SRE — Sempra
Sempra, an energy holding company founded in 1998 and headquartered in San Diego, California, conducts its operations both domestically and internationally. The firm adopted its current name in July 2021, having previously been known as Sempra Energy.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, Sempra trades at $83.34 (market cap ~$54.5B), near the bottom quarter of its $79.59-$101.04 52-week range, with a 24.0x trailing P/E and ~16.3x forward P/E on consensus EPS of $5.115. The tape is soft (below the 20/50/200-day SMAs) even though Q2 2026 earnings rose sharply and 80% of analysts rate it buy/strong-buy.
Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is genuinely two-sided. The tape is negative - SRE is -12.38% over 6 months, -9.7% over 3 months and -8.28% below its 200-day SMA - reflecting a California wildfire-liability overhang, negative free cash flow from a record capex cycle, interest-rate sensitivity and the ECA LNG Phase 1 schedule push to Q4 2026. Against that, the fundamental news flow is constructive: Q2 2026 GAAP EPS of $1.21 vs $0.71 a year earlier, reaffirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.80-$5.30, a $65B 2026-2030 regulated capex plan and a pending KKR deal to deconsolidate >$9B of debt. Analysts agree with the bulls (~80% buy/strong buy, ~$101 consensus target) while the market keeps selling - hence net-neutral, cautious sentiment rather than outright bearishness.
Revenue has been essentially flat for three years, oscillating $2.98B-$3.80B per quarter; Q2 2026 revenue of $2.997B was fractionally below Q2 2025's $3.00B, and Q1 2026's $3.655B was down ~3.8% YoY - there is no top-line growth story. The real movement is in earnings quality normalizing off a depressed base: 2H 2025 was impaired (Q3 2025 diluted EPS $0.12, Q4 2025 $0.54) while Q2 2026 diluted EPS rebounded to $1.21 from $0.71 a year earlier (+70%) with operating income of $832M vs $584M. Operating margin recovered to 27.8% in Q2 2026 from 19.5% in Q2 2025, and gross margin to 54.7% from 25.0%. Read this as an inflection off a one-off-depressed 2H25 trough layered on a structurally flat topline - improving profitability, not accelerating growth. The offset: free cash flow has been negative in all 12 quarters shown (-$1.57B in Q2 2026 alone) as capex runs far above operating cash flow.
Mixed but leaning fair-to-modestly-cheap on forward numbers. Trailing P/E of 24.0x (EPS TTM $3.488) sits basically in line with the 5-year average of 24.71x; P/S of 4.01x is modestly above the 5-year average of 3.55x, and P/B is 1.67x. But trailing EPS is depressed by 2H25 charges, so the more telling figure as of 2026-09-13 is forward P/E: $83.34 / $5.115 consensus forward EPS = 16.3x, well below the trailing multiple and below where regulated-utility peers typically trade. PEG (-1.47) is not meaningful given the lumpy earnings history. Dividend yield is 2.79%. Net: roughly fair on trailing book/sales, modestly undervalued on forward earnings.
The 24.0x trailing vs 16.3x forward gap is the whole story as of 2026-09-13. The market is paying ~16x for an earnings recovery that management guidance already assumes (2026 adjusted EPS $4.80-$5.30 reaffirmed; 2027 $5.10-$5.70), but is unwilling to pay up until it sees execution and cash flow. The -12.38% six-month drawdown is an overhang/tape problem (wildfire liability, negative FCF, LNG timing), not an estimate-cut problem - consensus EPS is holding. If SRE simply hits guidance, the trailing multiple mechanically compresses and the stock can re-rate toward the low-$90s. If estimates get trimmed on regulatory or LNG slippage, the 'cheap' forward multiple is a value trap. Watch estimate revisions and the KKR close, not the price chart alone.
As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 42.57 - weak but not oversold - with price -1.64% vs the 20-day, -5.39% vs the 50-day and -8.28% vs the 200-day SMA. That is a clean downtrend below every major moving average, with the stock in the bottom quarter of its $79.59-$101.04 52-week range. There is no reversal signal yet: a valuation buyer could scale in gradually, but trend-followers should wait for either an RSI dip toward 30-35 or a reclaim of the 50-day (roughly the high-$80s) before treating the decline as bottomed.
- Interest rates: as a capital-intensive utility funding a $65B capex plan (LT debt $31.0B, D/E 1.12x), Sempra is highly sensitive to the cost of debt and to the rate-driven attractiveness of its 2.79% dividend vs bonds.
- Texas load growth: Oncor's ERCOT batch-zero queue of ~44 GW of large-load requests (140% of current peak load) is a structural demand tailwind underpinning an expanded $47.5B base capital plan plus $10B of incremental opportunity.
- California wildfire liability and CPUC regulation: ongoing legislative debate on wildfire fund modifications and insurer claims keeps a sector-wide risk premium on SRE's California utilities.
- LNG/global gas cycle: Sempra Infrastructure's contracted LNG volumes tie the non-regulated segment to global gas pricing and project timing (ECA LNG Phase 1 now Q4 2026).
- Defensive sector rotation: with a 0.56 beta, SRE trades as a bond-proxy utility, so it moves on rate expectations and rotation into/out of defensives as much as on company news.
- Close of the KKR / Sempra Infrastructure Partners 45% stake sale, expected late Q3 2026, which should deconsolidate >$9B of project-level debt and formalize the CFO/leadership transitions.
- Q3 2026 earnings (late October/early November 2026), which will update guidance and give 2027 visibility.
- ECA LNG Phase 1 substantial completion and initial long-term SPA shipments in Q4 2026.
- Oncor/ERCOT large-load and 765kV transmission approvals, which would validate the incremental $10B capex opportunity.
- CPUC rate-case and wildfire cost-recovery decisions in California.
- California wildfire liability and adverse CPUC regulatory outcomes that could impair recovery or authorized returns.
- Persistent negative free cash flow (negative in all 12 recent quarters) and reliance on debt/equity markets to fund the $65B capex plan; rising rates pressure both funding cost and the dividend multiple.
- ECA LNG Phase 1 execution/timing risk - already slipped to Q4 2026 - which could delay contracted cash flows.
- Heavy leverage (LT debt $31.0B, D/E 1.12x) leaves limited cushion if the KKR deconsolidation is delayed or repriced.
- Execution risk from the strategic pivot to regulated U.S. utilities plus simultaneous senior leadership changes (new CFO, new SoCalGas CEO).
Sempra is a solid, low-beta regulated utility with a genuine growth pipeline (Texas/Oncor large loads, a $65B capex plan) trading at ~16.3x forward earnings, which is undemanding versus its own 24.7x trailing 5-year average. The problem is timing: the stock is in a clear downtrend, FCF is deeply negative, and the California wildfire and rate overhangs are unresolved, so there is no near-term catalyst forcing a re-rating. That makes it a reasonable long-term hold/accumulation candidate rather than a compelling buy right now - fairly valued with modest upside if guidance is delivered.
Applied a justified 18x forward P/E (a premium to the broad utility sector for above-average rate-base growth, but a discount to SRE's own 24.7x trailing 5-year average given California wildfire risk and a lower-growth regulated mix) to consensus forward EPS of $5.115, giving $92.07, rounded to $92.00. This sits between the $83.34 market price and the ~$99-$101 analyst consensus.
The deterministic 49.1 'Fair Fundamentals' score is in the right neighborhood but structurally harsh on a regulated utility mid-way through a growth-capex cycle. Three of its inputs - negative FCF in all 12 quarters, ROIC of 2.6%, and the depressed 2H25 margins/EPS - reflect the inherent economics of building rate base (deferred earnings, not deterioration), and the ratio screener penalizes sector-normal leverage (D/E 1.12x, LT D/E 0.95x) that is standard for utilities. The formula also can't see the pending KKR close that deconsolidates >$9B of debt, or that reaffirmed guidance implies a 16.3x forward P/E. I'd nudge the score roughly 10 points higher into the upper-50s (likely still Fair, borderline Good) on forward earnings power - a one-tier-at-most adjustment, hence Partially Agree rather than Agree or Disagree.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.