← Back to Rankings

VRTVertiv Holdings Co

Fundamentals Score: 71.5/100 (Good Fundamentals) · Industrials

Description

Vertiv Holdings Co, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, is a global provider of essential digital infrastructure technologies and comprehensive lifecycle services. The company specializes in the design, manufacturing, and servicing of critical systems vital for data centers, communication networks, and diverse commercial and industrial applications.

Score Breakdown

Growth
72.8/100
weight: 45%
Quality / Profitability
67.6/100
weight: 40%
Financial Health
78.2/100
weight: 15%
* Stockholders' equity moved +10% between 2024-12-31 and 2025-03-31 (vs. -31% for the same quarter a year earlier) in its reported financials - possibly a divestiture, spinoff, or major acquisition rather than organic performance. Growth/trend comparisons spanning this point may be distorted.
Valuation Context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry Timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral

Live Market DataPrice updated: 7m ago

P/E (TTM)
61.1
Yield
0.07%
RSI (14)
52.7
vs SMA20
+2.31%
vs SMA50
-2.42%
vs SMA200
+7.14%
Analyst Target
$368
+33.2%
12 analysts
AI Theoretical Price
$303
+9.6%
as of 2026-08-27

AI Deep-Dive Analysis

Analysis as of 2026-08-27 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-08-27, Vertiv trades at $269.28 with a $103.7B market cap, roughly 29% below its 52-week high despite strong recent fundamentals. The business is compounding quickly, but the stock is priced at about 40x forward earnings, so the debate is execution durability versus valuation.

AI Sentiment:Neutral

Market sentiment is mixed rather than euphoric. Analysts remain overwhelmingly bullish (20 buys, 1 hold in this dataset; consensus target ~$368.75), but the stock has fallen sharply from its 379.94 high after Q2 2026 revenue missed consensus on project timing, and a securities investigation has added headline overhang. The RSI is mid-range and price is below the 50-day, so the tape is in a consolidation phase, not an uptrend.

Quarterly Trend

Revenue growth has been consistently strong for three years: Q2 2026 grew 24.1% YoY to $3.27B, Q1 2026 grew 30.1%, Q4 2025 grew 22.7%, and Q3 2025 grew 29.0%. This is a structural acceleration in AI-infrastructure demand, not a cyclical trough or a blip. Operating margins have moved up from roughly 15% in 2023 to 19.5% reported in Q2 2026 (21%+ adjusted), and diluted EPS has scaled from $0.24 in Q3 2023 to $1.27 in Q2 2026. The one blemish is quarter-to-quarter delivery timing, which caused the slight Q2 revenue miss; the underlying trend remains strongly positive.

Valuation Assessment

Expensive. As of 2026-08-27, TTM P/E is 59.6x, price/sales is 9.0x, price/book is 21.8x, and the stock carries a 2.06 beta. The TTM P/E is actually in line with the 5-year average of 61.4x, but the 5-year average P/S of 3.34x versus the current 9.0x shows how much the market has repriced the AI growth story. On FY2026 consensus EPS of $6.72, forward P/E is about 40x — reasonable only if the company keeps delivering 20%+ revenue growth and continued margin expansion.

Price vs. Earnings Playbook

The market is pricing in continued strong growth and margin expansion, not a cheap entry. At $269.28 and $6.72 FY2026 estimated EPS, the stock is at roughly 40x forward earnings; a re-rating to 45x would put fair value near $302, while a de-rating to 30x on any guidance cut would imply roughly $202. The 29% drawdown from the high already reflects some de-risking, but the price still leaves little room for a delivery miss. The playbook is to buy on weakness or after Q3 confirms the raised guidance, not to chase strength.

Technical Picture

As of 2026-08-27, RSI stood at 47.23 — neutral, not oversold or overbought. Price was 0.59% below the 20-day SMA, 7.31% below the 50-day SMA, but 5.72% above the 200-day SMA. That describes a range-bound consolidation below short-term moving averages while still holding above the long-term uptrend. Momentum is not confirming the bull case yet; a reclaim of the 20-day and 50-day would be the first technical sign of repair, while losing the 200-day would be a more serious risk-off signal.

Macro Factors
  • Hyperscaler AI infrastructure capex: Vertiv is in the critical path for data center power and cooling, especially liquid cooling for high-density AI clusters.
  • Interest rates: with beta around 2.1 and a forward P/E near 40x, VRT is highly sensitive to long-end Treasury yields; rate spikes disproportionately compress high-multiple AI proxies.
  • Sector rotation: the stock is ~29% below its high largely due to general profit-taking and rotation out of high-multiple AI names, not a change in the underlying demand story.
  • Tariffs and supply chain: management has so far offset tariff and component cost inflation with pricing, which is protecting the path toward its 2030 adjusted operating margin targets.
  • Data center power constraints: grid access and physical buildout bottlenecks are both a tailwind for Vertiv's equipment and a risk if delivery timelines slip.
Key Catalysts
  • Goldman Sachs Communacopia + Technology Conference on September 8, 2026, where the CEO and CFO could provide updated order pacing and H2 confidence.
  • Q3 2026 earnings in late October/early November 2026 — the main test of whether management's raised revenue and margin guidance is achievable.
  • Continued hyperscaler liquid-cooling order announcements and expanding AI data center capex budgets.
  • Any clarification or quiet resolution of the securities investigation overhang.
Key Risks
  • Execution risk: Q2 2026 revenue missed consensus by about 3% on project timing; if H2 delivery slips again, the raised guidance could crack.
  • Valuation risk: at ~40x forward EPS, modest growth deceleration or multiple compression can produce 25-30% drawdowns, as already seen.
  • AI capex concentration: if hyperscalers pause or digest current GPU buildouts, Vertiv's order trajectory would slow.
  • Legal/investigation overhang: the announced securities investigation creates headline risk and potential distraction.
  • Competition and supply chain: rivals and customers may in-source thermal/power solutions, and tariff/component cost pressures could return.
Investment Thesis

Vertiv is a good business and a core AI-infrastructure compounder: 24% revenue growth, expanding operating margins, strong FCF conversion, and a multi-year liquid-cooling tailwind. As of 2026-08-27, the issue is valuation, not the business. At $269.28, I would not chase; I would look to add on a pullback toward $220-240 or after Q3 2026 validates the raised guidance. Directionally, I lean cautiously bullish — the fundamentals are too strong to be bearish, but the rich multiple demands proof.

AI Theoretical Price Methodology

Calculated by applying a 45x forward P/E to FY2026 consensus EPS of $6.72. The 45x multiple is a premium justified by ~25% revenue growth, expanding margins, ~18.5% ROIC, and strong cash conversion, but it is deliberately below the 5-year average trailing P/E of 61.4x and the consensus target's implied ~55x forward multiple to account for execution timing risk and the already-rich absolute valuation.

AI Lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: Medium

AI Review of the Deterministic Score

Agree

The deterministic score of 71.5 and 'Good Fundamentals' band is a fair read. My independent analysis confirms the key drivers: strong revenue and OCF growth, expanding operating margins, solid ROIC near 18.5%, and a negative accruals ratio of -3.79%, which means reported earnings are actually cash-backed. The one data quirk flagged around stockholders' equity movement is a caution on balance-sheet trend comparisons, but it does not undermine the revenue/OCF story. I would not move the score by more than a few points — if anything, the forward AI-infrastructure visibility supports a slight upward tilt, but the rich valuation keeps me from pushing it higher.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.