SOLV — Solventum Corporation
Solventum Corporation, established in 2023 and headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota, operates as a healthcare entity dedicated to pioneering, producing, and commercializing diverse solutions that address critical needs for both customers and patients. The company's business activities are organized into four principal segments.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Solventum traded at $87.45 (market cap ~$15.1B), roughly 7% below its 52-week high of $94.16 and up 31% over the prior six months, with RSI at 46.29 and the deterministic value score at 45.7 ('Fair Fundamentals'). The 2026-08-05 Q2 print delivered 9.5% organic growth, adjusted EPS of $2.55, a raised full-year guide, and the announcement of a Health Information Systems separation.
Tone turned constructive after the 2026-08-05 Q2 2026 report: $2.21B revenue, +9.5% organic (versus +2.2% reported), adjusted diluted EPS of $2.55 (+50.9% YoY), a raised FY2026 organic-sales/adjusted-EPS/free-cash-flow guide, and the announced HIS spinoff. Price action confirms it as of 2026-09-13 — +10.88% over three months and +30.99% over six months — even though the most recent week gave back 4.62%. Sell-side is constructive but not euphoric: FMP shows 9 Buy / 2 Hold / 1 Sell with a $91.22 consensus target and a $97.25 recent-average target, and the residual caution is concentrated on the $4.57B of long-term debt and the wide GAAP-to-adjusted earnings gap.
Revenue was dead flat at roughly $2.0–2.1B for twelve straight quarters (Q3 2023 through Q1 2026) and then inflected — Q2 2026 printed $2,209M, the highest in the dataset, up 2.2% reported but 9.5% organic, with the ~7-point gap being FX/divestiture drag that is now the single biggest swing factor in reported growth. The GAAP operating margin is a spinoff-financing story, not a demand story: it fell from 18.9% in Q1 2024 to a trough of 4.0% in Q1 2026 as standalone public-company, IT-separation and restructuring costs landed, then rebounded to 8.2% in Q2 2026, while gross margin held a healthy 54–58% band (58.2% in Q2 2026). The most concrete improvement is on the balance sheet: long-term debt fell from $8.31B (Q2 2024) to $4.57B (Q2 2026) and stockholders' equity rose from $2.87B to $4.80B. Two important caveats: the GAAP earnings trend is polluted by a one-time gain in Q3 2025 ($7.22 EPS and $1,266M net income on just $137M operating income) and an anomalous $1,678M operating-income line in Q4 2025; and free cash flow is deteriorating, with TTM FCF of roughly -$118M after a $805M FCF year in 2024.
The headline 10.6x TTM P/E is a trap — TTM EPS of $8.265 contains the one-time Q3 2025 gain and is not a real earnings multiple. On next-FY consensus EPS of $7.16, SOLV traded at ~12.2x as of 2026-09-13, essentially in line with its own five-year average P/E of 12.54x and cheap versus MedTech peers that generally trade in the high teens. Price/sales is the dissenting metric: 1.82x versus a 1.62x five-year average, a ~12% premium to its own history, and price/cash flow of 37.8x and P/B of 3.16x are both artifacts of the carve-out equity reset. EV/EBITDA is roughly 7.8–8x on trailing figures. Net verdict: fairly valued to modestly cheap on earnings and EBITDA, mildly rich on sales and book — a fair description of a leveraged, slow-growth carve-out that is only just beginning to inflect.
The market is paying ~12x forward adjusted EPS of $7.16 — a multiple that prices in 'steady, unspectacular' and gives almost no credit for 9.5% organic growth, the quarter-over-quarter margin recovery, or the HIS separation. That is the asymmetry: if the raised FY2026 guide is hit and the spinoff executes on a tax-free basis toward the high-end targets of $113–118, the multiple has room to re-rate into the mid-teens. The flip side is that the multiple is only defensible if the GAAP-to-adjusted bridge shrinks — Q2 2026 showed $2.55 adjusted EPS against $0.53 GAAP, and until that gap narrows the market will keep discounting the adjusted number. The single most important next datapoint will be the Q3 2026 free-cash-flow trajectory (expected late October/early November 2026), because TTM FCF is negative and the raised FCF guide is the one number that must be proven rather than promised.
As of 2026-09-13 the stock sat at $87.45 with RSI at 46.29 — neutral, neither oversold nor overbought. It was 2.76% below its 20-day SMA but 3.06% above its 50-day and 12.72% above its 200-day, the classic footprint of an uptrend taking a breather rather than a trend break. Medium-term momentum is clearly positive (+10.88% three-month, +30.99% six-month) but short-term is negative (-4.62% one week), and the stock is ~7% off its 52-week high of $94.16. Practical read: no urgency and no alarm. A pullback into the 50-day area would be a better entry than chasing into the 52-week high, and a break below the 200-day would be the signal that the margin-and-spinoff story is being repriced lower.
- Rate sensitivity: $4.57B of long-term debt as of 2026-06-30 means every refinancing and every 25bp of policy-rate movement flows straight into interest expense and the equity story — falling rates are a direct tailwind, sticky rates keep the multiple compressed.
- Input-cost inflation and tariffs: management continues to flag raw-material price pressure and trade-policy/tariff risk on components, partly offset by pricing power and internal cost-reduction programs.
- FX translation: reported growth of +2.2% versus organic +9.5% in Q2 2026 shows a large currency/divestiture drag — a weaker dollar is a meaningful and underappreciated earnings lever.
- Secular MedTech demand: aging demographics, procedure-volume recovery, preventive dental care, and hospital workflow spend provide a steady low-single-digit-plus volume baseline.
- Healthcare policy and reimbursement: hospital capex cycles, reimbursement changes, and any medtech-specific regulatory or tax shifts remain sector-level swing factors outside management's control.
- Health Information Systems separation (announced 2026-08-05): the structural timeline, tax-free mechanics, and eventual standalone valuation are the single biggest value-unlock lever.
- Q3 2026 results (expected late October/early November 2026): the first real test of the raised FY2026 organic-growth, adjusted-EPS, and free-cash-flow guidance — free cash flow matters most given negative TTM FCF.
- Fall investor conferences (e.g. Wells Fargo Healthcare in September 2026): management color on long-term margin expansion and the taper of separation-related friction costs heading into 2027.
- Continued deleveraging: another leg down in long-term debt or a credit-rating upgrade would de-risk the balance sheet and likely re-rate the multiple.
- Post-separation ownership effects: reclassification into a cleaner MedTech pure-play could shift the shareholder base and change the peer multiple the market applies.
- Balance sheet tightness: $4.57B long-term debt, debt/equity of 1.10, current ratio of 1.02 and quick ratio of 0.74 leave essentially no liquidity cushion and make the equity highly sensitive to rates and any earnings miss.
- Cash conversion: TTM free cash flow was roughly -$118M as of 2026-06-30, including a -$273M Q1 2026 outflow; 2025 FCF was about -$10M versus +$805M in 2024, and a raised FCF guide does not erase that track record.
- Earnings quality: $2.55 adjusted EPS versus $0.53 GAAP in Q2 2026, plus the one-time Q3 2025 gain that inflates TTM EPS to $8.265, means headline multiples understate the true earnings yield.
- Spinoff execution: separating HIS carries dis-synergies, stranded costs, and management distraction, with no guarantee the market rewards a smaller, more levered remaining MedTech.
- Input costs and FX: reported growth has repeatedly lagged organic growth by a wide margin, and raw-material inflation is only partly offset by pricing.
- Competitive scale: as a standalone carve-out, Solventum lacks the scale and balance-sheet flexibility of the large diversified MedTech peers it competes against.
Solventum is a decent, genuinely improving MedTech with a real catalyst — but after a 31% six-month run the easy money has been made. Q2 2026's 9.5% organic growth, the sequential margin rebound, the ~$3.7B of long-term debt retired since mid-2024, and the announced HIS separation are all real positives that a 12x forward P/E does not fully reflect. Against that, TTM free cash flow is negative, the current and quick ratios are thin, and the GAAP-to-adjusted earnings gap is wide enough that headline multiples flatter the business. My calculated fair value is about $92 versus $87.45 on 2026-09-13 — mid-single-digit upside, with leverage and cash-flow execution risk doing most of the offsetting. Not a mistake to own, but not a bargain worth chasing at this level.
I anchored on a forward P/E and cross-checked with EV/EBITDA: 13.0x the $7.16 next-FY consensus EPS gives $93.08 — a ~4% premium to the 12.54x five-year average P/E, justified by the jump to +9.5% organic growth, the Q1-to-Q2 2026 GAAP operating-margin rebound, ~$3.7B of long-term debt retired since Q2 2024, and the announced HIS separation — while ~9.0x EV/EBITDA on roughly $2.2B of forward EBITDA, less ~$4.2B of net debt and divided by 173.2M shares, gives about $90.25. The $91.67 midpoint rounds to $92.
The 45.7 / 'Fair Fundamentals' score is directionally defensible, but I would nudge it 10–15 points higher — mostly by discounting what the formula structurally cannot see. The score leans on the ratio screener (33.4), which punishes a 3.18x P/B and a 37.8x price/cash flow that are artifacts of the 3M carve-out equity reset rather than a deterioration in the underlying business, and it treats trailing GAAP numbers at face value even though the Q3 2025 one-time gain ($7.22 EPS on just $137M of operating income) and the Q4 2025 $1,678M operating-income line make the trailing window nearly unreadable. What the formula does capture — an accruals ratio of -0.95% (cash running ahead of reported profit, the healthy direction) and financial health of 61.2 — understates the real balance-sheet story: long-term debt down from $8.31B in Q2 2024 to $4.57B in Q2 2026. Combined with the HIS separation (a specific, dated 2026-08-05 event the backward-looking score cannot price), the honest adjustment is Fair moving to upper-Fair/lower-Good, i.e. roughly 57–60 rather than 45.7. I would not go further than that: negative TTM free cash flow and a 1.02 current ratio are genuine, not cosmetic, concerns, and the equity-score note about the 2024 equity distortion is a legitimate reason to distrust the trend inputs.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.