#13S&P 500 rank

TPL — Texas Pacific Land Corporation

2-yr score: 73.0/100 (Top 10%)Energy13d
$344.31+0.63%
Description

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) operates in two core business segments: land and resource management, and water services. Its Land and Resource Management division oversees a vast land portfolio, spanning nearly 880,000 acres.

Score breakdownLatest quarter80.3 · Strong
Growth
88.1
Quality / Profitability
66.5
Financial health
95.2
Ratio screener
80.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 73.0 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 74.3 (Good, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Nov 4, 2026 (in 13 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
43.9
Yield
0.63%
RSI (14)
45.6
vs SMA20
-0.64%
vs SMA50
-3.59%
vs SMA200
-14.10%
Analyst target
$0
-100.0%
0 analysts
AI theoretical price
$363
+5.4%
as of 2026-09-23

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-23 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-23, TPL trades at $335.74 (down 5.5% on the session and 36.7% over six months), sits well below its 50- and 200-day averages, yet Q2 2026 revenue still grew 31.2% YoY to a record $246.06M. A premium-multiple, debt-free Permian royalty business caught in a market-driven de-rating.

AI sentimentBearish

As of 2026-09-23 the tape is decisively negative: TPL fell 5.49% on the day to $335.74, sits 7.74% below its 20-day, 10.9% below its 50-day, and 15.12% below its 200-day averages, with a 14-day RSI of 37.72 and a -36.7% six-month return - all while reported earnings are still climbing. That divergence says the market is de-rating the multiple (fears about Permian production growth deceleration and softer oil/gas prices), not punishing the fundamentals. With no live news feed available for this run, the price action itself is the sentiment signal.

Quarterly trend

Growth is accelerating, not fading. Quarterly revenue rose from $157.97M in Q3 2023 to a record $246.06M in Q2 2026 (Q2'26 vs Q2'25: +31.2% YoY; also up sequentially from $236.82M in Q1'26). Diluted EPS climbed to $2.23 from $1.683 a year earlier (+32.5%), and net income hit $153.9M. Operating margin expanded to ~78.0% in Q2'26 (from ~76.7% in Q2'25) and net margin to ~62.6%. Free cash flow was $151.0M in Q2'26 and $526.7M on a trailing-twelve-month basis. The only blemishes are a softer Q4'25 (revenue $211.6M, FCF $85.0M) and the negative-FCF Q3'24 (one-quarter capex spike to $128.2M) - both look like quarterly noise, not a structural turn. This is a genuine multi-quarter acceleration in revenue, margins, and EPS.

Valuation assessment

Fair, leaning rich. At $335.74 (2026-09-23), TPL trades at 42.8x TTM EPS ($7.85), modestly above its 5-year average P/E of 40.69x; on next-FY consensus EPS of $9.30 the forward P/E is ~36x. P/S of 25.8x is essentially in line with its 5-year average of 25.72x, but the PEG of 2.47 is rich, and P/B of 13.85x / EV-EBITDA of ~30.8x leave no margin for error. The premium is partly earned - ~75% operating margin, ~30% ROIC, and a debt-free balance sheet (D/E 0.009) are exceptional - but the multiple already assumes the ~18% forward EPS growth actually shows up.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The tell is that earnings are going up while the stock goes down - a pure multiple-compression story. From roughly $530 six months ago to $335.74 on 2026-09-23, TPL lost 36.7% even as Q2'26 EPS grew 32.5% YoY. So the market is repricing the durability of those earnings (Permian growth trajectory, oil/gas prices), not disputing the reported numbers. If forward EPS of $9.30 lands, the forward multiple compresses to ~36x and the stock is close to fair; if growth stalls or crude weakens, the 42.8x trailing multiple has further to fall. Watch the multiple, not just the EPS print.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-23, TPL is in a confirmed downtrend: price $335.74 vs SMA20 -7.74%, SMA50 -10.9%, SMA200 -15.12%, with RSI(14) at 37.72 - weak but not yet oversold. The 52-week range of $269.23-$547.20 puts the stock in the lower third of its yearly band. Momentum is negative on every horizon (1wk -3.68%, 1mo -10.1%, 3mo -11.08%, 6mo -36.7%). Entry-timing implication: no reversal signal yet - this is a falling-knife setup, and prudent timing would wait for a reclaim of the 20-day average or an RSI push into the low-30s/high-20s followed by a higher low.

Macro factors
  • Oil and natural gas prices (WTI / Henry Hub): TPL's royalties are directly levered to realized commodity prices and production volumes - the single biggest swing factor.
  • Permian Basin drilling activity and rig counts: revenue tracks Permian development, and any activity deceleration hits both royalty volumes and water-services demand.
  • Interest rates / cost of capital: TPL carries essentially no debt (D/E 0.009), so rate risk shows up as multiple compression on a 40x-plus-earnings stock rather than in the balance sheet.
  • Water services demand (source water and produced-water disposal): a growing, more fee-like revenue stream that diversifies away from pure commodity royalty exposure.
  • Energy-sector rotation and index flows: as a ~$23B premium-multiple name, TPL is sensitive to shifts in energy-vs-growth positioning and to S&P index-related flows.
Key catalysts
  • Sustained Permian production growth and/or firmer oil and gas prices lifting royalty volumes and realizations.
  • Continued scaling of the water services business (source water + produced water) adding fee-based, less commodity-sensitive revenue.
  • Capital returns: with $248.6M cash, no long-term debt, and ~$527M TTM free cash flow, the board could raise the dividend, pay a special dividend, or accelerate buybacks.
  • A multiple re-rating / analyst upgrades if Q3'26 results confirm the ~$9.30 forward EPS path.
  • Strategic land or mineral acquisitions to expand the royalty acreage footprint.
Key risks
  • Commodity price collapse: as a Permian royalty owner, TPL's revenue falls directly with oil and gas prices and volumes.
  • Permian growth deceleration/plateau: the market's apparent concern - slowing basin development would blunt the 30%+ revenue growth the current multiple embeds.
  • Valuation/multiple compression: at ~42.8x TTM and a 2.47 PEG, there is little cushion, and further de-rating can overwhelm earnings growth - as the past six months demonstrate.
  • Single-basin concentration: essentially all revenue derives from the Permian, so any regional or regulatory setback is company-wide.
  • High-hurdle macro: a prolonged higher-for-longer rate regime pressures premium-multiple, long-duration equities like TPL.
Investment thesis

Exceptional business, demanding price. TPL is a debt-free Permian royalty machine with ~75% operating margins, ~30% ROIC, and accelerating 30%+ revenue growth - genuinely one of the best business models in energy. But as of 2026-09-23 it trades at ~42.8x TTM / ~36x forward earnings with a 2.47 PEG, is in a clear downtrend (down 36.7% in six months, below all major moving averages), and the market is actively de-rating it. The deterministic mapping (Strong Fundamentals + Neutral valuation) reads Bullish, and the underlying quality supports that over a multi-year horizon - but the technicals say there is no rush, and the valuation says pay up only if you are confident forward EPS of ~$9.30 holds.

AI theoretical price methodology

Forward P/E approach: applied a 39x multiple - a modest discount to TPL's 5-year average trailing P/E of 40.69x, justified by Permian activity-deceleration risk and elevated rates, and supported by ~75% operating margins, ~30% ROIC, and a debt-free balance sheet - to next-FY consensus EPS of $9.303, giving ~$363. Cross-checked against the 5-year average P/S of 25.72x on ~$1.01B forward revenue (~$377) and the 5-year average trailing P/E of 40.69x on forward EPS (~$378), it brackets a fair value modestly above the 2026-09-23 price of $335.74.

AI lean: BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lines up with the 80.3 / Strong Fundamentals score. The 95.2 financial-health pillar is fully earned - no net debt, a 4.55 current ratio, and consistently positive FCF - and the accelerating Q2'26 growth supports the 88.1 growth pillar. The one caveat a fixed formula cannot see: TPL's revenue is levered to Permian activity and commodity prices, so trailing 31% growth is more cyclical than the score implies, and the market's 36.7% six-month drawdown is a multiple-de-rating signal the backward-looking score ignores. That is a valuation/timing adjustment, not a fundamental-deterioration one, so I would shift the score by less than ~10 points - the band holds.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.