← Back to Rankings

SLBSlb N.V.

Fundamentals Score: 52.9/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Energy

Description

SLB N.V. engages in the provision of technology for the energy industry worldwide. The company operates through four divisions: Digital & Integration, Reservoir Performance, Well Construction, and Production Systems.

Score Breakdown

Growth
51.8/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
46.0/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
74.8/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 5h ago

P/E (TTM)
27.6
Yield
2.04%
RSI (14)
62.2
vs SMA20
+4.86%
vs SMA50
+13.23%
vs SMA200
+17.23%
Analyst Target
$63
+8.8%
12 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$52
-9.4%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, SLB traded at $55.01 with a $81.6B market cap, a TTM P/E of 26.4, and a forward P/E of roughly 22.2x based on consensus FY EPS of $2.48. The stock is riding positive momentum from a Q2 2026 adjusted EPS beat and an international/offshore 'upcycle' narrative, but reported margins have compressed over the past year and valuation is above its own 5-year averages.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

As of 2026-08-27, sentiment is positive: Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $0.55 beat consensus, management is talking about a structural upcycle with ~30% FID growth, and the stock has broken above its key moving averages. Analysts maintain a Buy consensus with a $63.83 target, and strength in international/offshore markets is overshadowing weak North American land activity. That said, the bullishness relies partly on forward estimates and the upcycle narrative, because reported operating margins in 2026 H1 are below year-ago levels.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue inflected higher: after YoY declines in 2025 H1 (Q1 2025 -2.5%, Q2 2025 -6.5%), growth turned positive in Q4 2025 (+5.0%) and continued into Q1 2026 (+2.7%) and Q2 2026 (+5.0%). The issue is reported profitability: TTM operating margin fell from roughly 17.0% as of mid-2025 to about 13.4% as of Q2 2026, and Q2 2026 reported operating margin was ~11.9% versus ~15.7% in Q2 2025. This looks like a cyclical recovery in revenue that has not yet fully translated into reported margin expansion, rather than a structural breakdown.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, SLB is not cheap: TTM P/E is 26.4x versus its 5-year average of 18.1x, and P/S is 2.24x versus its 5-year average of 1.97x. Forward P/E of roughly 22.2x on consensus EPS of $2.48 is more reasonable but still above the historical average. If you treat forward EPS growth of ~21% as real, the forward PEG is about 1.0x, making the stock fairly valued to slightly rich rather than a bargain.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $55.01, the market is pricing in an earnings recovery that has not yet appeared in trailing reported numbers. Consensus next-year EPS of $2.48 would justify about 22x forward earnings at the current price; management guidance for 3-4% sequential revenue growth in Q3 and Q4 revenue above $10B supports that path. But if reported margin compression persists and forward estimates come down, the stock has limited cushion from its rich 26.4x TTM multiple. This is a pay-up-for-the-upcycle setup rather than a value trap or a cheap entry.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 64.2, which is bullish but not overbought. Price was 4.7% above the 20-day SMA, 10.9% above the 50-day SMA, and 13.6% above the 200-day SMA, so the trend is clearly up. That said, the stock is extended after a large run from the $31.64 52-week low, so chasing here offers weaker reward/risk; a pullback toward the 20-day or 50-day SMA would be a cleaner entry.

Macro Factors
  • Brent crude holding near $90+/bbl amid Middle East tensions and Strait of Hormuz concerns is supporting upstream cash flows and drilling budgets.
  • International and offshore markets are accelerating while North American land activity remains subdued, which favors SLB's more global revenue mix.
  • Energy-security mandates are driving a forecast ~30% YoY increase in long-cycle deepwater and international FIDs, a direct tailwind to SLB's backlog.
  • Rising Treasury yields and intermittent sector rotation away from cyclicals can pressure the multiple despite strong fundamentals.
  • Energy transition exposure, especially CCUS projects like Havstjerne, gives SLB long-term optionality and some insulation from peak-oil narratives.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings in late October: management guided 3-4% sequential revenue growth and Q4 revenue above $10B, which would validate the upcycle.
  • Conversion of the projected ~30% increase in long-cycle FIDs into contract awards and backlog growth during 2026.
  • Further international/offshore contract wins and margin recovery, especially if reported operating margins stabilize back above 14%.
  • New energy/CCUS project milestones, including the Havstjerne carbon storage mandate, supporting the longer-term portfolio story.
Key Risks
  • A sharp drop in oil prices would quickly reduce E&P spending and undercut the entire upcycle thesis.
  • Reported operating margin compression in 2026 H1 may persist if revenue mix, charges, or project disruptions weigh on profitability.
  • Valuation is rich versus the stock's own 5-year history, so multiple compression is possible if forward EPS estimates prove too high.
  • Geopolitical disruptions in the Middle East and weak North American land activity could cause uneven quarterly results.
Investment Thesis

SLB is a high-quality, internationally diversified oilfield services leader with a strong balance sheet, clean accruals, and good FCF generation, entering what looks like an international upcycle. But at $55.01 the stock is already priced for that recovery, and reported margins have not yet confirmed it. I would not chase it here; the better risk/reward is in the low-to-mid $50s or after the Q3 report shows reported margin improvement.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Calculated by applying a 21.0x forward P/E to consensus FY EPS of $2.482, a middle ground between SLB's 5-year average P/E of 18.1x and its current forward multiple of ~22.2x; the modest premium over the historical average is justified by expected EPS growth of ~21% and the international/offshore upcycle, but tempered by cyclicality and compressed reported margins. 21.0 x 2.482 = $52.12.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The 52.9 Fair Fundamentals score is a reasonable backward-looking snapshot, but the formula cannot see that this is a cyclical earnings trough. It penalizes the 2026 H1 reported margin compression at the same time revenue is reaccelerating, consensus EPS expects +21% growth next year, and the balance sheet remains healthy (D/E 0.49, current ratio 1.44, negative accruals ratio of -1.03%). I would nudge the score modestly higher, probably into the low 60s, because the upcycle and FCF quality are real; however, the fact that reported margins have not yet confirmed the recovery and valuation is rich versus its own history keeps me from moving it to Strong. Net: the formula slightly understates the forward earnings power, but Fair-to-Good is the right general neighborhood.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.