#157S&P 500 rank

ROL — Rollins, Inc.

2-yr score: 55.4/100 (Middle 40%)Industrials
$33.45+0.33%
Description

Rollins, Inc. operates a network of subsidiaries that specialize in delivering pest and wildlife management solutions to a diverse clientele, encompassing both homeowners and commercial enterprises, throughout the United States and globally. For residential properties, the company offers comprehensive pest control, safeguarding homes from prevalent invaders such as rodents, insects, and other nuisance animals.

Score breakdownLatest quarter48.1 · Fair
Growth
40.8
Quality / Profitability
55.0
Financial health
46.5
Ratio screener
48.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 55.4 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 58.8 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
30.7
Yield
1.96%
RSI (14)
55.1
vs SMA20
+6.00%
vs SMA50
-0.96%
vs SMA200
-30.06%
Analyst target
$37
+10.6%
11 analysts
AI theoretical price
$36
+7.6%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, ROL traded at $34.73, sitting essentially on its 52-week low of $34.35 (range high $66.14) after a Q2 2026 earnings miss and full-year organic growth guidance cut triggered a roughly 40%-plus drawdown. RSI(14) stood at 31.06 and the stock was 32.9% below its 200-day SMA, so sentiment is washed out but the trend is still down.

AI sentimentBearish

The market's mood turned sharply negative on the Q2 2026 print: adjusted EPS of $0.32 vs. $0.34 expected, revenue of $1.078B (up 7.9% YoY but ~$10M light), and management cutting FY2026 organic revenue growth guidance to "at least 6%" citing softer digital lead generation in residential pest control, plus margin compression from medical and fuel costs. Sell-side followed: Wells Fargo downgraded to Underweight, JPMorgan to Neutral with its target cut from $70 to $45, and Barclays/BNP targets moved down to the $44-45 area; consensus is now a Hold with a $49 mean target but a $44.56 more recent average. Layered on top, Pomerantz announced a securities-fraud investigation in late August 2026. As of 2026-09-13 the tape reflects all of this: -3.15% over one week, -4.9% over one month, -26.4% over three months and -37.0% over six months, with the price 32.9% below its 200-day average.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth is decelerating but has not broken: YoY comparisons ran +12.1% (Q2 2025), +12.0% (Q3 2025), +9.7% (Q4 2025), +10.2% (Q1 2026), then +7.9% in Q2 2026 ($1,078.6M vs. $999.5M) — a genuine step down, consistent with the guidance cut to "at least 6%" organic. Margins have inflected the wrong way in the two most recent quarters: Q2 2026 operating margin of 18.7% is 117bp below Q2 2025's 19.8%, and Q1 2026's 16.1% was 129bp below Q1 2025's 17.3%, after Q3 2025 actually expanded to 21.9% from 20.9%. EPS is still grinding up (Q2 2026 $0.30 vs. $0.29; TTM diluted EPS $1.105), but free cash flow has flattened — TTM FCF of $619.2M versus FY2025's $650.0M, with Q1 2026 FCF of $111.2M down 20.6% YoY. Net read: this is a deceleration and a real margin squeeze, not a structural collapse — commercial (+7.2%) and termite (+8.9%) remain solid, and the softness is concentrated in residential digital lead generation, which is cyclical/consumer-linked rather than a broken business model.

Valuation assessment

As of 2026-09-13 the stock trades at 31.6x TTM earnings ($1.105 EPS) and roughly 30.4x next-FY consensus EPS of $1.142, with a PEG of 3.54, P/S of 4.26 (vs. a 5-year average of 6.99) and P/B of 11.7. Against its own 5-year average P/E of 49.7x it screens cheap — the deterministic overlay scores that comparison 97.2/100 — but that historical average was built in a near-zero-rate, premium-multiple era, so the "cheap" label is relative, not absolute. At ~30x forward earnings for 6-8% growth, ROL is still a premium-multiple stock versus the broad market; it is fairly valued at best, not a bargain. The case for the multiple is quality: 20.9% ROIC, 50.7% gross margin, 13.6% net margin, and highly recurring, non-discretionary revenue.

Price vs. earnings playbook

As of 2026-09-13, the story in the price is a multiple de-rating, not an earnings collapse: earnings are still growing while the multiple has compressed from the ~50x range toward ~30x. That means the stock is now priced for a permanent growth haircut to roughly 6% organic, but not for an actual earnings decline. The bear path is further estimate slippage — consensus next-FY EPS of $1.142 already embeds only about 6% growth off FY2026, and the low analyst target of $32 implies a mid-20s multiple on that number, so there is still downside if the residential weakness proves structural. The bull path is multiple re-expansion on stabilization: if residential lead volumes normalize and margins stop compressing, low-double-digit EPS growth plus a 33-35x multiple gets you to $38-40 without heroic assumptions. The Q3 2026 report (late October to early November 2026) is the first hard evidence either way, so near-term price action is likely to be event-driven around earnings rather than trend-driven.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 31.06 — approaching oversold but not at the capitulation extremes that usually mark durable lows — with the price 3.4% below its 20-day SMA, 10.71% below its 50-day SMA and 32.93% below its 200-day SMA. That is a textbook downtrend: every moving average is above the price and the 200-day gap is unusually wide, meaning the stock is extended to the downside but has shown no base-building yet. At $34.73 versus a 52-week low of $34.35, ROL is grinding along the bottom of its range on weak momentum (-3.15% 1wk, -4.9% 1mo). Implication: oversold bounce risk is real and short-covering rallies toward the $38-40 area are plausible, but there is no technical confirmation of a turn — a reclaim of the 20-day SMA with RSI back above 40 would be the first real signal. Practically, that argues for scaling in on weakness rather than a single full position, and for treating the pre-earnings drift as noise.

Macro factors
  • Housing turnover and rates: elevated mortgage rates and frozen existing-home sales suppress moving-related residential pest and termite demand, which feeds directly into the softer digital lead volumes that drove the guidance cut; a rate-cutting cycle would be a clear tailwind.
  • Consumer discretionary pressure: residential pest control has a discretionary/upgrade component, and stretched household budgets reduce inbound digital lead conversion even where recurring contract revenue holds.
  • Cost inflation: rising employee medical benefits and fuel/logistics costs are the explicitly named drivers of the 117-129bp YoY operating margin compression in the last two reported quarters, with technician wage inflation an ongoing structural cost.
  • Labor availability: technician recruiting and retention is the binding constraint on service capacity and organic growth in pest control, and it is a cost line that rarely deflates.
  • Defensive sector positioning: with a 0.736 beta and non-discretionary, regulatory-driven commercial demand, ROL is a classic defensive holding that tends to lag in risk-on rotations and attract flows when growth scares hit — a factor in both the de-rating and any eventual recovery.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (expected late October to early November 2026): the single most important datapoint — evidence on whether residential digital lead volumes are stabilizing, whether cost-realignment under new CFO William Harkins is biting, and whether the "at least 6%" organic guidance is reaffirmed or cut again.
  • Margin trajectory: proof the company can defend its historical ~25% EBITDA margin against medical and fuel inflation; two more quarters of YoY compression would validate the bear case.
  • Bolt-on M&A cadence and pricing power: continued disciplined acquisitions plus the annual price increase are the main levers to re-accelerate reported growth back toward double digits.
  • Resolution of the Pomerantz securities investigation announced in late August 2026 — a clean outcome removes an overhang; an escalation adds headline risk.
  • A rate-cut/housing-turnover recovery, which would lift residential lead generation without any company-specific execution improvement.
Key risks
  • The residential deceleration proves structural rather than cyclical (share loss to competitors such as Rentokil, regional operators or DIY/online alternatives), which would break the long-term compounding story rather than just dent a year.
  • Continued consensus EPS downgrades; next-FY consensus of $1.142 already bakes in only ~6% growth, and the $32 low analyst target implies further multiple and estimate compression.
  • Margin erosion that persists — Q2 2026 operating margin 18.7% vs. 19.8% a year earlier and Q1 2026 16.1% vs. 17.3% is a two-quarter pattern, not a one-off.
  • Securities litigation risk following the late-August 2026 Pomerantz investigation into whether management misled investors about residential demand prior to the Q2 miss.
  • Balance sheet optics: current ratio of 0.629 with $938M of current liabilities against $590M of current assets looks thin (mitigated by the fact that a chunk of that is deferred revenue collected up front), and D/E of 0.78 with $487M of long-term debt leaves less room than the pristine-multiple era implied.
Investment thesis

Rollins is a genuinely high-quality, non-discretionary, capital-light compounder — 20.9% ROIC, 50.7% gross margin, $619M of TTM free cash flow and a negative accruals ratio confirming cash is running ahead of reported earnings — that has been de-rated from the ~50x range to roughly 30x forward earnings after one soft quarter of residential lead generation. The de-rating has done most of the work: at $34.73 on 2026-09-13 the stock sits near my independently calculated fair value of about $36, so this is no longer stretched, but it is also not a bargain — you are paying a full multiple for a business growing 6-8% with compressing margins. Honest read: a quality name to accumulate on further weakness or on the first evidence of stabilization, not a screaming buy at this price, with Q3 2026 as the pivotal event.

AI theoretical price methodology

Simplified DCF on TTM free cash flow of $619.2M (Q3 2025-Q2 2026) growing 7% for five years with a 3.5% terminal rate and a ~7.8-8.0% WACC (beta 0.736, debt only ~2.8% of capital, net debt $378M) gives roughly $33.7/share; a justified-P/E cross-check using a 30-31x multiple on next-FY EPS of $1.142 (supported by a Gordon-growth implied multiple of ~31x from a ~62% payout, 8% required return and 6% sustainable growth) gives $34-35; I blend these and shade modestly higher for the 20.9% ROIC and recurring-revenue quality to land at $36.00, roughly 4% above the 2026-09-13 price of $34.73.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The score's direction is right — Fair-to-Good fundamentals on a business that is no longer priced at its historical premium — but 48.1 undershoots the underlying quality by roughly 8-12 points, which is why I land on Partially Agree rather than Agree. Specifically, the ratio screener (48.8) mechanically penalizes features that are structural to the model rather than weaknesses: P/B of 11.7 and P/C of 153 are artifacts of an asset-light, buyback-heavy balance sheet, and the 0.629 current ratio partly reflects customer prepayments (deferred revenue) sitting in current liabilities. The quality leg also looks light relative to a negative accruals ratio of -0.85%, 20.9% ROIC and $619M of TTM FCF. On the cyclical-trough question the instructions flag: ROL is not a commodity cyclical, but the leg of the business driving the disappointment (residential digital lead generation, tied to housing turnover and consumer spending) is the cyclical part, while commercial (+7.2%) and termite (+8.9%) remain solid — so the backward-looking growth score of 40.8 is penalizing a soft patch, not a structural break. Offsetting that, I'd mark down the 97.2/100 "Cheap vs. its own history" overlay, because the 5-year average P/E of 49.7 was a rate-driven anomaly and ~30x forward for 6-8% growth is only fair in absolute terms. Net, I'd put the fair score in the mid-to-upper 50s (low end of Good Fundamentals) rather than 48.1. No single dated event justifies deviating from the mandated band/valuation mapping, so overall_lean stays Neutral.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.