#78S&P 500 rank

WDC — Western Digital Corporation

2-yr score: 61.8/100 (Next 20%)TechnologyToday
$378.32+3.84%
Description

Western Digital Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets a broad range of data storage devices and software solutions across the United States, China, Hong Kong, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the rest of Asia, serving an international market. The company's product lineup includes client devices such as hard disk drives (HDDs) and solid-state drives (SSDs) for computing platforms like desktops, notebooks, smart video systems, gaming consoles, and set-top boxes.

Score breakdownLatest quarter62.4 · Good
Growth
89.2
Quality / Profitability
33.5
Financial health
81.3
Ratio screener
59.2
Track record: 2-yr avg 61.8 (Good, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 51.0 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Oct 22, 2026 (today)(official)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Rich vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
13.9
Yield
0.12%
RSI (14)
42.6
vs SMA20
-6.66%
vs SMA50
-13.56%
vs SMA200
-8.41%
Analyst target
$569
+50.4%
7 analysts
AI theoretical price
$395
+4.4%
as of 2026-10-13

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-10-13 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-10-13, WDC trades at $364.14 (market cap ~$125.5B, beta 2.17) after a violent round-trip inside a 52-week range of $112.52-$799.87 — fundamentally the company just posted 44% YoY revenue growth and a 41.7% operating margin, but the stock is down 35.5% over three months and sits below its 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages with RSI at 32.19.

AI sentimentNeutral

Sentiment is genuinely split and the data says so explicitly. The bullish side is loud: the August 5, 2026 Q4 FY26 report showed revenue up 44% YoY to $3.75B, non-GAAP gross margin of 54.4% (+1,310 bps YoY), and Q1 FY27 guidance of $4.1-4.2B (roughly +42-49% YoY); the sell-side consensus is Buy (44 buy / 16 hold / 1 sell) with targets clustered at $575-$643, and management is redeeming the remaining 3.00% convertible notes due 2028 against a balance sheet with zero long-term debt. The bearish side is equally loud: as of 2026-10-13 the stock had fallen 11.63% in a week, 18.77% in a month and 35.52% in three months, RSI was 32.19, and price sat 15.66% below the 20-day, 19.49% below the 50-day and 10.94% below the 200-day SMA. Great newsflow, terrible tape — that is a Neutral, not a Bullish or Bearish, reading.

Quarterly trend

The three-year record is structurally broken by the Flash separation (the December-2024 quarter still shows the combined company: $4,285M revenue and $12.1B of equity, versus $2,294M and $5.3B of equity one quarter later), so most YoY comparisons spanning that point compare two different businesses — the deterministic score's own notes flag exactly this. Strip that out and the post-separation HDD-only trend is a clean, accelerating up-cycle: revenue of $2,294M (Mar-25) → $2,605M → $2,818M → $3,017M → $3,337M → $3,747M (Jun-26), with sequential growth of +13.6%, +8.2%, +7.1%, +10.6% and +12.3%; operating margin rose from 26.1% (Jun-25 quarter) to 41.7% (Jun-26 quarter), and quarterly free cash flow went from $379M to $991M. That is a structural re-rating of the economics driven by tight nearline HDD supply and AI/cloud demand, not a one-quarter blip. The important caveat is on the bottom line: GAAP net income of $3,205M and $3,195M in the last two quarters (versus operating income of $1,190M and $1,563M) is inflated by roughly $1.6-2.0B of non-operating gains per quarter, which is why TTM net margin reads an implausible 72.9% and the accruals ratio is +15.12% as of 2026-07-03 — reported profit is running well ahead of the $1,099M of operating cash flow generated in the same quarter.

Valuation assessment

The trailing P/E of 13.4x (as of 2026-10-13) looks cheap against a 5-year average of 12.92x, but the denominator is fiction — TTM EPS of $27.32 contains several billion dollars of non-operating gains, and the TTM net margin of 72.9% is not a hardware-maker's margin. On numbers that reflect the actual business, $364.14 is 17.7x FY27 consensus EPS of $20.52 and about 6.5x FY27 consensus revenue of $19.2B; on TTM sales the stock is at 9.7x versus a 5-year average of 4.33x, and P/B is 14.2x with ROE of 106% (another artifact of the inflated earnings base). TTM free cash flow of $3.22B is a 2.6% yield — not cheap for a cyclical hardware name at peak margins. The deterministic model's 'Rich vs. its own history' label is the right call: WDC is defensibly priced only if FY27 estimates are hit and the ~$5B+ annualized FCF run-rate proves durable, and it is expensive relative to its own history on sales-based measures. The PEG of 0.033 should be ignored entirely; it is a mechanical artifact of the inflated trailing EPS.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $364.14 the market is paying roughly 17.7x FY27E EPS and about 23x TTM free cash flow — a mid-teens multiple on earnings that are still being revised upward (Q1 FY27 revenue guided to $4.1-4.2B versus $2,818M in the year-ago quarter), not the ~39x forward multiple it was paying at the $799.87 high. That is the constructive part of the setup: unlike a classic cycle top, the multiple has already compressed hard while estimates have gone up. The risk is symmetric on the earnings, not the multiple: if FY27 EPS of ~$20.52 is delivered and the market pays 20x, the stock is a $410 asset; if hyperscaler capex digests and nearline pricing rolls over, mid-cycle EPS of $10-13 even at 18x is a $180-235 asset. So the current price is a bet on estimate durability over the next four quarters, not on re-rating — which makes the 2026-10-22 print (Q1 FY27 gross margin, cloud mix, and any FY27 framing) the single most important checkpoint in this name.

Technical picture

As of 2026-10-13 the technical picture is a broken uptrend, not an oversold bounce setup yet. RSI(14) at 32.19 is approaching but has not crossed oversold; the stock is 15.66% below its 20-day SMA (~$432), 19.49% below its 50-day SMA (~$452) and 10.94% below its 200-day SMA (~$409), with returns of -11.63% (1 week), -18.77% (1 month), -35.52% (3 months) and only -0.82% (6 months) — meaning the entire prior melt-up to the $799.87 high has round-tripped back to where it started six months ago. Momentum is down and the moving-average stack is still in a bullish order (20-day above 200-day) but price is below all of them, which typically resolves as either a sharp mean-reversion bounce or a continued trend break. The practical implication is that this is not a low-risk entry: the stock is one negative hyperscaler data point away from a further leg down, and one strong October 22 report away from a violent snap-back, with beta of 2.17 amplifying whichever way it goes.

Macro factors
  • AI/cloud capital expenditure cycle: WDC's Cloud segment is roughly 89% of quarterly revenue, so a hyperscaler capex digestion pause hits volume and nearline pricing power simultaneously — this is the single largest swing factor in the thesis.
  • Nearline HDD supply discipline and HAMR transition: with essentially two credible suppliers (WDC and Seagate), the current 54.4% non-GAAP gross margin depends on capacity restraint and a smooth ramp of higher-capacity/higher-ASP drives; capacity additions or a botched HAMR transition compress both price and margin.
  • Tariffs and trade policy: management continues to flag shifting global trade frameworks as a risk to component costs and supply-chain efficiency, which matters more at 41.7% operating margins where a cost shock is highly visible.
  • Interest rates and high-beta factor rotation: with beta of 2.17, WDC is a levered expression of risk appetite; the 35.52% three-month drawdown alongside a 52-week range of $112.52-$799.87 shows how violently rate/AI-sentiment rotations move this stock independent of fundamentals.
  • Secular exabyte growth from generative AI and ML data lakes, which is the genuine tailwind underpinning both the volume and the pricing leverage in the last six quarters and is the reason a normal cyclical multiple may understate normalized earnings power.
Key catalysts
  • Q1 FY27 earnings on 2026-10-22: guidance is $4.1-4.2B of revenue (roughly +42-49% YoY); the key reads are gross-margin durability near 54% and whether management frames FY27/FY28 capacity and pricing as still tight.
  • Continued ramp and hyperscaler qualification of higher-capacity nearline drives (HAMR-class products), which drives ASP and margin mix.
  • Capital return acceleration: the remaining 3.00% convertibles due 2028 are being redeemed in mid-September 2026, long-term debt is $0, and cash is $1.58B — a buyback or dividend step-up is now affordable.
  • Further clarity/execution on the structural separation of the Flash and HDD operations, which the brief flags as an ongoing investor focus.
  • Analyst estimate and target revisions: consensus targets sit at $575-$643 versus a recent-average of $575.17, so continued upward revisions (or the reverse) are a direct sentiment driver.
Key risks
  • Cycle turn from a peak-margin position: operating margin went from 26.1% to 41.7% in four quarters and non-GAAP gross margin is 54.4%; if hyperscaler demand digests or supply loosens, both price and margin give back, and mid-cycle EPS could be roughly half of the FY27 consensus $20.52.
  • Earnings quality: GAAP net income ($3,195M in the Jun-26 quarter) vastly exceeded operating income ($1,563M) on non-operating gains, the TTM net margin of 72.9% is not sustainable, and the accruals ratio of +15.12% as of 2026-07-03 flags reported profit running ahead of operating cash flow of $1,099M.
  • Customer concentration: the Cloud segment is roughly 89% of quarterly revenue, leaving the demand curve in the hands of a handful of hyperscalers whose capex plans can change with one quarter's notice.
  • Valuation versus history: P/S of 9.7x versus a 5-year average of 4.33x and P/B of 14.2x leave little multiple cushion if estimates are revised down; the deterministic model already labels the stock 'Rich vs. its own history.'
  • Volatility and positioning: beta of 2.17, a 52-week range of $112.52-$799.87, and a 35.52% three-month decline mean drawdowns of 40%+ are a normal feature of owning this, not a tail event.
  • Trade/tariff and supply-chain shocks that raise component costs or disrupt assembly geography.
Investment thesis

Western Digital is currently a genuinely excellent business trading at a defensible-if-not-cheap price, and that combination is worth owning with position-size discipline. The HDD-only company is executing at a level it has rarely matched — revenue up 44% YoY, 41.7% operating margin, $991M of quarterly free cash flow, zero long-term debt — while the stock has de-rated from ~39x forward earnings at the $799.87 high to about 17.7x FY27E EPS at $364.14. The problem is that these are peak-cycle margins in a still-cyclical, 89%-cloud-concentrated duopoly, GAAP earnings are noisy with non-operating gains, and the tape is in a confirmed downtrend with RSI at 32.19 as of 2026-10-13. I would own it, but as a small, high-volatility position sized for 40% drawdowns, and I would treat the 2026-10-22 print as the event that decides whether this is a re-rating story or a cycle top. This is analysis, not personalized financial advice.

AI theoretical price methodology

Blended two methods as of 2026-10-13. (1) Forward earnings: I applied 18x to FY27 consensus EPS of $20.52, a multiple above WDC's ~12.9x five-year average P/E to reflect the post-spinoff margin reset (41.7% Q4 operating margin, 48.9% TTM gross margin versus a historically ~10-15% operating margin business) but deliberately held below the sell-side's implied 28-31x for a still-cyclical, 89%-cloud-concentrated HDD duopoly — that gives ~$369. (2) Cash flow cross-check: I estimated FY27 revenue near the $19.2B consensus at a conservative ~40% operating margin, yielding roughly $5.5B of free cash flow, and capitalized it at a 3.8% required FCF yield on ~344.7M shares — that gives ~$420. The 50/50 blend is ~$395, about 8% above the 2026-10-13 price of $364.14 and far below the $575-$643 sell-side cluster, which I think is anchored on peak earnings receiving a peak multiple.

AI lean: Cautiously BullishConfidence: Medium
AI review of the deterministic score
Agree

My independent read lands close to the 62.4 'Good Fundamentals' score, so I agree with the band — but I would get there from a different composition, and I think the formula is wrong in two offsetting ways. The quality/profitability leg of 33.5 is too harsh: the +15.12% accruals ratio is being driven by large non-operating GAINS (net income of $3,195M against operating income of $1,563M in the Jun-26 quarter), not by deteriorating cash conversion — operating cash flow actually rose from $672M to $1,123M to $1,099M across the last three quarters and ROIC is 39.7%. That leg deserves something closer to 55, worth roughly +8 points. Offsetting that, the growth leg of 89.2 is flattered by comparisons against the pre-separation combined company (the Dec-2024 quarter at $4,285M revenue is a different business), and both growth and financial health are measured at what is plausibly a cyclical margin peak. Net, my adjustments roughly cancel: I'd put the fair score in the high-60s, still solidly 'Good Fundamentals.' I also treat the 'Rich vs. its own history' valuation label as fair rather than harsh — P/S of 9.7x versus a 4.33x five-year average is real, even though the post-spinoff margin structure makes the historical P/S comparison imperfect. I found no single dated, material event the formula structurally cannot see, so Cautiously Bullish is the correct mapping (Good Fundamentals + Rich vs. its own history).

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.