STZ — Constellation Brands, Inc.
Constellation Brands, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, produces, imports, markets, and sells beer, wine, and spirits in the United States, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand, and Italy. The company offers beer under the Corona Extra, Corona Familiar, Corona Hard Seltzer, Corona Light, Corona Non-Alcoholic, Corona Premier, Corona Refresca, Modelo Especial, Modelo Chelada, Modelo Negra, Modelo Oro, Victoria, Vicky Chamoy, and Pacifico brands.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-10-07, Constellation Brands trades at $118.98 (market cap ~$20.3B, beta 0.4) — up 2.55% on the day after a fiscal Q2 2027 adjusted EPS beat ($3.74 vs ~$3.55 consensus) but still down 24.8% over six months, sitting 19.1% below its 200-day SMA, with a 3.1% dividend yield at 10.7x trailing earnings and a 52-week range of $110.60–$168.60.
The mood is clearly negative: as of 2026-10-07 the stock closed at $118.98, barely above its 52-week low of $110.60 and ~29% below the 52-week high, despite four consecutive EPS beats and reaffirmed FY27 comparable EPS guidance of $11.20–$11.90. Bears point to soft U.S. beer-category depletions, a pressured Hispanic and low-to-middle-income consumer base, a still-shrinking wine and spirits top line (revenue -11.3% YoY in the Feb 2026 quarter, -9.8% in the Nov 2025 quarter), and Q2 FY27 operating margin of 30.6% versus 35.2% a year ago. The analyst mix captures the stalemate — 24 buy, 20 hold, 1 sell — even though the $160.54 consensus target implies ~35% upside.
Revenue went through a real reset, not an organic collapse: quarterly revenue slid from $2,918.7M in the quarter ended Aug 2024 to $1,920.2M by Feb 2026 (-11.3% YoY) as the mainstream wine brands were divested and wine/spirits shrank — but the last two quarters show a clear inflection, with Q1 FY27 (May 2026) down only 3.3% YoY and Q2 FY27 (Aug 2026) up 6.1% YoY to $2,633.0M, helped by +5.5% beer shipment volumes and ~20% Pacifico growth. Margins are mixed rather than steadily deteriorating: gross margin of 52.9% in the Aug 2026 quarter is up from ~51% two years ago (and the 54.3% posted in May 2026 was the best in the dataset), but operating margin compressed hard YoY — 30.6% in Q2 FY27 vs 35.2% in Q2 FY26 — so +6.1% revenue came with operating income down 7.9%, the biggest yellow flag in the trend. GAAP earnings are heavily distorted by one-offs (net losses of -$1,199M in Q2 FY25 and -$375M in Q4 FY26 from impairments/writedowns), so the cleaner read is Q2 FY27 GAAP EPS of $3.32 versus $2.65 a year earlier, on $3.74 adjusted. The genuinely anomalous line is cash: Q2 FY27 operating cash flow was -$661.8M and free cash flow -$839.0M versus +$852.1M OCF in the year-ago quarter — a ~$1.2B negative accrual swing (accruals ratio +5.56% of assets as of 2026-08-31) that either reverses in H2 or is a real earnings-quality problem.
Cheap on every static measure and cheap against its own history — but cheap for identifiable reasons. As of 2026-10-07: trailing P/E 10.66x versus a ~21.4x 5-year average (provider used only 2 years) and a ~28x 5-year median cited in the brief; PEG 0.17; forward P/E of ~10.3x on the $11.55 midpoint of FY27 comparable EPS guidance; P/S 2.21x versus a 3.99x 5-year average; dividend yield 3.1% versus a historical norm closer to 1.5%; ROE 20.9% and operating margin 30.9%. Two caveats: the reported 6.26x EV/EBITDA is understated because the balance-sheet feed shows long-term debt of $0 at 2026-08-31 (it was $9.09B the prior quarter) — add ~$9.0B of net debt to the $20.3B market cap and the truer figure is about 9x on ~$3.3B EBITDA, still below branded-beverage peers. The discount is the market asserting that the ~$11 EPS run rate is a peak rather than a base.
Earnings are winning; the price isn't — and that gap is the whole trade. STZ has beaten EPS four quarters running (Q2 FY27: $3.74 adjusted vs ~$3.55 consensus, revenue $2.63B vs ~$2.54B) and reaffirmed FY27 comparable EPS of $11.20–$11.90 while hinting September momentum could push toward the high end, yet the stock was down 9.76% in the month to 2026-10-07 and 24.81% over six months. The market is therefore not pricing the guidance — it is pricing a durable deceleration (soft depletions, a pressured core consumer) and treating current EPS as peak-cycle. Practically: if you believe the volume trend (Pacifico +20%, total beer shipments +5.5%) and the wine/spirits profit recovery hold, you are buying ~$11.5 of earnings at ~10x with a re-rating path to 13–14x; if volumes roll over, 10x is not a floor, because the E falls with them.
As of 2026-10-07 the tape is still bearish, not yet reversed: RSI(14) 37.02, price 1.76% below the 20-day SMA, 8.5% below the 50-day, and 19.1% below the 200-day, with 6-month and 3-month returns of -24.81% and -12.21%. The one constructive data point is the 1-week +2.57% move to $118.98 — above the $110.60 52-week low — following the 6 October print, an early attempt at a base, but RSI in the high 30s is weak rather than oversold and there is no higher-low or 50-day reclaim yet. Timing implication: this is a value-hunter's setup, not a momentum one — waiting for a close above roughly $130 (50-day area) or a successful retest of $110–113 would confirm the bottom rather than averaging into a falling knife.
- U.S. consumer softness: persistent inflation and compressed discretionary budgets among lower-to-middle-income and Hispanic households are suppressing off-premise alcohol depletions — the core demand driver for Modelo, Corona and Pacifico.
- Interest-rate environment: elevated rates have compressed multiples across consumer staples, and STZ's 0.4 beta means it offers little portfolio hedge while staples stay out of favor, while still carrying roughly $9B of debt to service.
- Tariffs on Mexican imports: STZ brews essentially all of its beer in Mexico, making tariff policy a direct gross-margin risk; the wine/spirits swing back to profit was partly aided by tariff recoveries, a non-repeating tailwind.
- Input-cost normalization: packaging, aluminum and agricultural costs have stabilized after two inflationary years, providing a modest margin tailwind that supports the 53% gross margin level.
- Category and regulatory pressure: GLP-1 adoption, moderation trends among younger drinkers and evolving alcohol labeling/health guidance are structural headwinds for the entire alcohol complex, not just STZ.
- Holiday retail off-take (November–December) — the key read on whether Pacifico's ~20% growth and total beer shipment growth of +5.5% are durable into calendar 2027.
- SpikedAde spiked-RTD integration and distribution scale-up through Gold Network distributor partners ($75M upfront plus contingent payments, announced 2026-10-06).
- Continued Wine & Spirits operating-profit recovery from cost optimization and tariff recoveries, which would remove the segment's drag on consolidated margins.
- Debt paydown (long-term debt fell from $10.28B in Nov 2025 to $9.09B in May 2026) lowering interest expense and mechanically lifting EPS.
- Multiple re-rating if beats continue: FY27 guidance migrating to the high end ($11.90) and any evidence that off-premise depletions have bottomed.
- Volume and pricing risk: the Mexican beer franchise is the profit engine, flagship brands already showed 'minor volume friction,' and the U.S. category backdrop remains soft.
- Cash-flow anomaly: Q2 FY27 operating cash flow of -$661.8M and FCF of -$839.0M versus +$852.1M OCF a year earlier, with accruals at +5.56% of assets — if it doesn't reverse, reported EPS is outrunning cash generation.
- Operating margin compression: 30.6% in Q2 FY27 versus 35.2% YoY means revenue growth is not currently converting into profit growth.
- Liquidity and leverage: only $98.5M of cash, a current ratio of 0.999 and a quick ratio of 0.53 against ~$9.1B of debt (the reported 0.013 debt-to-equity is a data artifact from a missing long-term-debt figure).
- Structural demand risk: GLP-1 usage, moderation among younger consumers and a pressured Hispanic consumer base could cap beer growth for years rather than quarters.
Not a buy here — but the cheapness is real and worth close monitoring. This is a high-quality franchise misjudged by a formula that sees divestiture-driven revenue declines and one distorted cash-flow quarter rather than a 30.9% operating-margin beer business growing shipments 5.5%, paying a 3.1% dividend and trading at ~10x earnings. Against that, the tape is broken (19.1% below the 200-day), operating margin compressed 4.6 points YoY, and cash flow went sharply negative in the latest quarter, so there is no confirmation the bottom is in. The honest read: $118.98 prices in zero growth, which makes it a reasonable place for a patient, income-oriented investor to begin scaling in on evidence (a 50-day reclaim or a successful retest of $110) — not a place to back up the truck today.
Multiple-based and worked from the data: I apply a 13.0x forward P/E to the $11.55 midpoint of FY27 comparable EPS guidance of $11.20–$11.90, giving $150.15, rounded to $150. The 13x is justified as a premium to Molson Coors (~10x) for STZ's superior brand mix and mid-single-digit shipment growth, a discount to Heineken/AB InBev (~14–15x) for the soft U.S. category and weaker cash conversion, and it reconciles a ~3.1% dividend yield plus ~4–6% EPS growth into a ~10–11% expected total return. Cross-checks anchor the number: ~9x EV/EBITDA on ~$3.3B EBITDA against ~$9.0B net debt implies ~$165, while a normalized ~$1.6B FCF at a 7% required yield implies ~$134 — so $150 sits in the upper-middle of that $134–165 band, below the $160.54 analyst consensus.
I would rate this higher than 39.1 — call it 53–57, i.e. Fair rather than Weak Fundamentals — for three things the fixed model structurally cannot see. First, the growth leg (38.2) penalizes revenue declines that stem largely from divesting the mainstream wine brands, not from the core business eroding: beer shipment volumes rose 5.5% and Pacifico ~20%. Second, the quality leg (28.7) is dominated by a 65% accruals sub-weight computed off a single quarter, and that quarter (ended 2026-08-31) shows OCF of -$661.8M against prior-quarter OCF of exactly +$661.8M — a suspiciously symmetrical figure that looks like a working-capital/timing or data-alignment artifact rather than a permanent break in earnings quality; normalize it and the accruals penalty largely vanishes. Third, the financial-health leg (65.0) is flattered by a balance-sheet feed reporting long-term debt of $0 at 2026-08-31 when it was $9.09B the quarter before, and the 6.26x EV/EBITDA in the ratio screener inherits that same missing-debt error (true figure is closer to ~9x). Still not a strong score: ROIC of 10.5% is only adequate, operating margin did compress YoY, and the negative cash quarter is a genuine risk until it reverses — which is why I move the band one tier, not two. Because the mandated mapping pairs Weak Fundamentals with 'Cheap vs. its own history' and produces Cautiously Bearish, I am keeping that lean; the 2026-10-06 earnings beat and the $75M SpikedAde acquisition are not a material dated event of the kind that would justify overriding the table.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.