#425S&P 500 rank

TGT — Target Corporation

2-yr score: 41.4/100 (Lower 20%)Consumer Defensive
$152.39−1.05%
Description

Target Corp. engages in the operation and ownership of general merchandise stores. It offers food and general merchandise, clothing and household goods, electronics, and toys.

Score breakdownLatest quarter50.2 · Fair
Growth
60.1
Quality / Profitability
59.9
Financial health
62.7
Ratio screener
40.0
Track record: 2-yr avg 41.4 (Weak, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 42.8 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 18, 2026 (in 27 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
15.7
Yield
2.97%
RSI (14)
44.1
vs SMA20
-1.56%
vs SMA50
-3.31%
vs SMA200
+15.07%
Analyst target
$164
+7.9%
31 analysts
AI theoretical price
$160
+5.0%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Target trades at $155.83 (market cap $70.8B) with a 16.1x trailing P/E and a 2.97% dividend yield, sitting 5.2% lower over the past week but still up 32.8% over six months. The stock is 3.1% below its 20-day SMA yet 25.7% above its 200-day, and the headline Q2 FY2026 beat was materially flattered by roughly $1.65/share of one-off tax/tariff refunds.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment has cooled from euphoric to cautious consolidation. The Aug 19, 2026 Q2 print was a genuine headline beat ($26.54B revenue vs. ~$26.13B consensus, comps +3.8%, traffic +3.6%, digital +8.7%, GAAP EPS $4.11 vs. ~$2.35 expected) and management raised FY2026 guidance to ~5% sales growth and $9.90-$10.90 EPS. But roughly $1.65 of that EPS came from discrete tax/tariff refunds (~90bps of operating margin), sell-side notes (including a Bernstein downgrade) argue the Fiddelke turnaround is now priced in after a 70-80% twelve-month run, and the analyst book is split almost evenly (28 buy / 28 hold / 4 sell) with consensus targets of ~$163-$166 - barely above the 2026-09-13 price of $155.83. That combination of a strong print, a raised guide, and a virtually exhausted price target is exactly what a Neutral read looks like.

Quarterly trend

The three-year arc is a stumble followed by a genuine inflection, with one large asterisk. FY2025 (quarters ending May 2025 through Jan 2026) was a down year: revenue fell ~1.7% to ~$104.8B (Q3 FY2025 revenue -1.6% YoY to $25.27B, Q4 FY2025 -1.5% to $30.45B) and full-year EPS slipped to $8.13 from $8.86. FY2026 then inflected hard but unevenly: Q1 (ending 2026-05-02) revenue rose 6.7% YoY to $25.44B while operating income actually fell 22.9% to $1.135B on margin pressure; Q2 (ending 2026-08-01) revenue rose 5.3% to $26.54B and operating income nearly doubled to $2.56B (operating margin 9.65% vs. 5.22% a year earlier; gross margin 33.7% vs. 29.0%). That Q2 margin explosion is not run-rate - it reflects non-recurring tax/tariff refunds, and the accruals ratio of -3.15% does not flag it because refunds are cash. Strip the one-offs and the underlying story is real but modest: positive traffic, mid-single-digit digital growth, same-day delivery +25%, and a raised guide - an early-cycle recovery, not a step-change in earning power.

Valuation assessment

Optically cheap, genuinely fair-to-slightly-rich on clean numbers. As of 2026-09-13 the trailing P/E of 16.1x sits just below Target's 17.59x five-year average, P/S of 0.657 is below the 0.68 five-year average, and PEG is 1.309 - all of which screen as mild discount. But TTM EPS of $9.665 embeds about $1.65/share of non-recurring refunds; on roughly $8.00 of clean trailing EPS the multiple is closer to 19.5x, i.e., a premium to its own history rather than a discount. The forward multiple (15.5x on the $10.079 analyst next-FY figure) has the same flaw. A 2.97% dividend yield and a 6.4% trailing FCF yield ($4.55B LTM FCF on a $70.8B market cap) are the honest supports; the low headline P/E is not.

Price vs. earnings playbook

This is a classic case of price running well ahead of reported earnings. FY2025 EPS actually declined to $8.13 from $8.86, yet TGT shares rose roughly 70-80% over the trailing twelve months to the $155.83 print on 2026-09-13 - the market re-rated the multiple in anticipation of the recovery rather than in response to delivered profit. The recovery has partially arrived (comps +3.8%, traffic +3.6%, raised guidance), and consensus now sits at $10.079 for next FY against a $10.40 guidance midpoint. The catch: ~$1.65 of that guide is refund-driven, so the clean number is nearer $8.75. The next leg up therefore has to come from clean margin expansion and sustained traffic, not from further multiple expansion. Watch the Nov 18, 2026 Q3 print (~$2.04 consensus): if comps and gross margin hold without the refund tailwind, the current ~15x guided multiple is defensible; if margins normalize back toward a 5-6% operating rate, expect a de-rating toward 14-15x clean EPS.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) stood at 47.87 - dead neutral, no overbought or oversold signal. Price was 3.07% below its 20-day SMA (approximately $160.77) after a -5.24% week, but 4.61% above its 50-day SMA (~$148.96) and 25.74% above its 200-day SMA (~$123.93). That is a strongly extended, multi-month uptrend that is currently cooling off in the short term, with the stock at roughly 91% of its 52-week range ($83.44-$170.75). Read: not a breakdown, but not an entry either. The cleanest timing levels are a pullback toward the 50-day near $149, or a decisive reclaim of the 20-day near $161; buying into a stock 26% above its 200-day after a hot six months is buying extension, not value.

Macro factors
  • Value-conscious consumer spending: inflation fatigue is keeping shoppers promotion-sensitive. Target has cut prices on 10,000+ everyday items and held back-to-school costs flat, which protects traffic (+3.6% in Q2 FY2026) but caps basket size and gross margin.
  • Tariffs and sourcing costs: the Q2 FY2026 windfall came from favorable tariff adjustments and refunds that are explicitly non-recurring. Ongoing trade policy and international sourcing costs remain a persistent gross-margin risk for a big-box importer with a discretionary-skewed mix.
  • Interest rates and yield competition: with a beta of 0.986 and a 2.97% dividend yield, TGT trades partly as a bond proxy for income investors; a higher-for-longer rate backdrop pressures the multiple even if operating results hold.
  • Channel competition: Walmart, Amazon, Costco and off-price players continue to compete for grocery and essentials share, and Target's apparel/home skew makes it more exposed than Walmart or Costco to discretionary pullback.
  • Alternative revenue mix shift: Roundel retail media and the Target Circle 360 paid membership are growing faster than the core and carry far higher margins, progressively becoming the swing factor in consolidated operating margin - and a legitimate part of any re-rating case.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 FY2026 earnings on Nov 18, 2026: consensus ~$2.04 EPS. The single most important read on whether comps and margins hold without the Q2 tax/tariff refund tailwind.
  • Holiday/Q4 season: the quarter ending late Jan is Target's largest by revenue (~$30.5B-$30.9B in recent years) but carries the lowest operating margin (~4.5%), so holiday mix and promotional intensity will drive the earnings outcome.
  • Brand and traffic initiatives: the September 2026 'Target by Design' New York showcases and nationwide Momentous supplements rollout are aimed squarely at the beauty/health/food/baby categories management has flagged as growth engines.
  • Continued scaling of Roundel and Target Circle 360, plus same-day delivery (+25% in Q2 FY2026), which collectively lift mix toward higher-margin revenue.
  • Any further tariff-refund or trade-policy developments - a positive swing could extend the earnings beat; their absence mechanically removes ~$1.65/share of FY2026 EPS support.
Key risks
  • Earnings quality: about $1.65/share of Q2 FY2026 GAAP EPS (roughly 17% of TTM EPS of $9.665) came from discrete tax/tariff refunds. Underlying earnings power is materially lower than the headline, and the accruals check (-3.15%) does not catch it because the benefit is cash.
  • Balance-sheet liquidity is thin for a retailer: current ratio of 0.988 and a quick ratio of just 0.363, with debt-to-equity at 1.048 and $14.2B of long-term debt against $5.4B of cash. There is not much cushion if working capital or margins swing.
  • Valuation risk after the run: the stock is up 32.8% in six months and ~70-80% over twelve, and analyst ratings (28 buy / 28 hold / 4 sell) alongside a recent downgrade suggest limited incremental buyers. The deterministic ratio screener scored only 40/100, dragged by exactly these liquidity and leverage metrics.
  • Discretionary demand sensitivity: Target's mix skews more toward apparel, home and general merchandise than Walmart or Costco, so a consumer slowdown hits comps and basket size harder than peers.
  • Technical extension: at 25.74% above the 200-day SMA as of 2026-09-13, the stock carries meaningful mean-reversion risk. A drift back toward the 50-day (~$149) would be an ordinary correction, not a thesis break.
Investment thesis

Target is a genuinely improving retailer - traffic is positive, digital is compounding, the guide was raised, and free cash flow of roughly $4.5B supports a near-3% dividend - but as of 2026-09-13 at $155.83 the turnaround is largely in the price. The headline 16.1x P/E is an illusion created by ~$1.65/share of non-recurring tax/tariff refunds; on roughly $8.00 of clean trailing EPS the stock trades near 19.5x, slightly rich versus its own 17.59x five-year average. With my fair value near $160, only ~3% upside, a split analyst book, and the shares 26% above their 200-day average, the risk/reward is balanced rather than attractive. This is a watch-and-wait name: a pullback into the $145-$150 zone (near the 50-day) would create a far better entry than chasing here.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended two methods, both anchored to normalized rather than reported earnings. (1) Forward P/E: I estimate clean FY2027 EPS near $9.60 (FY2026 guidance midpoint of $10.40 less ~$1.65 of non-recurring refunds equals ~$8.75 clean, grown at roughly 8-9% on traffic, digital and margin recovery) and apply 16.5x - a modest discount to Target's 17.59x five-year average to reflect the discretionary mix and thin current ratio - giving ~$158. (2) FCF yield cross-check: LTM free cash flow of ~$4.55B on 454M shares is ~$10.02/share, which at a 6.5% required yield implies ~$154, while ~$5.0B of normalized forward FCF at the same yield implies ~$169; the midpoint is ~$162. Averaging $158 and $162 gives $160, which also sits sensibly against the $162.97-$166.10 analyst target cluster without simply copying it.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lands in the same neighborhood as the computed 50.2 / 'Fair Fundamentals' band, so I agree - but for different reasons than the formula used. The growth leg (60.1) and quality/profitability leg (59.9) are both flattered by Q2 FY2026's ~$1.65/share of non-recurring tax/tariff refunds, which lifted that quarter's operating margin to 9.65% from 5.22% and gross margin to 33.7% from 29.0%; the -3.15% accruals ratio does not catch this because the refunds are cash, so the score's earnings-quality check has a blind spot here. Strip the one-offs and trailing EPS is closer to $8.00 than $9.665, which would pull the growth and quality legs down by several points. Offsetting that, the formula is entirely backward-looking and cannot see the genuine forward improvement - traffic +3.6%, digital comps +8.7%, same-day delivery +25%, raised FY2026 guidance, and high-margin Roundel/Circle 360 mix - which deserves several points of credit. The two adjustments roughly cancel, leaving me at roughly 48-52 versus the computed 50.2; that is a move of well under 10 points and keeps the band at Fair Fundamentals. The one genuinely under-reflected item is the ratio screener's 40/100, driven by a 0.363 quick ratio and 0.988 current ratio - a real liquidity constraint the qualitative narrative tends to gloss over. No dated, material, structurally-invisible event (acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, fraud) justifies deviating from the Fair Fundamentals -> Neutral mapping.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.