#448S&P 500 rank

SYY — Sysco Corporation

2-yr score: 39.8/100 (Lower 20%)Consumer Defensive12d
$82.06−1.00%
Description

Sysco Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in the marketing and distribution of various food and related products to the foodservice or food-away-from-home industry in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and internationally. It operates through U.S.

Score breakdownLatest quarter42.5 · Weak
Growth
39.8
Quality / Profitability
52.6
Financial health
43.3
Ratio screener
39.6
Track record: 2-yr avg 39.8 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 41.9 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 3, 2026 (in 12 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:27 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
22.4
Yield
2.56%
RSI (14)
59.8
vs SMA20
+3.64%
vs SMA50
+1.80%
vs SMA200
+2.32%
Analyst target
$88
+7.6%
3 analysts
AI theoretical price
$89
+8.5%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, SYY trades at $83.21 (~$39.8B market cap), near the middle of its $68.19-$91.85 52-week range, at 22.7x trailing GAAP EPS ($3.667) but only ~16.4x FY27 consensus adjusted EPS ($5.074), with a 2.56% dividend yield, RSI 54.7 and the price above its 20-, 50- and 200-day averages.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment is genuinely two-sided. The positives: Q4 FY26 (reported mid-August 2026) showed sales of $22.12B, +4.7% YoY, adjusted EPS of $1.53 (a $0.02 beat), U.S. Foodservice volume +2.5% and local case volume +2.6%; management guided FY27 sales +6-7% and adjusted EPS +9-11%; and the Sept 9, 2026 AI efficiency program (targeting $500M of savings by FY29) was well received. The analyst distribution (18 Buy / 9 Hold / 3 Sell) supports a 'Moderate Buy' consensus. The negatives: the market is skeptical that the FY27 EPS lift is organic (it leans on a 53rd fiscal week plus cost-outs rather than accelerating volume), a cautious U.S. restaurant-traffic backdrop caps unit growth, and recent cautious notes (e.g., a Hold downgrade) plus a -1.75% one-month return against a +3.95% one-week bounce show a market that is range-trading, not conviction-buying.

Quarterly trend

Revenue is a steady, low-single-digit grower, not an accelerating or inflecting story: quarterly sales have chopped between roughly $19.6B and $22.1B for two-plus years, and Q4 FY26 (June 2026) came in at $22.12B versus $21.14B a year earlier (+4.7%). Full-year FY26 revenue was ~$84.6B. Operating margin tells the more important story: FY26 quarters ran 3.78% / 3.33% / 3.02% / 4.45% versus 3.94% / 3.53% / 3.48% / 4.20% in the prior year — i.e., three of four quarters compressed YoY, with only the June quarter expanding. EPS is seasonal (the June quarter is always strongest: $1.23, $1.10, $1.15 across FY24-FY26), and the trailing GAAP figure ($3.667) sits well below adjusted EPS (Q4: GAAP $1.15 vs adjusted $1.53), so a large recurring non-GAAP gap is doing real work in the headline numbers. Verdict: stable-to-slightly-soft through FY26 with a Q4 margin bounce — a blip of improvement, not yet a structural upshift. There is no cyclical-trough dynamic here; Sysco is a defensive staples distributor, not a commodity/cyclical business bottoming out.

Valuation assessment

Fairly valued, with a modest forward-looking discount. As of 2026-09-13, the trailing P/E of 22.67 sits essentially on top of the 5-year average of 22.93 (the deterministic model tags this 'Neutral vs. its own history'), and P/S of 0.471 is slightly below the 5-year average of 0.50. But the trailing P/E is flattered by a GAAP figure that understates the company's adjusted earnings run-rate: against FY27 consensus adjusted EPS of $5.074, the forward P/E is only ~16.4x, and the 2.56% dividend yield is covered. The PEG ratio of -10.6 is negative and therefore meaningless — ignore it. Bottom line: not cheap, not expensive; a defensive staples name trading in line with its own multiple history and at a mild forward discount, with the multiple unlikely to re-rate without organic volume acceleration.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At ~16.4x forward adjusted EPS, the market is pricing FY27's 9-11% adjusted EPS growth as roughly deliverable and no more. The catch is composition: a meaningful slice of that growth comes from a 53rd fiscal week and planned cost-outs, not from organic volume (local case volume was only +2.6% in Q4 FY26). So the setup is 'show-me': if organic volume stays ~2.5%, adjusted EPS growth converges toward ~5-6% revenue growth and the forward multiple starts to look full; if volume reaccelerates or the AI cost program ($500M by FY29) lands early, there is room for both estimate and multiple upside. The stock is not underpricing a turnaround — there is no turnaround to price — and it is not pricing in growth that hasn't shown up. It is simply discounting the guidance as-is.

Technical picture

Neutral-to-mildly-constructive and range-bound. As of 2026-09-13, RSI was 54.7 (squarely neutral, neither overbought nor oversold), with the price 1.2% above the 20-day SMA, 0.29% above the 50-day SMA and 4.64% above the 200-day SMA. The razor-thin 20-vs-50 spread signals consolidation rather than a trend, and the one-week +3.95% bounce against a one-month -1.75% shows chop. Entry-timing implication: no edge here — not oversold enough to buy aggressively, not extended enough to avoid; a pullback toward the low-to-mid $70s would be a materially better risk/reward than chasing the mid-$80s.

Macro factors
  • Soft U.S. restaurant traffic and cautious consumer spending (persistent cost-of-living pressure) directly cap Sysco's local case-volume growth — the key organic driver.
  • Food-category inflation (notably meat and seafood) can pressure gross margin, partially offset by strategic sourcing and logistics productivity.
  • Elevated Treasury yields raise the cost of servicing ~$12.3B of long-term debt (~$10.5B net of $1.79B cash) and keep the cost of capital high — though ~$1.9B TTM free cash flow and a defensive profile buffer this.
  • Freight/fuel cost volatility tied to oil prices and geopolitical friction feeds directly into distribution expense.
  • Defensive consumer-staples rotation: a low beta of 0.63 makes SYY a relative haven in risk-off tape but a laggard in strong risk-on markets.
Key catalysts
  • Q1 FY27 earnings (typically late October/early November 2026) — the first real test of the 6-7% sales / 9-11% EPS guidance and of domestic local case-volume trends.
  • Milestones on the new AI efficiency program (Sept 9, 2026 announcement) targeting at least $500M of cost savings by FY29 — could drive margin-expansion credibility and multiple re-rating if executed early.
  • The 53rd week in the FY27 fiscal calendar mechanically boosts FY27 EPS and will flatter reported growth versus underlying trend.
  • Continued buyback-driven share shrinkage and dividend growth (2.56% yield) supporting per-share metrics.
Key risks
  • Razor-thin profitability — net margin 2.1% and operating margin 3.7% — leaves little cushion, so a small gross-margin or cost shock swings earnings meaningfully.
  • High leverage and a buyback-shrunken equity base: D/E of 5.6x and stockholders' equity of just $2.67B against ~$12.3B long-term debt (~2.8x net debt/EBITDA); rising rates raise refinancing and interest cost.
  • Soft restaurant traffic limiting organic volume growth (local case volume +2.6% in Q4) — the primary reason the FY27 EPS growth is non-organic.
  • Adjusted-vs-GAAP earnings gap: Q4 FY26 GAAP EPS $1.15 vs adjusted $1.53 — a large recurring gap that warrants watching for quality-of-earnings degradation.
  • FY27 EPS growth dependent on the 53rd week and planned cost-outs; if either disappoints, the low-organic-growth reality becomes the story.
Investment thesis

Sysco is a solid, cash-generative, defensive staples distributor — not a compelling new-money buy at $83.21. My independent fair-value work lands near $89 (~7% upside), which sits squarely between the recent consensus target (~$84-90) and the current price, so the stock is roughly fairly valued rather than mispriced. The business is stable but structurally slow (revenue ~+5%, margins ~3.7% operating), leverage is real, and the FY27 profit guide leans on a 53rd week and cost-outs rather than volume. This is a hold-and-collect-the-dividend name, best bought on a pullback toward the low-to-mid $70s; the mandated Bearish label in this report stems from the deterministic score's weak band, not from my own fair-value work.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a justified 17.5x forward P/E — modestly below Sysco's long-run forward adjusted multiple range (~18-19x) to reflect slow ~5% organic growth and thin margins — to FY27 consensus adjusted EPS of $5.074, giving $88.80, and cross-checked it against ~13x EV/EBITDA on ~$4.1-4.3B of forward EBITDA less ~$10.5B net debt (which implied ~$89-92), converging on a single fair value of $89.00 as of 2026-09-13.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

Independently, the 42.5 'Weak Fundamentals' score is too harsh on the balance-sheet legs. Its ratio screener (39.6) and financial-health (43.3) components punish a 15x P/B and a 5.6x D/E that are buyback artifacts, not distress — Sysco has repurchased itself down to $2.67B of equity while running net debt/EBITDA of only ~2.8x and a healthy 12.4% ROIC, so the leverage signal is distorted. The growth score (39.8) is fair: revenue genuinely grows only ~5%. Net, I'd lift the score to roughly the low-to-mid 50s ('Fair Fundamentals'), a ~10-12 point adjustment that shifts the band one tier — hence Partially Agree rather than Disagree. I want to be explicit that this is NOT the cyclical-trough pattern the backtest warns about: Sysco is a defensive staples distributor with stable demand, not a commodity/cyclical business at a cyclical bottom, so a low trailing score is not masking an imminent recovery — it simply reflects a mature, slow-growth, thin-margin, buyback-levered business that the formula reads more harshly than warranted.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.