#271S&P 500 rank

SLB — Slb N.V.

2-yr score: 49.6/100 (Middle 40%)Energy1d
$51.10+2.24%
Description

SLB N.V. engages in the provision of technology for the energy industry worldwide. The company operates through four divisions: Digital & Integration, Reservoir Performance, Well Construction, and Production Systems.

Score breakdownLatest quarter53.1 · Fair
Growth
51.8
Quality / Profitability
46.0
Financial health
74.8
Ratio screener
53.2
Track record: 2-yr avg 49.6 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 50.2 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 23, 2026 (tomorrow)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
24.6
Yield
2.01%
RSI (14)
53.9
vs SMA20
+3.16%
vs SMA50
-2.69%
vs SMA200
-0.14%
Analyst target
$67
+30.9%
8 analysts
AI theoretical price
$54
+5.7%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, SLB trades at $56.06 (market cap ~$83.2B), sitting about 7% below its 52-week high of $60.46 and up 25.4% over six months, while carrying a 27.0x trailing P/E and roughly 22.6x forward P/E versus a five-year average P/E of 18.1x. The franchise quality is high and cash generation is resilient, but the reported earnings trend is soft and the multiple is stretched relative to SLB's own history.

AI sentimentBullish

Street sentiment is clearly constructive as of 2026-09-13: the analyst consensus rating is Buy with 56 buys, 6 holds and 4 sells, and a consensus price target of $64.33 (recent average $63.31, high $72) - roughly 15% above the $56.06 spot price. The stock rallied ~25.4% over the prior six months on a combination of international oilfield services strength, Brent above $86/bbl, the ChampionX integration and, most recently, the August 31, 2026 announcement of the $3.4B cash (plus $0.7B assumed debt) Kelvion acquisition, which reframes SLB partly as an AI/data-center cooling and infrastructure play; sell-side targets were pushed to $71-72 after that news. The one sour note is momentum: -2.52% over the last week and -0.21% over three months, i.e. the stock has churned sideways near its highs and the near-$60 area that earlier cautions flagged as a valuation ceiling. Sentiment is bullish, but it is bullish on a narrative rather than on reported earnings.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is grinding higher but only barely on an organic basis: quarterly revenue went $8,310M (Q3 2023) to $8,972M (Q2 2026), and the last four quarters ran $9,282M / $9,745M / $8,721M / $8,972M versus a prior-year four-quarter run of $9,159M / $9,284M / $8,490M / $8,546M - about +3.5% trailing-year revenue growth. Critically, that Q2 2026 +5.0% YoY revenue gain ($8,972M vs $8,546M) is NOT clean organic growth: ChampionX only entered the consolidated numbers from Q3 2025 (stockholders' equity jumped from $20.3B at Q2 2025 to $26.1B by Q4 2025), so underlying legacy SLB revenue is closer to flat. The real story is margin, and it is clearly negative: gross margin fell from 20.5% in Q2 2024 and 18.9% in Q2 2025 to 15.5% in Q2 2026, and operating margin fell from 17.5% (Q2 2024) and 15.7% (Q2 2025) to 11.9% (Q2 2026) - roughly 560bps of YoY operating-margin compression. Diluted GAAP EPS has fallen from a $0.74-0.83 run-rate in 2024 to $0.50-0.53 over the last four quarters, and trailing-twelve-month net income is $3,077M versus $4,092M a year earlier, a ~25% decline (TTM EPS $2.053 vs ~$2.92 prior). Management-framed adjusted EPS ($0.55 in Q2 2026, beating $0.51 consensus) says a chunk of the GAAP decline is non-cash amortization/charges tied to ChampionX, and the -1.03% accruals ratio (cash flow exceeding reported net income) supports that earnings are not being flattered. Cash is the stabilizer: TTM operating cash flow of $6,533M and TTM free cash flow of $4,554M are essentially flat versus $6,641M and $4,656M a year ago, with the usual ugly Q1 working-capital drain ($487M OCF / $80M FCF in Q1 2026) followed by a strong Q2 ($1,359M OCF / $964M FCF). Net read: stable-to-slightly-growing top line, structurally lower margins, declining GAAP EPS, resilient cash generation. This is margin compression and mix dilution, not yet a growth inflection.

Valuation assessment

Expensive on earnings, full-to-fair on cash. As of 2026-09-13 the price of $56.06 puts SLB at 26.95x trailing EPS of $2.053 versus a five-year average P/E of 18.07x, and 2.29x trailing sales versus a five-year average P/S of 1.97x - a ~49% and ~16% premium respectively, on both a trailing-P/E and, more cleanly, a P/S basis (P/S is not distorted by the margin mix shift). On next-FY consensus EPS of $2.478, the forward P/E is ~22.6x, still well above the historical average. Price/book is 3.22x with ROE of 12.8% and ROIC of 10.3% - i.e. the market is paying ~3.2x book for a low-teens-return business. The PEG ratio (-0.921) is meaningless here because trailing growth is negative. The one genuinely supportive lens is free cash flow: $4,554M TTM FCF on an $83.2B market cap is a ~5.5% FCF yield, which is not egregious for a franchise with a 2.01% dividend yield and a fortress-ish balance sheet (D/E 0.491, current ratio 1.44). Verdict: not a bargain. The stock is priced for a margin/earnings recovery plus the data-center optionality that does not exist in the reported numbers yet.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is paying today for earnings it expects tomorrow. At $56.06 versus $2.053 of trailing GAAP EPS, SLB trades at 27x what it actually earned over the last year, while forward consensus of $2.478 implies +21% EPS growth that must come from sources not yet visible in the P&L: Middle East activity normalisation, conversion of international/offshore FIDs into revenue, ChampionX cost synergies, and eventually the Kelvion data-center cooling vertical. If that EPS growth lands, the stock derates from 22.6x to ~20x forward with flat price - a reasonable outcome. If it slips (oil below ~$70, persistent Middle East friction, Kelvion integration drag) you are left holding a low-single-digit-revenue-growth industrial at 22-23x forward earnings, where a de-rating toward the mid-teens multiple implies downside into the mid-$40s. The asymmetry is not favourable at $56; it becomes attractive closer to $50 or on evidence of an actual sequential margin turn (watch gross margin re-crossing 17%).

Technical picture

Trend up, but stretched and not a fresh entry. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 55.53 - neutral, with neither overbought nor oversold pressure. The $56.06 price sat +0.87% above the 20-day SMA (~$55.58), +8.61% above the 50-day (~$51.62) and +13.32% above the 200-day (~$49.47), so all three averages are rising and stacked positively - a textbook uptrend. The problem is extension: the stock is ~93% of the way up its 52-week $31.64-$60.46 range and has gone three months (-0.21%) without making net progress, while printing -2.52% in the last week. That combination - rising averages, neutral RSI, stalled three-month price, near the 52-week high - says the trend is intact but the easy money has been made. Timing implication: chasing at $56 offers poor entry risk; the higher-probability add zones are a retest of the 50-day around $50-52 (which also capped the stock on the way up) or a decisive break above $60.46 on volume.

Macro factors
  • Oil price and upstream capex: Brent holding above $86/bbl plus resilient international and offshore final investment decisions underpin oilfield services demand - but SLB's revenue sensitivity to a move below ~$70 is high, and 2026 spend is largely committed while 2027 budgets are not.
  • Middle East geopolitics: regional conflict and operational friction are actively denting activity and asset utilisation in one of SLB's highest-margin regions, and Q2 2026 beat was explicitly helped by other regions offsetting Middle East disruption.
  • AI/data-center power and cooling boom: the Kelvion acquisition ($3.4B cash + $0.7B debt, announced 2026-08-31) and the NVIDIA digital partnership are repositioning SLB as an infrastructure supplier tied to data-center capex, partially decoupling its story from the oil cycle - though none of this is yet material in reported revenue.
  • Energy transition policy and carbon capture: Havstjerne carbon storage awards and New Energy ventures provide long-dated optionality but depend on subsidies and policy durability, and remain sub-scale.
  • Rates, leverage and the dollar: with long-term debt already jumping from $9,670M (Q1 2026) to $11,140M (Q2 2026) ahead of the Kelvion close, a higher-for-longer rate path raises funding costs on a cash-funded deal, while a strong dollar pressurises translation of ~80%-plus international revenue.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings (expected late October 2026): the sequencing on 3-4% sequential revenue growth, and whether gross margin inflects off Q2's 15.5% floor.
  • Kelvion deal closing milestones: regulatory clearances and the $4.1B funding structure, plus any disclosure on Kelvion's revenue/EBITDA contribution that would let the market value the data-center cooling vertical.
  • ChampionX synergy realisation and the point at which non-cash amortization rolls off or dilutes against rising adjusted EPS, narrowing the GAAP-versus-adjusted gap.
  • Middle East normalisation and conversion of international/offshore FIDs into revenue - the cleanest path to organic growth without acquisitions.
  • Continued digital/AI and carbon-storage awards (NVIDIA partnership, Brunei Shell Petroleum enterprise agreement, ExaCT downhole control system) that support the re-rating narrative.
  • Capital returns: buybacks and dividend growth; the 2.01% yield has room to rise if FCF stays near $4.5B/yr.
Key risks
  • Multiple compression: 26.95x trailing and ~22.6x forward earnings versus a 18.07x five-year average, with P/S at 2.29x versus 1.97x - a de-rating to historical norms alone implies a materially lower share price even if earnings hold.
  • Sustained margin erosion: gross margin is down ~500bps YoY (20.5% in Q2 2024 to 15.5% in Q2 2026) and operating margin down ~560bps; if this is pricing/mix rather than a temporary reset, the earnings base is permanently lower than the market assumes.
  • Inorganic growth masking organic stagnation - the Q2 2026 +5% YoY revenue gain includes ChampionX, meaning legacy SLB may be flat to down, which makes the 22.6x forward multiple harder to defend.
  • Kelvion execution and balance-sheet risk: $4.1B of cash/debt for a business with no disclosed standalone financials, funded just as long-term debt rose from $9.67B to $11.14B quarter over quarter; integration missteps or overpayment would hit FCF and leverage.
  • Commodity and geopolitical shock: an oil break below ~$70 or a widening Middle East conflict would cut both activity and pricing power, and SLB retains a 0.774 beta to a sector that trades directly off crude.
Investment thesis

SLB is a best-in-class oilfield services franchise with real free cash flow ($4.55B TTM), a healthy balance sheet (D/E 0.49, current ratio 1.44), genuine long-term optionality in data-center cooling and carbon capture, and no sign of financial distress. But it is not a good buy right here: as of 2026-09-13 the stock at $56.06 trades at 27x trailing and ~22.6x forward earnings against an 18.1x five-year average, on a top line growing only ~3.5% and with operating margins down ~560bps YoY, while the revenue growth that exists is largely acquisition-driven. You are paying a premium multiple for a recovery and a new narrative that have not yet appeared in reported results. The right posture is patient: own it on a pullback toward the $50-52 50-day average, or wait for hard evidence of margin inflection and organic growth - not chasing a stock that has gone three months sideways while sitting 93% up its 52-week range.

AI theoretical price methodology

A three-way blend, all inputs anchored to the 2026-09-13 data: (1) forward P/E - 20x (a modest premium to the 18.07x five-year average, justified by SLB's franchise leadership and new-energy optionality but not by its ~3.5% trailing revenue growth) applied to next-FY consensus EPS of $2.478 = $49.56; (2) EV/EBITDA - 10.5x applied to forward EBITDA of roughly $9.0B (forward revenue $37.0B at a ~24-25% EBITDA margin) = ~$94.5B EV, less pro-forma net debt of ~$13.3B after the Kelvion outlay, on 1.484B shares = ~$54.70; (3) FCF yield - TTM free cash flow of $4,554M capitalised at a 5.25% target yield on $83.2B of market cap = ~$58.40. Averaging the three gives ~$54, which implies the stock is roughly 4% overvalued at $56.06 and sits well below the $63-64 analyst consensus - the gap being exactly the margin-recovery and data-center narrative that has not yet shown up in reported earnings.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read confirms the deterministic 53.1 / "Fair Fundamentals" band, so I agree with the number - but the reasons behind it matter more than the score itself. First, the cyclical-trough caveat does NOT apply here: this is not a beaten-down business at the bottom of a cycle. Revenue of $36.7B TTM is near record levels, Brent is above $86, and the balance sheet is healthy (D/E 0.49, ROIC 10.3%, current ratio 1.44), so the formula is not unfairly punishing a temporarily depressed cyclical. What it IS seeing accurately is a real deterioration: operating margin down from 17.5% in Q2 2024 to 11.9% in Q2 2026, gross margin down from 20.5% to 15.5%, and TTM EPS down ~30% - not a blip, and partly a permanent mix shift from ChampionX's lower-margin product/chemical revenue. Second, two things the fixed formula genuinely cannot see cut in opposite directions: (a) the -1.03% accruals ratio confirms reported earnings are conservative (cash flow exceeds net income) and GAAP EPS is being depressed by ChampionX-related amortization the score's growth leg treats as pure earnings decline, which argues the growth score of 51.8 is modestly harsh; and (b) the single dated, material event the score structurally cannot price - the August 31, 2026 Kelvion agreement ($3.4B cash plus $0.7B assumed debt) - is two-sided rather than clearly bullish: it opens a real AI/data-center cooling vertical, but it consumes ~90% of a year's free cash flow for a business with no disclosed standalone economics, and long-term debt already rose from $9.67B to $11.14B in the quarter. Netting these out, I would nudge the score modestly up to roughly 55-58, still solidly inside "Fair Fundamentals" - well under the ~10-point threshold - so Agree is the honest label rather than a rubber-stamp. The separate "Rich vs. its own history" valuation overlay (score for reference: 14.9) is, if anything, understated by P/E alone and better captured by P/S at 2.29x versus a 1.97x five-year average.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.