#133S&P 500 rank

PTC — PTC Inc.

2-yr score: 57.1/100 (Next 20%)Technology13d
$194.38+0.53%
Description

PTC Inc. operates as a global provider of software and services, with its market presence extending across the Americas, Europe, and the Asia Pacific regions. The company's business is organized into two primary divisions: Software Products and Professional Services.

Score breakdownLatest quarter45.1 · Fair
Growth
24.4
Quality / Profitability
57.5
Financial health
65.8
Ratio screener
46.3
Track record: 2-yr avg 57.1 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 56.3 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 4, 2026 (in 13 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
18.7
Yield
N/A
RSI (14)
79.5
vs SMA20
+11.09%
vs SMA50
+24.06%
vs SMA200
+32.87%
Analyst target
$196
+0.8%
14 analysts
AI theoretical price
$158
-18.7%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, PTC trades at $130.78 — about 37% below its 52-week high of $208.56 — with RSI at 35.93 and price below its 20-, 50- and 200-day averages, even though constant-currency ARR grew 9.1% ex-divestitures and management raised FY26 guidance on July 29, 2026. The setup is a high-quality, cash-generative industrial software franchise priced at ~16x forward non-GAAP EPS and a ~6% trailing FCF yield, with a share price that has not yet acknowledged the improving underlying metrics.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is genuinely split. The tape is bearish: PTC was down 7.26% in the week and 11.63% in the month into 2026-09-13, sits 11.23% below its 20-day and 11.57% below its 200-day average, and has an RSI of 35.9. The bear case rests on optics — Q3 FY26 GAAP revenue of $600.0M was down ~6.8% year-over-year versus the $643.9M reported in the June 2025 quarter — plus a soft industrial capex backdrop and a wave of price-target trims (Stifel cut to $165 from $180, Citigroup to $141). The sell-side, however, stayed constructive: the rating breakdown is 20 Buy / 10 Hold / 3 Sell with a $162.71 consensus target and a $153.71 recent average, and management actually raised full-year constant-currency ARR growth guidance to ~9.25% and lifted revenue and non-GAAP EPS expectations on July 29, 2026. The market is trading the headline revenue decline; the sell-side is trading the ARR and cash-flow improvement. That gap is the whole story.

Quarterly trend

The three-year trend is best described as optically deteriorating, fundamentally stable-to-improving. Reported revenue is lumpy and currently falling: Q1 FY26 $685.8M (+21.4% YoY), Q2 FY26 $774.3M (+21.7% YoY), then Q3 FY26 $600.0M (-6.8% YoY versus Q3 FY25's $643.9M). That Q1/Q2 strength followed by a sharp Q3 decline is not demand destruction — it reflects the completed divestitures of Kepware and ThingWorx, which removed low-margin revenue from the consolidated base, and it is why headline GAAP revenue is misleading. The metric that matters — constant-currency ARR — grew 9.1% ex-divestitures to $2.448B with $60M of net new ARR in the quarter. Free cash flow is unambiguously trending up: TTM FCF through 2026-06-30 is $935.4M versus $856.7M for the TTM ending 2025-09-30, roughly +9% YoY, with Q3 FY26 FCF of $249.3M against $242.0M a year earlier. Margins are choppier than the trailing figures suggest: operating margin was 27.7% in Q3 FY26 versus 32.6% in Q3 FY25 (a genuine year-over-year compression worth watching), but 38.2% in Q2 FY26 versus 35.1%, and 32.2% in Q1 FY26 versus 20.4%. Net income is heavily distorted — Q2 FY26 booked $590.7M of net income and $4.99 diluted EPS versus $162.6M and $1.35 in Q2 FY25, a one-off gain (consistent with the divestiture proceeds) that inflates TTM EPS to $10.67 and makes the 12.6x trailing P/E meaningless. Verdict: the revenue decline is a portfolio artifact, ARR and FCF are compounding at roughly 9%, but Q3 FY26 operating-margin compression means the 'divestitures lift margins' thesis has not yet shown up cleanly in the data.

Valuation assessment

Cheap on cash flow, fair-to-cheap on earnings, and cheap versus its own history — but not a giveaway relative to its growth rate. As of 2026-09-13 at $130.78: the 12.6x TTM P/E and 0.088 PEG are both artifacts of the $590.7M one-off gain in Q2 FY26 and should be ignored. The honest numbers are ~16.0x forward non-GAAP EPS ($130.78 / $8.19 FY26E, with guidance of $7.87–$8.42), 5.11x trailing P/S against a 5-year average of 8.08x, 9.7x EV/EBITDA, and a ~6.2% trailing FCF yield ($935.4M TTM FCF on a $15.1B market cap). The deterministic overlay scores valuation context at 97.9 — 'Cheap vs. its own history' — and the data supports it: 5.11x sales versus an 8.08x five-year average is a ~37% discount, and the 45.54x five-year average P/E (itself GAAP-distorted) is nowhere in sight. The caveat is that a chunk of that historical premium was a zero-rate artifact, and 16x forward earnings for ~9% ARR growth is a fair, not heroic, multiple in a derated software market. Net: modestly undervalued, with the discount defensible rather than extreme.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $130.78 as of 2026-09-13, the stock is pricing a business that is shrinking — roughly 16x forward non-GAAP EPS for a company with 84.1% gross margins, ~9% constant-currency ARR growth, 37.8% trailing operating margin, and a buyback program running at $1.625B for FY26 against a $15.1B market cap (over 10% of the float annually). That multiple only makes sense if you believe ARR growth decelerates toward mid-single digits, or that software multiples keep compressing. The re-rating trigger is concrete: if the November 11, 2026 Q4 FY26 print delivers the ARR step-up and initial FY27 guidance holds near ~9%, the multiple should migrate toward the high-teens/low-20s, which is where the sell-side sits ($153.71 recent average target, $162.71 consensus). The failure mode is equally concrete: net new ARR slipping below the ~$60M/quarter pace would turn the low P/E into a classic value trap as FY27 estimates get cut. This is an estimate-revision story, not a multiple-expansion story — watch net new ARR, not revenue.

Technical picture

Weak, but approaching the zone where oversold bounces begin. As of 2026-09-13: RSI(14) 35.93, price 11.23% below its 20-day average (that implies a 20-day near $147.32), 5.01% below its 50-day (implies ~$137.68) and 11.57% below its 200-day (implies ~$147.89). The stock returned -7.26% in a week, -11.63% in a month, but +15.04% over three months and -16.11% over six — so a June–July rally has been fully given back. Price sits in the lower third of a $108.50–$208.56 52-week range. Entry-timing implication: this is not a confirmed base. RSI below 40 with price under all three moving averages argues against chasing, but with the 20-day and 200-day clustered at roughly $147–148 and the 50-day at ~$137.68, those are the levels to watch — a reclaim of ~$137.68 followed by ~$147 would be the first real evidence that the downtrend is over. Until then, the path of least resistance is still down.

Macro factors
  • Industrial and discrete-manufacturing capex caution: elevated borrowing costs and cautious enterprise budgets across automotive, aerospace and defense have compressed software multiples sector-wide and lengthened PTC's sales cycles.
  • Enterprise AI spending dynamics: manufacturers must clean up product data foundations ('systems of record') before deploying AI, which is a structural tailwind for PTC's PLM/CAD franchises — but AI-native design tooling is simultaneously a credible long-term competitive threat to incumbent CAD/PLM vendors.
  • Persistent software-sector multiple derating: PTC's five-year average P/E of 45.54 and P/S of 8.08 reflect the zero-rate era; the current ~16x forward earnings and 5.11x sales show how far the sector's valuation regime has reset, and there is no guarantee it snaps back.
  • Currency and constant-currency reporting: management guides on constant-currency ARR, and FX swings can create gaps between reported and underlying performance that muddy quarter-to-quarter comparisons.
  • Tariffs, trade policy and global industrial production: PTC's end markets are global and cyclical, so trade friction or an industrial recession hits net new ARR with a lag.
  • Interest rates and debt-funded capital returns: rising long-term debt (from $1.173B at 2026-03-31 to $1.398B at 2026-06-30) makes the buyback partly rate-sensitive.
Key catalysts
  • Q4 and full-year FY26 earnings on November 11, 2026 (after market close): the single most important event — Q4 ARR step-up, deferred ARR health for FY27, and initial FY2027 guidance metrics.
  • Continued share repurchase execution: $525M bought back in Q3 FY26 alone, FY26 target ~$1.625B, diluted share count expected at ~116M — every dollar spent below intrinsic value is a direct per-share EPS tailwind.
  • AI product monetization: the nearly seven-figure ServiceMax AI deal (largest AI contract to date), Creo AI and PTC Orbit rollouts translating into incremental net new ARR.
  • Potential further portfolio rationalization or M&A using divestiture proceeds, which would keep the GAAP revenue decline narrative in the headlines.
  • An industrial capex recovery or rate-cut cycle that revives manufacturing software budgets and re-rates the whole group.
Key risks
  • GAAP revenue contraction is now the headline: Q3 FY26 revenue fell ~6.8% year-over-year, and the next-FY revenue estimate of $2.723B implies continued decline versus TTM revenue of $2.954B — if investors anchor on revenue rather than ARR, the multiple can compress further regardless of business quality.
  • Net new ARR deceleration: the ~$60M quarterly pace and ~9% constant-currency growth could slip to mid-single digits if industrial macro stays soft, which would turn 'cheap' into a value trap.
  • Balance-sheet creep from debt-funded buybacks: long-term debt rose to $1.398B and total liabilities to $3.044B at 2026-06-30, with a thin current ratio of 1.025 and D/E up from 0.40 to 0.46 in one quarter; capital returns are increasingly levered.
  • Margin durability: Q3 FY26 operating margin compressed year-over-year to 27.7% from 32.6%, undercutting the thesis that divesting lower-margin assets mechanically lifts profitability.
  • Competitive pressure from larger industrial software platforms (Siemens, Dassault, Autodesk) bundling suites and from AI-native design tools that could commoditize PTC's core CAD/PLM interfaces.
  • One-off distortion risk: the $590.7M Q2 FY26 net income quarter means TTM EPS ($10.67) and the 12.6x P/E are misleading, and any investor screening on those figures is mispricing the stock in both directions.
Investment thesis

This is a reasonably attractive risk/reward for a patient investor, but not a compelling one right now. You are buying a sticky, 84%-gross-margin industrial software franchise growing ARR ~9%, generating ~$935M of trailing free cash flow (a ~6.2% yield), and retiring more than 10% of its market cap annually in buybacks, for ~16x forward non-GAAP EPS — a meaningful discount to its own five-year history (5.11x sales versus 8.08x) and to software peers. What you are not getting is a clean entry: GAAP revenue is shrinking, operating margin compressed year-over-year in the most recent quarter, leverage is creeping up to fund the buyback, and the tape (RSI 35.9, price below all three major moving averages on 2026-09-13) shows no sign of a base. I would characterize this as accumulate-on-weakness rather than buy-the-breakout — the November 11 Q4 FY26 ARR print is the real decision point.

AI theoretical price methodology

Independent blended valuation as of 2026-09-13: 60% weight on a forward P/E of 19.5x applied to the $8.19 FY26E non-GAAP EPS estimate (PTC's own guidance range is $7.87–$8.42), which nets $159.71, and 40% weight on a 6.0% forward free-cash-flow yield applied to estimated FY27 FCF of ~$1.0B and ~112M shares post-buyback (~$8.93 FCF/share), which nets ~$148; the blended result rounds to $158. The 19.5x multiple is deliberately between the ~16.0x the stock trades at and the 25x+ the business commanded pre-derating, justified by 84.1% gross margins, ~9% constant-currency ARR growth, a 37.8% trailing operating margin and a buyback running above 10% of market cap annually, while the 6.0% FCF yield reflects the same conclusion from the cash-flow side — two independent methods converging within ~7%.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 45.1 'Fair Fundamentals' score and its 24.4 growth component are being dragged down by an input the formula cannot contextualize: GAAP revenue YoY, which is negative (~-6.8% in Q3 FY26) purely because of the deliberate Kepware and ThingWorx divestitures, while the actual operating metric management runs the business on — constant-currency ARR — grew 9.1% ex-divestitures, and TTM free cash flow is up ~9% YoY ($935.4M versus $856.7M). The quality leg is being under-credited too: the accruals ratio of -2.18% is strongly negative, meaning cash generation is running well ahead of reported net income, exactly the conservative earnings profile the Sloan accrual check is designed to reward. Conversely, the formula correctly ignores the Q2 FY26 one-off ($590.7M of net income) that makes the 12.6x trailing P/E and 0.088 PEG worthless, and it correctly flags thin liquidity (current ratio 1.025) and rising leverage. My independent read would lift the score by roughly 10–13 points into the mid-50s — right at the Fair/Good band boundary — driven almost entirely by correcting the divestiture-distorted growth leg. I stop short of a bigger adjustment because GAAP revenue really is contracting, Q3 FY26 operating margin really did compress year-over-year, and the industrial end-market really is soft — those are not artifacts. Note also that the score is entirely backward-looking and PTC is a cyclical industrial-exposed name near a multi-month low, so a low score here is at least partly a timing artifact rather than a verdict on business quality.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.