UPS — United Parcel Service, Inc.
United Parcel Service, Inc., a package delivery and logistics provider, offers transportation and delivery services. It operates through two segments, U.S.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13 UPS trades at $100.27 (market cap ~$85.2B), down 7.23% over three months and below all three key moving averages (RSI 38.2), sitting mid-range in a $82-$122.41 52-week band. The story is a genuine inflecting turnaround - Q2 2026 revenue +7.6% YoY and a raised FY26 guide - obscured by heavy one-off restructuring charges that gut GAAP earnings.
Cautious and split. The Q2 2026 beat-and-raise was real: revenue $22.83B, non-GAAP adjusted EPS $1.76 vs. ~$1.65 consensus, and management lifted FY26 guidance to ~$91.2B revenue and ~$7.22 adjusted EPS, prompting target hikes (BMO $110->$115, Oppenheimer $115->$117, UBS to $124). But as of 2026-09-13 the tape disagrees: shares are down 1.97% 1wk, 3.49% 1mo and 7.23% 3mo, RSI is 38.2, and the analyst consensus rating is only Hold (~20 hold vs. ~21 buy, 4 sell, 13 price targets averaging ~$119). GAAP EPS of $0.71 in Q2 (on an $891M / $1.05 per-share after-tax charge) makes the headline numbers look worse than operations, so the market is waiting for proof the cost-out and margin recovery are durable before re-rating the stock.
Revenue was in a clear downtrend through 2025 - Q3 2025 $21.42B (-3.6% YoY), Q4 2025 $24.48B (-3.0% YoY), Q1 2026 $21.20B (-1.6% YoY) - and then inflected hard positive in Q2 2026: $22.83B vs. $21.22B, +7.6% YoY. That is a real inflection, not noise, and lines up with the Amazon 'glide-down' volume headwind completing mid-2026. Margins tell a more complicated story: GAAP operating margin fell to 4.07% in Q2 2026 from 8.59% in Q2 2025 and 8.86% in Q2 2024, but that is almost entirely transformation charges (Driver Choice Program, separation costs) - adjusted EPS of $1.76 vs. GAAP $0.71 confirms the underlying operation is not collapsing. GAAP diluted EPS has fallen from $2.10 (Q4 2025) to $1.02 (Q1 2026) to $0.71 (Q2 2026), which is exactly why the trailing P/E looks inflated. Cash generation is the healthiest signal: TTM free cash flow is ~$5.49B (2025 Q3 $1.51B + Q4 $2.59B + 2026 Q1 $1.19B + Q2 $0.19B) versus ~$3.54B in the prior-year TTM window, up ~55%, and the accruals ratio of -0.4% confirms cash is running ahead of reported profit (a good sign). Bottom line: revenue/volume is inflecting up, adjusted profitability is stable, GAAP optics are depressed by one-offs, and FCF is improving.
Two different pictures depending on which earnings you use. On trailing GAAP it looks full: P/E TTM 18.6x on EPS of $5.376, P/B 5.66 (flattered by a shrinking equity base - ROE 34.3%), P/S 0.95 vs. a 5-year average of 1.41. But on the numbers that matter going forward it looks cheap: forward P/E is ~13.9x ($100.27 / $7.194 next-FY estimate, essentially management's $7.22 FY26 adjusted guide), below UPS's own 5-year average P/E of 16.31x, and the 6.43% dividend yield is well above anything in its recent history. PEG of -0.934 is meaningless (negative because trailing earnings are falling). The deterministic valuation overlay calls it 'Neutral vs. its own history' (score 61.7), which undersells the gap between depressed GAAP and normalized forward earnings. Verdict: fair on GAAP, modestly cheap on forward adjusted earnings, with the yield providing a real floor.
The market is pricing UPS on GAAP-depressed trailing EPS and, in effect, refusing to pay up for the turnaround until it shows up in reported numbers. At ~13.9x forward adjusted EPS versus a 16.31x 5-year average, you are being paid to wait if the $7.22 adjusted EPS guide holds - a re-rate to even 15.5x-16x would imply $112-$115. The flip side: if transformation charges keep 'recurring' quarter after quarter and GAAP EPS stays near $0.70-$1.00, the market's skepticism is validated and the 6.4% yield becomes a value-trap signal rather than a support. Watch two tells each quarter: (1) whether adjusted EPS tracks the $7.22 guide, and (2) whether the GAAP-to-adjusted gap shrinks - charges should be tailing off, not perpetual.
Weak, but not yet washed out. As of 2026-09-13: RSI(14) 38.18 (below 50, not oversold), price 2.45% below its 20-day SMA, 6.33% below its 50-day (~$107), and 4.53% below its 200-day (~$105). Returns of -1.97% (1wk), -3.49% (1mo) and -7.23% (3mo) describe a downtrend, though the +3.16% 6-month figure shows it is not in freefall. Entry-timing implication: there is no mean-reversion trigger yet - a constructive setup requires reclaiming ~$103 (20-day), then ~$105 (200-day), then ~$107 (50-day). Buying below all three MAs with RSI at 38 is catching a falling knife, not buying an oversold bounce.
- Interest-rate expectations: lower rates entering late 2026 are supportive for a capital-intensive, leveraged carrier (long-term debt ~$23.85B, D/E 1.90) that funds a ~$3B annual capex program.
- Global trade and tariff policy: UPS's International and Supply Chain Solutions segments are directly exposed to cross-border tariff structures and shifting manufacturing hubs, making trade headlines a swing factor for volumes.
- Labor cost inflation: the prior Teamsters contract and wage escalation pressure margins; the offset is aggressive automation and the Driver Choice Program workforce reduction, so execution of cost-out is the swing variable.
- E-commerce parcel volume vs. soft retail demand: B2C volumes track consumer spending, while the completion of the Amazon glide-down removes a multi-year structural volume headwind.
- Industrial/PMI and B2B freight backdrop: higher-margin commercial and healthcare volumes are tied to industrial activity, and sector rotation into/out of rate-sensitive industrials moves the multiple.
- Q3 2026 earnings (late October 2026): the first real test of whether the $91.2B revenue / $7.22 adjusted EPS FY26 guide holds and whether the new global operating model (effective September 1, 2026) is driving margin expansion.
- Peak-season execution (Nov-Dec 2026): the reconfigured, leaner network's capacity and service performance during holiday peak will validate (or undermine) the restructuring thesis.
- Cost-takeout realization: continued Driver Choice Program separations, automation, and network consolidation pushing adjusted operating margin toward the high-single/low-double-digit target.
- Dividend and capital-allocation update: whether the ~$5.4B annual dividend remains covered by FCF (TTM FCF ~$5.49B) or gets cut/rebalanced, and any buyback changes.
- Portfolio/structural actions flowing from the September 1, 2026 global operating model reorganization (surface, air, automotive, healthcare).
- Restructuring charges prove recurring rather than one-off: GAAP operating margin already fell to 4.07% in Q2 2026, and if the GAAP-to-adjusted gap does not close, the 'cheap on adjusted' argument collapses.
- Dividend coverage is thin: ~$5.4B of dividends against ~$5.49B of TTM free cash flow leaves essentially no cushion if FCF dips, raising cut risk and undercutting the yield floor.
- Elevated leverage: D/E of 1.90 and ~$23.85B of long-term debt increase sensitivity to rates and any demand shock, especially with cash falling from $5.89B (Q4 2025) to $4.65B (Q2 2026).
- Macro/volume sensitivity: international, freight forwarding and B2B commercial volumes are exposed to tariffs, weak industrial demand, and shifting trade routes.
- Competitive and pricing pressure from FedEx and other carriers, plus the lingering revenue hole from Amazon's completed in-sourcing, could cap volume recovery.
A genuine show-me turnaround at an inflection point. The revenue trend just flipped positive (+7.6% YoY in Q2 2026), the Amazon glide-down is behind it, FCF is up ~55% TTM, and the 6.43% dividend pays you to wait - while forward adjusted EPS of ~$7.20 puts the stock at ~13.9x, below its 16.31x 5-year average. Against that: GAAP earnings are muddied by one-off charges, leverage is high (D/E 1.90), the dividend consumes essentially all free cash flow, and the tape is weak (below all key MAs, RSI 38.2 as of 2026-09-13). The risk/reward is reasonable for a patient income-oriented investor accumulating on weakness, but at $100.27 without a technical confirmation or evidence the charges are truly ending, this is not a clear buy - it is a fairly-priced, higher-risk turnaround.
Applied a 15.5x forward P/E to non-GAAP adjusted EPS of ~$7.20 (FY26 guidance $7.22, consensus $7.194) - a discount to UPS's own 5-year average P/E of 16.31x reflecting elevated leverage (D/E 1.90) and a ~100% FCF dividend payout, but a premium to the ~13.9x the market pays on that forward number today. Cross-checked against a ~5.9% required dividend yield on the ~$6.36/share payout (~$108) and 10.3x EV/EBITDA on adjusted EBITDA (~$120+), giving a blended midpoint of ~$112.
The 47.6 'Fair Fundamentals' score is directionally defensible but understates UPS because it is entirely backward-looking and UPS is mid-transition, exactly the pattern the methodology warns about. The quality/profitability leg (41.3) is dragged down by a GAAP TTM operating margin of ~7.3% and GAAP ROIC of 10.4% - both depressed by large one-off restructuring charges ($891M after-tax in Q2 2026 alone), while the company's own non-GAAP adjusted operating margin target (~9.5% on $91.2B revenue) and adjusted EPS of $1.76 in Q2 tell a materially better underlying story. On the other side, the score correctly captures real structural negatives: the ratio screener (39.5) flags genuine leverage (D/E 1.90, LT D/E 1.58) and a P/B of 5.66, and the ~$5.4B dividend against ~$5.49B TTM FCF is a real coverage concern the formula also can't weigh. Netting these, I would move the score up roughly 10-15 points toward the mid-50s - the one-off charge distortion and the forward P/E of 13.9x versus a 16.31x 5-year average argue for a higher mark, but the leverage and dividend-coverage risks keep it near the top of 'Fair' rather than into 'Good.' Hence Partially Agree, not Agree.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.