WM — Waste Management, Inc.
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) functions as a premier provider of environmental waste solutions across North America, serving a diverse client base that includes residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal customers. The company's core operations involve comprehensive collection services, which include gathering and transporting both waste materials and recyclables from their initial point of generation to designated transfer stations, material recovery facilities (MRFs), or final disposal sites.
Price chart & technical analysis
Loading chart…
As of 2026-09-13, WM trades at $213.46 (market cap $85.3B), down 5.68% over one month and 10.51% over six months, with RSI(14) at 31.89 and price below its 20-, 50-, and 200-day moving averages. Q2 2026 (reported 2026-07-29) beat adjusted EPS ($2.02 vs $1.99) but missed revenue ($6.68B vs $6.70B), and management trimmed FY26 revenue guidance to $26.275-26.475B.
Sentiment is genuinely split. The bearish side is price action: WM was -2.53% in the week, -5.68% in the month, and -10.51% over six months ending 2026-09-13, sitting in the lower third of its $194.11-$248.13 52-week range. Soft raw waste volumes, weak recycled-commodity and RFS credit pricing, RNG pipeline tie-in delays, a modest Q2 revenue miss, and a small insider sale by the Chief Accounting Officer (~$300K in early September 2026) all weigh. The bullish side is analyst support and cash generation: consensus is a Moderate Buy (~20 Buy / 15 Hold / 0 Sell), targets of $244-$259 sit well above the price, Q2 beat on EPS, margins outlook was raised, TTM free cash flow reached $3.57B, and the dividend ($0.945/qtr, 1.72% yield) keeps a defensive bid under the stock. Net: the market is waiting for evidence that volumes and RNG connections are turning before re-rating it.
Revenue growth has decelerated sharply and that is a structural fact, not a blip. YoY revenue growth ran +7.9% (Q3'24), +13.0% (Q4'24), +16.7% (Q1'25), +19.0% (Q2'25), +14.9% (Q3'25), +7.1% (Q4'25), +3.5% (Q1'26) and +3.9% (Q2'26) - from ~19% to ~4% in four quarters as the WM Healthcare Solutions/Stericycle acquisition anniversaries lap and organic volumes soften. Margin is stable-to-slightly-better, not deteriorating: operating margin was 18.74% in Q2'26 vs 18.46% in Q2'25 and 17.87% in Q1'26 vs 17.08% in Q1'25, i.e. roughly 30-80bps of YoY expansion off a Q2'24 peak of 19.75%. Note the gross-profit step change (Q4'25 29.3% -> Q1'26 40.7%) looks like a cost-of-revenue reclassification, not a real inflection - do not read it as margin magic. EPS is compounding mid-to-high single digits on a clean basis: $1.95 in Q2'26 (+8.3% YoY), $1.79 in Q1'26 (+13.3% YoY); Q3'25 ($1.49) and Q4'24 ($1.48) were both distorted down by large below-the-line charges (net income far below operating income), which understates TTM EPS of $7.09. The best line in the whole dataset is free cash flow: TTM FCF through Q2'26 is $3.573B ($1,096M + $851M + $810M + $816M) versus $2.163B in the comparable prior-year window, helped by capex discipline ($630M in Q2'26 vs $732M a year earlier) rather than just operations. Verdict: decelerating top line, flat-to-improving margins, accelerating cash conversion.
Fair, not cheap - and neutral versus its own history. As of 2026-09-13 the stock trades at 30.1x TTM EPS of $7.09, a slight discount to its 5-year average trailing P/E of 32.25x, and 3.32x sales versus a 5-year average of 3.59x. On forward numbers it looks better: 26.3x the next-FY consensus EPS of $8.11. But the PEG ratio is 6.17, and that is the honest tell - a 30x trailing multiple is being paid for roughly 4% revenue growth and ~7-8% EPS growth. EV/EBITDA is 14.4x and price/book is 8.65x, both rich in absolute terms and both a function of a leveraged, buyback-heavy balance sheet (D/E 2.35) rather than a red flag about the business. At 26x forward with a 1.7% dividend yield, the total-return math works out to roughly 9-10% a year if the multiple holds - reasonable for a 0.43-beta essential-services franchise, but there is no margin of safety if the multiple compresses toward the low-20s.
The multiple, not the earnings, is what moves this stock from here. WM has now printed an EPS beat alongside a revenue miss two quarters running, and both Q2'26 (adj. $2.02 vs $1.99) and the trimmed FY26 revenue guide say the same thing: the beat is coming from pricing and cost control, not volume. That is lower-quality growth than it looks, because it is finite - you can only cut cost so far, and pricing power eventually meets customer resistance. If revenue growth stays pinned near 4%, a 30x trailing P/E is hard to defend and the stock de-rates toward the low-to-mid 20s on forward earnings, implying roughly $170-$200. If instead the RNG grid ties complete and Healthcare Solutions synergies reach the targeted $250M annualized run-rate by 2027, EPS can compound low-double-digits and justify a high-20s forward multiple, which is where the $244-$259 analyst targets come from. Watch the gap between EPS beats and revenue misses as the cleanest quality-of-earnings signal for this name.
Clean downtrend, not yet a washout. As of 2026-09-13, RSI(14) was 31.89 - approaching oversold but not below 30 - and price sat 3.29% below the 20-day SMA, 6.24% below the 50-day, and 5.22% below the 200-day, with all three averages overhead. Six-month return was -10.51%, one-month -5.68%, one-week -2.53%, and the price sits in the lower third of the $194.11-$248.13 52-week range. This is a falling-knife setup for anyone trying to catch the bottom: the trend has not even produced one higher low yet. The first real evidence of a turn would be a reclaim of the 20-day SMA, an RSI push back above 40-45, or a higher low above the $194-$200 zone, which is the next meaningful support. Nothing in the technical picture argues for urgency today.
- Interest rates and refinancing costs: WM carries $22.28B of long-term debt with D/E at 2.35x and a current ratio of 0.907; lower rates reduce interest expense and support the multiple, while a higher-for-longer regime squeezes both free cash flow and the valuation ceiling.
- Inflation versus pricing power: WM's ability to pass through labor and fleet-maintenance cost inflation via annual price escalators is the core of its margin story. If inflation re-accelerates faster than contracts reset, the roughly 30-80bps of YoY operating margin expansion the company is currently delivering reverses.
- Recycled commodity and RFS/RIN credit prices: the recycling and renewable natural gas lines are directly exposed to volatile commodity and clean-fuel credit markets, which the live brief cites as a current headwind capping near-term revenue acceleration.
- Industrial and commercial waste volumes as a real-economy proxy: municipal and industrial collection volumes are already soft and are cyclically exposed; a manufacturing or construction slowdown feeds straight into the volume line that is currently the biggest drag on growth.
- Regulation and permitting: landfill permitting, landfill-methane emissions rules, and Renewable Fuel Standard policy shape both the cost base and the RNG investment returns; state-level recycling mandates cut both ways.
- Defensive rotation and low beta: WM's 0.43 beta makes it a bond proxy that tends to lag in risk-on rotations and lead when growth fears or rate-cut expectations dominate.
- Q3 2026 earnings, expected late October 2026 - the key read is whether pricing and cost control keep expanding operating margin while raw waste volumes stay soft, and whether FY26 revenue guidance is trimmed again.
- RNG facility completion and grid-tie milestones - the timing of pipeline connections is the single biggest swing factor in hitting multi-year free cash flow growth targets.
- WM Healthcare Solutions synergy ramp toward the targeted $250M annualized run-rate by 2027, which the live brief frames as the margin-expansion buffer against weak underlying volumes.
- The CEO transition - John J. Morris, Jr. takes over from James C. Fish, Jr. in early 2027; any change in capital allocation, M&A appetite, or sustainability spending would be re-rated by the market.
- Rate cuts, which would lower funding costs on a $22B debt stack and typically lift low-beta defensives.
- Continued capital return: the $0.945 quarterly dividend (1.72% yield) plus buybacks, backed by $3.57B of TTM free cash flow, gives an annual dividend-increase catalyst.
- Multiple compression is the biggest risk by far: paying ~30x trailing and ~26x forward earnings for ~4% revenue growth leaves the stock exposed to a de-rating toward the low-20s forward multiple, which alone implies $170-$200 even if earnings hold.
- Volume erosion: raw waste volumes are already soft; a recession hitting commercial, industrial, and construction collection would turn a pricing-and-cost-control story into a genuine earnings decline.
- Leverage and liquidity: $22.28B of long-term debt, D/E of 2.35x, and a current ratio of 0.907 leave less room for error, amplify interest-rate exposure, and cap how aggressively the company can buy back stock or pursue M&A when rates are elevated.
- Execution and commodity risk on the sustainability portfolio: recycled commodity and RIN credit price softness plus RNG pipeline tie-in delays are already capping revenue, and a further slippage would undermine the free-cash-flow growth thesis directly.
- Structural growth deceleration: revenue growth fell from ~19% YoY in Q2'25 to ~3.9% in Q2'26 as the Stericycle/WM Healthcare acquisition laps; reported growth from here reflects low-single-digit organic, which is a much weaker base for a 30x multiple.
- Leadership transition risk from the announced CEO succession in early 2027, and small but real insider selling (the Chief Accounting Officer sold 1,365 shares for ~$300K in early September 2026).
Waste Management is a wide-moat, low-beta essential-services franchise with genuinely improving cash generation - TTM free cash flow of $3.57B is up sharply year over year on capex discipline - and a dependable, growing dividend. But the price does not offer much for that quality: as of 2026-09-13 you are paying 30.1x trailing and 26.3x forward earnings for roughly 4% revenue growth and 7-8% EPS growth, with softening volumes, delayed RNG connections, and a stock in a confirmed downtrend below all three key moving averages. It is a good business at a full price, not a good entry. A patient investor gets a better risk/reward either near the $194-$200 support zone (roughly 24x forward) or after the company shows volumes stabilizing and RNG facilities actually tying into the grid.
I applied a 28x forward P/E - a deliberate discount to WM's 5-year average trailing P/E of 32.25x (adjusting that historical trailing multiple for ~7-8% earnings growth implies roughly 29-30x forward) but a premium to the current 26.3x, reflecting the wide moat and 0.43 beta against decelerating ~4% revenue growth - to next-FY consensus EPS of $8.11, giving 28 x 8.11 = $227. I cross-checked this against a simplified FCF-based DCF ($3.573B TTM free cash flow growing ~6% for five years, 2.5% terminal, ~6.5% WACC given the low beta), which lands near $213, and against analyst targets of $244-$259, which I view as too optimistic given the revenue trajectory. $227 implies roughly 28x TTM and 6% upside, consistent with my view that WM is a fairly-valued quality name rather than a bargain or a value trap.
The deterministic score of 40.4 ('Weak Fundamentals') is directionally defensible but the band is harsher than the business deserves, so I would put my own read closer to 52-55 ('Fair'). The drag is almost entirely the ratio screener (31.4), which penalizes D/E of 2.353, P/B of 8.67, P/C of 154.6 and a 0.907 current ratio - all structural features of a leveraged, buyback-heavy landfill and collection network with negative working capital, not evidence of operational deterioration. The fundamentals-only score of 49.5 (growth 46.1, quality/profitability 54.8, financial health 45.5) is much closer to reality, and the quality leg is genuinely strong: an accruals ratio of -2.03% at 2026-06-30 means cash flow is running ahead of reported earnings, which is the conservative, healthy pattern. The formula also cannot see that Q3'25 and Q4'24 EPS were depressed by large below-the-line charges (net income of $603M and $598M against operating income of $1,216M and $941M), which understates the TTM EPS base of $7.09, nor that TTM free cash flow of $3.573B is up roughly 65% year over year. That is roughly a 12-15 point upward adjustment, which moves the band one tier from Weak to Fair - hence Partially Agree, not Disagree. This is not the cyclical-trough pattern that would justify overriding a low score: WM is a defensive, non-cyclical compounder whose growth is decelerating because an acquisition comp is lapping, not because its end market has collapsed. There is no single dated, material event (no new acquisition, bankruptcy, restatement, or fraud disclosure) that justifies deviating from the mandated band/valuation mapping for overall_lean.
AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.