← Back to Rankings

TRGPTarga Resources Corp.

Fundamentals Score: 64.9/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Energy

Description

Targa Resources Corp., alongside its subsidiary Targa Resources Partners LP, is a significant entity in the North American midstream energy sector, focusing on the ownership, operation, acquisition, and development of crucial energy infrastructure assets. Its business is structured into two main divisions: "Gathering and Processing" and "Logistics and Transportation." Within these segments, the company undertakes a broad range of activities, including the collection, compression, treatment, processing, transport, and sale of natural gas.

Score Breakdown

Growth
75.2/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
64.3/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
35.4/100
weight: 15%
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)

Live Market DataPrice updated: 21m ago

P/E (TTM)
27.5
Yield
1.66%
RSI (14)
54.5
vs SMA20
+1.14%
vs SMA50
+4.42%
vs SMA200
+21.89%
Analyst Target
$320
+10.3%
16 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$298
+2.8%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, TRGP trades at $288.95, near its 52-week high of $307.94 after a 76% 12-month run. The stock is coming off a record Q2 2026 (adjusted EBITDA $1.603B) and the August ExxonMobil long-term agreement, with consensus Buy and average target ~$303.85.

AI Sentiment:Bullish

Market sentiment is bullish after the Q2 2026 beat, the 20-year ExxonMobil dedications, and eight upward EPS revisions in 60 days. Major banks raised targets to $312-$343, and the stock hit an all-time high in late August; the only visible caution is that a 76% run has pushed P/E above its own 5-year average.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue is noisy due to commodity pass-through, but the earnings trend is clearly accelerating. Q2 2026 revenue rose 10.3% YoY to $4.44B, operating income jumped 52.7% to $1.235B, and diluted EPS rose 23.6% to $3.56. Operating margin expanded to 27.8% from 20.1% in Q2 2025; Q1 2025's weak EPS of $0.91 and Q1 2026's flat op-income comparison are blips, not the structural trend.

Valuation Assessment

As of 2026-08-27, TRGP is expensive vs. its own history on trailing multiples: 27.4x TTM EPS vs. 23.7x 5-yr average, and 3.69x sales vs. 1.48x average, though P/S is less meaningful because revenue includes pass-through commodity. On forward numbers it is more reasonable: 25.7x FY26 EPS consensus of $11.25, with a PEG around 0.8 using ~32% expected FY26 EPS growth. A premium multiple is justified, but this is not a cheap stock.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

The price has already absorbed the Q2 beat and ExxonMobil news; at 25.7x forward earnings, the market is underwriting continued volume growth and margin expansion. If TRGP merely hits $11.25 and the multiple reverts to its 23.7x 5-year average, the stock would be worth ~$266, so near-term upside depends on estimates continuing to rise. This is a growth-priced stock, not a value-priced one.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI is 55.84, price is +3.86% vs. the 20-day SMA, +5.26% vs. the 50-day SMA, and +23.32% vs. the 200-day SMA. The uptrend is intact but not overbought; buying weakness near the 50-day (~$274) is better risk/reward than chasing at $288.95.

Macro Factors
  • Permian production growth and E&P consolidation keep gathering and processing volumes rising.
  • International NGL/LPG export demand, especially LPG, supports Gulf Coast fractionation and export margins.
  • Interest rates and cost of capital matter for the $5.0B 2026 growth capex plan and $18.9B debt load.
  • Natural gas/NGL price volatility is dampened by fee-based contracts but still affects processing economics and Waha basis.
  • Permian gas takeaway constraints and pipeline bottlenecks could create near-term throughput friction.
Key Catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings in early November and progress on the $5.0B capex plan.
  • Integration of the ExxonMobil 20-year dedications, new processing plants, and the Bull Run II pipeline.
  • September 1, 2026 leadership transition to the new President and CFO, and any strategic updates.
  • Continued dividend growth and buybacks; dividend is already $5.00 annualized, up 25% YoY.
Key Risks
  • Execution or delay on the expanded $5.0B capex program after the ExxonMobil agreements.
  • Balance-sheet leverage: long-term debt was $18.9B at 2026-06-30, current ratio 0.77, and FCF was negative in several recent quarters due to growth capex.
  • Multiple compression from 27x TTM earnings toward the 23.7x historical average.
  • An NGL/commodity price downturn or Permian takeaway bottlenecks hitting volumes or margins.
  • Management transition risk from the CFO retirement and new-leadership onboarding.
Investment Thesis

Targa is a high-quality Permian midstream compounder with fee-based cash flows, record volumes, and a 20-year ExxonMobil contract, but the market knows it. I would be a buyer on a pullback toward the 50-day rather than chasing the current price; over a 12-month horizon the stock can grind higher if capex execution and 2027 estimates hold.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Using a 26.5x forward P/E on FY2026 consensus EPS of $11.25—a ~12% premium to the 23.67x 5-year average, justified by ~32% expected FY26 EPS growth and the 20-year ExxonMobil dedications—yields $298.13, roughly 14.3x forward EV/EBITDA on ~$5.8B adjusted EBITDA.

AI Lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: High

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Partially Agree

The 64.9 'Good Fundamentals' score is directionally right but a bit low. Unlike a cyclical-trough case, the trailing data here is not unfairly depressed—Q2 2026 was a record—but the financial-health leg over-penalizes debt-to-equity and current ratio for a contracted midstream model, and the formula cannot see the August 2026 ExxonMobil 20-year dedications or the $5B growth capex that locks in future volumes. I would put fundamental quality around 73-75, still in the Good Fundamentals band, so I partially agree.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.