ROST — Ross Stores, Inc.
Ross Stores, Inc., through its various subsidiaries, manages a chain of off-price retail establishments focusing on apparel and home goods. These stores operate under two main brand names: Ross Dress for Less and dd's DISCOUNTS.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, ROST trades at $230.74, up 2.33% on the day but down 7.05% over the past month, with RSI 45.34 and price below its 20-day (-0.95%) and 50-day (-2.14%) SMAs yet above its 200-day (+7.87%). The company just posted Q2 FY26 comps +10% and raised full-year EPS guidance to $8.61-$8.77, though the quarter included a $0.60 tariff refund benefit.
Market sentiment is positively skewed after the August 20, 2026 Q2 FY26 earnings beat, which featured 13% sales growth, 10% comparable-store sales, and a large EPS beat. Management raised FY26 EPS guidance and accelerated store openings, prompting a wave of analyst price-target hikes (Barclays to $298, Jefferies to $285, Citigroup to $290, Baird to $270). The stock's recent pullback from its 52-week high of $257 has cooled momentum, but the consensus rating remains Buy with an average target near $270, well above the 2026-09-13 price of $230.74.
The quarterly trend is inflecting upward. Revenue growth accelerated from roughly +2-5% in early FY25 to +10.4% in Q3 FY25, +10.2% in Q4 FY25, +20.6% in Q1 FY26, and +13.3% in Q2 FY26. Q2 FY26 comparable-store sales rose 10%, driven by traffic, and gross margin jumped to 33.8% from 27.6% a year earlier. That margin expansion was heavily aided by a ~$253 million IEEPA tariff refund ($0.60 EPS benefit), but management noted core operating margin still expanded ~205 bps excluding the refund. EPS rose to $2.66 in Q2 FY26 from $1.56 in Q2 FY25; ex-refund EPS would be roughly $2.06, still up ~32% year-over-year. Free cash flow remains robust: Q2 FY26 FCF was $624.5 million versus $466.6 million a year earlier, and the balance sheet carries $4.31 billion in cash against only $777 million of long-term debt. The underlying trend is genuinely strong, though the headline Q2 numbers overstate the run-rate.
As of 2026-09-13, ROST trades at 27.7x TTM EPS of $8.353, a ~12% premium to its 5-year average P/E of 24.78. Its 3.02x TTM price-to-sales is ~34% above the 5-year average of 2.26x. The PEG ratio of 0.877 looks attractive, but it is distorted by trailing EPS growth inflated by the Q2 tariff refund. On normalized forward EPS of roughly $8.50, the stock trades near 27.1x. That is not egregious for a defensive off-price retailer with positive comps and a net-cash balance sheet, but it is rich versus its own history. Valuation is a real headwind at the 2026-09-13 price.
The stock is pricing in continued double-digit comparable-store sales and durable margin expansion. The Q2 beat was excellent, but roughly $0.60 of the $2.66 EPS came from a non-recurring tariff refund; excluding it, earnings power was closer to $2.06. If Q3 FY26 comps hold at the guided 6-7% and core margins stay above prior-year levels, the premium multiple can be justified. If comps decelerate toward low single digits or margin expansion fades once the refund annualizes, the market may compress the P/E toward its 24.78x historical average, implying a stock closer to $210. The playbook is to watch Q3 comps and ex-refund margin flow-through, not the headline EPS comparison.
As of 2026-09-13, RSI stood at 45.34, squarely neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. Price was 0.95% below the 20-day SMA and 2.14% below the 50-day SMA, but still 7.87% above the 200-day SMA. The stock is up 11.86% over six months but down 7.05% over one month and down 3.91% over three months, consistent with a healthy pullback/consolidation after a strong run toward the 52-week high of $257. The entry-timing implication is that the stock is not at a screaming technical buy; waiting for a reclaim of the 50-day SMA or a deeper dip toward the 200-day area would offer better risk/reward. The longer-term trend remains positive while the 200-day is rising.
- Consumer trade-down behavior: persistent cost-of-living pressures and value-seeking across income brackets continue to benefit off-price retailers like Ross, supporting traffic and comparable-store sales.
- Tariff and import cost volatility: the Q2 FY26 tariff refund was a one-time boost, but future tariff policy, freight rates, and sourcing costs could pressure gross margins.
- Interest rates and Treasury yields: elevated yields weigh on consumer discretionary valuations and could compress the multiples investors are willing to pay for quality retailers.
- Off-price sector share gains: traditional department stores and specialty apparel retailers are losing share to off-price, but competition from TJX, Burlington, and others remains intense.
- Labor and supply-chain costs: wage inflation and inventory availability for closeout merchandise affect both operating expenses and the ability to sustain attractive product assortments.
- Q3 FY26 earnings release on November 19, 2026: management guided EPS of $1.75-$1.83 on comparable-store sales of +6% to +7%; this is the next major test of whether the Q2 momentum is sustainable.
- Dividend payment on September 30, 2026: quarterly cash dividend of $0.445 per share, a modest but steady return of capital.
- Holiday season performance: off-price retailers typically benefit from value-seeking holiday shoppers, and strong traffic could drive upside to Q4 guidance.
- Further store expansion: Ross raised its full-year store opening plan to 115 new locations, which could support revenue growth and operating leverage into FY27.
- Comparable-store sales deceleration: Q2 FY26 comps of +10% may be a peak; easier comparisons fade, and a consumer normalization could slow traffic abruptly.
- Non-recurring tariff refund: the $0.60 EPS benefit in Q2 FY26 will not repeat, making future year-over-year EPS comparisons much tougher and potentially disappointing headline-focused investors.
- Valuation compression: at 27.7x TTM earnings versus a 24.78x 5-year average, the stock is priced for continued strong execution; any miss could trigger multiple contraction.
- Margin pressure: tariffs, freight, wages, and higher markdowns could reverse recent gross margin gains, especially once the refund benefit annualizes.
- Competitive intensity: TJX, Burlington, and other off-price and discount retailers compete for the same closeout inventory and value-seeking customers, potentially pressuring pricing and sourcing.
Ross Stores is a high-quality off-price retailer with accelerating comps, a net-cash balance sheet, and a structural tailwind from value-seeking consumers. However, as of 2026-09-13, the stock at $230.74 trades at a premium to its own history, and Q2 FY26 earnings were flattered by a $0.60 tariff refund that will not recur. My fair value estimate is roughly $234, meaning the shares are close to fairly valued rather than clearly cheap. I would be Cautiously Bullish: own it for quality and momentum, but wait for a pullback or evidence that Q3 comps and ex-refund margins hold before adding aggressively.
I applied a 27.5x justified P/E to normalized forward EPS of roughly $8.50 (consistent with next-FY consensus of $8.485 and FY26 ex-refund core earnings), a modest premium to the 5-year average P/E of 24.78 justified by above-average comps, a net-cash balance sheet, and defensive off-price demand. As a cross-check, a 10-year DCF using TTM free cash flow of ~$2.79 billion, 7% near-term FCF growth, 3% terminal growth, and an 8.5% WACC yields roughly $233 per share. Both methods converge near $234.
The deterministic score gives ROST 63.4, or Good Fundamentals, driven by strong financial health (80.1) and decent growth/quality (58.8/56.7). My independent read largely confirms this: even excluding the $253 million tariff refund, Q2 FY26 core operating margin expanded ~205 bps, comps rose 10%, and free cash flow is robust. The formula is backward-looking and includes the refund, which slightly inflates the growth and quality legs, but the underlying business is genuinely strong. I would not move the score more than ~5 points lower, so the Good Fundamentals band is fair. The main caveat is that the score excludes valuation, which is rich versus history; that is captured in the overall lean rather than in the fundamentals score.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.