URI — United Rentals, Inc.
United Rentals, Inc., founded in 1997 and headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, functions as a prominent equipment rental firm through its various subsidiaries. The company's operations are divided into two main divisions: General Rentals and Specialty.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, United Rentals traded at $989.12 (~$61.6B market cap), down 12.41% over the prior month despite a July 22 Q2 2026 beat-and-raise, leaving it 8.27% below its 50-day average while still up 34.17% over six months. The operating story is accelerating — record Q2 revenue of $4.41B (+11.8% YoY) and FY26 guidance raised to $17.5–17.8B revenue / $7.975–8.125B EBITDA — but the deterministic score is 44.1 ('Weak Fundamentals') with a valuation label of 'Rich vs. its own history'.
Sell-side sentiment is unambiguously Bullish: 28 Buy ratings against 8 Hold and 5 Sell, a consensus rating of Buy, and a $1,219.15 average price target (~23% above the 2026-09-13 price of $989.12) after Citi, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan and Jefferies raised targets post-earnings. The tape disagrees. URI jumped roughly 10% on the July 22, 2026 Q2 report ($12.76 adjusted EPS vs ~$11.55 consensus, revenue $4.41B vs $4.21B expected, fleet productivity +3.4% YoY) and then round-tripped the entire move and more, falling 12.41% over the month into 2026-09-13 with RSI at 36.5. Record results plus a raised guide against a double-digit drawdown is the signature of multiple compression on rate/cycle concerns, not a broken earnings story — hence Neutral rather than Bullish.
The three-year quarterly record shows a clear deceleration-then-reacceleration arc, not a structural decline. Revenue growth faded through 2025: +9.8% YoY in Q4 2024 (4,095 vs 3,728), then +6.7% (Q1 2025), +4.5% (Q2 2025), +5.9% (Q3 2025) and a trough of just +2.8% in Q4 2025 (4,208 vs 4,095). That was the scare. 2026 reversed it hard: +7.2% in Q1 2026 (3,985 vs 3,719) and +11.8% in Q2 2026 (4,410 vs 3,943), the fastest YoY growth in the twelve-quarter window and a record revenue quarter. Margins tell the same story: operating margin fell from 28.1% in Q3 2024 to 26.3% in Q3 2025 and 25.0% in Q4 2025, then turned back up +20bps YoY in Q1 2026 (21.8%) and +40bps YoY in Q2 2026 (25.8%). Gross margin expanded even more sharply — Q2 2026 gross profit of $1,732M on $4,410M revenue is 39.3% versus 36.1% in Q2 2025, a ~320bp gain. EPS followed: +2.0% in Q3 2025, -2.7% in Q4 2025, then +5.6% in Q1 2026 and +23.5% in Q2 2026 ($11.84 vs $9.59). Cash generation is real — TTM operating cash flow of $5,742M against TTM net income of $2,638M, an accruals ratio of -3.31%, i.e. earnings are running behind, not ahead of, cash. The honest caveat: one quarter does not make a trend, Q2 has the easiest comp and the strongest seasonality (Q1 operating margin of 21.6–21.8% is structurally the low point, Q3 the high), and the Q3 2026 report in late October is the real confirmation test. But the direction of travel into mid-2026 is up, not down.
Expensive versus its own history, and merely fair-to-slightly-rich on forward numbers. As of 2026-09-13 the TTM P/E was 23.86x against a five-year average of 16.91x — a ~41% premium — with P/S at 3.66x versus a 2.73x average and P/B at 6.80x. The trailing PEG of 3.385 looks damning, but it is measuring a trailing window that includes the 2025 air pocket. Forward math is friendlier: on next-FY consensus EPS of $49.477, the forward P/E is 19.99x, and on TTM EBITDA (implied ~$6.41B from the 11.56x EV/EBITDA reading) versus FY26 EBITDA guidance of $8.05B at the midpoint, forward EV/EBITDA is roughly 9.2x. Forward PEG, using 11–15% expected EPS growth, lands near 1.4–1.8x. So: you are paying the top of URI's own five-year multiple range for a mid-teens grower carrying $12.69B of long-term debt, a 1.67 debt-to-equity ratio, a 0.764 current ratio and only $112M of cash. The multiple, not the earnings, is where the risk sits.
The price is discounting the guidance being right, not another beat. At $989.12 the market pays ~20x next-FY EPS of $49.477 and ~9.2x the $8.05B midpoint of FY26 EBITDA guidance — the high end of URI's own historical range on both. That means a Q3 2026 print (late October) that merely confirms the $17.5–17.8B revenue / $7.975–8.125B EBITDA range probably does not lift the stock, because the July beat-and-raise already bought a 10% pop that fully reversed. What pays is a second consecutive raise or hard evidence that mega-project bookings convert into 2027 revenue — worth roughly $1,150–1,200 at 22–23x forward EPS. What punishes is any hint the cycle is rolling: reverting to the 17x five-year average multiple on implied FY26 EPS of ~$44.6 is roughly $760. The July-to-September action (up 10% on the print, then -12.4% over the following month) says the market is already trimming the multiple rather than paying up for the raise — a negative asymmetry that argues against chasing.
As of 2026-09-13 URI closed at $989.12 with RSI(14) at 36.5 — weak, but above the 30 oversold line, so no capitulation signal yet. Price sat 5.99% below its 20-day (~$1,052), 8.27% below its 50-day (~$1,078), and 6.17% above a 200-day around $932. Returns of -2.05% (1 week), -12.41% (1 month) and -7.92% (3 months) against +34.17% (6 months) describe a sharp intermediate-term rollover inside an intact longer-term uptrend. Entry implication: this is not a buy-the-dip setup without confirmation. Two cleaner entries exist — a flush into the $930–950 zone that pushes RSI under 30 into the 200-day, or a decisive reclaim of the 50-day at ~$1,078 on volume. With beta at 1.787, a broad-market wobble makes the first scenario more likely than the second.
- Interest rates and project financing: URI carries $12.69B of long-term debt at 1.67x debt-to-equity against only $112M of cash, and its contractor customer base funds projects with credit — higher-for-longer rates pressure both the company's own refinancing cost and its customers' project pipelines simultaneously.
- Non-residential mega-project and data-center capex: domestic manufacturing re-shoring, power/infrastructure buildout and data-center construction are the core demand tailwinds, and management explicitly cited visibility into large-scale commercial projects when raising FY26 revenue guidance to $17.5–17.8B.
- Structural rental penetration: the shift from contractor-owned equipment to rental fleets continues to expand North American rental penetration toward the 55–60% range, a multi-year share tailwind that disproportionately benefits the largest player (~16% share) over fragmented local competitors.
- Used-equipment residual values and fleet pricing: any normalization or softening in the used equipment market hits both disposal margins and the residual assumptions underpinning a fleet that absorbed $5.11B of TTM capex, and would likely force a reassessment of growth capex plans.
- Tariffs and OEM equipment cost inflation: new-fleet purchase prices set the capex per unit and ultimately the rental rates URI must charge, so higher equipment inflation cuts both ways — it supports rental pricing but raises the capital bill on a business already running negative free cash flow in Q2.
- Broad industrial/freight activity: the research brief flags confirming volume growth at CSX and Union Pacific, which matters because general industrial rental demand is the least project-specific and most macro-sensitive slice of the revenue base.
- Q3 2026 earnings, expected late October 2026 — the first real test of whether the raised $17.5–17.8B revenue and $7.975–8.125B adjusted EBITDA ranges are securely on track, and the single most important near-term event for the stock.
- Continued mega-project and data-center/power infrastructure bookings converting into 2027 revenue, which would justify holding a premium multiple instead of having it compress toward the 17x historical average.
- Execution of the new $5B share repurchase authorization — roughly $1B was already returned year-to-date through mid-2026 via buybacks and dividends, and continued shrinkage of a ~62.2M share count mechanically lifts EPS.
- Management commentary at investor conferences (URI presented at the Morgan Stanley 14th Annual Laguna Conference in early September 2026) and any mid-quarter datapoints on fleet productivity and rental rates.
- Initial FY2027 guidance and the Q4 2026 print in late January 2027, which will set the forward EPS baseline the market capitalizes.
- Direction of the 10-year Treasury and credit spreads, which drive both URI's refinancing cost on $12.7B of debt and its contractors' willingness to break ground on marginal projects.
- Multiple compression is the dominant risk: TTM P/E of 23.86x versus a 16.91x five-year average and P/S of 3.66x versus 2.73x. A simple reversion to the historical P/E on implied FY26 EPS of ~$44.6 implies roughly $760 — about 23% below the 2026-09-13 price of $989.12.
- Balance-sheet fragility: debt-to-equity of 1.67x, $12.69B of long-term debt, a current ratio of 0.764 and only $112M of cash leave little liquidity cushion, and the debt is secured against fleet whose value is itself cyclical.
- Capex is consuming the earnings: TTM free cash flow is roughly $632M after $5.11B of capex, and Q2 2026 FCF was negative $261M on $2.05B of capex. If the mega-project demand that justified that build does not materialize, the fleet becomes stranded and residuals fall.
- Cyclicality and high beta (1.787): revenue is tied to non-residential construction and industrial capex, so a recession or credit crunch hits rental volume and rental rates at the same time, and the equity amplifies the move.
- Used-equipment market normalization: softening resale values pressure the margin on equipment disposals and would likely force downward revisions to fleet residual assumptions and future growth capex.
- Insider signaling: CFO William E. Grace sold 1,500 shares (~$1.7M) via Form 4 shortly after the post-earnings pop — small in dollar terms and easily routine diversification, but it is not the direction an investor wants to see immediately after a raise.
- One-quarter trend risk: the Q2 2026 +11.8% revenue acceleration came against a soft +4.5% Q2 2025 comp and peak construction seasonality; if the underlying run-rate is closer to the +5–7% seen across 2025, the growth premium in the multiple is not earned.
United Rentals is a genuinely good operating business that has stopped being a good price. Q2 2026 delivered record revenue of $4.41B (+11.8% YoY), 39.3% gross margin (+320bps YoY), 25.8% operating margin, 27.8% ROE and clean cash conversion (TTM OCF $5,742M vs net income $2,638M, accruals ratio -3.31%), and management raised FY26 guidance to $17.5–17.8B revenue and $7.975–8.125B EBITDA. But at $989.12 as of 2026-09-13 you are paying 23.86x trailing and ~20x forward earnings, 3.66x sales, ~9.2x forward EBITDA, and 6.8x book for that — the top of the company's own five-year range — while the balance sheet carries 1.67x debt-to-equity, a 0.764 current ratio, $112M of cash and FCF of only ~$632M after $5.11B of capex. The market has already started voting: a 10% pop on the July beat has fully reversed into a 12.4% one-month decline with RSI at 36.5 and price 8.3% below its 50-day. I would not add here. The risk/reward works better either on a flush into the $930s–950s (RSI under 30, testing the 200-day) or after a Q3 confirmation that produces a second guidance raise. The mandatory framework lean is Bearish — 'Weak Fundamentals' band plus a 'Rich vs. its own history' valuation label maps there directly — though the honest characterization of that view is fully-valued quality cyclical, not deteriorating business.
Justified forward P/E on next-FY consensus EPS: I set the multiple at 21.5x — a premium to URI's five-year average of 16.91x to reflect the structural rental-penetration and mega-project growth now visible in the raised FY26 guide, but a discount to the 23–25x the bull case would require given 1.79 beta and $12.69B of long-term debt — and applied it to next-FY estimated EPS of $49.477, giving $1,064. Cross-check: 10.0x FY26 guidance EBITDA midpoint of $8.05B implies an enterprise value of $80.5B; less ~$12.58B of net debt (long-term debt of $12.689B less $0.112B cash) gives ~$67.9B of equity, or ~$1,091 across ~62.2M shares. The two methods bracket $1,039–$1,091 and average to roughly $1,064, which is about 7.6% above the 2026-09-13 price of $989.12 and well below the $1,219.15 sell-side consensus — consistent with a high-quality cyclical that is fairly valued, not a bargain, at 20x forward earnings.
The 44.1 'Weak Fundamentals' band is too harsh and I would move it up roughly 15 points to ~59-60 ('Fair'). The drag comes almost entirely from two components that are structurally hostile to equipment rental: ratio_screener at 29.7 and financial_health at 24.5, which punish a 0.764 current ratio, 1.67 debt-to-equity and 6.80x P/B. Those are not distress signals — URI funds a depreciating, long-lived $20B+ fleet with secured debt that sits outside current assets, so a sub-1.0 current ratio and heavy leverage are the business model, not a warning. Meanwhile the operating legs of the score actually agree the business is fine: growth 67.1 and quality/profitability 61.8, with a -3.31% accruals ratio confirming earnings run behind cash, not ahead of it. The legitimate knock the formula does capture is free cash flow: ~$632M TTM after $5.11B of capex, and Q2 2026 FCF of -$261M — that is a real constraint and I would not wave it away. I also checked the cyclical-trough carve-out and it does not apply here: URI is mid-expansion with revenue growth re-accelerating from +2.8% (Q4 2025) to +7.2% (Q1 2026) to +11.8% (Q2 2026) and guidance moving up, so the backward-looking score is understated because of a 2025 air pocket that has already reversed, not because it is catching a bottom. I found no single dated, material event in the research brief (no acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement or fraud disclosure) that the deterministic score structurally cannot see, so I applied the mandated band/valuation mapping exactly rather than deviating. In short: the band is one tier too low, but the 'Rich vs. its own history' valuation label is correct, and that combination is what drives the bearish lean.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.