TPL — Texas Pacific Land Corporation
Fundamentals Score: 80.5/100 (Strong Fundamentals) · Energy
Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) operates in two core business segments: land and resource management, and water services. Its Land and Resource Management division oversees a vast land portfolio, spanning nearly 880,000 acres.
Score Breakdown
Live Market DataPrice updated: 5h ago
AI Deep-Dive Analysis
Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market dataAs of 2026-08-27, TPL trades at $369.71 with a $25.5B market cap, roughly 32% below its 52-week high despite record Q2 2026 earnings. The stock is sitting below its 50- and 200-day moving averages, with RSI at 46.8.
Q2 2026 was fundamentally strong: record net income of $153.9M, EPS of $2.23 beating consensus, and revenue up 31.2% YoY. But revenue still slightly missed, WTI has faded into the low $80s after Q2's $97.55 average, and the stock is below key moving averages. Analyst opinion is split—3 Buy/1 Hold/1 Sell in the FMP breakdown, with the research brief describing the street as a cautious Hold—so the tape feels mixed rather than euphoric.
Revenue has accelerated from $158.0M in Q3 2023 to $246.1M in Q2 2026. YoY revenue growth went from roughly 14-17% in late 2025 to +31.2% in Q2 2026. EPS grew from $1.53 in Q3 2023 to $2.23 in Q2 2026, with both 2026 quarters well above the prior run-rate. Operating margins remain consistently in the high-70s, and TTM free cash flow is about $527M despite one soft Q4 2025. The Q2 2025 dip was a commodity-driven blip, not a structural break; this is an acceleration story, though oil-price swings will keep individual quarters choppy.
Expensive on absolute and trailing metrics. As of 2026-08-27, TTM P/E is 47.1x and P/S is 28.4x versus 5-year averages of 40.7x and 25.7x. Forward P/E on FY26E EPS of $8.80 is about 42x, with a PEG of 2.7. The near-zero debt, ~75% operating margin, and 30% ROIC justify a premium, but this is not a cheap stock. The $639 FMP consensus target looks aggressive relative to the thin rating mix, so I would not anchor to it.
At $369.71, the market is paying 42x forward EPS of $8.80, roughly in line with TPL's 5-year average trailing P/E after the 32% drawdown from the 52-week high. That means the stock is no longer pricing in perfection, but it is still pricing in continued double-digit EPS growth and real value for the land/data-center optionality. If FY26 EPS only lands near $8.20 or oil stays weak, the multiple is too generous; if EPS tracks toward $9.50+ by 2027, today's price will look reasonable in hindsight.
As of 2026-08-27, RSI(14) stood at 46.8, which is neutral—not oversold or overbought. Price is +0.14% above the 20-day SMA but -4.71% below the 50-day and -5.32% below the 200-day, so the medium-term trend is still negative/range-bound. The stock is in the lower portion of its 52-week range ($269.23-$547.20). For entry timing, a sustained reclaim of the 50-day would be the first real confirmation; until then, expect churn.
- Crude oil prices: TPL is completely unhedged, so Q2's $97.55 realized oil price boosted results, while WTI easing into the low $80s is an immediate revenue headwind.
- Permian drilling and completion activity: royalty volumes and new wells drive production growth; any operator pullback in the Permian would slow organic royalty growth.
- Data center/AI electricity demand: West Texas power demand, water sourcing, and land leases—including Project Kilby with Chevron—create a non-oil growth driver.
- Interest rates: TPL's long-duration, no-debt cash flow stream is sensitive to rate expectations; lower rates support the high multiple, higher rates pressure it.
- Texas water regulation and produced-water infrastructure: an opportunity via desalination and water sales, but also a potential regulatory/permit risk.
- Q3 2026 earnings in early November—watch whether Project Kilby/data-center agreements start producing measurable revenue or water/power sales.
- Ex-dividend date September 1, 2026: $2.40 per share dividend is a near-term income event.
- Further strategic land acquisitions in West Texas and expansion of water/desalination infrastructure could extend the growth runway.
- A sustained rebound in WTI back toward $90+ would directly lift quarterly royalty revenue and likely re-rate the stock.
- Sustained oil or gas price weakness: unhedged royalty revenue would fall with WTI, and Q3 2026 could miss the Q2 run-rate.
- Valuation multiple compression: at 28x sales and 47x trailing earnings, any growth disappointment could hit the stock hard.
- Permian concentration: single-basin exposure to geology, hydrology, regulation, and operator activity.
- Data-center/power monetization may take years to scale; Project Kilby is still a development-stage narrative, not yet a large earnings line.
- Thin and split sell-side coverage—5 ratings in the FMP data with mixed views—means less informational cushion and potentially more volatility.
TPL is a high-quality compounder with clean economics: near-zero debt, ~75% operating margins, ~30% ROIC, negative accruals, and a credible new growth leg in water and power infrastructure. The stock is not cheap, but the 2026 correction has removed the most extreme valuation risk. For a long-term investor comfortable with commodity swings, the risk/reward is modestly positive at $369.71.
I applied a justified forward P/E of 45x to FY26E EPS of $8.80—a modest premium to TPL's 5-year average P/E of 40.7x, supported by 31% revenue growth, ~75% operating margins, 30% ROIC, and no debt. That yields $396.0, which also triangulates to roughly 27.5x estimated FY26 revenue of $995M, and is above the current $369.71 price but well below the $639 analyst consensus target.
AI Review of the Deterministic Score
The deterministic score of 80.5 and 'Strong Fundamentals' band are a fair read. Trailing growth, profitability, and balance-sheet quality are genuinely excellent: revenue +31.2% YoY, TTM FCF around $527M, debt/equity near zero, current ratio 4.55, and an accruals ratio of -1.02%, showing cash earnings are not running ahead of reported profit. The formula is backward-looking, but this is not a cyclical trough—TPL is at a cyclical/operating high, so I would not discount the score as a low-point artifact. The main thing the formula cannot see is Project Kilby and the broader data-center/water optionality, which could extend growth beyond the trailing numbers; that nudges my independent read slightly higher, perhaps to the mid-80s, but not enough to change the band. Hence I agree with the score.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.