#119S&P 500 rank

PKG — Packaging Corporation of America

2-yr score: 58.0/100 (Next 20%)Consumer Cyclical
$239.12+0.08%
Description

Packaging Corporation of America (PCA) is a U.S.-based enterprise specializing in the production and sale of containerboard and corrugated packaging materials. Its operations are organized into two primary divisions: Packaging and Paper.

Score breakdownLatest quarter58.7 · Fair
Growth
64.1
Quality / Profitability
49.6
Financial health
81.7
Ratio screener
56.5
Track record: 2-yr avg 58.0 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 54.3 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
30.9
Yield
2.28%
RSI (14)
59.0
vs SMA20
+2.85%
vs SMA50
+0.64%
vs SMA200
+4.82%
Analyst target
$285
+19.2%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$216
-9.7%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, PKG traded at $234.40 ($20.9B market cap), about 10% below its 52-week high of $259.98, with RSI at 43.4, the shares down 8.55% over the prior month but still up 4.68% versus the 200-day SMA. Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-22) delivered +14.7% YoY revenue growth to $2.49B and $2.35 in adjusted EPS, a modest beat, while reported EPS of $2.15 fell short of the year-ago $2.67 on special items.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment has cooled even though the operating news was good: Q2 2026 posted record corrugated shipments and a $0.04 adjusted EPS beat, and management guided Q3 2026 to $2.91 (vs. $2.51 reported a year ago). But the stock is -8.55% over the past month and -1.2% over the past week as of 2026-09-13, BofA cut its price target to $260 from $280 on 2026-09-11, insiders (President Thomas Hassfurther, VP Donald Shirley) sold stock in early August 2026, and the trailing P/E of 30.3x sits far above both the 19.0x five-year average and the 15x-22x packaging peer range. The tape and the narrative are pulling in opposite directions, which is what a genuinely Neutral reading looks like.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is clearly ACCELERATING: YoY growth ran +6.0% in Q3 2025, +10.1% in Q4 2025, +10.6% in Q1 2026 and +14.7% in Q2 2026 ($2.49B vs. $2.17B), helped by the Greif containerboard acquisition and record corrugated volumes. Earnings and margins are the opposite story. Operating income was essentially flat YoY in Q2 2026 ($333.2M vs. $333.7M) despite that 14.7% revenue jump, so operating margin fell to 13.38% from 15.37%. That is not a one-quarter blip: Q1 2026 was 11.51% vs. 13.09% a year earlier, and Q3 2025 was 14.03% vs. 14.99%. The pattern says the incremental revenue is coming at structurally lower margin — mix from acquired containerboard, plus freight inflation ($0.26/share hit in Q2 2026) and mill utility interruptions. Reported EPS is distorted downward by one-offs: Q4 2025 printed $1.13 versus $2.51 in Q3 2025 even though operating income was $282M, pointing to below-the-line charges (Wallula mill closure/restructuring), and Q2 2026 carried integration and closure costs that took reported $2.15 down from $2.35 adjusted. Net: a revenue inflection with a margin problem, not a demand problem.

Valuation assessment

Expensive versus its own history on almost every line, as of 2026-09-13. TTM P/E was 30.3x against a 5-year average of 19.0x; P/S was 2.19x against a 1.87x 5-year average; P/B 4.45x; EV/EBITDA 13.4x, which is above the ~9-11x range typical for containerboard peers. The one piece of relief is forward-looking: on the $10.50 FY2027 consensus EPS, the forward P/E is 22.3x, still a ~17% premium to the historical 19.0x average. PEG is quoted at -1.31, which simply reflects negative trailing growth rather than a real signal, and is another way of saying the trailing P/E is being computed on depressed earnings. The stock is not priced for disaster; it is priced for the earnings recovery to arrive roughly on schedule.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying up for earnings that have not shown up yet. At $234.40 the stock discounts the FY2027 consensus $10.504 EPS at 22.3x, well above the 19.0x five-year average, even though TTM EPS is only $7.81 and reported Q2 2026 EPS actually FELL year over year. The bull case rests on the Q3 2026 guidance of $2.91 — if management delivers, the annualized run-rate approaches $11-plus and the multiple starts to look defensible; if freight, utility and integration costs keep eating the price increases, the FY2027 estimate gets cut and 22x forward becomes 25x fast. Practically, for a reader in late 2026 the next earnings print, not the multiple, is the whole ballgame.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI was 43.35 — neutral, tilting soft but nowhere near oversold. Price sat 3.03% below the 20-day SMA, 3.02% below the 50-day SMA and 4.68% above the 200-day SMA, so this is a pullback inside a longer uptrend rather than a breakdown. Momentum is mixed: -8.55% over one month but +2.7% over three months and +9.28% over six months. Entry-timing implication: the setup is 'wait and see' — the stock has lost its short-term trend and RSI offers no oversold bounce signal, so there is no urgency to buy ahead of the Q3 print in late October 2026. A reclaim of the 50-day SMA or an RSI dip into the low 30s would be the more interesting entry.

Macro factors
  • Containerboard/corrugated demand is levered to consumer goods, e-commerce and industrial shipping volumes — a US consumer slowdown or manufacturing recession would hit volumes and undercut the price increases PKG is currently realizing.
  • Containerboard pricing and industry supply discipline: PKG is rolling out consecutive price hikes, but any new industry capacity restart or import flow could break pricing power quickly in this commodity-like market.
  • Freight, logistics and energy cost inflation plus mill utility reliability — Q2 2026 alone absorbed a $0.26/share freight headwind and power interruptions across mills, and these are largely outside management control.
  • Interest rates: the $3.97B long-term debt load (up from $2.48B pre-Greif) makes PKG more rate-sensitive than it was, while an easing backdrop supports cyclical industrial valuations generally.
  • Input costs and trade policy: old corrugated container (OCC) and virgin fiber prices, chemicals, and potential tariffs on imported containerboard all feed directly into mill economics.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings release and call in late October 2026 — management guided to $2.91 adjusted EPS; delivery (or miss) on price realization and Greif integration progress is the single biggest near-term driver.
  • Realization of the announced containerboard/corrugated price increases flowing through with a seasonal volume uplift and an extra shipping day in Q3.
  • Greif containerboard integration synergies and the on-time-startup Ohio box plant ramp — evidence that the lower-margin acquired mix is translating into internal box-plant supply advantage would be a genuine positive.
  • Dividend growth and capital return: PKG declared $1.50/quarter on 2026-09-02 against $742M of trailing-twelve-month free cash flow; continued hikes plus any buyback would support the multiple.
  • Any easing in freight/energy costs or a policy-driven turn in the industrial cycle, which would reverse the margin compression the market is currently penalizing.
Key risks
  • Persistent margin compression: operating margin of 13.38% in Q2 2026 vs. 15.37% a year earlier, with revenue +14.7% — if price/cost doesn't inflect, the FY2027 $10.50 EPS estimate is vulnerable and the 22.3x forward multiple expands against a falling number.
  • Valuation risk: 30.3x TTM and 22.3x forward P/E vs. a 19.0x five-year average and 15x-22x industry range leaves essentially no cushion — this is a stock priced for execution.
  • Balance-sheet leverage after Greif: long-term debt jumped from $2.475B (Q2 2025) to $3.966B (Q3 2025), D/E of 0.945, which constrains flexibility and amplifies any earnings disappointment.
  • Commodity cyclicality: containerboard is a price-taking business; softening demand or new supply could reverse the pricing gains that underpin the bull case.
  • Earnings quality/one-offs: Q4 2025 EPS of $1.13 (vs. $2.51 the prior quarter) shows how quickly closure, restructuring and impairment charges can gut reported results.
  • Insider selling by senior executives in August 2026 and BofA's September 2026 price-target cut are sentiment headwinds that can keep a lid on multiple expansion even if fundamentals hold.
Investment thesis

PKG is a genuinely well-run, investment-grade containerboard franchise with accelerating revenue (+14.7% YoY in Q2 2026), record corrugated shipments and a credible $2.91 Q3 guidance — but as of 2026-09-13 the stock already pays 22.3x FY2027E EPS versus a 19.0x five-year average, while operating margins are compressing for the fourth straight quarter and leverage has nearly doubled to $3.97B of long-term debt to fund Greif. That is a good business at a full price, not a mispricing. Neutral: wait for either the Q3 print to validate the earnings recovery or a lower entry before getting constructive.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied a justified forward P/E of 20.0x — a small premium to PKG's own 5-year average of 19.0x for post-Greif scale and accelerating volumes, discounted for higher leverage (D/E 0.945) and commodity cyclicality — to FY2027 consensus EPS of $10.504, giving ~$210; cross-checked with 12x EV/EBITDA on ~$1.95B of forward EBITDA (FY2027E revenue of $10.08B at a normalized ~14% operating margin plus ~$0.55B D&A), less $3.53B net debt, giving ~$224/share. Weighting 60/40 toward the P/E method yields $216.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lands close to the deterministic score. The 58.7 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band is a fair characterization: growth at 64.1 correctly captures the accelerating top line, financial health at 81.7 correctly captures the 2.94 current ratio and 1.86 quick ratio, and quality/profitability at 49.6 correctly captures the 11.7% operating margin and 9.4% ROIC. I would nudge the score modestly higher (roughly +5 points, still comfortably 'Fair') for two things the formula structurally cannot see: Q4 2025's $1.13 EPS and Q2 2026's reported-vs-adjusted gap ($2.15 vs. $2.35) are one-off closure, restructuring and integration charges that depress the trailing margin and accrual inputs, and the Greif containerboard acquisition dilutes reported blended margin today while adding internal containerboard supply that should be margin-accretive for the box business over time. Offsetting that, the score's separate valuation overlay ('Rich vs. its own history,' 14.3) is right — the stock is paying a premium to its own history on almost every multiple — and that is not in the 58.7. Net, these roughly cancel, so I agree with the number and band. Note also that PKG is not at a cyclical trough in the sense the backtest warning describes: demand is strong and prices are being realized, so there is no 'temporarily depressed, about to turn' argument to upgrade the score on.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.