SO — The Southern Company
The Southern Company operates as an energy utility, primarily involved in the production, transmission, and distribution of electricity. Its operations are segmented into Gas Distribution Operations, Gas Pipeline Investments, Wholesale Gas Services, and Gas Marketing Services.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, The Southern Company traded at $87.17 (market cap ~$100.3B), roughly 4% above its 52-week low of $83.80 and 13.6% below its 52-week high of $100.84, with a 3.25% dividend yield and an RSI(14) of 31.77. The stock is down 11.06% over six months even as consensus forward EPS estimates rose to $4.591, meaning the entire de-rating is multiple compression, not earnings deterioration.
The tape says cautious, the demand narrative says constructive, and the two have not reconciled. Analysts sit squarely on Hold (21 of 34 ratings, zero strong buys, 3 sells) with a $97 consensus target, and the price drift is one-directional as of 2026-09-13: -1.07% over one week, -5.78% over one month, -7.27% over three months, -11.06% over six months. The bull case is real - Q2 2026 results (reported 2026-07-30) showed adjusted EPS of $1.13 vs $0.92 a year earlier, data-center power usage up 55% YoY, and a contracted large-load pipeline that grew by 6 GW to 17 GW - but it is being outvoted by rate and financing concerns, including a $2.38B convertible senior note offering and a $68.8B long-term debt stack. Net: nobody is panicking (a 3.25% yield and 0.32 beta keep it a defensive holding), but nobody is chasing either.
Revenue is decelerating even as underlying demand accelerates. YoY revenue growth ran +17.0% in Q1 2025, +7.9% in Q2 2025, +7.5% in Q3 2025, +10.1% in Q4 2025, +8.0% in Q1 2026, then slammed to +0.1% in Q2 2026 ($6,977M vs $6,973M). Utilities pass fuel costs through revenue, so this line is noisy, but the direction is unmistakably down. Operating margin is stable ex-Q4: 25.3% in Q2 2025 vs 25.5% in Q2 2026, 33.2% in Q3 2025, 24.0% in Q1 2026. Q4 is the recurring problem child - 16.7% margin in Q4 2024 and just 13.0% in Q4 2025 (operating income $911M, EPS $0.37) on seasonal and one-off charges, so annual comparisons should be made ex-Q4. Earnings quality deserves a flag: in Q2 2026, adjusted EPS rose ~23% YoY, but operating income rose only 0.7% and GAAP net income rose 33% - the beat came from below the operating line (tax credits, AFUDC, favorable one-off comps), not from the top. The structural trend is capital: trailing-12-month capex of $13.6B against $10.2B of trailing operating cash flow produced -$3.3B of TTM free cash flow, and long-term debt climbed from $56.0B (Q3 2023) to $68.8B (Q2 2026). This is a deliberate capex cycle aimed at 9% rate-base growth, not a demand collapse - but the earnings arrive years later while the financing shows up immediately. One genuine positive: the accruals ratio of -0.91% as of 2026-06-30 is negative, meaning cash generation exceeds reported net income - the conservative pattern, not the warning sign.
As of 2026-09-13, SO trades at 20.9x TTM EPS of $4.096 and 19.0x the $4.591 consensus forward EPS - an 8.5% discount to its own 5-year average P/E of 22.84x. But price/sales of 3.32x is above the 5-year average of 3.09x, so the 'cheap vs. history' read is not clean. The PEG of 3.02 is genuinely unappealing and says the trailing growth does not support the multiple, though it is distorted by the Q4 2024/Q4 2025 charges. Verdict: fair-to-slightly-attractive on the P/E line versus its own history, and expensive relative to the quality of the growth - 19x forward earnings for a regulated utility growing EPS mid-single-digits with a 3.25% dividend yield is an average price for a premium franchise in a higher-rate world, not a bargain.
This is the cleanest signal in the dataset: consensus forward EPS has been revised UP 6.7% to $4.591 while the share price fell 11.06% over six months. Estimates and price are moving in opposite directions, so the multiple - not the earnings - is doing all the work. The market is either (a) correctly discounting that $13.6B of annual capex must be financed with more debt and equity, so per-share earnings get diluted even as absolute earnings grow, or (b) underpricing a 17 GW contracted pipeline that management says supports 9% annual rate-base growth through 2030. Watch which resolves: if Q3 2026 EPS lands at the top of the $4.50-$4.60 range and pipeline GW convert into signed contracts, today's 19x forward looks like a mispricing; if the $2.38B convertible is followed by further equity issuance and GAAP EPS keeps lagging adjusted EPS, the multiple is right.
As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 31.77 - near oversold but not there - with price 2.62% below the 20-day SMA, 6.00% below the 50-day and 5.64% below the 200-day. Every moving average sits above the price, a textbook downtrend, and the return ladder (-1.07% one week, -5.78% one month, -7.27% three months, -11.06% six months) shows steady orderly selling rather than capitulation. The stock is 4.0% off its 52-week low of $83.80. Entry-timing implication: there is no reversal signal yet. RSI near 31 creates a plausible bounce setup, but the tradeable trigger is RSI reclaiming ~40-45 and price reclaiming the 20-day SMA. For a long-horizon income buyer, scaling in between $84 and $87 toward a 3.25%+ yield is defensible; for anyone trading, the trend is still down.
- Interest rates: SO is a textbook bond proxy (beta 0.316) with $68.8B of long-term debt, so higher-for-longer policy both compresses the multiple and inflates interest expense; expected policy easing is the single largest potential de-rating driver in reverse.
- AI/data-center electricity demand: data-center power usage rose 55% YoY and the contracted large-load pipeline grew 6 GW to 17 GW - the strongest structural demand backdrop the Southeast has seen in decades, and the core of the bull case.
- Regulatory environment: earnings depend on state commission approvals of authorized ROE and capex recovery; potential political shifts at the Georgia Public Service Commission introduce localized risk to returns and cost recovery timing.
- Capital markets and equity issuance: an $80B+ capex plan requires continuous external financing, and the completed $2.38B convertible senior note offering is a reminder that dilution and credit spreads are now first-order variables for the per-share story.
- Sector rotation: utilities underperform in risk-on regimes, and the 11% six-month drawdown occurred while estimates were rising - a classic defensive de-rating rather than a fundamental miss.
- Q3 2026 earnings (late October/early November 2026): updated data-center pipeline metrics and whether management holds or raises the $4.50-$4.60 full-year guidance range it is currently tracking toward the upper end of.
- Georgia PSC and other state rate case decisions on recovery mechanisms for the multi-billion-dollar generation expansion - outcomes directly set authorized ROE and the pace of capex recovery.
- Federal Reserve policy path: rate cuts would lift the entire utility complex and lower SO's own borrowing costs on new debt issued to fund capex.
- Additional large-load contracts beyond the current 17 GW pipeline, and hyperscaler commitments that convert capacity into rate base.
- The annual dividend increase, which Southern has historically delivered each spring - a continuation reinforces the income thesis and the 3.25% yield's growth trajectory.
- Balance sheet: debt-to-equity of 1.948, current ratio of 0.787 (current liabilities of $15.7B exceed current assets of $12.4B), and $68.8B of long-term debt leave almost no cushion if credit spreads widen or refinancing costs rise.
- Persistent negative free cash flow: TTM capex of $13.6B against TTM operating cash flow of $10.2B produced -$3.3B of FCF, and FCF was negative in 8 of the last 12 quarters - growth depends on continuous external financing and dilution.
- Valuation risk: 19.0x forward earnings, PEG of 3.02, P/B of 2.505 and P/S of 3.32 above the 5-year average leave limited margin of safety if rates stay elevated.
- Regulatory/political risk: an adverse Georgia PSC outcome or delay in cost-recovery mechanisms could cut authorized ROE or strand capital already deployed.
- Data-center demand lumpiness: the 17 GW pipeline is contracted but hyperscaler capex is not obligated on the same timeline as SO's construction spend - slower conversion could leave Southern with capacity and debt ahead of the revenue.
- Earnings quality and weather noise: GAAP EPS swings wildly by quarter (Q4 2025 at $0.37 vs Q3 2025 at $1.54), and Q2 2026's net income beat came from below the operating line while operating income rose just 0.7% YoY.
Not a compelling buy at $87.17 on 2026-09-13, but not a broken business either. Southern is a genuinely advantaged regulated utility riding a real demand inflection - 17 GW of contracted large load, 55% YoY data-center usage growth, 9% targeted rate-base growth - yet it is priced at 19x forward earnings while generating -$3.3B of trailing free cash flow and carrying $68.8B of long-term debt against a 1.95 debt-to-equity ratio. Every dollar of growth must be financed, and the $2.38B convertible offering is only the first installment. With RSI at 31.77 and price below all three moving averages, both the tape and the balance sheet say wait; income investors get paid 3.25% to be patient, but the total-return case does not clear the bar until either the multiple resets lower or the data-center pipeline starts showing up in reported GAAP EPS rather than only in adjusted numbers.
Two methods averaged: (1) a justified forward P/E of 20.5x applied to the $4.591 consensus forward EPS yields $94.12 - a modest discount to Southern's own 5-year average trailing P/E of 22.84x, reflecting the higher-rate regime and ongoing convertible/equity dilution; (2) a Gordon-growth DDM using the current $2.83 annual dividend grown at 5.5% against an 8.75% required return ($3.00 / (0.0875 - 0.055)) yields $92.31. Blending the two gives roughly $93, modestly below the $97 analyst consensus and above the $87.17 price as of 2026-09-13 - the gap reflecting real data-center upside that has not yet converted into reported GAAP EPS.
The deterministic 35.2 / 'Weak Fundamentals' result is heavily shaped by the ratio screener (25.9/100), which z-scores Southern's quick ratio (0.577), current ratio (0.787) and debt-to-equity (1.948) against the full S&P 500 - a population full of asset-light tech and consumer names. For a regulated utility, sub-1.0 current ratios and ~2x leverage are the norm, not distress, so that half of the score is largely a sector artifact. The financial health leg (32.6) similarly penalizes negative free cash flow that is the deliberate mechanism of utility growth: $13.6B of TTM capex deployed into rate base that earns an authorized return, with the accruals ratio of -0.91% confirming cash generation is not running behind reported earnings. On the other hand, growth (43.1) and quality/profitability (50.5) really are mediocre - revenue growth went to ~0% YoY in Q2 2026, ROIC is 4.2%, and the earnings beat came from below the operating line. My independent read lands closer to Fair than Weak, implying a score around 45-50 - roughly a 10-15 point upward adjustment and one band shift, not two. This is also NOT the cyclical-trough pattern the methodology warns about: Southern is not a cyclical at a cycle low, it is a regulated utility mid-capex-cycle with weather-noisy GAAP EPS, so the low score cannot be written off as 'temporarily depressed.' No single dated material event (acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, fraud) justifies deviating from the mandated band/valuation mapping, so the overall lean follows the table mechanically.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.