#327S&P 500 rank

VTR — Ventas, Inc.

2-yr score: 46.9/100 (Middle 40%)Real Estate5d
$85.38−1.28%
Description

Ventas, Inc. is an S&P 500 company enabling exceptional environments that benefit a large and growing aging population. With approximately 1,450 properties in North America and the United Kingdom, Ventas occupies an essential role in the longevity economy.

Score breakdownLatest quarter43.0 · Weak
Growth
63.2
Quality / Profitability
46.7
Financial health
31.7
Ratio screener
34.1
Track record: 2-yr avg 46.9 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 41.4 (Weak, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 27, 2026 (in 5 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
155.2
Yield
2.25%
RSI (14)
49.4
vs SMA20
+1.28%
vs SMA50
-2.99%
vs SMA200
-0.98%
Analyst target
$101
+18.2%
9 analysts
AI theoretical price
$93
+8.9%
as of 2026-09-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-09-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-09-13, Ventas traded at $89.98 (market cap ~$43.7B), mid-range inside its 52-week band of $66.54-$101.60, sitting below both its 20- and 50-day averages with RSI at 42.96. Operationally the business is running hot: Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-29) delivered $0.97 normalized FFO/share (+9% YoY), +21.7% total revenue growth, +10% same-store cash NOI, and a raised full-year 2026 FFO guide of $3.85-$3.90.

AI sentimentBullish

The fundamental narrative is decisively bullish: a 2026-07-29 Q2 beat on normalized FFO ($0.97 vs. $0.96 consensus, +9% YoY), FY26 normalized FFO guidance raised to $3.85-$3.90, the full-year investment target lifted to $4.5B from $3B, SHOP same-store NOI up 16%, roughly 78% of covering analysts at Buy and a $99.43 consensus price target. The tape is noticeably less convinced: as of 2026-09-13 the shares were 1.88% below the 20-day and 3.13% below the 50-day, up only 1.1% over one month, with RSI at 42.96 - so sentiment is bullish on the story and lukewarm on the price action.

Quarterly trend

Revenue growth is accelerating, not decelerating. YoY growth ran +7.5% in Q3 2024 and +10.5% in Q4 2024, then stepped up to +18.3%, +20.4%, +21.7% and +22.0% across the last four reported quarters, taking quarterly revenue from $1.15B in Q3 2023 to $1.73B in Q2 2026. GAAP operating margin has moved the opposite way: 14.9% in Q3 2025, 13.0% in Q4 2025, 11.6% in Q1 2026 and 12.5% in Q2 2026 - consistent with acquisition mix and the SHOP ramp rather than weakening demand, but a real compression worth watching. Diluted EPS has been flat and tiny for six straight quarters ($0.11-$0.15; $0.552 TTM) because depreciation swamps reported earnings, so the economic trend lives in FFO, which grew 9% YoY to $0.97 in Q2 2026. One quarter distorts the trailing picture badly: Q4 2025 gross profit printed -$2.13B against $1.57B of revenue, a roughly $2.1B non-cash charge that is a one-quarter blip but drags TTM gross margin to -2.6% and poisons several trailing quality ratios.

Valuation assessment

On the metrics that matter for a REIT, VTR is fairly-to-slightly-rich rather than cheap. As of 2026-09-13, $89.98 equals about 23.2x the midpoint of FY26 guided FFO ($3.875) and roughly 21x a ~$4.22 FY27 estimate, with a 2.25% dividend yield. The headline figures - 163.6x TTM P/E, 6.54 PEG, 2.97x book, 6.79x sales versus a 5-year average P/S of 4.92 - are distorted by depreciation-depressed GAAP earnings, but the P/S gap against its own history is a genuine signal that the market is paying up, and EV/EBITDA of 23.1x confirms it. The deterministic framework itself labels the valuation 'Neutral vs. its own history.' You are paying a full multiple for a ~9% FFO growth story plus a 2.25% dividend - a workable roughly 11-12% total-return setup, not a bargain.

Price vs. earnings playbook

The price is discounting an FFO recovery that is already visibly underway, not one that hasn't shown up: Q2 2026 FFO/share of $0.97 (+9% YoY) and the raised $3.85-$3.90 FY26 guide are what justify a ~21-23x forward FFO multiple. The trap is reading GAAP EPS - TTM EPS of $0.552 and a 4.1% net margin make the stock screen as absurdly expensive (163.6x), and any EPS-based screen will misprice this in both directions. The correct playbook is to track normalized FFO/AFFO per share, same-store cash NOI (+10%) and SHOP NOI (+16%) each quarter. If those hold at 9-10%, the multiple is defensible and returns come from growth plus the dividend; any deceleration in SHOP NOI or a slower-than-planned $4.5B investment year is what would make the multiple look wrong in a hurry.

Technical picture

As of 2026-09-13, RSI stood at 42.96 - neutral-to-soft, not oversold - with the $89.98 price 1.88% below its 20-day (~$91.70), 3.13% below its 50-day (~$92.89), and 5.41% above its 200-day (~$85.36). That is a short-term downtrend inside a longer-term uptrend: a consolidation range with the 20- and 50-day averages acting as nearby resistance and the 200-day as support well below. The entry-timing implication is that there is no urgency to chase; the stock is neither washed out nor breaking out, so scaling in on weakness toward the mid-$80s or waiting for a reclaim of the 50-day is a more disciplined posture than buying here.

Macro factors
  • Interest rates and cost of capital: REITs are rate-sensitive (beta 0.724). Falling long yields would compress cap rates, lift REIT multiples, and cheapen funding for Ventas's $4.5B acquisition program; a sustained rise in long rates does the reverse and raises the cost of its $12.7B of long-term debt.
  • The demographic 'age wave': the front edge of the Baby Boomer cohort turning 80 in 2026 is a step-function increase in addressable senior housing demand - the single strongest structural tailwind behind the SHOP NOI acceleration.
  • Supply-demand imbalance in senior housing: new construction starts remain near historic lows on high build costs and prior credit tightening, giving operators multiyear pricing power on occupancy and rent.
  • Capital markets access for acquisitions: management's raised $4.5B investment target plus a ~$700M disposition program at a ~7% blended yield only works if debt and equity markets stay open at reasonable spreads - this is the swing variable on external growth.
  • Healthcare labor and operator credit: SHOP margins depend on nurse and caregiver availability and wage inflation, while the triple-net portfolio carries operator counterparty risk if a tenant's coverage deteriorates.
  • Sector rotation versus bonds: as a 2.25%-yielding income vehicle, VTR competes with Treasuries and credit for the same capital, so 10-year yield direction and rate-cut expectations drive relative performance independent of operations.
Key catalysts
  • Q3 2026 earnings on 2026-10-28 after the close - the key reads are SHOP occupancy and margin trajectory, same-store cash NOI growth, and progress toward the raised $4.5B full-year investment target.
  • Further normalized FFO guidance raises or initial FY2027 guidance, which would validate or refute the ~9% FFO growth the multiple is currently pricing.
  • Rate cuts or a falling 10-year Treasury yield, which historically re-rate REITs and reduce Ventas's acquisition funding cost simultaneously.
  • Continued SHOP same-store NOI growth at or near the +16% Q2 level, plus any evidence that the ~$700M disposition program is recycling capital into higher-yielding senior housing.
  • Analyst price-target revisions - consensus already sits at $99.43 with 18 Buys versus 12 Holds and 2 Sells, so upgrades from the hold cohort are a plausible incremental catalyst.
Key risks
  • Valuation risk: at roughly 21-23x forward FFO with a 2.25% yield, the shares offer little margin for error; a single quarter of FFO or SHOP NOI deceleration would de-rate the multiple quickly.
  • Margin compression: GAAP operating margin has fallen from 14.9% in Q3 2025 to 12.5% in Q2 2026, and if acquisition mix keeps diluting margins the revenue growth story loses some of its shine.
  • Leverage and liquidity: $12.69B of long-term debt against $14.44B of total liabilities, a 0.93 debt-to-equity ratio, and a 0.27 current ratio leave a thin working-capital cushion, even with the $4.9B of reported liquidity.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity: a sustained rise in long rates lifts cap rates, pressures REIT multiples, and raises refinancing costs on a capital-intensive balance sheet.
  • SHOP operator and labor risk: wage inflation outpacing rate increases, or a healthcare operator credit event in the triple-net portfolio, would hit NOI and coverage ratios directly.
  • Acquisition integration risk: raising 2026 investment volume to $4.5B roughly 50% mid-year is aggressive; paying up at a favorable point in the cycle is the classic REIT value-destruction pattern.
  • Thin GAAP profitability: TTM net margin of 4.1%, ROE of 2.0% and EPS of $0.552 mean reported earnings provide essentially no valuation support if the FFO narrative cracks.
Investment thesis

Operationally, Ventas is doing nearly everything right - accelerating revenue at +21.7% YoY, +9% normalized FFO growth, +10% same-store cash NOI, +16% SHOP NOI, a raised FY26 guide and a genuinely favorable demographic and supply backdrop for the next several years. That does not make it a buy at $89.98: roughly 21-23x forward FFO with a 2.25% yield already prices in continued flawless execution, GAAP operating margins are compressing, and leverage is real ($12.69B long-term debt against a 0.27 current ratio). I would want the shares closer to the mid-$80s, or a Q3 print on 2026-10-28 confirming SHOP margins are still expanding and the acquisition program is on track, before adding to a position.

AI theoretical price methodology

I applied a 22x multiple to my FY2027E normalized FFO of ~$4.22 - built by growing the FY2026 guidance midpoint of $3.875 at the ~9% YoY pace management has been delivering - a multiple benchmarked to healthcare REIT peers and VTR's own post-2020 range, haircut modestly versus the sector leader for Ventas's thinner GAAP margins and larger legacy triple-net exposure. That yields $92.84, rounded to $93, which sits below the $99.43 analyst consensus and implies roughly 3% upside from the 2026-09-13 price of $89.98.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

My independent read is that the 43.0 score ('Weak Fundamentals') understates the business, but not by enough to call the screen wrong. The weakness is largely an accounting artifact: REIT depreciation on a $29.7B asset base crushes GAAP net income (TTM EPS $0.552, ROIC 3.2%, 163.6x P/E), and REITs deliberately run near-zero working capital funded with long-term debt, so the 0.27 current ratio and its 31.7 financial-health score are close to meaningless here. The score also inherits a one-off distortion the methodology explicitly cannot judge: Q4 2025 gross profit of -$2.13B against $1.57B of revenue, a ~$2.1B non-cash charge that drags TTM gross margin to -2.6%. On the metrics that actually govern this business - same-store cash NOI +10%, SHOP NOI +16%, normalized FFO/share +9% YoY to $0.97, FY26 FFO guidance raised to $3.85-$3.90, and a $4.5B investment pipeline - the 'Weak' band is too harsh, and I would move the score to roughly 60-63, i.e. 'Fair Fundamentals.' That is a one-tier shift, which is why this is Partial rather than full disagreement. The 34.1 ratio-screener score is not wrong about price, though: EV/EBITDA of 23.1x and P/S of 6.79x versus a 5-year average of 4.92x confirm VTR is fully valued, and the leverage is real. Net: better business than the score says, not a better stock.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.