#291S&P 500 rank

PNR — Pentair plc

2-yr score: 48.6/100 (Middle 40%)Industrials5d
$52.86−0.04%
Description

Pentair plc engages in the provision of water solutions for residential, commercial, industrial, infrastructure, and agricultural applications. It operates through the following segments: Flow, Water Solutions, and Pool.

Score breakdownLatest quarter41.4 · Weak
Growth
9.7
Quality / Profitability
66.3
Financial health
65.7
Ratio screener
42.0
Track record: 2-yr avg 48.6 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 47.7 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 27, 2026 (in 5 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
13.2
Yield
1.69%
RSI (14)
38.4
vs SMA20
-0.03%
vs SMA50
-7.84%
vs SMA200
-31.93%
Analyst target
$73
+38.1%
7 analysts
AI theoretical price
$76
+43.8%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Pentair trades at $56.58 - dead at the bottom of its 52-week range ($56.25-$113.95) and down 35.9% over six months - after a late-July 2026 guidance cut tied to ~$170M of pool-channel inventory destocking. The market has de-rated a high-quality water franchise to ~14x trailing earnings on a cyclical trough it may be misreading as structural.

AI sentimentBearish

Sentiment is decisively negative and the price action confirms it: -6.0% in a week, -14.0% in a month, -23.3% in three months, -35.9% in six, with RSI(14) at 25.6 as of 2026-09-13. The trigger was Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-28): net sales of $932.6M, down ~17% YoY, and a full-year 2026 outlook reset to a -4% to -7% sales decline from prior +2% to +4%. Analysts slashed targets in July (Stifel to $65, BNP to $64, Goldman to $72), leaving a 10-analyst average 12-month target near $78.80 versus the $56.58 price - a wide 39% gap that itself signals how violently estimates were cut. The July 2026 CFO resignation (Nicholas Brazis out, Bob Fishman back as interim) added a governance question mark on top of the operational one. Consensus rating is a cautious Hold (0 strong buy, 14 buy, 23 hold, 6 sell).

Quarterly trend

Through 2024 and early 2026 the trend was quietly improving: revenue growth went -1.5% YoY (Q3 2024), -1.2% (Q4 2024), -0.7% (Q1 2025), then +2.2%, +2.9%, +4.9%, and +2.6% through Q1 2026 - a slow but real re-acceleration. That broke hard in Q2 2026: revenue fell 17% YoY to $932.6M from $1,123.1M on the ~$170M pool-channel destock. Operating income fell to $166.5M from $248.6M and operating margin compressed to 17.9% from 22.1% - but note this was pure SG&A/volume deleverage, not a mix problem: gross margin actually expanded to 42.4% from 40.7%. The decline is concentrated in discretionary Pool (new installs, remodeling); non-discretionary Flow and Water Solutions are holding. This reads as a cyclical inventory correction, not a structural breakdown - TTM free cash flow (~$673M) still exceeds TTM net income (~$651M) and the accruals ratio is a healthy -6.6%. Near-term trend: clearly negative. Whether it's a one-year air-pocket or a genuine decline depends on 2027 pool-channel normalization.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13, PNR traded at 14.11x TTM EPS of $4.028 - roughly a 35% discount to its own 5-year average P/E of 21.86x - and 2.25x TTM sales versus a 3.23x 5-year average. On the $4.65 next-FY consensus EPS, the forward P/E is only ~12.2x. The catch: the 'E' is trough-depressed by pool destocking, so the optically cheap multiple is partly an artifact. On a normalized ~$4.70-4.80 earnings base the multiple is still only ~12x, which is genuinely undemanding for a 41%-gross-margin business with a 12.4% ROIC and ~$673M of TTM free cash flow (~7.4% FCF yield). PEG of 1.63 is the least flattering lens because near-term growth is negative. Verdict: cheap versus its own history and versus quality-industrial peers, but the discount is a bet on normalization rather than a free lunch.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock is pricing in a pessimistic 'E.' GAAP 2026 EPS guidance ($3.86-4.06) sits ~$0.70 below reaffirmed adjusted EPS ($4.60-4.80), and TTM EPS of $4.028 only partially reflects the trough. At $56.58 the market pays ~12x forward adjusted EPS and ~14x trailing, effectively assuming the pool drag persists indefinitely. Two paths: if the late-October 2026 Q3 print shows destocking tracking toward completion and gives credible 2027 visibility, the multiple can re-rate toward the high-teens and both E and P/E move up together - a double-tailwind. If the drag runs into 2027, the cheap multiple is a classic value trap and the sell-side $4.65 next-year estimate still has room to fall. This is an 'estimates haven't troughed yet' setup, not an 'earnings are about to beat' one.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 25.61 - deeply oversold - with the price 8.03% below the 20-day SMA, 13.65% below the 50-day, and 33.29% below the 200-day, on a six-month return of -35.9% and a fresh 52-week low ($56.25). This is a textbook downtrend, not a confirmed bottom: oversold readings can persist for weeks in a falling knife, and there is no moving-average or momentum confirmation of a turn. Entry-timing implication: chasing the oversold bounce is a trade, not an investment; the higher-probability signal would be the price reclaiming the 20- and 50-day averages with RSI recovering above ~40-45, ideally on a destocking 'bottoming' headline from the Q3 report.

Macro factors
  • Elevated interest rates suppressing new residential construction, remodeling, and big-ticket discretionary pool installs - the core driver of the Pool segment weakness.
  • Housing market sluggishness and softening high-end consumer spending, which disproportionately hit Pentair's most profitable, most cyclical end-market.
  • Secular clean-water infrastructure and municipal upgrade tailwinds supporting non-discretionary Flow and Water Solutions demand.
  • Industrial and data-center buildout (cooling, fluid management) creating a growing, structurally attractive demand pool - the strategic logic behind the Taco acquisition.
  • Tariffs, input costs, and FX exposure from a global manufacturing/distribution footprint that can pressure margins independent of volume.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (typically late October 2026): the key checkpoint on whether ~$170M pool-channel destocking is tracking toward completion and on early 2027 visibility.
  • Taco Group Holdings acquisition close (expected Q4 2026): adds HVAC, data-center, and infrastructure water exposure - new growth vectors not yet in 2026 guidance.
  • Potential interest-rate cuts / housing thaw, which would revive discretionary pool installations and accelerate the Pool recovery.
  • Any management commentary signaling 2027 normalization, which would force upward earnings revisions and likely a multiple re-rating.
Key risks
  • Pool-channel destocking proves structural (housing/consumer-led) rather than transitory, extending the revenue and earnings pressure into 2027 and invalidating the current trough-earnings thesis.
  • Management/leadership churn - the July 2026 CFO resignation and interim-CFO arrangement - creates execution and credibility risk right as the company navigates a downturn and an acquisition.
  • Taco integration risk plus incremental leverage onto an already ~$1.5B net-debt balance sheet ($1.606B long-term debt, only $91.8M cash at 2026-06-30).
  • Further estimate/target cuts if Q3 shows no destocking progress, which could push the multiple lower even from today's depressed level.
  • Competitive and pricing pressure in pool equipment if demand stays soft and dealers keep inventory lean.
Investment thesis

Pentair is a genuinely good business (41% gross margin, 12.4% ROIC, ~7.4% FCF yield, manageable 0.47 debt/equity) trading at a trough multiple because of a pool-inventory destocking that looks cyclical rather than structural. That combination - quality franchise, cheap multiple, deeply oversold technicals - is exactly the setup where the risk/reward quietly improves before the headline numbers do. But the timing is unproven: the Q2 print was ugly (-17% sales, margin compression, CFO churn), momentum is still down, and the trap is real if pool weakness is consumer-structural. This is a 'watch closely, wait for the Q3 destocking checkpoint' stock, not a clean buy today.

AI theoretical price methodology

Primary method: a justified forward P/E of ~16.3x applied to next-FY consensus EPS of $4.65 = ~$76, i.e., a deliberate discount to the company's 21.86x 5-year average (reflecting the unresolved pool destock, CFO transition, and subdued near-term growth) but well above the current 14.1x trailing multiple, which is distorted by trough earnings. Cross-checked with a simplified DCF on ~$673M TTM free cash flow growing 5-6% and a ~8.5% WACC, which lands in a $73-80 range, and a normalized EV/EBITDA approach (~15x on ~$901M TTM EBITDA less ~$1.5B net debt) that also implies ~$75. All three methods cluster near the mid-$70s.

AI lean: Cautiously BearishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 41.4 overall score and 'Weak Fundamentals' band are dragged almost entirely by the growth pillar (9.7), which is purely backward-looking and is capturing a cyclical trough - precisely the pattern the methodology warns about. Quality/profitability (66.3, with a healthy -6.6% accruals ratio) and financial health (65.7) are solid, and the valuation context ('Cheap vs. its own history,' 91.1) is strong. My independent read would lift the score roughly 10-20 points - enough to argue for a 'Fair' rather than 'Weak' band - because the Q2 2026 collapse is a ~$170M pool-channel destock concentrated in a discretionary segment, not evidence of a broken franchise, and non-discretionary Flow/Water Solutions remain resilient. I stop short of full disagreement because the recovery timing is genuinely uncertain, the CFO transition is a live governance risk, and the score's low mark is directionally honest about a real near-term deterioration.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.