#93S&P 500 rank

Q — Qnity Electronics, Inc.

2-yr score: 60.1/100 (Next 20%)Technology13d
$120.17+1.52%
Description

Qnity Electronics, Inc. specializes in providing electronic solutions and materials essential for manufacturing semiconductor chips, alongside advanced electronic materials. Previously known as Novus SpinCo 1, Inc., the company officially adopted its current name, Qnity Electronics, Inc., in April 2025.

Score breakdownLatest quarter57.7 · Fair
Growth
51.9
Quality / Profitability
47.7
Financial health
74.1
Ratio screener
61.9
Track record: 2-yr avg 60.1 (Good, 7 quarters ≈ 1.8 yrs) · long-term avg n/a · next earnings Nov 4, 2026 (in 13 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
42.9
Yield
0.25%
RSI (14)
44.1
vs SMA20
-3.54%
vs SMA50
-3.90%
vs SMA200
-6.42%
Analyst target
$175
+45.8%
4 analysts
AI theoretical price
$127
+5.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Qnity trades at $126.40 (market cap ~$26.5B), 29% below its 52-week high of $177.28 but 79% above its $70.50 low, having bounced +4.9% on the week while still down 11.0% on the month and 16.1% on the quarter. The fundamentals are split: revenue re-accelerated to +22.1% YoY in Q2 2026 and gross margin expanded 470bp YoY to 46.6%, but GAAP diluted EPS fell to $0.59 from $0.90 and free cash flow fell to $151M from $224M.

AI sentimentNeutral

The sell side is one-sidedly bullish and the tape is not. As of 2026-09-13, FMP shows 4 buy ratings, 0 holds and 0 sells with a $179.80 consensus price target from 3 analysts (low $165, high $189), while the live research brief claims 9 analysts at ~1.1 average recommendation and targets up to $198.45 — a real discrepancy between the two sources worth flagging rather than smoothing over. Insider behavior supports the bulls: Director Bondt De bought 1,000 shares at $138.14 on 2026-08-11, roughly 9% above the current price. But the market's own vote has been negative: -16.1% over three months and -11.0% over one month into 2026-09-13, price still below its 50-day SMA, and RSI at a neutral 48.4 with no oversold washout. The net is a divided tape — bullish consensus estimates versus a stock that has been de-rating for a quarter — which is Neutral sentiment, not Bullish.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is inflecting UP, not decelerating: $1,118M (Q1'25) → $1,170M (Q2'25) → $1,276M (Q3'25) → $1,190M (Q4'25) → $1,315M (Q1'26) → $1,429M (Q2'26). YoY growth went from +6.1% in Q2'25 to +17.6% in Q1'26 and +22.1% in Q2'26, with sequential gains of +10.5% then +8.7%. Gross margin is the standout and looks structural: 41.9% (Q2'25), 41.1% (Q3'25, the low), 41.8% (Q4'25), 43.0% (Q1'26), 46.6% (Q2'26) — a 470bp YoY expansion and 550bp off the trough. None of that is reaching the bottom line yet. Operating margin in Q2'26 was 19.3% versus 21.2% a year earlier despite gross profit rising $176M YoY, which means roughly $138M of incremental opex (R&D was only +$10M) absorbed the entire gross-profit gain — the classic signature of a newly standalone company carrying separation and public-company costs that did not exist in the carve-out. Net income fell to $124M from $188M and diluted EPS to $0.59 from $0.90; Q4'25 was the reported trough at $100M/$0.48, the quarter in which long-term debt jumped from $1.72B (2025-09-30) to $4.46B and stockholders' equity fell ~$3.8B (from $10.93B at 2025-06-30 to $7.10B at 2025-12-31). Cash is positive but softening: Q2'26 operating cash flow of $241M was -11.7% YoY and Q1'26's $135M was -34.8%, with capex nearly doubling YoY ($90M vs $49M) leaving FCF of $13M and $151M vs $103M and $224M a year earlier. Bottom line: a genuine demand and gross-margin upturn colliding with a one-time-heavy cost and capital-structure reset. The revenue and gross-margin lines look structural; the EPS and FCF declines look transitional — but that is precisely what has not yet been proven in reported numbers.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13 at $126.40, Qnity trades at 45.1x TTM GAAP EPS of $2.796, 5.08x TTM sales ($5.21B), 3.65x book and ~20.4x TTM EV/EBITDA. Against its own 5-year averages of 29.67x P/E and 4.34x P/S — averages built on only 4 data years for a company with ~10 months of independent trading history, so treat them as a rough reference, not gospel — the stock is rich, and the deterministic model's valuation overlay agrees, scoring 14.4/100 and labeling it 'Rich vs. its own history.' The counterargument is forward earnings: on next-FY consensus EPS of $4.553 the multiple compresses to 27.8x, and the $5.61B revenue estimate implies roughly 16-17x forward EV/EBITDA — inside the 13-18x band where semis-materials peers like Entegris and MKS typically trade. The PEG of 0.838 is flattered by a depressed TTM base and should not be taken at face value. Verdict: expensive on reported numbers, roughly fair-to-slightly-rich on consensus adjusted numbers, with the entire valuation case resting on the GAAP-to-adjusted bridge actually closing.

Price vs. earnings playbook

This is an 'estimates must be validated' setup, not a buy-the-trough setup. The gap is stark: TTM GAAP EPS is $2.796 and next-FY consensus is $4.553, a 63% step-up, while the most recent quarter printed $0.59 of GAAP EPS, down 34% YoY. At $126.40 the market is paying 27.8x earnings that have not yet appeared in any filing — so the stock is priced for the spinoff cost base and interest drag to roll off, not for current profitability. If GAAP EPS keeps running near $0.60-0.72 a quarter (~$2.5-2.9 annualized), the real multiple is 44-50x and there is no cushion. If the $4.55 is real, 27.8x forward for a business growing revenue 22% with 46.6% gross margins is defensible. Practical playbook: watch the non-GAAP-to-GAAP bridge each quarter — specifically the standalone SG&A run-rate, interest expense on the ~$4.0B of long-term debt, and whether gross-margin expansion keeps passing through to operating income. The stock re-rates when operating margin follows gross margin; it de-rates hard if it doesn't.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 48.37 — dead neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. Price was +0.29% versus the 20-day SMA (essentially flat), -4.89% versus the 50-day SMA (roughly $132.9, now resistance) and +3.13% versus the 200-day SMA (roughly $122.6, now support). The stock sits almost exactly mid-range — 52.3% of the way from the $70.50 low to the $177.28 high — having bounced +4.92% on the week while still down 11.04% on the month and 16.10% on the quarter. Read it as a three-month downtrend that is attempting to base above its 200-day, with the 50-day capping every rally since June. Entry-timing implication: there is no oversold washout to buy here; the higher-probability entries are either a decisive reclaim of ~$133 on volume (trend confirmation) or a retest of ~$122 with RSI back under 35 (valuation plus sentiment reset).

Macro factors
  • AI/HPC and advanced-packaging capex: Qnity's advanced packaging materials, interconnect and high-end PCB products sit directly in the chiplet / 2.5D-3D and data-center buildout — the single largest demand swing factor, and the reason Q2 2026 revenue grew 22.1% YoY.
  • Semiconductor cycle and inventory correction: as a tier-1 materials supplier, volumes lag foundry and OSAT utilization; a memory or logic digestion phase would hit revenue and the 45x trailing multiple at the same time.
  • Interest rates and duration risk: a 45.1x trailing P/E on 5.08x sales makes the multiple highly rate-sensitive, and the ~$4.0B of long-term debt pushed on at separation (D/E 0.554) is a genuine refinancing-rate exposure as well as an earnings drag.
  • US-China export controls, tariffs and regional fab incentives (CHIPS-style subsidies) reshape where Qnity's customers build capacity, adding both compliance cost and demand volatility by geography.
  • Post-spinoff index and ownership dynamics: S&P 500 inclusion plus mandate-driven selling/buying around the DuPont separation distort near-term supply/demand independently of fundamentals.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (likely early-to-mid November 2026, based on the 2025-11-18 filing for Q3 2025) — the single most important datapoint: does the 46.6% gross margin convert into operating-margin expansion above Q2 2026's 19.3%?
  • First full standalone-year guidance and any disclosure of the run-rate standalone SG&A / separation cost base, plus order-visibility commentary on advanced packaging lines.
  • Capital allocation against the debt: with $961M cash versus ~$4.0B long-term debt and Q2 2026 FCF of $151M, any deleveraging, buyback initiation or dividend step-up would be a re-rating signal.
  • Analyst coverage expansion (only 3 price targets appear in the FMP set versus the brief's claimed 9 raters) and whether the $165-189 target cluster holds if GAAP EPS does not recover.
  • Follow-through on insider/institutional accumulation — Director Bondt De's 1,000-share purchase at $138.14 on 2026-08-11 sits above the 2026-09-13 price of $126.40 and is worth tracking.
Key risks
  • The GAAP-to-adjusted earnings gap: TTM GAAP diluted EPS of $2.796 versus a $4.553 next-FY consensus (a 63% step-up) while Q2 2026 GAAP EPS of $0.59 fell 34% YoY. If separation and standalone costs are structural rather than one-time, forward estimates get cut and the 45x trailing multiple has nothing underneath it.
  • Leverage and weak returns: ~$4.0B long-term debt against $961M cash, TTM ROIC of just 6%, ROE 9.8% and net margin 11.2% — debt service consumes a large share of operating income, and the ~$3.8B equity reduction between 2025-06-30 and 2025-12-31 shows how much the capital structure changed at separation.
  • Cyclical demand risk: Qnity sells into foundry and OSAT production, so a semiconductor digestion phase would cut materials volumes at the same time as compressing a rich multiple.
  • Valuation/mean reversion: 45.1x trailing P/E and 5.08x sales versus a 4.34x 5-year average P/S, with the deterministic model explicitly labeling it 'Rich vs. its own history' (valuation overlay 14.4/100). Beta of 1.631 amplifies drawdowns.
  • Post-spinoff execution and disclosure risk: only about four quarters of standalone financials exist, and pre-separation carve-out comparatives overstated equity while understating standalone costs.
  • Technical downtrend: down 16.1% over three months and trading below its 50-day SMA as of 2026-09-13, with the 52-week high 29% above the current price.
Investment thesis

Honest read: a good-but-not-elite business at a full price, with the bull case not yet proven. Revenue is genuinely re-accelerating (+22.1% YoY in Q2 2026) and gross margin has expanded 550bp off the Q3 2025 bottom, but GAAP EPS fell to $0.59 from $0.90, FCF fell to $151M from $224M, and TTM ROIC is only 6% against ~$4.0B of separation-date debt — so the 27.8x forward multiple and the street's $165-189 targets require the cost and interest drag to roll off, which has not happened yet in any filing. At $126.40 on 2026-09-13, with RSI at 48.4 and price still under its 50-day SMA, I would rather wait for the Q3 2026 print to show gross-margin gains reaching operating income than pay up 11% off the recent low for a thesis the reported numbers do not yet support.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended two forward-looking methods as of 2026-09-13: (1) 27x next-FY consensus adjusted EPS of $4.553 = $123/share, a mid-range semis-materials multiple sitting between the stock's current 27.8x forward and ~29.7x 5-year average P/E, discounted for 6% ROIC and new leverage; (2) 17x forward EBITDA of ~$1.80B (derived from $4.553 EPS on 209.3M shares, grossed up for ~23% tax and ~$180M interest, plus ~$380M D&A), less $3.04B net debt on 209.3M shares = ~$132/share, at the top of the 13-18x peer EV/EBITDA range. Averaging the two outputs ($122.93 and $131.67) yields $127.30 — essentially the current price, which is why I read Qnity as fairly valued rather than the bargain the $165-189 street target cluster implies.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 57.7 / 'Fair Fundamentals' score is directionally defensible but I would nudge it up roughly 10-12 points to ~68-70 ('Good Fundamentals'), a one-tier move — hence Partially Agree, not Agree. Two pillars are penalizing the wrong thing: growth (51.9) is dragged by operating cash flow down 11.7% YoY in Q2 2026 and 34.8% in Q1 2026, and quality/profitability (47.7) by a 6% ROIC and a 19.3% Q2 2026 operating margin — yet revenue growth is accelerating (+17.6% then +22.1% YoY), gross margin expanded 470bp YoY to 46.6%, and the operating-margin miss came from ~$138M of incremental opex that looks like newly standalone public-company and separation costs rather than demand or pricing weakness. ROIC's denominator is also inflated by carve-out goodwill and $4.0B of separation-date debt — equity fell ~$3.8B between 2025-06-30 and 2025-12-31. I explicitly considered the cyclical-trough caveat and it does NOT apply here: revenue is at a record and margins are inflecting up, so the depression is cost-structure-driven and self-fixable, which is better than a demand trough but not yet proven. Offsetting the upgrade, GAAP EPS is falling YoY and the score's own note correctly flags that comparisons spanning the separation are distorted — a note I treat as a reason to trust the score's inputs less, not more. I am not deviating from the mandated Neutral overall lean: the spinoff is already captured in the score's notes, so no single dated event outside the score's visibility justifies overriding the Fair Fundamentals mapping.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.