← Back to Rankings

TPRTapestry, Inc.

Fundamentals Score: 57.1/100 (Fair Fundamentals) · Consumer Cyclical

Description

Tapestry, Inc. is a prominent global fashion house specializing in premium accessories and distinct lifestyle brands. It operates internationally, serving customers across the United States, Japan, Greater China, and other markets worldwide.

Score Breakdown

Growth
45.2/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
71.3/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
55.3/100
weight: 15%
* Stockholders' equity moved -55% between 2024-09-28 and 2024-12-28 (vs. +10% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
* Stockholders' equity moved +1% between 2026-03-28 and 2026-06-27 (vs. -43% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Favorable (oversold / below trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 7m ago

P/E (TTM)
16.4
Yield
1.14%
RSI (14)
32.4
vs SMA20
-7.39%
vs SMA50
-13.02%
vs SMA200
-11.49%
Analyst Target
$181
+47.9%
10 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$135
+10.5%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, TPR trades at $123.24, down ~5.4% on the day and roughly 25% below its 52-week high of $164.80 after a post-earnings selloff. Fundamentals remain solid — FY26 sales +14%, non-GAAP EPS +38%, ~$1.8B FCF — but FY27 guidance is conservative and the chart is in a downtrend.

AI Sentiment:Bearish

The market's near-term mood turned bearish after the August 13, 2026 Q4 beat was overshadowed by FY27 guidance of only mid-single-digit revenue growth and low-double-digit EPS growth; shares fell about 16% after the print and slid another ~5.4% by August 27. Insider selling over the past year adds to the caution despite a consensus Buy and an average 12-month target around $173.83.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue inflected sharply upward in FY26 then decelerated into year-end: TTM sales were $8.00B vs $7.01B in FY25 (+14%) and $6.67B in FY24. Quarterly YoY revenue growth was +13% (Q1), +14% (Q2), +21% (Q3), then +9% (Q4), so the acceleration is flattening. Margin quality is much better than the GAAP line suggests: FY25 Q4 had a -$583.5M operating loss (one-off charge), while FY26 GAAP operating margin came in near 24% and non-GAAP margin expanded 340bps to 23.4%. TTM GAAP EPS is $7.49, with quarterly EPS of $1.66, $1.65, $2.68, and $1.28 in the last four reported quarters.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, the stock trades at 16.5x trailing GAAP EPS and roughly 15.5x forward FY27 consensus EPS of $7.96 — a meaningful discount to its 5-year average P/E of 30.8x, though that historical average is flattered by depressed earnings. P/S of 3.11x is above the 5-year average of 2.12x, but the margin/ROIC profile is also far better than the average. On forward earnings with ~13% expected EPS growth, the stock looks fairly valued rather than either deep value or expensive.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

The price has de-rated faster than estimates have moved: TPR is down ~25% from its high, while FY27 EPS consensus is still $7.96. The market is therefore pricing in a multiple reset and deceleration, not an earnings collapse. If Coach's Gen-Z-driven momentum continues and Kate Spade stabilizes, estimates could prove conservative and the multiple could re-expand toward 17-18x; if FY27 guidance is too high, $123 leaves only a modest margin of safety at 15.5x forward earnings.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI is 30.24 — at the oversold line — and price is -13.6% below its 20-day SMA, -14.2% below its 50-day SMA, and -10.5% below its 200-day SMA. That combination is a downtrend with an oversold bounce risk rather than a confirmed bottom; the prudent entry timing signal would be a reclaim of the 20-day/50-day averages or at least a higher low before assuming the slide is over.

Macro Factors
  • US consumer and tariffs: import duties on handbags and accessories could pressure gross margin or force pricing; Tapestry's 77.8% gross margin makes tariff absorption more feasible than lower-end retail but not free.
  • Trade-down/accessible luxury dynamics: Coach is benefiting from consumers trading down from European mega-luxury, but a broader US consumer slowdown would hit the same aspirational customer first.
  • China/Asia discretionary demand remains a swing factor for luxury accessories and international tourist flows.
  • Interest rates and buyback economics: higher-for-longer rates make the $1.35B annual buyback less accretive and could cool the consumer credit-card spend that supports impulse luxury purchases.
  • Post-Capri M&A overhang: the failed acquisition left balance-sheet noise and limits equity-based strategic optionality, leaving organic growth and capital returns as the primary value levers.
Key Catalysts
  • Fiscal Q1 2027 earnings on ~Nov 5, 2026 — the first hard read on holiday inventory, Coach momentum, and whether Kate Spade is stabilizing.
  • Continued margin expansion via the 'Mira' AI merchandising/personalization platform and further high-margin DTC sales mix.
  • Capital returns: another large buyback authorization or dividend hike could set a floor under the stock.
  • Kate Spade turnaround progress or a brand-level strategy update.
Key Risks
  • Portfolio concentration: Coach is roughly 86% of sales, so a slowdown in Coach's viral/appeal cycle is essentially a single-brand earnings risk.
  • FY27 guidance is only mid-single-digit revenue growth; if Q1 comes in below that, the recent selloff will have been justified and estimates will move lower.
  • Balance-sheet optics: stockholders' equity is just $692M due to buybacks and the failed Capri deal, and book D/E looks high even though adjusted leverage is ~1.1x.
  • Insider selling (~$49M over the past year with no open-market buys) suggests those closest to the business see limited near-term upside.
Investment Thesis

Tapestry is a genuinely high-quality, cash-generative business — FY26 FCF of ~$1.8B, 23.4% non-GAAP margins, and a negative accruals ratio show earnings are real and well-covered by cash. The problem is the setup: growth is decelerating, the story is almost all Coach, and the market is intentionally paying a lower multiple for that. At $123.24 the stock is reasonably priced, but not obviously cheap enough to overweight without seeing either the multiple stabilize or Kate Spade/guidance improve.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Applied a 17.0x P/E multiple to forward FY27 consensus EPS of $7.963 — a discount to TPR's 5-year average P/E but above the current 15.5x forward multiple — justified by ~78% gross margins, ~29% ROIC, negative accruals/high cash conversion, and low-double-digit EPS growth, with the discount reflecting Coach concentration and decelerating revenue.

AI Lean: NeutralConfidence: Low

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The deterministic score of 57.1 ('Fair Fundamentals') matches my independent read. It penalizes the decelerating growth and distorted balance-sheet metrics while crediting strong profitability — non-GAAP operating margin 23.4%, ROIC ~29%, and a -2.61% accruals ratio all indicate high-quality, cash-backed earnings. I would nudge the score a few points higher because adjusted net leverage is only ~1.1x and FCF comfortably funds the buyback, so the high reported D/E is largely a buyback/legacy Capri artifact rather than financial distress; however, that is a single-digit adjustment, not enough to move it out of 'Fair.' This is also not a cyclical-trough situation — growth is maturing from a high base, not depressed and about to inflect.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.