WEC — WEC Energy Group, Inc.
WEC Energy Group, Inc. is a major energy provider operating across the United States, delivering regulated natural gas and electricity, as well as both regulated and non-regulated renewable energy services. The company's operations are divided into six main business segments: Wisconsin, Illinois, Other States, Electric Transmission, Non-Utility Energy Infrastructure, and Corporate and Other.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, WEC Energy trades at $105.33, about 2% above its 52-week low of $102.95 and 5.6% below its 200-day SMA, on a 20.3x TTM P/E versus a 21.2x five-year average, with a 3.39% dividend yield and FY2026 guidance reaffirmed at $5.51–$5.61 per share.
Sentiment as of 2026-09-13 is apathetic rather than hostile. Q2 2026 (reported July 29) beat on EPS — $0.91 versus a $0.80–$0.83 consensus — but missed on revenue ($2.06B versus $2.11B), and the shares dropped ~2.5% pre-market; a wave of late-July/August price-target trims (Truist $122 to $114, KeyBanc to $117) has kept a cap on the stock. The analyst panel is a genuine Hold — 10 buy, 21 hold, 3 sell, 1 strong sell — with average targets of $118.50–$121.91 implying 11–15% upside. Price action tells the more candid story: -0.58% over one week, -3.46% over one month, -7.15% over three months and -10.24% over six months, a rate-sensitivity and utility-rotation de-rating rather than any operational breakdown.
Revenue growth is clearly decelerating, though from elevated comps rather than collapsing demand: year-over-year revenue went +12.9% in Q3 2025 ($2,104.0M vs $1,863.5M), +11.1% in Q4 2025 ($2,537.1M vs $2,284.2M), +9.0% in Q1 2026 ($3,434.2M vs $3,149.5M), then +2.6% in Q2 2026 ($2,062.1M vs $2,009.5M). EPS is choppier: $0.83 in Q3 2025 (+9.2% YoY), $0.97 in Q4 2025 (-32.2% versus $1.43), $2.45 in Q1 2026 (+7.9%), $0.91 in Q2 2026 (+19.7%). The Q4 2025 print is the real outlier and drags FY2025 to roughly $4.83, which is why the $5.51–$5.61 FY2026 guide looks like a ~15% jump. Margins are mixed but not deteriorating: Q2 2026 operating margin was 21.0% versus 20.1% a year earlier (expansion), while Q1 2026 came in at 28.5% versus 29.8% (compression) — remember Q1 is the seasonally dominant heating quarter. The balance sheet is growing exactly in line with the capital plan: total assets $48.5B to $52.8B (+8.8% YoY), long-term debt $17.1B to $19.2B (+12.3%), equity $13.25B to $14.13B, with Q2 2026 operating cash flow of $992.3M (+16.3% YoY) offset by $1.26B of capex. Net-net: a stable, low-growth regulated utility with decelerating top-line growth — not a structural decline, but no inflection either.
Fair, marginally cheap versus its own history on earnings and full on asset-based measures, as of 2026-09-13. TTM P/E is 20.26 versus a five-year average of 21.16 — roughly a 4% discount. On forward numbers it is cheaper still: $105.33 against the FY2026 guidance midpoint of $5.56 is ~18.9x, and against the FY2027 consensus of $5.601 it is ~18.8x, both below the stock's own five-year earnings multiple. Price/sales of 3.38 versus a five-year average of 3.34 is dead in line. The PEG ratio of -26.5 is statistical noise from a near-zero growth denominator and should be ignored. Where it looks full: P/B of 2.43 and EV/EBITDA of 14.0x are rich for a regulated utility, and the 3.39% dividend yield offers little spread over risk-free rates. Verdict: you are paying a fair-to-slightly-cheap multiple on earnings for a fair-quality, capital-hungry asset.
This is the crux. Between February and September 2026 WEC fell about 10% while beating on EPS and reaffirming guidance — that is multiple compression, not an earnings downgrade cycle. At $105.33 the market is paying 18.9x for $5.56 of FY2026 EPS versus a 21.2x five-year average, so either the market is under-crediting the reaffirmed guidance and the 8.8% rate-base CAGR, or it is correctly pricing in rate-case timing risk, a higher cost of capital and flat FY2027 growth. The number to watch is FY2027: the $5.601 consensus is only +0.7% over the FY2026 guidance midpoint, which if true means the story stalls and today's price is roughly right. If Wisconsin/Illinois rate relief plus data-center load push FY2027 toward the mid-$5.80s, today's multiple is too low. The Q3 print on October 29, 2026 is the next hard datapoint.
Weak and still trending down, as of 2026-09-13. RSI(14) is 38.83 — soft, but not yet the sub-30 oversold zone that has historically marked tradable lows in this name. Price sits below all three key averages: -1.78% versus the 20-day (~$107.2), -4.54% versus the 50-day (~$110.3) and -5.64% versus the 200-day (~$111.6). At $105.33 it is only ~2.3% above the 52-week low of $102.95, and the return ladder is uniformly negative: -0.58% (1wk), -3.46% (1mo), -7.15% (3mo), -10.24% (6mo). There is no bottoming signal yet. A break below $102.95 opens a fresh leg lower; reclaiming the 50-day near $110.3 would be the first evidence of a reversal. For an income buyer, scaling in near the low end beats a full position here, and an RSI dip below 30 would be a better entry trigger.
- Interest rates: WEC is a textbook bond proxy (beta 0.457, 3.39% yield) carrying $19.2B of long-term debt, up 12.3% year over year. Higher-for-longer rates raise both its refinancing cost and the discount rate applied to its earnings; falling rates would be the single biggest re-rating catalyst for the stock.
- Regulatory outcomes: returns are set by the Wisconsin and Illinois commissions. Timely recovery of the environmental-compliance and clean-energy capex embedded in the roughly $28B capital plan is the difference between the targeted ~8.8% rate-base CAGR showing up in EPS and it showing up only in the debt balance.
- Load growth from data centers and large industrials: surging regional demand (including projects tied to Microsoft) is a genuine, incremental demand tailwind for the first time in a decade — but it also draws regulatory scrutiny over cost allocation and rate design.
- Utility sector rotation: defensives have lagged in a growth-led tape. WEC's -10.24% six-month return is as much about where the market's money has been going as it is about WEC itself.
- Capex funding and dilution: trailing-twelve-month free cash flow is roughly -$1.4B (Q2 2026 -$269.7M, Q1 2026 +$400.5M, Q4 2025 -$905.4M, Q3 2025 -$625.7M). A capital program of this size must be funded with debt and equity issuance, which mutes per-share EPS growth relative to rate-base growth.
- Q3 2026 earnings on October 29, 2026 (pre-market): confirmation or slippage of the $5.51–$5.61 FY2026 guidance, plus updates on data-center load integration.
- Wisconsin and Illinois rate-case proceedings and new rate-base investment approvals, each of which directly sets the ROE the company earns on the $28B capital plan.
- FY2027 guidance, likely issued with Q4 results in February 2027 — the current consensus of $5.601 implies only +0.7% over the FY2026 midpoint, so an upward reset would be a meaningful positive surprise, while a confirm would validate the bear case.
- Federal Reserve policy path: as a low-beta yield vehicle, WEC is highly sensitive to moves in the 10-year Treasury; any easing cycle would likely compress its equity risk premium and expand the multiple.
- Continued dividend growth — the board paid $0.9525 per quarter on September 1, 2026; another raise keeps the ~3.4% yield competitive with fixed income.
- Balance-sheet stress: long-term debt rose 12.3% YoY to $19.2B against $14.1B of equity (D/E 1.63), the current ratio is 0.446 and cash on hand is just $50M, with trailing free cash flow of roughly -$1.4B. Growth here is financed with borrowed money.
- Regulatory lag: ROIC of 5.2% and ROE of 11.4% leave little cushion if a commission delays or disallows recovery of environmental or clean-energy capital, which is exactly the pressure that shows up as negative free cash flow.
- Rate sensitivity: with a 0.457 beta and a dividend yield that is thin versus prevailing risk-free rates, WEC's multiple can compress further even without any change in the underlying earnings power — the last six months are the proof.
- Stalling near-term growth: a FY2027 consensus of $5.601 against an FY2026 guidance midpoint of $5.56 implies essentially zero growth, and revenue growth has already decelerated from +12.9% YoY in Q3 2025 to +2.6% in Q2 2026 with a revenue miss in the latest quarter.
- Single-quarter earnings fragility: Q4 2025 EPS of $0.97 was down 32.2% year over year from $1.43 — for a utility that grows earnings ~5% a year, one bad quarter can erase two years of progress.
WEC is a well-run regulated utility trading near the bottom of its 52-week range at ~18.9x forward earnings versus its own 21.2x five-year average, with a 3.4% yield and freshly reaffirmed FY2026 guidance — that is genuinely not expensive. But the forward setup does not earn a buy at $105.33: revenue growth has decelerated to +2.6% YoY, FY2027 consensus EPS implies almost no growth over the FY2026 guide, the $28B capital plan is being funded with debt (LT debt +12.3% YoY) and negative $1.4B trailing free cash flow, and the chart is in a clean downtrend below all three moving averages with RSI at 38.8. This is a mid-single-digit total-return bond proxy, not a compounder, and there is no earnings inflection or technical base to justify chasing it before the October 29 print. Income investors can scale in toward $100–103; everyone else can wait for either a reclaim of the 50-day near $110 or an RSI below 30.
Method: a justified forward P/E on blended forward EPS, cross-checked against a target dividend yield. Inputs: forward EPS of ~$5.60 (FY2026 guidance midpoint of $5.56 blended with the FY2027 consensus of $5.601) multiplied by a justified 20.0x multiple — a discount to WEC's own five-year average TTM P/E of 21.16x to reflect decelerating revenue growth (+2.6% YoY in Q2 2026), flat FY2027 consensus and a negative $1.4B trailing free cash flow, but a premium to the broad utility sector given the 8.8% rate-base CAGR and very low 0.457 beta — giving $5.60 x 20.0 = $112. Cross-check: the $3.81 annualized dividend ($0.9525 quarterly) divided by a 3.4% target yield also yields ~$112, corroborating the earnings-based result. This sits below the analyst consensus of $118.50–$121.91 because I am not willing to underwrite the street's implied multiple expansion without either a lower rate path or an upward revision to FY2027 EPS.
My independent read says the given 32.6/'Weak Fundamentals' score understates the business by roughly 15 points, but not by enough to change more than one band — hence Partially Agree. The score is dragged down by the ratio screener (21.8, weighted 50%) and the financial-health pillar (14.6), both of which z-score WEC against the full S&P 500 population on quick ratio (0.303), current ratio (0.446), debt/equity (1.626), LT debt/equity (1.359), P/B (2.451) and EV/EBITDA (14.0). Every one of those metrics structurally penalizes a rate-regulated utility that is required to fund a $28B capital plan with debt — a Wisconsin utility will never screen like a software company, and comparing it to the broad index on leverage is an apples-to-oranges artifact, not evidence of deterioration. Strip that out and the informative legs look fine: the accruals ratio of -1.31% as of 2026-06-30 means cash generation is running ahead of reported net income (no earnings-quality red flag), Q2 2026 operating cash flow of $992.3M was up 16.3% YoY, Q2 2026 operating margin expanded to 21.0% from 20.1%, and the growth score of 44.5 understates a company with a reaffirmed guidance range and an 8.8% projected rate-base CAGR. Importantly, the trough-cyclical caveat does not apply here: WEC is a regulated utility with inelastic demand, not a commodity or semiconductor name at the bottom of a cycle, so a low trailing score is not a hidden entry signal — it is mostly a sector-mismatch artifact. I also checked for the one permitted deviation from the mechanical band-to-lean mapping and found none: the August 31, 2026 Controller appointment (Caroline Garcia) is not a material dated event, and there is no announced acquisition, restatement, bankruptcy or fraud disclosure in the brief. So the mandated mapping from 'Weak Fundamentals' + 'Neutral vs. its own history' to a Bearish lean stands, even though a utility-native scoring framework would have put this in the high-40s (Fair) and mapped to Neutral.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.