#131S&P 500 rank

TEL — TE Connectivity plc

2-yr score: 57.1/100 (Next 20%)Technology6d
$213.98+0.15%
Description

TE Connectivity plc, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells connectivity and sensor solutions in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia–Pacific, and the Americas. The company operates through two reportable segments, Transportation Solutions and Industrial Solutions.

Score breakdownLatest quarter59.1 · Fair
Growth
61.2
Quality / Profitability
56.6
Financial health
86.9
Ratio screener
54.9
Track record: 2-yr avg 57.1 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 53.6 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 28, 2026 (in 6 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
20.8
Yield
1.46%
RSI (14)
51.5
vs SMA20
-0.58%
vs SMA50
+1.79%
vs SMA200
+0.28%
Analyst target
$245
+14.5%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$240
+12.2%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, TE Connectivity traded at $211.96 (market cap ~$61.5B) after a +3.58% session, sitting roughly 2.9% above both its 20-day (~$206) and 50-day (~$206) moving averages but 1.8% below its 200-day (~$216), and about 16% below its 52-week high of $252.56. The fundamental picture is stronger than the price: Q3 FY26 (reported 2026-07-24) produced record orders of $5.7B (+27% YoY) on 14% revenue growth and a 21.9% adjusted operating margin.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is genuinely mixed. The bull case is visible in the tape: TEL rallied 3.58% on the day, is up 6.29% over six months and 1.59% over the past week, and the analyst community is constructive with 14 Buy ratings, 0 Sells, and a consensus price target of $248 (range $220-$300). The bear case shows up in the drift: the stock is down 1.05% over one month and up only 0.75% over three, is still below its 200-day average, and FMP's own consensus rating field reads 'Hold.' The market is essentially splitting the difference between a genuinely strong operating quarter (record $5.7B orders, +21% organic growth in Industrial Solutions, 90bp of adjusted margin expansion) and two overhangs: management's own commentary that AI-infrastructure hyper-growth rates are 'normalizing' as capacity scales, and a soft traditional automotive cycle. That tension, plus a valuation that is only in line with TEL's own five-year history rather than cheap, explains the range-bound chop between roughly $190 and $253.

Quarterly trend

The three-year quarterly record shows a clear, sustained inflection rather than a blip. Revenue sat in a $3.83B-$4.07B band through FY24, then broke out: $4.14B (Mar-25), $4.53B (Jun-25), $4.58B (Sep-25), $4.67B (Dec-25), $4.74B (Mar-26), and a record $5.16B (Jun-26). Year-over-year growth went from +0.8% (Sep-24), +0.1% (Dec-24) and +4.4% (Mar-25) to +13.9%, +12.5%, +21.7%, +14.5% and +13.8% across the last five quarters - roughly a 10-point step-change in the growth rate that has now persisted for five consecutive prints. Margins confirm the operating leverage: operating margin ran 16.0%-19.5% through FY24 and has run 18.1%-20.9% over the last five quarters, with Jun-26 at 19.0% GAAP (21.9% adjusted, up 90bp YoY) and gross margin at 35.6% versus 35.3% a year ago. Diluted EPS tells the same story once you strip out two large below-the-line one-offs: net income of $1.803B in Dec-23 on just $731M of operating income (a ~$1.07B non-operating gain) and net income of only $13M in Mar-25 on $748M of operating income (a ~$735M non-operating hit, EPS $0.04). Excluding those, GAAP EPS has climbed from a $1.75-$1.86 run-rate in FY24 to $2.14-$2.22 in FY25 to $2.53-$2.90 in FY26, with Jun-26 adjusted EPS at $2.94. Free cash flow is similarly strong and lumpy-but-growing: $3.64B over the trailing four quarters (including $1.204B in the Jun-26 quarter alone) against $1.11B of capex. Verdict: accelerating growth, expanding margins, record order book - not a cyclical trough, and not a decelerating story either.

Valuation assessment

Fair, not cheap and not expensive. As of 2026-09-13, TEL traded at 20.6x trailing EPS of $10.364 versus a five-year average P/E of 21.13x - essentially a 2-3% discount to its own history - and at 18.5x the next-FY consensus EPS of $11.446. On sales it is actually at a premium: 3.21x TTM versus a 5-year average of 2.90x. EV/EBITDA is 13.4x, price/book is 4.66x, and the dividend yield is 1.46%. The FCF yield is the most attractive single number: $3.64B of trailing FCF on a $61.5B market cap is 5.9%. The given PEG of 0.186 is not usable (it implies triple-digit growth). Bottom line: you are paying roughly the market multiple or TEL's own historical multiple for a business growing revenue ~14% with expanding margins - reasonable, but with no valuation cushion if the AI/data-center order flow cools.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The stock at $211.96 embeds about 11% EPS growth from the $10.36 trailing base to the $11.45 forward estimate, which is arguably conservative against what the order book is saying: record Q3 FY26 orders of $5.7B, up 27% YoY, with Industrial Solutions organic growth of 21%. Orders lead revenue by roughly two to four quarters, so if that backlog converts, consensus FY27 estimates look beatable and a 20-21x multiple on $12+ of EPS gets you to $240-$250. The flip side is that the market is already discounting management's 'normalization' language on AI-infrastructure hyper-growth plus a soft auto cycle, and at 3.2x sales (above the 2.9x five-year average) there is no deep-value floor if that normalization arrives faster than expected. Practically: this is a stock where you want estimate revisions to confirm the order book before paying up, not one where you're being paid to wait.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI-14 stood at 56.33 - neutral, no overbought or oversold signal. Price was 2.88% above the 20-day SMA (~$206) and 2.83% above the 50-day SMA (~$206), but 1.81% below the 200-day SMA (~$216), which is the key detail: short-term momentum has turned up inside a longer-term downtrend/consolidation. With the stock at $211.96 inside a 52-week range of $190.27-$252.56, it sits mid-range - roughly 11% above the low and 16% below the high - and the returns profile (1-month -1.05%, 3-month +0.75%, 6-month +6.29%) confirms range-bound chop rather than a trend. Entry-timing implication: there is no oversold discount to exploit here. The cleanest signals to watch are a decisive close above the ~$216 200-day line (trend confirmation, opens the path back toward the $245-$253 area) or a breakdown below ~$200 (which would put the $190 low in play). Buying the middle of the range only makes sense for investors with a multi-quarter horizon on the electrification/AI-power theme.

Macro factors
  • AI data-center buildout: the dominant tailwind - power distribution and high-speed connectivity content per rack is rising sharply, and TE's Industrial segment grew 21% organically in Q3 FY26. The offsetting risk is that this is the single most consensus-crowded capex theme in the market, and management has already flagged hyper-growth rates 'normalizing.'
  • Grid hardening and electrification capex: multi-year utility investment in transmission, distribution and power reliability underpins the Richards Manufacturing (April 2025) and Astrodyne TDI (July 2026) deals; this demand is more regulated and less sentiment-driven than AI capex.
  • Automotive cyclicality and EV adoption pace: Transportation Solutions is roughly half of net sales and grew only 5% organically in Q3 FY26. Global auto production softness, choppy EV demand, and tariff-driven cost inflation are direct drags on that half of the business.
  • Tariffs, trade policy and supply-chain regionalization: a globally manufactured, connector-heavy product line is exposed to tariff costs and to customers reshoring supply chains - a mixed bag that pressures near-term cost but can raise content per unit over time.
  • Interest rates and FX: a ~1.16 beta industrial with meaningful non-USD revenue is sensitive both to discount-rate-driven multiple compression and to dollar translation; the 200-day moving average TEL is trading below reflects that macro drag more than any company-specific deterioration.
Key catalysts
  • Q4 and full-year FY26 earnings in late October/early November 2026 - consensus expects EPS of roughly $3.05-$3.07 on $5.25-$5.3B of revenue. The FY27 guidance framework and any update on whether the record $5.7B order book is still building will be the single biggest driver of the next move.
  • Closing and integration of the $1.4B Astrodyne TDI acquisition, including regulatory clearance timing, purchase-multiple disclosure, and any synergy targets; follow-on bolt-ons funded by $3.6B of trailing free cash flow are also plausible.
  • Conversion of the AI/data-center and grid-hardening order book into revenue - a third consecutive quarter of double-digit organic Industrial growth would likely force upward EPS revisions and push the stock back through its 200-day average.
  • Capital return acceleration: with 0.42x debt/equity, a 1.88x current ratio and $1.24B of cash, TE has room to step up buybacks or dividend growth, which would support the multiple.
  • Analyst estimate revisions and target changes post-guidance (current targets: consensus $248, average recent $243.20, range $220-$300).
Key risks
  • AI data-center order normalization: management has explicitly said the earliest hyper-growth rates in some AI infrastructure rollouts are moderating as capacity scales. If that becomes a genuine digestion pause, the highest-multiple part of the growth story (Industrial organic +21%) decelerates and 18.5x forward earnings stops looking cheap.
  • Automotive downturn: Transportation is ~50% of revenue and delivered only 5% organic growth last quarter. A global production cut or an EV demand stall would hit half the company at the same time the AI narrative is being scrutinized.
  • Valuation has no cushion: 3.21x TTM sales versus a 2.90x five-year average means TEL is already priced above its historical sales multiple; a growth stumble would compress the multiple and the estimate simultaneously.
  • M&A and returns on capital: reported ROIC of 8.8% and 4.66x price/book reflect a goodwill-heavy balance sheet built through acquisitions. The $1.4B Astrodyne deal adds integration and purchase-accounting risk precisely when the qualitative score is weakest.
  • Margin give-back from tariffs, input costs and mix: the 21.9% adjusted operating margin (up 90bp YoY) relies on pricing actions and productivity offsetting inflation; if pricing power fades in the auto channel, the margin expansion reverses - and note GAAP operating margin actually compressed ~80bp YoY in Q3 FY26 (19.8% to 19.0%), with the gap to adjusted driven by amortization and charges.
  • FX and non-operating noise: the last three years include a ~$1.07B non-operating gain (Dec-23) and a ~$735M non-operating hit (Mar-25), evidence that headline GAAP numbers can swing violently on items unrelated to the operating business.
Investment thesis

TE Connectivity is a genuinely well-run industrial compounder - 14% revenue growth, a record $5.7B order book up 27% YoY, 21.9% adjusted operating margins, a 5.9% free cash flow yield and 0.42x debt/equity - levered to two durable secular themes in AI data-center power and grid hardening. The problem is the price, not the business: at $211.96 it trades at 20.6x trailing earnings versus a 21.13x five-year average and 3.21x sales versus a 2.90x average, meaning you are paying full freight for a story where the key growth engine is explicitly 'normalizing' and the cyclical half of the company (Transportation) is only growing 5% organically. This is a name to accumulate on weakness toward the low end of its $190-$253 range or on a confirmed break back above the 200-day average - not one with enough margin of safety to chase here. Neutral.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied 21.0x (essentially TE's own five-year average P/E of 21.13x, justified by ~12-14% revenue growth, expanding margins, a 5.9% FCF yield and a 0.42x debt/equity balance sheet) to the next-FY consensus EPS of $11.446, which yields $240.4, rounded to $240. I cross-checked this with an EV/EBITDA approach: ~$4.9B of EBITDA (derived from the given 13.445x EV/EBITDA on an enterprise value of ~$65.8B) at 15.0x gives a $73.4B enterprise value; subtracting $4.29B of net debt ($5.53B long-term debt less $1.24B cash) gives ~$69.1B of equity, or ~$238 per share on ~290M shares - converging on the same ~$240 figure from two independent methods.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lands within about five points of the 59.1 'Fair Fundamentals' score, so I confirm the band. The score's strengths are real and empirically grounded: an accruals ratio of -2.92% (cash generation running ahead of reported net income, the healthy Sloan-anomaly pattern), a financial-health score of 86.9 (0.42x debt/equity, 1.88x current ratio, positive and rising FCF), and clean, hard-to-manipulate growth inputs. Where the formula is structurally blind - and where I would nudge it higher rather than lower - is the order book: record Q3 FY26 orders of $5.7B (+27% YoY) and 21% organic growth in Industrial are leading indicators that a trailing-YoY growth leg (61.2) simply cannot see, and they argue for a growth score closer to the mid-70s. I would also flag that the two most distorted quarters in the window go the wrong way for a naive score: the Dec-23 quarter shows $1.803B of net income on $731M of operating income (a ~$1.07B below-the-line gain that flatters trailing comparisons) and the Mar-25 quarter shows $13M of net income on $748M of operating income (~$735M below-the-line hit that depresses them); neither reflects operating reality. Adjusting for order momentum and those one-offs, I'd put fair value nearer the mid-60s - still 'Fair,' arguably brushing 'Good,' but not two tiers away. Importantly, the cyclical-trough caveat does not apply here: this is not a semiconductor-style down-cycle with depressed trailing numbers. Revenue and orders are at all-time highs, margins are expanding, and the score is middling because of a full-ish valuation and a modest 8.8% reported ROIC, not because of temporary weakness. That is why I agree with 'Fair' rather than pushing for the lower band.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.