← Back to Rankings

TGTTarget Corporation

Fundamentals Score: 60.4/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Consumer Defensive

Description

Target Corp. engages in the operation and ownership of general merchandise stores. It offers food and general merchandise, clothing and household goods, electronics, and toys.

Score Breakdown

Growth
60.1/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
59.9/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
62.7/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 16m ago

P/E (TTM)
16.9
Yield
2.97%
RSI (14)
61.6
vs SMA20
+2.28%
vs SMA50
+11.19%
vs SMA200
+33.45%
Analyst Target
$162
-0.9%
33 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$175
+7.0%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Target traded at $165.91 with a 2.97% dividend yield, just above the average analyst target and below its 52-week high of $170.75. The Q2 FY26 beat, a 3.8% comp gain, and a one-time $994M tariff refund drove sentiment to a distinctly bullish tone.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

As of 2026-08-27, the tape is bullish: TGT just delivered a Q2 FY26 comp of +3.8%, traffic +3.6%, digital comps +8.7%, raised full-year sales guidance to ~5%, and saw analysts lift forward estimates. The stock is up roughly 60% over 12 months and is trading near the top of its 52-week range; the main reason it is not euphoric is that the average analyst target ($165.14, recent average $162.42) has yet to catch up to the price.

Quarterly Trend

The past 12 quarters show a clear turn, not just a blip. YoY revenue growth was negative for four straight quarters through Jan-2026 (roughly -2.8%, -0.9%, -1.6%, -1.5%), then inflected to +6.7% in Q1 FY26 and +5.3% in Q2 FY26. Reported EPS in Q2 FY26 doubled to $4.12 from $2.05, but that includes a $1.65 one-time IEEPA tariff refund; underlying EPS was about $2.46, up ~20%. Reported gross margin jumped to 33.7% from 29.0%, but ex-refund it was ~29.9%, still a ~0.9pt improvement. Reported operating margin was 9.6%; stripping out the refund leaves ~5.9%, up from 5.2% a year ago. Q1 FY26 was messy (operating margin fell to 4.5% from 6.2%), so the recovery is not perfectly smooth, but the trajectory has shifted from decelerating to accelerating.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, valuation is fair, not obviously cheap or expensive: 17.1x trailing EPS and about 16.5x the next-FY EPS estimate of $10.03, versus a 5-year average P/E of 17.6x. The 0.70x price/sales is in line with the 5-year average of 0.68x, and the PEG of 1.39 implies the market is paying a reasonable multiple for roughly 12% expected growth. A 2.97% dividend yield adds a floor of return. This is a 'neutral vs. own history' valuation, so the stock is not a bargain after the 60% run, but neither is it priced like a growth stock.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

At $165.91, TGT is essentially sitting on the consensus price target ($165.14) and above the more recent average ($162.42). That means the market has already absorbed the Q2 beat, and the next leg requires estimates to be revised up again. The correct earnings anchor is the ~20% organic EPS growth on a normalized basis, not the headline doubled EPS that includes the $1.65 refund; anyone anchoring on the reported EPS will be disappointed next year. If Q3/holiday guidance confirms the acceleration, targets should move toward $175-180; if traffic stalls, the stock has little valuation cushion and could quickly revisit the $140 low end of analyst targets.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI was 68.6, just below overbought, and price was 6.9% above its 20-day, 15.6% above its 50-day, and 37.9% above its 200-day moving average. This is a strong, extended uptrend rather than a range or a base. The nearest support is roughly the 20-day near $155; a pullback to that area would offer a better entry than chasing $166. A decisive close above $170.75 (the 52-week high) would signal the next breakout leg.

Macro Factors
  • Consumer value-seeking: Target's price cuts and owned brands are pulling traffic from higher-priced and online competitors, but a consumer slowdown could reverse the traffic trend.
  • Tariff/trade policy: The $994M IEEPA refund was a one-time regulatory windfall; new tariffs on imported goods would pressure gross margin while another legal win would add cash.
  • Interest rates and credit: Higher-for-longer rates weigh on discretionary big-ticket spending and credit card balances; a more confident consumer is needed for sustained comps.
  • Competition from Walmart, Amazon, and discounters: Target is differentiating through grocery overhaul, beauty, toys, and same-day delivery, but any pricing misstep shows up fast.
  • High-margin ancillary revenue: Roundel advertising, Target Circle 360 membership, and Target+ marketplace grew over 20% in Q2, offsetting softness in traditional retail margin.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 FY26 earnings, expected mid-November 2026: investors will watch whether comps and traffic stay above 3% and whether holiday guidance is conservative or aggressive.
  • Holiday execution: management raised full-year sales growth guidance to ~5%; back-to-school and holiday selling will determine if the comp inflection is durable.
  • Category momentum: the grocery overhaul (largest in a decade), Fun 101 strength, and the August 26, 2026 Beauty Studio launch could keep driving foot traffic.
  • Continued growth of Roundel, Circle 360, and Target+; these high-margin streams are the cleanest path to operating margin expansion.
  • Upward analyst revisions if the stock holds above consensus; the current 28 Buy / 28 Hold / 4 Sell split could tilt further positive.
Key Risks
  • One-time tariff refund distortion: reported Q2 EPS of $4.12 includes $1.65 that will not repeat, making future YoY EPS comparisons look weak even if operations are fine.
  • Consumer spending / credit deterioration: a discretionary-heavy mix (electronics, toys, home) means traffic can reverse quickly if the lower-income consumer weakens.
  • Tariff re-escalation or import cost inflation would hit gross margin; the same trade policy that created the refund can also create a headwind.
  • Valuation/technical risk after a 60% rally: RSI 68.6, price above the average analyst target, and no valuation cushion if Q3 disappoints.
  • Balance sheet/working capital: current ratio is 0.99 and debt/equity is 1.05, typical for retail but leaves little flexibility if sales stall or rates rise.
Investment Thesis

Target is a legitimate operational turnaround with accelerating sales, organic EPS growth around 20%, and a growing high-margin ancillary business, and the stock is only fairly valued rather than priced for perfection. It is a good business to own, but the best risk/reward is on a pullback toward the low-$150s or after Q3 confirmation, not by chasing at $165.91.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

I applied a 17.5x forward multiple to the next-FY consensus EPS of $10.027 (10.027 x 17.5 = $175.47). The multiple sits just below Target's 5-year average P/E of 17.6x and is consistent with a PEG of about 1.4 assuming roughly 12% long-term EPS growth, so it reflects both the historical range and the growth inflection. This is my own forward-multiple calculation, not a copy of the $165.14 consensus target.

AI Lean: BullishConfidence: High

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The deterministic 60.4 / Good Fundamentals is a fair read. It is slightly flattered by the $994M Q2 tariff refund, which lifts trailing EPS, operating income, and ROIC; on normalized earnings I would shave a few points from the quality pillar. But the revenue inflection from negative to positive YoY growth, the jump in free cash flow, and the negative accruals ratio (-3.15%) are real and support the same band. Since I would still land in Good Fundamentals within roughly 5 points of 60.4, I agree with the score rather than adjusting the band. This is an earnings inflection rather than a cyclical trough, and the formula is picking up the right direction.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.