#224S&P 500 rank

VLO — Valero Energy Corporation

2-yr score: 52.0/100 (Middle 40%)EnergyToday
$436.75+0.77%
Description

Valero Energy Corporation functions as a global producer and marketer of transportation fuels and petrochemicals, with operations spanning the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and other international territories. The company organizes its business across three primary divisions: Refining, Renewable Diesel, and Ethanol.

Score breakdownLatest quarter65.8 · Good
Growth
85.1
Quality / Profitability
59.0
Financial health
86.4
Ratio screener
56.8
Track record: 2-yr avg 52.0 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 51.6 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 22, 2026 (today)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Unfavorable (overbought / extended above trend)
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
18.1
Yield
1.51%
RSI (14)
61.0
vs SMA20
+3.56%
vs SMA50
+12.29%
vs SMA200
+57.11%
Analyst target
$410
-6.2%
19 analysts
AI theoretical price
$355
-18.7%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, VLO traded at $390.42, up 69.3% over six months and 50.9% over three, sitting just below its 52-week high of $399.26, after a record Q2 2026 that produced $12.62 diluted EPS versus $2.28 a year earlier. The stock is priced above virtually every published analyst target while RSI (78.61) sits deep in overbought territory.

AI sentimentBullish

The tape and the sell side are aligned: Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-30) delivered $3.72B net income and $5.35B of free cash flow on refining operating income of $4.5B, roughly 5x the year-ago quarter. That triggered a wave of target hikes — UBS to $450 (from $355), Piper Sandler to $435, Wells Fargo to $389 — and the stock ran to an all-time high near $399.26 on a multi-day winning streak. Management returned $2.6B in Q2 alone, and a $1.20/share quarterly dividend supports the cash-return narrative. The euphoria is real, and it is fully reflected in price: RSI 78.61, +20.2% above the 50-day and +60.1% above the 200-day as of 2026-09-13.

Quarterly trend

This is a textbook refinery cycle, and the data traces it cleanly. Operating margin ran 9.1% in Q3 2023, compressed through 2024 (5.3% → 3.5% → 1.5% → 1.1%), went negative at -3.0% in Q1 2025 (a -$1.90 EPS quarter) and bottomed there. From Q2 2025 it recovered in a steady stair-step — 3.3%, 4.7%, 5.0%, 5.4% — and then broke violently higher in Q2 2026 to 14.2% operating margin on $36.65B revenue, $5.20B operating income and $12.62 EPS. That is not a blip at the margin; it is a 3x step-change versus the prior four quarters. The critical read: the seven quarters from Q3 2024 through Q1 2026 averaged roughly 2.3% operating margin, so the Q2 2026 result is a spike sitting far above anything in the trailing three years, driven by exceptional crack spreads rather than volume (revenue of $36.6B is still below the $38.4B of Q3 2023). Growth is inflecting, not smoothly accelerating, and inflections in refining go both ways.

Valuation assessment

Mixed, and the mix is the whole story. On trailing numbers it looks reasonable: as of 2026-09-13 the P/E of 16.19 is essentially in line with the 5-year average of 15.69, PEG is a meaningless 0.018 (an artifact of the Q2 earnings spike), and price/book of 4.59 is unremarkable for a company earning 9.9% ROE. But the forward math is where it gets uncomfortable: at $390.42, the next-FY EPS estimate of $45.06 implies only ~8.7x forward earnings — optically cheap, except that $45.06 would be a record by a wide margin (2024 realized $8.49 and 2025 realized $7.65). Meanwhile P/S of 0.846 is 2.6x the company's own 5-year average of 0.32, which tells you sales have not grown — this is entirely a margin story. The deterministic framework independently tags this 'Rich vs. its own history.' My read: the stock is expensive against any normalized earnings base and only looks cheap if you assume Q2 2026 margins persist indefinitely.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The price has outrun the models. As of 2026-09-13 VLO at $390.42 sits well above the consensus price target of $340.20 and even above the more recent average target of $353.83 — a rare setup where the stock trades through the sell side's own published fair values. That usually means one of two things: analysts are behind and will chase estimates up (the UBS $450 and Piper $435 targets are already doing this), or the price is discounting a permanence of Q2's crack spreads that the earnings estimates of $45.06 barely capture. Watch the Q3 print on 2026-10-22 closely — if throughput and capture guidance normalize, the $45 EPS number gets cut and the 'cheap forward P/E' evaporates instantly. Treat the forward multiple as conditional on peak margins, not as a margin of safety.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13 the technical picture is stretched to a degree that argues against fresh capital. RSI(14) was 78.61, the stock sat 8.68% above its 20-day SMA, 20.19% above its 50-day and 60.10% above its 200-day, with a 5.31% one-week and 18.23% one-month return. That combination — overbought RSI plus a 60% extension above the long-term trend line — historically resolves through mean reversion or a prolonged sideways digestion, not through immediate further acceleration. Anyone establishing a position here is buying the top tick of a six-month 69% move. The disciplined entry is patience: a pullback toward the 50-day (roughly the low-to-mid $320s by extrapolation) or a multi-week consolidation that lets RSI cool below 60 would offer a far better risk/reward than chasing at $390 with the 52-week high at $399.26 directly overhead.

Macro factors
  • Structurally constrained global refining capacity — European and Asian plant closures plus no meaningful US greenfield builds — is keeping crack spreads above mid-cycle levels and disproportionately benefiting complex Gulf Coast refiners like Valero.
  • Geopolitical friction around Middle Eastern shipping lanes and sanctions on Russian refined product exports adds crude-cost volatility but supports distillate cracks; Valero's ability to run heavy, discounted sour slates is a direct margin advantage in this environment.
  • Carbon-intensity regulation and low-carbon fuel standard policy (LCFS, RFS) are a swing factor for the Diamond Green Diesel and ethanol segments — favorable mandates reward the renewable investments, but shifting compliance rules add cost uncertainty.
  • Macro rotation into cash-generative, low-leverage energy names has been a tailwind; VLO's 0.568 beta, 0.454 debt/equity, 1.636 current ratio and 1.51% dividend yield fit that profile, but a rates-driven rotation out of cyclicals would reverse the flow quickly.
  • US gasoline and distillate demand is essentially flat year over year — this rally is a supply/margin story, not a demand story, which caps how far volume-driven upside can go.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on Thursday, October 22, 2026 — the single most important datapoint, with guidance on Q4 throughput capacity, capital allocation priorities and renewable diesel yields all in play.
  • Startup of the St. Charles FCC unit optimization in Q3 2026, an incremental margin-capture project that should show up in Q3/Q4 capture rates.
  • Continued aggressive capital returns — $2.6B distributed in Q2 2026 with a $1.20/share quarterly dividend; any buyback upsizing or special dividend is a positive catalyst.
  • Winter distillate/heating-oil demand and any further tightening of global diesel supply, which is where the outsized crack spreads live.
  • Sell-side target revisions continuing to chase the price higher (UBS $450, Piper $435 already above spot), or conversely, estimate cuts if crack spreads normalize.
Key risks
  • Crack spread normalization is the dominant risk. Q2 2026's 14.2% operating margin is roughly 6x the 2.3% average of the prior seven quarters; a return toward that run-rate would take EPS from the $45+ estimate back toward single digits and gut the thesis.
  • Valuation and technical stretch — the stock trades above its own recent analyst target average of $353.83, at 2.6x its historical P/S, with RSI 78.61 and a 60% extension above the 200-day as of 2026-09-13. Both mean-reversion vectors point the same direction.
  • Regulatory and compliance cost risk across the renewable diesel and ethanol segments as carbon-intensity rules evolve; policy shifts could erode DGD economics without warning.
  • Insider behavior — roughly $9.4M of open-market insider sales over recent months with no offsetting open-market purchases, at all-time-high prices. Not damning on its own, but it is not a vote of confidence.
  • Demand-side recession risk: with flat US product demand, a macro slowdown would hit volumes on top of already-elevated margins, compounding the downside.
Investment thesis

Valero is a well-run, low-leverage, cash-generative refiner that just posted a genuinely exceptional quarter, and the structural tightness in global refining capacity is a real, multi-year tailwind. But this is not a good entry point: at $390.42 on 2026-09-13 the stock is priced above almost every analyst target, at 2.6x its own historical price/sales, with RSI at 78.61 and earnings at what is very likely a cyclical peak. The bullish case requires Q2 2026's extraordinary margins to persist; the data says the prior seven quarters averaged a small fraction of that. Own it on weakness, not on a 69% six-month run into an all-time high.

AI theoretical price methodology

I blended two normalized methods as of 2026-09-13. (1) EV/EBITDA: ~$12.5B of mid-cycle EBITDA (roughly the $12.9B trailing figure with Q2 2026's ~$3.4B of excess operating income pulled back toward the 3-5% margin run-rate of the prior seven quarters) at 8.0x — a premium to the peer mid-cycle multiple justified by VLO's Gulf Coast complexity and renewable platform — gives $100B EV, less $2.55B net debt ($10.42B LT debt minus $7.87B cash) = $97.45B equity, or ~$336/share on ~290M shares. (2) Normalized P/E: ~$28.00 of mid-cycle EPS (between the $24.53 TTM and the peak-cycle $45.06 next-FY estimate) at 13x, a discount to the 15.69x 5-year average because the market pays less for peak earnings, gives ~$364/share. Averaging the two produces roughly $350; I round to $355 to reflect the genuine structural-tightness tailwind on crack spreads.

AI lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

The 65.8 'Good Fundamentals' band holds up on my independent read. The growth leg (85.1) and financial health leg (86.4) are genuinely earned — Q2 2026 free cash flow of $5.35B, debt/equity of 0.454, current ratio of 1.636, and a negative accruals ratio of -2.88% confirming earnings are cash-backed rather than accounting-driven. The 56.8 ratio screener fairly penalizes the rich P/B (4.591) and P/S. The one thing the formula structurally cannot see is cyclicality: as a refiner, VLO's trailing margin/ROIC/growth legs are being flattered by a Q2 2026 margin spike (14.2% operating margin against a 2.3% average over the prior seven quarters) that may not persist — that argues the score is, if anything, slightly generous. Offsetting it, the formula also cannot see that forward EPS of $45.06 implies an ~8.7x P/E that reflects real structural tightness in global refining, which argues it is slightly harsh. Those two push in opposite directions, so I land within roughly 5 points of the given number. No dated material event exists that the score misses — the Q2 2026 blowout (reported 2026-07-30) is already inside the trailing data — so I apply the band/valuation mapping as written.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.