PLTR — Palantir Technologies Inc.
Palantir Technologies Inc. engineers and deploys advanced software platforms primarily for the intelligence community, supporting counterterrorism investigations and operations across the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally. One such product is Palantir Gotham, a sophisticated software system that enables users to uncover hidden patterns within diverse datasets, from signals intelligence to confidential informant reports.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, PLTR traded at $167.23 (market cap ~$384B, beta 1.62), roughly 19% below its 52-week high of $207.52 after a ~50% August post-earnings surge and a subsequent 4% weekly pullback. The operating business is firing on every cylinder - Q2 2026 revenue of $1.94B (+93% YoY), a 47.1% GAAP operating margin, and $1.20B of quarterly free cash flow - while the valuation multiple remains the entire debate.
Sentiment is constructive on the business and defensive on the price. The Q2 2026 print filed 2026-08-04 beat decisively (revenue $1.94B vs ~$1.81B consensus, EPS $0.41 vs $0.34 expected) and management raised FY2026 revenue guidance to ~$8.15B with adjusted FCF of $4.5-4.7B, triggering a ~50% August rally and prompting DA Davidson to lift its target from $200 to $250. But the tape has cooled: as of 2026-09-13 the stock was -4.07% on the week, -2.23% on the month, and RSI sat at 49.16, with the FMP analyst consensus at 13 buy / 10 hold / 3 sell and an average target of $180.50 (recent average $183.33) - only modestly above the $167.23 price. The market loves this company; it is no longer obviously underpaying for it.
Unambiguously accelerating, not a blip. Quarterly revenue ran $558M (Q3 2023) to $1,935M (Q2 2026), and YoY growth has stepped up six consecutive quarters: +39% (Q1 2025), +48% (Q2 2025), +63% (Q3 2025), +70% (Q4 2025), +85% (Q1 2026), +93% (Q2 2026). Sequential growth has held at +16% to +19% per quarter since Q3 2025, so this is compounding rather than easy comps. GAAP operating margin expanded from 1.3% (Q4 2024) to 26.8%, 33.3%, 40.9%, 46.2% and 47.1% in the five quarters since, with R&D up only 43% YoY ($135M to $193M) against 93% revenue growth - real operating leverage, not accounting noise. Diluted EPS went $0.13 (Q2 2025) to $0.41 (Q2 2026) and quarterly FCF went $532M to $1,202M. Two caveats: GAAP net income ($1,062M in Q2 2026) is running above operating income ($912M), so interest income on a growing cash pile and tax items are flattering the bottom line; and the growth is concentrated in US commercial (+149% YoY per the research brief), which cuts both ways. Structural trend: up and to the right; the biggest long-run risk is the law of large numbers, not a reversal.
Expensive on every absolute measure as of 2026-09-13: 132.7x TTM EPS of $1.259, 104x the next-FY consensus EPS of $1.602, 62.4x TTM sales (~47x the ~$8.19B forward revenue estimate), 41x book, 138x EV/EBITDA, and a TTM FCF yield of just ~0.9% (1.2% on the $4.6B FY2026 FCF guide midpoint). The company's own-history comparison (5-year average P/E of 264.5, average P/S of 39.95) makes it look tame, but that average spans years when Palantir had a fraction of today's revenue and no GAAP profits - it is a weak anchor. P/S at 62x TTM is well above, not in line with, its 5-year average. The PEG of 0.471 is a mechanical artifact of a ~280% trailing EPS jump and should be ignored entirely. Verdict: rich. There is no margin of safety at this price; you are paying for a decade of above-market compounding up front.
The earnings print is not the risk - the multiple is. At ~104x forward EPS, a routine beat-and-raise for FY2027 (even to 45-50% growth) is already capitalized into the price, so positive results may not move the stock much, while a re-rate of the multiple alone can. Holding a plausible FY2027 EPS near $2.30, 100x forward earnings is a ~$230 stock and 60x is a ~$138 stock - the same earnings produce a 40%+ swing. That asymmetry means entry price and position size matter more here than the next two quarters of results, and it argues for buying weakness rather than momentum. The mirror image: Palantir has out-run the growth its multiple implied for three straight years, so shorting 'expensive' has been a losing trade - the discipline is not to fight the trend but to size for a 30-40% air pocket.
Neutral-to-constructive consolidation as of 2026-09-13: RSI(14) at 49.16 (dead center), price 4.74% below its 20-day SMA but 8.64% above its 50-day and 10.37% above its 200-day, with -4.07% over one week and -2.23% over one month against +30.66% over three months and +10.79% over six months. The August parabola is being digested inside an intact uptrend. This is neither an oversold entry nor a breakout; the actionable levels are roughly $155-165 (the 50-day area and the post-earnings gap), where a pullback would be a legitimate trend test, and a decisive close below the 50-day would be the first real warning since spring. Absent that, expect range-bound chop between roughly $160 and $185 until the Q3 print.
- Rates and duration: a ~47x forward sales multiple makes most of the valuation a terminal-value bet, so it is acutely sensitive to real yields and any renewed upward move in the 10-year Treasury.
- Enterprise AI 'sovereignty' shift: corporates moving away from generic cloud APIs toward on-prem/sovereign, multi-model deployments is a direct tailwind for Foundry and AIP - but it also invites hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google, AWS) and model vendors to bundle competing data/AI stacks.
- US defense/intelligence budget cycle: government revenue is tied to appropriations and contract award timing, so continuing resolutions, budget impasses or a shift in spending priorities create lumpy quarters.
- AI-sector concentration and rotation: the S&P's returns are heavily concentrated in AI beneficiaries, so a sector-wide de-rating drags PLTR with it regardless of company-specific execution (beta of 1.62 amplifies this).
- Data-privacy, export-control and procurement regulation across the US, EU and allied governments affects cross-border deployments and the pace of sovereign AI contract signings.
- Q3 2026 earnings, expected early November 2026 - the primary test of whether 80%+ top-line growth and 47%+ operating margins are sustainable or were a peak quarter.
- US commercial/AIP pipeline conversion into large enterprise contracts following AIPCon 11; US commercial grew 149% YoY in Q2 2026 and is the swing factor in the growth story.
- Execution and expansion of the Nvidia partnership (Nemotron open models inside Foundry/AIP, on-premise and sovereign deployments) and the Nebius infrastructure agreement, which broaden the addressable deployment footprint.
- Further guidance raises, including upside to the $4.5-4.7B FY2026 adjusted FCF range, and any new allied-government sovereign AI awards.
- Sell-side target revisions - the range is already extreme ($80 low to $250-255 high), so new initiation or upgrade/downgrade flow can move the stock on sentiment alone.
- Valuation with zero cushion: 104x forward EPS, ~47x forward sales, 138x EV/EBITDA, 0.9% TTM FCF yield. A re-rate to merely 'expensive' (60-70x forward EPS) is a 30-45% drawdown with no change in the business.
- Deceleration asymmetry: growth is 93% YoY today and mathematically must slow; a guide toward 40-50% growth could be read as a broken thesis even though it would still be elite for software.
- Revenue concentration in US government/defense and a limited number of very large contracts, where award timing and renewal cycles create quarter-to-quarter volatility.
- Stock-based compensation and share creep - net income of $1,062M on diluted EPS of $0.41 implies roughly 2.6B diluted shares versus a market-cap-implied ~2.3B shares outstanding, so dilution is a persistent tax on per-share value.
- Competitive encroachment from hyperscalers and data-platform vendors (Databricks, Snowflake, Microsoft Fabric) moving toward the same semantic-layer/workflow territory, plus any open-source substitution pressure on pricing.
- Crowded positioning and high beta (1.62) after a ~50% single-month move - the shareholder base is momentum-heavy and quick to exit on any macro risk-off episode.
This is a genuinely elite business at a price that already assumes near-flawless execution for a decade. The fundamentals are exceptional and improving - 93% YoY revenue growth, 47% GAAP operating margin, $1.2B quarterly FCF, zero long-term debt, $7.2x current ratio - and the deterministic score's 'Strong Fundamentals' band is deserved. But at 104x forward EPS and a 0.9-1.2% FCF yield, my own probability-weighted DCF lands around $135, roughly 20% below the 2026-09-13 price of $167.23, and the framework's own valuation overlay is at best neutral. Own it if you have a decade-long horizon and can stomach a 35% drawdown; do not buy it here expecting a margin of safety, and prefer adding on a test of the 50-day rather than on strength.
Probability-weighted two-stage FCF DCF as of 2026-09-13, starting from the FY2026 adjusted FCF guidance midpoint of $4.6B: bear case (25%) assumes FCF growth decays to ~30%/22%/16% with a 11.5% discount rate and 3% terminal growth (~$88/share); base case (50%) assumes 45%/35%/28%/23%/19% for 2027-2031, then 12%, a 10.5% discount rate and 3.5% terminal (~$113/share); bull case (25%) assumes 50%+ growth sustained far longer on a 9.5% discount rate and 4% terminal (~$225/share). Probability-weighting those three (0.25 x 88 + 0.50 x 113 + 0.25 x 225) yields ~$135, i.e. roughly 20% below the $167.23 price, with net cash of ~$2B added and ~2.30B shares used for consistency with the market cap.
The 83.8 / 'Strong Fundamentals' band is a fair read of this company and my independent analysis lands within a few points of it. If anything the fundamentals-only pillar (84.3) is slightly harsh: a 47.1% GAAP operating margin, 49% TTM net margin, a healthy negative accruals ratio of -1.32%, and $1.2B of quarterly FCF against zero long-term debt argue for a low-90s quality score, which would nudge the composite up only a few points and would not change the band. Three caveats worth naming. First, the 83.3 ratio-screener component looks generous given a P/B of 44x, P/C of 46x and EV/EBITDA of 138x - those are population outliers and arguably deserve more weight against the pristine balance sheet. Second, this score is entirely backward-looking, and unlike the cyclical-trough failure mode it has no way to penalize a price that already discounts a decade of the very growth it is measuring; PLTR's problem is the inverse of a trough - it is scoring at a cyclical peak of growth and multiple simultaneously. Third, GAAP net income is running above operating income ($1,062M vs $912M in Q2 2026), so some of the measured 'quality' is interest income and tax items rather than operations. On the overlay, I would tag valuation closer to 'Rich' than 'Neutral vs. its own history' (62x TTM sales is above, not in line with, the ~40x five-year average), which is the reason to treat the lean as bullish-but-fully-priced rather than an unqualified green light; on the score's own fundamentals-only terms, however, Agree is correct and I would not move the band.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.