP's consensus price target of $110.40 actually sitting BELOW the $114.53 spot price. The explanation is the growth optic: headline revenue growth decelerated from roughly +19.9% in the Feb-2026 quarter to +5.9% in the Aug-2026 quarter as the Paycor acquisition annualized, and float income faces an arithmetic headwind if short rates fall. Meanwhile the AI story (WISE, WISE Hire, 50,000+ clients using WISE) is real but unmonetized in the numbers. Note the research brief cites an average target near $126.76 versus FMP's $110.40 - that internal conflict is itself a signal that sell-side conviction here is low and stale.

Quarterly trend

Strip out the acquisition noise and the read is 'steady top line, inflecting profitability.' Reported revenue went $1.32B (Q1 FY26, Aug-2025) to $1.63B (Q1 FY27, Aug-2026, +5.9% YoY), but the path matters: YoY growth ran +4.7% and +4.8% in Q2/Q3 FY25 before the 2025 Paycor deal (visible in the long-term debt step-up from $799M at Feb-2025 to $4.56B at May-2025), then printed +10.2%, +16.8%, +18.3%, +19.9% and +12.5% as acquired revenue rolled into the base. The collapse back to +5.9% is a lap, not a breakdown - underlying organic growth is a stable mid-single-digit 5-6%. The real inflection is margins: operating margin bottomed at 30.2% in Q4 FY25 (May-2025, deal-cost quarter) and 35.2% in Q1 FY26, then printed 36.7%, 43.8%, 37.7% and 38.0%, meaning the last two quarters (+7.5pt and +2.8pt YoY) are the first clean year-over-year margin expansion since the acquisition. For perspective, FY26 revenue grew 16.9% ($5.57B to $6.51B) but operating income grew only 13.7% and net income just 6.2% ($1,657M to $1,760M) - the bought revenue landed at lower margin with ~$4.5B of debt attached. TTM operating margin is now 39.2% (vs. 38.6% in FY26 and 39.6% pre-deal in FY25) and TTM GAAP EPS is $5.08 vs. $4.88 for FY26. One genuine blemish: Q1 FY27 operating cash flow fell 42% YoY to $413.5M from $718.4M, dragging quarterly FCF to $357.4M from $662.5M - most likely client-funds/tax-calendar working capital, but it needs to normalize in the Dec-2026 quarter or it becomes a real question.

Valuation assessment

Fair-to-modestly-cheap, with strings attached. As of 2026-09-23, PAYX traded at 22.68x TTM EPS ($5.08) and 19.2x the $5.96 next-FY consensus EPS, versus a 5-year average trailing P/E of 27.44x - roughly a 17% discount to its own history - and 6.17x sales versus a 5-year average of 8.26x. PEG on trailing numbers is 1.78, which is not a bargain screen. EV/EBITDA is ~13.6x against a business with 74.4% gross margin, 39.2% TTM operating margin, 27.4% net margin, 20.4% ROIC and 47.1% ROE. The 3.82% dividend yield is high relative to PAYX's own recent history and consumes ~73% of FY27E EPS (~86% of depressed TTM GAAP EPS), so the yield is support, not a growth engine. The honest caveat: at only ~5-6% organic revenue growth, 27x was never the right multiple, so 'cheap vs. its own history' partly reflects a legitimate de-rating to a ~19-21x forward band rather than pure mispricing. And the FMP consensus target of $110.40 implies the Street thinks you are paying a small premium to fair value right now.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying ~19x forward for ~6% revenue growth and low-teens EPS growth - i.e., it is pricing PAYX as a rate-sensitive, bond-proxy-like compounder, not as a re-accelerating HCM platform. The Q1 FY27 print fit that framing exactly: a ~$0.01-0.02 adjusted EPS beat with revenue merely matching means estimates did not reset higher, which is why an in-line-to-slightly-better quarter produced no pop. That creates an asymmetric setup: the multiple only re-rates toward 21-23x if the double-digit PEO & Insurance growth and the margin expansion of the last two quarters persist and WISE adoption converts into disclosed revenue, while the downside case (organic growth stuck at 5-6% plus float-income compression) simply keeps the stock in an 18-21x band where the 3.82% dividend does most of the work. Put differently, you are not paying for a turnaround that hasn't shown up - you are paying a fair price for a known quantity, with multiple expansion as the optionality rather than the base case.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-23, the technical picture is 'uptrend in a sharp short-term pullback.' RSI(14) was 38.63 - weak, but not the <30 washout that typically marks a durable entry. Price at $114.53 sat 4.78% below its 20-day SMA (~$120.28) and 3.68% below its 50-day SMA (~$118.91), both of which now act as overhead resistance, while remaining 9.78% above the 200-day SMA (~$104.33). The return profile confirms the same story: -3.19% over one week and -7.99% over one month, against +16.88% over three months and +26.4% over six. The 52-week range of $85.45-$130.32 puts the stock almost exactly mid-range. Timing implication: this is not a knife-catch, but it is also not a compelling entry - RSI in the high 30s with price below both short moving averages argues for patience. A reclaim of the $119-120 area would confirm the pullback is over; a retest of the 200-day near $104 would be the higher-conviction accumulation zone, and would still leave the long-term trend intact.

Macro factors
  • Interest-rate cycle and client-funds float income: Paychex earns interest on billions of dollars of client payroll funds held before disbursement, so short-rate cuts compress a meaningful slice of revenue and margin, while a higher-for-longer path is a tailwind. This is the single biggest swing factor in forward EPS estimates.
  • SMB labor-market health: the core customer is the small-to-medium business, and the Paychex Small Business Employment Watch through Aug/Sep 2026 showed steady employment. Any SMB credit tightening or hiring freeze would hit client retention, worksite-employee counts, and PEO revenue, which is the most cyclically exposed segment.
  • Wage inflation moderation: Paychex revenue is partly tied to the dollar value of payrolls processed, so slower wage growth mechanically trims revenue growth even with stable client counts - it also reduces client cost pressure, which supports retention.
  • Regulatory and compliance complexity: proliferating state labor laws, tax rules and benefits mandates are a genuine structural tailwind, since SMBs increasingly cannot self-serve compliance and outsource to platforms like Paychex.
  • Sector rotation and software multiple compression: PAYX trades as a hybrid defensive-dividend and HCM-technology name, so it is exposed to the broader de-rating of HCM/software peers (ADP, Paycom, Paylocity) and to flows rotating out of low-growth defensive names. Longer term, AI-native entrants (Rippling, Gusto) threaten incumbent pricing power - WISE is Paychex's answer.
Key catalysts
  • Q2 FY27 earnings, expected late December 2026: first quarter with the Paycor-lapping optics fully behind it, and the first real test of whether the +38% operating margin and shrinking float headwind can hold. Also the first check on whether Q1's 42% YoY operating-cash-flow decline reverses.
  • WISE / WISE Hire adoption and, critically, any disclosed monetization metric - over 50,000 client businesses are using WISE; converting that from a cost-saver into a priced product is the most plausible path to multiple expansion.
  • Continued double-digit growth in the PEO and Insurance Solutions segments, which is the highest-value organic growth engine and the main offset to mid-single-digit core payroll growth.
  • Any acceleration or delay in central-bank rate cuts, which would drive immediate revisions to float-income assumptions and forward EPS.
  • Capital return: the annual dividend increase (typically announced with fiscal Q4 results in May) and any buyback expansion - a 3.82% yield with ~73% payout of FY27E EPS leaves room for a mid-single-digit raise but not a dramatic one.
  • Realization of remaining Paycor cost synergies, which would show up as further year-over-year operating margin expansion beyond the +2.8pt in Q1 FY27.
Key risks
  • Float-income compression: if short rates fall faster than forward curves imply, interest on client funds - a high-margin revenue line with essentially no incremental cost - shrinks directly out of operating income, and consensus FY27 EPS of $5.96 would need trimming.
  • Organic growth ceiling: with core payroll growing only ~5-6% and competition intense, PAYX may simply deserve a ~19-20x forward multiple rather than its historical 27x. In that world, the stock delivers the dividend plus modest EPS growth and nothing more.
  • SMB recession or credit tightening would hit client retention and PEO worksite-employee counts simultaneously - PEO revenue is billed per worksite employee, making it the most cyclically levered part of the model.
  • Competitive and AI disruption: ADP, Paycom, Paylocity, Rippling and Gusto all compete for the same SMB wallet, and agentic AI could erode the compliance-complexity moat that justifies outsourcing fees in the first place.
  • Earnings quality watch item: Q1 FY27 operating cash flow fell 42% YoY to $413.5M while net income rose 12%, pushing quarterly FCF down to $357.4M from $662.5M. It almost certainly reflects client-funds/tax-calendar working capital, but a repeat in Q2 FY27 would undercut the 'clean, cash-backed earnings' thesis.
  • Balance-sheet data integrity: the Aug-2026 balance sheet shows long-term debt collapsing from $4.556B to $63M with no offsetting asset or liability decline - almost certainly a classification artifact, not real repayment. Gross debt of ~$4.5B existed three months earlier, so any analysis treating PAYX as debt-free (including a 0.017 debt-to-equity ratio) is misleading; net debt/EBITDA was roughly 1.2x as of May-2026 and easily covered by ~$2.0B TTM FCF, but the true leverage is not zero.
  • Valuation ceiling versus sell-side: FMP's consensus target of $110.40 sits below the $114.53 price as of 2026-09-23, so there is no obvious estimate-revision or target-raising tailwind to lift the shares in the near term.
Investment thesis

Paychex is a genuinely high-quality, cash-generative HCM franchise at a fair-to-slightly-cheap price - not a bargain, and not a broken story. The fundamentals are stable rather than deteriorating: mid-single-digit organic revenue growth, a real margin inflection (37.7% and 38.0% operating margin in the last two quarters vs. 30.2% and 35.2% a year earlier as Paycor deal costs lapped), 20.4% ROIC, a 0.1% accruals ratio that confirms earnings are cash-backed, and a 3.82% dividend. But the upside is capped: organic growth is structurally 5-6%, float income faces a rate-cut headwind, the AI story isn't monetized yet, and the stock at 19.2x forward EPS and RSI 38.6 in a short-term pullback gives you no urgency to buy. My read is a neutral, own-it-for-the-yield-and-quality name rather than a table-pounder at $114.53 as of 2026-09-23; I'd want either a reclaim of the $119-120 area or a dip toward the 200-day near $104 to get constructive.

AI theoretical price methodology

I blended three methods, all as of 2026-09-23: (1) a forward P/E of 20.5x applied to next-FY consensus EPS of $5.96, giving ~$122 - justified as a discount to PAYX's 5-year average trailing P/E of 27.44x (which predates the growth reset) but a premium to the Street's implied ~18.5x, appropriate for a 74.4%-gross-margin, 20.4%-ROIC business with a 3.82% yield; (2) a required 4.6% FCF yield on $2.017B of TTM free cash flow, giving ~$123 per share (355.7M shares); and (3) a 10-year DCF at an 8.5% discount rate with 7% near-term and 2.5% terminal FCF growth, giving a conservative ~$114. The ~$122 result sits ~6.5% above the $114.53 spot price, above FMP's $110.40 consensus target, and below the $126.76 average cited in the research brief.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 53.9 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band is a broadly fair read, though I'd land nearer 57-60 - same band, slightly better number - because two of its inputs distort in opposite directions. The growth score of 27.3 is unfairly depressed by arithmetic that cannot distinguish organic deceleration from acquisition lapping: reported revenue growth fell from +19.9% (Q3 FY26) to +5.9% (Q1 FY27) purely because the Paycor revenue is now in the base, while the other 30% of that leg correctly flags a genuine 42% YoY drop in quarterly operating cash flow to $413.5M. On the other side, the financial-health score of 71.0 rests on a 0.017 debt-to-equity ratio derived from an August-2026 balance sheet showing long-term debt of $63M versus $4.556B three months earlier with no offsetting asset or liability decline - an almost certain classification artifact. Real leverage (~$3.4B net debt in May-2026, ~1.2x EBITDA, covered ~7x by TTM FCF of ~$2.0B) is worse than the score implies, but still comfortably investment grade. Those two distortions roughly cancel, so I would not move the score by the 10+ points required to say 'Partially Agree.' This is not a cyclical-trough situation where the backward-looking formula would misfire - Paychex is not a depressed-margin commodity name about to inflect; it is a mature compounder with a temporarily noisy growth optic.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.