#137S&P 500 rank

WRB — W. R. Berkley Corporation

Strong Underwriting, Slowing Growth, Full Price

Q3 earnings beat masked a revenue miss and slowing premium growth; valuation sits above its own history.

2-yr score: 56.9/100 (Next 20%)Financial Services
$74.34+1.63%
Description

W. R.

Score breakdownLatest quarter41.5 · Weak
Growth
32.9
Quality / Profitability
46.8
Financial health
79.5
Ratio screener
37.6
Track record: 2-yr avg 56.9 (Fair, 8 quarters ≈ 2 yrs) · long-term avg 55.7 (Fair, 40 quarters ≈ 10 yrs) · next earnings Jan 25, 2027 (in 95 days)
Valuation context (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral vs. its own history
Entry timing (informational only — not part of the score)
Neutral
Live market dataPrice updated Oct 21, 4:28 PM ET
P/E (TTM)
15.7
Yield
2.73%
RSI (14)
64.5
vs SMA20
+4.72%
vs SMA50
+6.20%
vs SMA200
+7.64%
Analyst target
$71
-4.5%
5 analysts
AI theoretical price
$72
-3.8%
as of 2026-10-20

Price chart & technical analysis

Loading chart…

AI deep-dive analysisAnalysis as of 2026-10-20 - price/technical figures below reflect that date, not live market data

As of 2026-10-20, W. R. Berkley trades at $73.84 with a 15.5x trailing / ~15x forward P/E and a 2.73% dividend yield; Q3 2026 delivered an operating EPS beat ($1.17 vs. ~$1.15) but a revenue miss ($3.74B vs. ~$3.82B) as net premium growth slowed to ~1.3%.

AI sentimentNeutral

Post-Q3 the tone is cautious-leaning. The October 19, 2026 print beat on operating EPS ($1.17 vs. $1.14-1.16) but missed on revenue, and the stock fell roughly 3.6-5.9% to the $72-74 area. Consensus is a 'Hold' (7 buy / 17 hold / 6 sell), and price targets cluster around $69-73 (consensus $70.10, recent avg $71.29) — at or below the $73.84 trading level. Mizuho nudged to $73 Neutral and Evercore cut to $69 Underperform, so the Street sees a quality name priced for limited upside.

Quarterly trend

Revenue climbed from ~$3.2B/quarter in 2023 to ~$3.7B through 2025-2026, but growth is decelerating: Q3 2026 gross premiums rose 3.0% YoY while net premiums grew just ~1.3% as management prioritized margin over volume, and renewal pricing has stepped down to ~4%. Trailing net income slipped to ~$1.86B (Q3 2026 $446M vs. Q3 2025 $511M, down ~13% YoY) and operating margin compressed from 17.7% (Q3 2025) to 15.4% (Q3 2026), though the reported Q2 2026 revenue of $6.83B is a data anomaly that distorts trend math. This reads as cycle moderation, not structural decline: the combined ratio held at a disciplined 90.8% (88.1% accident-year ex-cat) and net investment income rose 9.2% YoY to $383.5M.

Valuation assessment

Fair-to-slightly-rich versus its own history. As of 2026-10-20 the trailing P/E of 15.5x sits above the 5-year average of 14.45x and the forward P/E is ~15.0x on next-FY EPS of $4.94. P/S of 1.525 is below the 5-year average of 1.73, and P/B is roughly 2.7x — reasonable against an 18.3% ROE. The PEG ratio of -14.9 is meaningless (negative growth input). With ~3% expected EPS growth, the market is paying an average-to-premium multiple for a below-average growth rate; not expensive on quality, but no obvious discount.

Price vs. earnings playbook

At $73.84 the stock already embeds ~15x forward earnings — roughly its historical multiple — for a business expected to grow EPS only ~3%. The Q3 beat came from cost control and investment income, not the top line, so the market is paying for durability and underwriting quality rather than growth. That leaves little room for multiple expansion: upside now requires premium growth to reaccelerate or the investment-income tailwind to keep compounding, while any deceleration or reserve charge would compress the multiple toward the $70 consensus level.

Technical picture

As of 2026-10-20, RSI-14 stood at 64.4 — firm but not overbought — with price 4.45% above the 20-day, 5.59% above the 50-day, and 6.93% above the 200-day SMA, an intact uptrend within a 52-week range of $62.87-78.96, near the upper portion after a 12.9% six-month gain. Momentum is positive, but the extension above all three averages argues against chasing; a pullback toward the 50-day (~$70) would offer better entry timing.

Macro factors
  • Elevated interest rates remain a structural tailwind: maturing lower-yield bonds keep rolling into higher-yielding securities, lifting net investment income (up 9.2% YoY to $383.5M in Q3 2026).
  • The specialty P&C pricing cycle is moderating — renewal increases ex-workers' comp have flattened near 4%, and casualty reinsurance and monoline excess face softer, more competitive conditions.
  • Social and economic inflation on long-tail casualty reserves is the key swing variable; reserve adequacy depends on disciplined terms and claims handling.
  • As a low-beta (0.27) defensive name, WRB's relative appeal depends on rate expectations — cuts would trim investment income but could broaden demand for defensive financials.
Key catalysts
  • January 2027 reinsurance renewals — a critical read on pricing adequacy and market discipline across lines.
  • Continued capital deployment: $435M+ of buybacks through the first nine months of 2026 plus scaling of new specialty units like Berkley Meridian.
  • Net investment income growth if rates stay elevated and the portfolio yield continues rolling higher.
  • Next earnings (2027-01-26, estimated) — focus on premium-growth trajectory and reserve development.
Key risks
  • Decelerating premium growth and softening pricing, especially in casualty reinsurance and monoline excess, could stall earnings momentum.
  • Long-tail reserve deterioration from social/economic inflation could pressure the combined ratio.
  • Valuation risk: ~15x forward P/E for ~3% EPS growth with analyst targets (~$70) below the current $73.84 leaves little margin for error.
  • Data-quality anomalies in recent filings (Q2 2026 revenue spike, Q3 2026 balance sheet showing zero equity) obscure the true trend and reduce confidence.
Investment thesis

WRB is a genuinely high-quality specialty insurer — 18.3% ROE, a 90.8% combined ratio, negative accruals (cash running ahead of reported earnings), modest leverage, and a 2.73% dividend — but it is a quality business in a moderating cycle, not a growth story, trading at ~15x forward EPS for ~3% expected growth with analyst targets ($70) below the current $73.84. The deterministic 'Weak Fundamentals' score is too harsh on a business this disciplined, yet there is no valuation cushion here either; I would not chase it at these levels and would want a cheaper entry or evidence of premium-growth reacceleration before turning constructive.

AI theoretical price methodology

Applied a 14.5x forward P/E — in line with the stock's 5-year average of 14.45x, justified by its high underwriting quality but offset by only ~3% expected EPS growth — to next-FY consensus EPS of $4.94, yielding ~$71.6. That sits slightly below the $73.84 trading level, consistent with a quality name already fairly-to-fully priced.

AI lean: BearishConfidence: Low
AI review of the deterministic score
Partially Agree

The 41.5/Weak band overstates the problem and I would push the fair score up toward ~53-57 (Fair). WRB's quality is real — 18.3% ROE, 90.8% combined ratio, a healthy 79.5 financial-health score, and a negative accruals ratio (-0.76%, meaning cash exceeds reported earnings). The weak growth score (32.9) is distorted by a data anomaly (Q2 2026 revenue jumped +85%, and the Q3 balance sheet shows zero equity — both flagged in the notes) and by a deliberate margin-over-volume strategy, not structural deterioration. The formula is right that growth is decelerating and the stock isn't cheap, but 'Weak Fundamentals' is the wrong label for a business this disciplined — a one-tier upgrade, hence Partially Agree rather than Agree. Note the mandated mapping (Weak band + Neutral valuation) still yields a Bearish lean; my review concerns the score's magnitude, not the lean table.

AI-generated analysis for informational purposes only, not financial advice.