#164S&P 500 rank

VMC — Vulcan Materials Company

2-yr score: 55.1/100 (Middle 40%)Basic Materials7d
$264.64+1.04%
Description

Vulcan Materials Company, alongside its affiliated entities, stands as a prominent producer and distributor of construction aggregates, primarily operating within the United States. The company's activities are organized into four distinct divisions: Aggregates, Asphalt, Concrete, and Calcium.

Score breakdownLatest quarter47.2 · Fair
Growth
35.2
Quality / Profitability
45.2
Financial health
69.7
Ratio screener
50.2
Track record: 2-yr avg 55.1 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 55.2 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 29, 2026 (in 7 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Cheap vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
31.1
Yield
0.74%
RSI (14)
65.4
vs SMA20
+6.68%
vs SMA50
+3.04%
vs SMA200
-5.96%
Analyst target
$286
+7.9%
6 analysts
AI theoretical price
$272
+2.8%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, VMC trades at $252.74 (market cap ~$32.7B), about 24% below its 52-week high of $331.09 and down 9.9% over the prior month, with RSI-14 at 34.2 and price below its 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages. Q2 2026 revenue rose 2.5% YoY to $2.16B, but operating margin compressed ~270bp YoY to 19.7% on diesel and input-cost inflation.

AI sentimentBearish

Market sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is clearly negative, not merely cautious. The stock fell ~4.5% on the Q2 2026 print (filed 2026-07-29) because shipments grew only ~2% YoY to 59.9M tons and operating margin contracted to 19.7% from 22.4% a year earlier on a ~$40M diesel headwind. Price action confirms it: -3.77% over 1 week, -9.86% over 1 month, -11.77% over 3 months, and roughly -14% YTD versus a materials sector that has also lagged. Insider activity has been a mild negative (Executive Chairman J. Thomas Hill exercised options and sold shares in August 2026, contributing to a net-negative trailing-12-month insider trend). The one bullish counterweight - sell-side consensus of Moderate Buy with a $314.63 average target for ~24% upside - looks stale relative to the tape and is not being traded on.

Quarterly trend

Decelerating, with a clear margin inflection downward in the most recent quarter. Revenue YoY went +13.9% (Q3 2025) -> +3.2% (Q4 2025) -> +7.4% (Q1 2026) -> +2.5% (Q2 2026), so the double-digit growth of mid-2025 has faded to low single digits. Operating margin in the high-volume summer quarters tells the sharper story: 22.5% (Q2 2024), 16.8% (Q3 2024, a weak print), 22.4% (Q2 2025), 23.8% (Q3 2025), then 19.7% (Q2 2026) - a genuine step back from the 22-24% summer run-rate. Gross margin also slipped to 29.0% in Q2 2026 from 29.7% a year earlier, and the fact that operating margin fell more than gross margin implies SG&A and other overhead are absorbing inflation too. EPS is still up on a trailing basis (TTM $8.60 versus $7.15 at Q2 2025, helped by the very weak Q3 2024 base), but the newest quarter grew just +2.9% YoY ($2.48 vs $2.41). Cash generation is the healthiest line item: TTM operating cash flow of $1.80B against $777M of capex produced $1.03B of TTM free cash flow, and the accruals ratio is a conservative -0.12% (cash earnings running ahead of reported net income). Verdict: this reads as a cyclical/input-cost margin trough layered on a decelerating but still-positive volume trend, not a structural breakdown - but the inflection has not yet shown up in reported numbers.

Valuation assessment

Genuinely cheap versus its own history, only fair on an absolute growth-adjusted basis. As of 2026-09-13: P/E (TTM) 29.73x against a 5-year average of 37.24x, a ~20% discount; P/S 4.04x versus a 5-year average of 4.27x; forward P/E of ~27.7x on the FY2027 consensus EPS of $9.141. P/B is 3.89x and EV/EBITDA is 14.74x. The problem is what you're paying for the growth: PEG is 1.63, TTM EPS growth is only ~18% (flattered by a weak base), and the forward estimate implies just +6% EPS growth off the TTM figure of $8.60. A ~28x forward multiple for mid-single-digit near-term growth is not a bargain - it is a quality/moat premium plus an implicit bet that 2028 margins and volumes normalize well above today's trough. So: cheap relative to VMC's own recent decade, expensive relative to its current earnings trajectory.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The market is discounting a slow, unimpressive grind - not a V-shaped recovery. At $252.74 the stock sits on 27.7x FY2027 consensus EPS of $9.14, which is only ~6% above TTM EPS of $8.60; that multiple is doing the work, not the earnings. If early-2027 pricing actions restore price/cost to a tailwind and volumes recover toward 3-4%, mid-cycle EPS of ~$10.50 justifies $285-300 on a 27-28x multiple, and that is the bull path. If diesel stays elevated and private non-residential construction stays frozen, 27x on essentially flat earnings implies downside toward $215-230. In other words the stock is priced near the midpoint of two very different outcomes, which is why the setup is interesting but not yet an obvious mispricing. The October 29, 2026 Q3 print is the first real test of which path is operative.

Technical picture

Decidedly bearish trend, not yet oversold enough to be a clean bounce setup. As of 2026-09-13, RSI-14 stood at 34.22 (weak, approaching but not reaching the 30 oversold line), with price 5.60% below the 20-day SMA, 9.27% below the 50-day SMA, and 12.16% below the 200-day SMA - a textbook stacked downtrend with every moving average overhead as resistance. Price at $252.74 is only ~2.7% above the 52-week low of $246.20, so the immediate support is thin, and a break of $246 would put the stock in price discovery. Returns of -3.77% (1wk), -9.86% (1mo) and -11.77% (3mo) show no deceleration in selling pressure. Timing implication: there is no technical reason to step in front of this. A constructive entry would require either RSI pushing under 30 with a reversal candle, a reclaim of the 20-day SMA, or a fundamental catalyst (the Q3 print) - not simply a low price.

Macro factors
  • Federal and state highway/transportation funding is the demand floor: public infrastructure work is aggregates-heavy and formula-funded, providing durable visibility, but late-year congressional action on a surface transportation bill or continuing resolution is a live swing factor.
  • Diesel fuel costs are the single biggest margin swing factor right now - a roughly $40M headwind in Q2 2026 alone - so any sustained move in distillate prices flows almost directly into VMC's operating margin.
  • Interest rate volatility continues to suppress private non-residential and residential construction, the higher-margin private side of the demand mix; a credible rate-cut path into 2027 would be the biggest single re-rating lever.
  • Broad input-cost inflation (labor, hauling, maintenance) is running ahead of realized price in the current pricing cycle, compressing margins even where volumes hold.
  • Sector rotation away from Basic Materials: VMC is down roughly 14% YTD versus a market that has been rewarding other sectors, so flows are a headwind independent of company execution.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on October 29, 2026 - the key test of whether shipments rebound and whether mid-year price increases are finally outrunning diesel and overhead inflation.
  • Mid-year 2026 and early-2027 price actions; sell-side trackers (e.g. Stifel) expect price/cost to swing back to a clear tailwind, which is the core of the margin recovery thesis.
  • Monetization of the September 2026 international tribunal ruling that Mexican environmental authorities unlawfully shuttered the Quintana Roo quarry - a legal win whose compensation/asset value is not yet reflected in any reported financial metric.
  • Federal transportation funding legislation or a continuing resolution late in 2026 that locks in formula-based highway spending.
  • Continued portfolio realignment - divesting lower-margin ready-mixed concrete assets and recycling capital into higher-margin aggregates - which should structurally lift gross margin over time.
Key risks
  • Valuation risk is the top one: 27.7x forward EPS for a business compounding earnings in the mid-single digits leaves little cushion, and the 37.2x 5-year average P/E was earned in a zero-rate regime that is unlikely to return soon.
  • Persistent diesel and input-cost inflation could extend the margin compression for another two to three quarters, in which case the 'cyclical trough' thesis is early rather than wrong.
  • Volume stagnation - shipments grew only ~2% YoY in Q2 2026 - if private non-residential and residential construction stay frozen while public funding timing gaps bite.
  • Insider selling: Executive Chairman option exercises and on-market sales in August 2026 contribute to a net-negative trailing-12-month insider trend, a weak signal at a 52-week low.
  • Balance sheet and cross-border exposure: long-term debt of $3.96B as of 2026-06-30 (though actively paid down from $4.88B at 2025-12-31) plus ongoing Mexico legal/regulatory risk beyond the Quintana Roo matter.
Investment thesis

VMC is a genuinely high-quality, reserve-backed aggregates franchise going through a cyclical and input-cost soft patch, and at $252.74 it is trading roughly 20% below its own 5-year average earnings multiple and within 3% of a 52-week low. The problem is that the recovery is entirely prospective: trailing revenue growth is 2.5%, operating margin just fell ~270bp YoY, ROIC is only 8%, and you are asked to pay ~28x forward earnings for ~6% near-term EPS growth. My honest read is fair-to-modestly-attractive, not a compelling buy at this price: I'd want the Q3 print on October 29 to show the price/cost inflection beginning, or a flush toward $240-246 with RSI under 30, before treating this as a high-conviction entry. It is a good business in a bad tape, priced for the middle of two very different 2027 outcomes.

AI theoretical price methodology

I blended two anchors as of 2026-09-13: (1) 29.5x FY2027 consensus EPS of $9.141 = ~$270 - a deliberate ~21% discount to VMC's own 5-year average P/E of 37.24x to reflect higher rates and slower near-term growth, but still a quality-premium multiple to the broad market; and (2) a 15.5x EV/EBITDA cross-check on the data-derived EBITDA of ~$2.48B ($38.4B EV less $3.77B net debt = ~$34.6B equity, or ~$267/share). The two methods land within $3 of each other near $268, and I shade to $272 to reflect modest optionality from the September 2026 Quintana Roo tribunal ruling. This is my own reasoned estimate, not a restatement of the $314.63 sell-side consensus target or of the deterministic score's band.

AI lean: NeutralConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The deterministic 47.2 / 'Fair Fundamentals' score is an accurate description of the trailing data - revenue +2.5% YoY, operating margin down ~270bp YoY, OCF up just 0.5% YoY, ROIC of 8%, and a 35.2 growth subscore that correctly flags the deceleration - but it structurally cannot distinguish a cyclical trough from a structural decline, which is exactly the pattern to watch for here. The Q2 2026 shortfall was driven by ~$40M of diesel cost and weather-delayed shipments rather than lost share or broken pricing, and the formula also cannot see the September 2026 international tribunal ruling in VMC's favor against Mexican environmental authorities over the Quintana Roo quarry - a real, dated event with monetization value that appears nowhere in the trailing financials. On the other side, the 8% ROIC and 3.89x P/B do embed genuine capital intensity, and the 'Cheap vs. its own history' label leans on a 37.2x 5-year average P/E earned in a zero-rate era. Netting those out, I would put the fair score in the 55-58 range - roughly 10 points above the formula, at the top of Fair and knocking on Good - so I Partially Agree rather than fully agree or disagree. I am not applying the permitted overall_lean deviation because the Mexico ruling, while dated and positive, is an uncertain-value legal outcome rather than an announced acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement or fraud disclosure.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.